I am 13 years old for now and I enjoy Swimming, reading, spending time with family, and playing video games like Valorant, league of legends, and Genshin.
Ariel Cruz
Mr. Combs
ELA Regents 809
30/11/2021
Why Do People Do Bad Things?
Everyone has made the wrong decision or done a bad thing at some point in their lives. Their actions depend on a multitude of reasons. To understand whether an action is bad or not, the action has to be evaluated by considering its short and long term effects and if it is deemed socially acceptable or not. Even then, a person's intentions or thought process could differ from its effect corresponding to a gray area of morality. Most difficult situations never have truly good or bad courses of action which can be witnessed in the texts such as “Button, Button” as well as “Lather and Nothing Else.” People do bad things because they justify their actions with their values, don't consider repercussions or effects of their actions, or have no emotional attachment to the situation at hand.
People would have no problem with doing what you would consider wrong if their values or morals justify their actions. In “Ruthless” the conflict is that Judson the protagonist was suspicious that someone had taken a swig of his liquor and he felt they should be held responsible if they tried to do so again. Justifying any action including murder with values can be observed when the protagonist says, “When it comes to protecting my property I make my own laws” (De Mille). He is referring to the extent of justice he will attempt to seek for a crime against him. His belief that one should take justice into their own hands is why he comes to the conclusion that murder is an absolutly acceptable solution to the problem at hand. Also, in “Button, Button'' the character Norma is fine with killing someone she doesn't know if they are a certain race or if there's a possibility they are of a certain race to win $50,000. She says to her husband, “If it’s some old Chinese peasant ten thousand miles away? Some diseased native in the Congo” (Matheson)? In this case once again the wrong action or decision is being made because the person finds nothing wrong with it. She is valuing monetary gain over human life and her intended use for money is a vacation with her husband which is most definitely a luxury meaning this course of action is not out of desperation or need. In both of these cases the character makes the decision accepting the repercussions however, a person could do the same without as much forethought or none at all.
A person might commit a bad act if they don't fully understand or think through the repercussions of their actions. In the text named, “Lamb to the Slaughter” we witness the protagonist, Mary Maloney killing her husband, Patrick out of vengeance for him declaring he was going to divorce her while she was pregnant. She takes a leg of lamb out of the freezer and kills him with the frozen meat. However, it was only after she killed her husband that she realized that she failed to consider something, “What about the child? What were the laws about murderers with unborn children? Did they kill them both — mother and child” (Dahl)? If this had been taken into account she would have not killed him especially because we see that the reason she covers up the murder becomes the safety of her child. A person would avoid doing a bad thing if they think through or are aware of the possible repercussions of their actions. In “Lather and Nothing Else” the main character, a barber, has the opportunity to kill Captain Torres, an executioner that was brutalizing members of his revolution. In this case the barber thought through the repercussions of killing Captain Torres and just provided him with the shave he requested (Tellez). He knew this executioner deserved death however he realised he could not be the one to deliver it to him. If the protagonist however did not have his future career or emotional attachment to weigh in on the decision, he would have definitely decided to end the executioner's life.
If one were to be faced with a situation where they don't have an emotional attachment, they are likely to view the situation differently causing their personal opinion of right and wrong to change. In “The Stanford Prison Experiment” video, a group of college students playing the roles of prisoners and guards displayed how average people after gaining near absolute dominance over another group of average people in a simulated prison are capable of forming such a violent relationship between the two groups. Only one week after the experiment started, the conditions were horrendous and it truly displayed how and why the power being unbalanced caused one group to turn on the other. The situation could have stayed peaceful. In this case those acting as guards did not see the prisoners as much as humans as they did strangers on the street, because of their uniform outfits and being referred to as numbers instead of their names. This dehumanization would emotionally detach the guards causing them to act differently than they would if they weren't under these circumstances.
