IMP2ART Results

Review templates are commonly used in long-term condition (LTC) consultations to standardise care for patients and promote consistent data recording. However, templates may affect interactions during the review and, potentially, inhibit patient-centered care. This study aimed to systematically review the literature about the impact that LTC review templates have on process and health outcomes, and the views of health professionals and patients on using review templates in consultations. 

In total, twelve qualitative and fourteen quantitative studies were included (two studies reported both qualitative and quantitative date, and were included in both analyses). Review templates were well used, but the only study to assess health outcomes showed no effect. Templates can improve documentation of key measures and act as a reminder tool; however, they can restrict the review process, and risk health professionals' agendas being prioritized over those of patients. Templates may also limit opportunities to discuss individuals' concerns about living with their condition and act as a barrier to providing patient-centered care. Please click HERE to view the published paper.

The COVID-19 pandemic forced health care systems globally to adapt quickly to remote modes of health care delivery, including for routine asthma reviews. A core component of asthma care is supporting self-management, a guideline-recommended intervention that reduces the risk of acute attacks, and improves asthma control and quality of life. Please click HERE to view the published paper. 

For more information on the IMP2ART study results please visit the weblink provided by clicking the IMP2ART heading.