When it comes to correctly assessing our leadership, maximum confidence is not nearly as important as accurate confidence. Many of us often fall into the trap of being overconfident or underconfident in our abilities from time to time and there are issues with either. 


For the sake of clarity, it helps us to define our terms. We are using competence to refer to your ability to effectively carry out a task, while confidence is the belief in your ability to do exactly that.


If you are underconfident, you will lack belief in your ability to make decisions and lead. This in turn will make others hesitate to follow, even if the direction is good. If you are overconfident, then you may appear arrogant, or seen more as a sayer than a doer, which can be off-putting to others. 


This is not to say that high or low confidence is good or bad nor is having higher or lower competence inherently good or bad. The trick is to calibrate and correctly assess your confidence to match your competence so you can know if you need to grow in an area, or if you should be helping to lead others to grow in that area.