Some may say that people only make bad decisions and do bad things because they intend to do harm. That statement says bad decisions are premeditated acts with a lot of prior thought. It is very easy to do a bad thing before you realize what you have actually done or fail to consider the consequences of your actions. Even if harm wasn't intended, harm was involved. There are other reasons as to why a person would do a bad thing however, their thought process or knowledge of the situation is the most important thing to consider when judging a person's reasoning.
There are three key reasons why most people do bad things, justifying the rationale, not considering repercussions, and staying emotionally detached to a situation. Wanting to do the right thing all the time is hard and doing it is even more difficult. People and their brains are unique and it is amazing how many have drastically opposing views when it comes to doing bad things. A person who does a bad thing is not necessarily a bad person but it is hard to understand their lack of intention.
Works Cited
Alvarez, Kyle Patrick, et al., directors. The Stanford Prison Experiment = the Prison Experiment: L'expérience De Stanford. Universal Pictures UK, 2016, https://www.worldcat.org/title/stanford-prison-experiment-the-prison-experiment-lexprience-de-stanford/oclc/1022943655 Accessed 30 Nov. 2021
Dahl, Roald. “Lamb To The Slaughter.” CommonLit, 1953, https://www.commonlit.org/en/students/student_lessons/9807639
DeMille, William. “Ruthless.” CommonLit, 1945, https://www.commonlit.org/en/students/student_lessons/9510617
Matheson, Richard. “Button, Button.” CommonLit, 1970, https://www.commonlit.org/en/students/student_lessons/9582510
Téllez, Hernando. “Lather and Nothing Else.” CommonLit, 2007, https://www.commonlit.org/en/students/student_lessons/9847730
Ariel Cruz
Mr. Caleb Haraguchi-Combs
ELA Class 809
September 19, 2021
The Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls
Can We Overcome Our Family Histories?
Family relationships whether positive or negative influence the people we become. A positive relationship can have a positive influence on a child’s growth while a negative relationship has the potential to have a harmful impact on the wellbeing of a child. In her memoir, The Glass Castle, Jeannette Walls demonstrates that it is possible to be a fulfilled and happy person even though she and her siblings grew up in a dysfunctional family where they lived in poverty and “moved around like nomads”, many times without shelter and food. They would “do the skedaddle” which was Dad, Rex Wall’s words for moving in the middle of the night. Her parents were irresponsible, there were no rules, and put their children in danger. Mom believed, “children shouldn’t be burdened with a lot of rules and restrictions” (Walls 55). Overcoming family history is possible even when it seems impossible and Jeanette Walls shows us.
Jeannette Walls overcomes her incredibly negative upbringing by always focusing on a better future. As a young child, she believed in her father’s dream of building the Glass Castle, a large home for the family. By the time Jeannette turned 12, she realized her father’s dream would never come true. She and her brother surprised Dad by digging a big hole for the foundation on the land at 93 Little Hobart Street in Welch, West Virginia that Dad said was perfect for the Glass Castle. When Dad told them to fill it with garbage because they could not afford the “trash collection fee”, they knew this dream was dead (Walls 153). It was then when Jeannette knew she and her siblings would need to create their own futures. At the age of 13, Jeannette wrote “I had made two decisions. The first one was that I’d had my last whipping. No one was ever going to do that to me again. The second was that, like Lori, I was going to get out of Welch. The sooner, the better. Before I finished high school, if I could. I had no idea where I would go, but I did know I was going. I also knew it would not be easy. People get stuck in Welch. I had been counting on Mom and Dad to get us out, but I now knew I had to do it on my own. It would take saving and planning” (Walls 221). Lori, the oldest of the four children returned from a summer camp program when Jeannete was 13 and realized that “if she got out of Welch, and away from the family, she might have a shot at a happy life. From then on, she began looking forward to the day she’d leave Little Hobart Street and be on her own” (Walls 217). She figures out she had to move to New York City to be successful and Jeannette and Brian realize if they help Lori, they too have hope for a better life and can follow her out of Welch (Walls 223).
