Technology Frameworks
There are many frameworks available when planning how to integrate technology into lesson plans. While the Department of Educational Technology has not officially adopted a framework for schools to use, the models below can serve as a guide when deciding how to integrate technology.
TPACK Framework
When integrating technology, we can look to exemplar models to provide a framework for the best practices to provide the best educational experience for students. The TPACK Framework is an excellent guide to help incorporate technology into the classroom.
The TPACK framework was introduced by Punya Mishra and Matthew J. Koehler of Michigan State University in 2006. They show the complex interplay of the three primary forms of knowledge: Content (CK), Pedagogical (PK), and Technological (TK). The framework was designed in a Venn Diagram to show how the three forms of knowledge intersect with one another to provide successful technology integration.
The center of the diagram, known as TPACK, represents the full understanding of how to teach with technology. The purpose of this is to show how to use technology to teach concepts in a way that enhances the student learning experience.
It is imperative that all three forms of knowledge are considered when designing a lesson plan for students. One must include Content Knowledge, Pedagogical Knowledge, and Technological Knowledge when lesson planning to ensure the students have the best possible lessons.
TPACK RESOURCES
TPACK Website - Links to explanations, examples, and readings to help you increase your understanding of the TPACK model.
“What is Successful Technology Integration?” - From Edutopia looks at integrating technology into teaching and learning.
SAMR Framework
The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition Model offers a method of seeing how computer technology might affect teaching and learning. It also shows a progression that adopters of educational technology often follow as they progress through teaching and learning with technology.
While one might argue over whether an activity can be defined as one level or another, the important concept to grasp here is the level of student engagement. One might well measure progression along these levels by looking at who is asking the important questions. As one moves along the continuum, computer technology becomes more important in the classroom but at the same time becomes more invisibly woven into the demands of good teaching and learning.
SAMR Examples with Google
This image shows ways you can move up the SAMR framework using Google Workspace applications. Each stage of the framework shows how you can use different Google apps to integrate technology into your lesson plan. These are great sparks to start ideas on how you can adapt them for your subject and grade level.
SAMR RESOURCES
Emerging Ed Tech - Shares examples of actual lessons and how they can be adjusted to move from Substitution to Redefinition.
Common Sense Education - Shares how SAMR aligns to Blooms Taxonomy.