None of these hopes and dreams were possible if Jeannette and her siblings were not strong, their resiliency and toughness allowed them to survive, and they adapted and persevered in their struggles to get to a better life. At the end of the book, Jeannette tells us about a conversation she had with her second husband, John Waters, “when I first showed him my scar, he said it was interesting. He used the word textured. He said smooth was boring but textured was interesting, and the scar meant that I was stronger than whatever it was that had tried to hurt me” (Walls 283). This is the definition of resiliency. She knew from an early age that her family was not like most families and accepted that. She was never overwhelmed by a challenge and faced everything head on. When she realized that she was on her own and if she had a set back from her goals, she would work even harder to succeed. This was seen when Jeannette realized that the money she, Lori, and Brian were pooling together for their future survival was stolen by Dad and she went right back to collecting enough money for their escape to New York City. The success of the escape plan would change her life drastically, finally distancing herself from her parents and her incredibly challenging life. She was determined to not be her parents, to overcome their neglect and yet she always loved them and was able to understand why they did what they did without totally resenting them. This made her stronger.
Unfortunately, Jeannette and her siblings had to be self-sufficient as children at a very young age to survive. Even their parents pushed them to be independent. As Mom said, “Just remember...what doesn’t kill you will make you stronger” (Walls 177) and “Mom always said people worried too much about their children. Suffering when you’re young is good for you” (Walls 25). They learned to survive on a little amount of food and provided for themselves. At the age of three Jeanette made herself hot dogs because she was hungry. She writes in her book, “If we asked Mom about food-in a casual way, because we didn’t want to cause any trouble-she’d simply shrug and say she couldn’t make something out of nothing. We kids usually kept our hunger to ourselves, but we were always thinking of food and how to get our hands on it” (Walls 65). Jeannette and her siblings would scavenge for food. She would take food out of the garbage at school that kids had thrown out at recess and go into other kids lunch bags and find food. She and Brian would dive into dumpsters to find bottles to redeem for money. Another example of Jeannette’s self sufficiency is when she knew she needed braces but also knew her irresponsible parents who had never taken her to the dentist would never get them for her. She decided she had to do something herself and went to the library to research and to make her own braces (Walls 200-202). Providing for children should be the parents’ responsibility, but as Jeannette and her siblings showed us that to survive, they had to be the responsible ones in the family and be self-sufficient.
The Walls’ children survived and overcame their family upbringing by solving problems with common sense and intelligence. Dad was an alcoholic who when he was sober taught his children math, physics, about the stars, morse code, and was a great storyteller. Mom was trained to be a teacher who read everything but preferred working on her art all day at the expense of caring for her children. Even with a lack of proper parenting, these children figured out how to survive. Having dreams and hope stems from their ability to learn from every experience and improve their situation. Ultimately being self-sufficient is what kept them alive and being resilient is what allowed them to never give up and they proved that you can overcome your family history.
Works Cited
Walls, Jeannette, The Glass Castle, Accessed August 1, 2021- September 19, 2021
Telling a lie is an action that is generally frowned upon however in some situations I believe it is acceptable to lie to someone. Lies are entirely about misdirection from the truth in some cases the truth could be just as harmful as a lie. As long as the lie isn't backed with malicious intentions and is logical then it is acceptable. Also In general I believe that you should do anything you want to do as long as it's not hurting anybody including yourself. Even though you are taught differently about lies they can do good. Imagine you're at dinner making a first impression with your friend's family and they ask you how the food was you're most likely going to respond saying that the food tasted great no matter how you actually felt about it to make sure you don't offend the parents. In that case you lied to be polite to the people that gave you food. On the other hand lying can be a horrible choice, for example if you went to your doctor and you answered their questions regarding your health with lies there could be serious repercussions. You might lose the ability to find a possibly life threatening condition, because when you misdirected the doctor it made his job to make sure that you're safe impossible. In this case your intentions might have been bad however the situation is volatile because your life is at risk based on the information that failed to be given to the doctor. Overall trying to figure out whether lying is acceptable is up to the context of the situation and then intentions that come with said lie.
Research Paper
Ariel Cruz
Mr. Combs
ELA Regents 8th Grade
06 Feb 2022
Logo for the 2022 Winter Olympic Games
February 2022
www.beijing 2022
Should the 2022 Winter Olympics Have Been Held in Beijing?
The 2022 Winter Olympics are in progress in Beijing, China. The United States decided to have a diplomatic boycott and nine other countries have supported this decision. The Olympics are unique. They have a complicated and long history as a very large international event involving years of planning by the host city and the athletes training to participate. There is a debate about whether the location of the 2022 Winter Olympics in China should have been changed due to human rights abuses or was it correct to allow China to host because the Olympics are just a sporting event. To evaluate this decision it is important to understand the history of the Olympic Games including whether any Games have ever been relocated. The factors used in the selection process by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to choose a host are also necessary to understand why China was given the bid in the first place when it was already known about human rights abuses. The issue is not straightforward and it is apparent that China is putting on a facade at the Olympic Games regarding Western criticism of genocide and human rights abuses. The Games are always held with many world wide events going on around them. Beijing should not have been awarded the bid to host the 2022 Winter Olympics. The decision to host in China was short sighted by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) because there are more implications that need to be considered as seen in the selection process, and the historical circumstances that have led to an Olympic event being negatively affected in the past. Despite what the IOC communicates regarding its mission and purpose, politics do play a role in the decision making, both internally at the IOC and externally in the world. The Tokyo 2020 Olympics had an audience of three billion people who watched the Games and saw the stories regarding the host city. The viewers of the Beijing Olympics are learning about what is happening in China behind the backdrop of the Olympics and as the media discusses the human rights abuses of this authoritarian country, hopefully the audience can see this as more than a major sporting event.
The Olympic Games are major international multi-sport events with a complex history. The location chosen is a very important decision and can have an impact on the message of the Games to the world. Both the Winter and Summer Games have been held every four years since 1896 when the Summer Olympics were held in Athens, Greece. The first Olympic Winter Games was held in 1924 in Chamonix, France which is 28 years after the first Summer Games. Until 1986, the Summer and Winter Olympics were held in the same calendar year. Due to increasing costs and more complicated logistics, the schedule was changed to have an Olympic game every two years. The International Olympic Committee has awarded the bid to host the Olympics Games to many different cities. See Exhibit I for a complete list of the host cities (Insider). The only non western countries to host are the current Olympics in Beijing, the 1998 Winter Olympics held in Nagano, Japan, the 1980 Summer Olympics in the Soviet Union, the 2014 Sochi Olympics in Russia, the 1984 Winter Olympics in Sarajevo, Yugoslavia, and the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeong Chang, South Korea. Yugoslavia and South Korea are located in Asia but have been westernized. It is very expensive to host the Olympics and not many cities can compete due to the financial constraints. Most of the money is privately funded and the IOC does give a donation to the host committee. The Sochi Olympics in 2014 were the most expensive so far, costing 60 billion dollars.
The International Olympic Committee is the non government group responsible for organizing the Olympic Games. On their website they define their mission as “ To unite the world in peaceful competition and foster an atmosphere of peace, development, resilience, tolerance, and understanding’ (IOC). The Olympic games are guided by the rules of the IOC, not by the host government who must sign a contract. Baron Pierre deCoubertin, who founded the modern Olympic Games and the IOC in 1894 said, “We shall not have peace until the prejudice that now separates the different races are outlived”(IOC). The IOC claims to be aligned with his intentions by “ [ensuring] respect for human rights insofar as they apply to Olympic Games-related activities” (IOC). Their emphasis is always on human rights issues within the Games yet here in 2022, the human rights abuses in China have started to taint the overall message of the Games. While the IOC works with an Olympic Committee on many issues including “ those that have human rights implications”, the effect of human rights abuses were completely overlooked or disregarded, despite the impact it is having on the Games (IOC). The IOC clarifies numerous times that human rights outside of the Olympic Games’ activities are beyond the scope of the IOC (olympics.com). The IOC loses sight of the fact that the actual event of the Games takes away from focussing on the political abuses of a host country. It is wrong to congratulate China on the success of this major event when their own citizens are not allowed to participate in this success and are, to the contrary, being abused. The media has been vocal talking about the human rights issues in China but it is too late, China is getting all the benefits of being able to host the Olympics.
There have only been five cancellations of the Olympic Games and one time when they were awarded to another city after an initial host had been selected. The 1916 Summer Games in Berlin were the first in the 20 year history of the Olympics to be cancelled due to the outbreak of World War I. The 1940 Winter Olympics in Sapporo, Japan and the 1944 Summer Games in London were cancelled due to World War II. The 1944 Summer Olympics would have been the 50th year celebration of the founding of the Olympics in 1894. The 1940 Olympic Games were eventually canceled due to World War II but were more complicated. They were originally scheduled in Tokyo, Japan. Japan would have hosted both the Winter and Summer Olympics that year. It would have been the first games hosted by a non-western country and the Japanese had been advocating since 1930 to host. These Games were referred to as the “Phantom Olympics”. Paul Droubie in his article, “ The Phantom Olympics, Why Japan Forfeited Hosting the 1940 Olympics” states that “hosting the Games in 1940 was as much an ideological project as it was a major sporting event...It was this confluence of issues that caused Japan to withdraw its offer to host the games”(The Phantom Games). Japan was using the Games as a display of nationalism. There was Western criticism of Japan’s invasion of China in 1837. There were growing concerns from the IOC that Japan would not have the infrastructure in place due to increased military expenses. The British Olympic Committee announced a boycott of the Games. All of these factors led Japan to forfeit the Games (Phantom Olympics). The IOC gave the bid to Helsinkii, Finland but these games were ultimately cancelled due to World War II. The most recent Olympic Games to be cancelled are the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo due to the world COVID-19 Pandemic. They were ultimately postponed to the following summer of 2021.
Russia has been involved with several controversies surrounding the Olympics yet has never been sanctioned by the IOC. David Mariness in “ Rome 1960: The Olympics That Changed the World '' reveals that in the Rome, Italy Summer Olympics held in 1960, the first doping scandal took place involving Russia (Marinus). Russia hosted the 1980 Moscow Summer Games when President Jimmy Carter boycotted the Games and refused to send the United States athletes to Moscow because of the Soviet Union’s failure to comply with the U.S. deadlines for troops to be removed from Afghanistan and 67 nations joined in this boycott. There was a fear that the invasion of Afghanistan would revive the Cold War rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union that lasted for decades but had quieted down (history.com). Russia turned around at the next Summer Games being held in Los Angeles and refused to send athletes with 13 other countries claiming it would not be safe. The Beijing Olympics mark the third Olympics that athletes from Russia represent the ROC, Russian Olympic Committee and not the country of Russia. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) sanctioned Russia after being accused of running a state-backed doping program. The athletes cannot use their country’s name, flag, or anthem at the Olympics. This ban will end at the end of 2022 (Gomez). Since 1960, there have been 62 years of issues with Russia and the Olympic Games. Between 1960 and 2019 Russian athletes have been using performance enhancement drugs. The total impact of Russia’s participation in Beijing as they are on the verge of declaring war will not be known until the Olympics end. If the IOC is recognizing the sanctions by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, placed on Russian athletes, Russia should not be allowed to have diplomatic representation at the Olympic Games. Russia and China being allowed to hold such a large presence at the Olympics reinforces the issue that the IOC needs to take a stronger position in deciding who should be allowed to host. Neither Russia or China should be given this opportunity.
The only Diplomatic Boycott of the Olympic Games is taking place now in Beijing. In 2015, China was awarded the bid to host these 2022 Games and had previously hosted the Summer Olympics in 2008. China’s President Xi Jinping is responsible for the suppression of one million people including the Uyghurs, a Muslim group. The United States decided to have a diplomatic boycott of the 2022 Winter Olympics based on human rights abuses. Jen Psaki on behalf of President Biden announced at the Whitehouse that the United States is making it clear that sending government representatives would imply that we do not oppose what is currently going on in China. She said, "US diplomatic or official representation would treat these games as business as usual in the face of the PRC's egregious human rights abuses and atrocities in Xinjiang, and we simply can't do that" (CNN Wire). Only nine countries joined the United States in this boycott. Other countries such as France and Germany did not support this boycott yet they speak out against human rights. It is time that more countries stand up and fight against these issues especially because of the IOC inaction. A boycott does succeed in drawing attention to a global issue but it does not necessarily change the behavior of a host country. It is a difficult decision to have athletes boycott who have been preparing their entire lives to go to the Olympics. Human rights activists protested against Hitler and advocated for a boycott of the 1936 Olympics in Berlin. Not even President Franklin D. Roosevelt got involved arguing that the Olympics operated independently.
The Olympics are able to take place in Beijing while genocide and crimes against humanity are taking place far away from the media. The IOC is ignoring Russia whose President and athletes are participating in this global event that is supposed to represent unity and threatening to wage war at any moment. On Friday, China produced a spectacular Opening Ceremony with both of these conflicts present. It was high tech with massive LED screens welcoming in Spring and showing the Games through the years. The performers included children who sang and danced. This was all taking place as the two most powerful authoritarians in the world, Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia and Xi Jinping, President of China were sitting together in the VIP box. While viewing the Opening Ceremony, the NBC reporters wondered if Putin would have his troops invade Ukraine since they had already surrounded it on three sides. The Ukraine athletes would be marching past the VIP in a short time. It seems unthinkable that something like this would happen during the Olympics. But the exact same scene happened in 2008 when Beijing hosted the Summer Games for the first time. Putin was in the VIP Box with Xi Jinping and Russian troops invaded Georgia, a former Soviet republic. The Georgia athletes had to face the Russian athletes at a volleyball game a few days later. As the Opening Ceremony progressed this year, China delivered messages to the western world throughout the ceremony. The most significant was when the last athlete to carry the Olympic torch before lightong the Cauldron was from Xinjiang, the home of the Muslim group being suppressed. The IOC needs to finally take a stand against the injustices going on in the world when selecting a country to host the Olympics. It is understandable that as a non government group that they cannot tell a country how to handle their government. But, they need to publicly acknowledge the impact that the Olympics have on the world. They cannot hide behind their mission and goals.
The Olympics are much bigger than just a sporting event. The backdrop of the Olympics are just as important as the athletic competition. We must all be global citizens and not be tolerant of human abuses and war. Global powers need to band together to fight these injustices. This must be the beginning for the Biden Administration of the fight against atrocities towards human rights. Attention has been brought to the issue of genocide and human rights atrocities in China. NBC has been discussing it on their Olympic broadcasts and has the ability to reach billions of viewers. It is a start but there has to be more done to have an impact on these countries. The International Olympic Committee needs to re-evaluate how they select a host city. They need to consider the impact a country will have on the Games that are not related to the athletic competition. Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping have mocked the world in actions at the 2008 and 2021 Summer Games. This is unacceptable.
Work Cited
Droubie , Paul. “The Phantom Olympics: Why Japan Forfeited Hosting the 1940 Olympics.” Home, https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/summer-2021/the-phantom-olympics-why-japan-forfeited-hosting-the-1940-olympics.
Gómez, Sergio. “Why Is Russia Called Roc at the 2022 Beijing Olympics?” AS.com, AS En, 4 Feb. 2022, https://en.as.com/en/2022/02/04/olympic_games/1643963106_653681.html
Ioc. “Olympic Games Tokyo 2020 Watched by More than 3 Billion People - Olympic News.” International Olympic Committee, IOC, 20 Dec. 2021, https://olympics.com/ioc/news/olympic-games-tokyo-2020-watched-by-more-than-3-billion-people.
"Maraniss, David. Rome 1960: The Olympics That Changed the World." Gale In Context Online Collection, Gale, 2008. Gale In Context: Middle School, link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ2181703597/MSIC?u=nysl_me_jhs118ww&sid=bookmark-MSIC&xid=690d8959. Accessed 21 Jan. 2022. This book was published by Simon and Schuster.
“Olympic Games: Full List by City & Year - Ticketcity Insider.” Insider, https://blog.ticketcity.com/olympic-games-full-list-by-city-year/
“Olympic Games: Roles and Responsibilities.” International Olympic Committee, International Olympic Committee, 26 Oct. 2021, https://olympics.com/ioc/olympic-games-roles-and-responsibilities
“President Carter Announces Olympic Boycott.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 16 Nov. 2009, https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/carter-announces-olympic-boycott
“THE MOVEMENT TO BOYCOTT THE BERLIN OLYMPICS OF 1936.” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-movement-to-boycott-the-berlin-olympics-of-1936.
"White House announces US diplomatic boycott of 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing." CNN Wire, 6 Dec. 2021, p. NA. Gale In Context: Middle School, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A685596333/MSIC?u=nysl_me_jhs118ww&sid=bookmark-MSIC&xid=172e6bab. Accessed 30 Dec. 2021
Exhibit I
Summer & Winter Olympics: 1896 to Present
2032
Summer Olympics
TBD***
TBD
2030
Winter Olympics
TBD**
TBD
2028
Summer Olympics
USA
2026
Winter Olympics
Milan
Italy
2024
Summer Olympics
Paris
France
2022
Winter Olympics
Beijing
China
2021
Summer Olympics
Tokyo
Japan
2018
Winter Olympics
Pyeongchang
South Korea
2016
Summer Olympics
Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
2014
Winter Olympics
Sochi
Russia
2012
Summer Olympics
London
England
2010
Winter Olympics
Canada
2008
Summer Olympics
Beijing
China
2006
Winter Olympics
Turin
Italy
2004
Summer Olympics
Athens
Greece
2002
Winter Olympics
USA
2000
Summer Olympics
Sydney
Australia
1998
Winter Olympics
Nagano
Japan
1996
Summer Olympics
USA
1994
Winter Olympics
Lillehammer
Norway
1992
Summer Olympics
Barcelona
Spain
1992
Winter Olympics
Albertville
France
1988
Summer Olympics
Seoul
South Korea
1988
Winter Olympics
Calgary
Canada
1984
Summer Olympics
USA
1984
Winter Olympics
Sarajevo
Yugoslavia
1980
Summer Olympics
Moscow
USSR
1980
Winter Olympics
USA
1976
Summer Olympics
Canada
1976
Winter Olympics
Innsbruck
Austria
1972
Summer Olympics
Munich
Germany
1972
Winter Olympics
Sapporo
Japan
1968
Summer Olympics
Mexico City
Mexico
1968
Winter Olympics
Grenoble
France
1964
Summer Olympics
Tokyo
Japan
1964
Winter Olympics
Innsbruck
Austria
1960
Summer Olympics
Rome
Italy
1960
Winter Olympics
USA
1956
Summer Olympics
Melbourne
Australia
1956
Winter Olympics
Cortina d’Ampezzo
Italy
1952
Summer Olympics
Helsinki
Finland
1952
Winter Olympics
Oslo
Norway
1948
Summer Olympics
London
England
1948
Winter Olympics
St. Moritz
Switzerland
1936
Summer Olympics
Berlin
Germany
1936
Winter Olympics
Garmisch-Partenkirchen
Germany
1932
Summer Olympics
USA
1932
Winter Olympics
USA
1928
Summer Olympics
Amsterdam
Netherlands
1928
Winter Olympics
St. Moritz
Switzerland
1924
Summer Olympics
Paris
France
1924
Winter Olympics
Chamonix
France
1920
Summer Olympics
Antwerp
Belgium
1912
Summer Olympics
Stockholm
Sweden
1908
Summer Olympics
London
Great Britain
1906
Olympic Games
Athens
Greece
1904
Summer Olympics
USA
1900
Summer Olympics
Paris
France
1896
Summer Olympics
Athens
Greece