Embedded Files
Each semester Student Teachers, Cooperating Teachers, and University Supervisors have the opportunity to Evaluate one another and the program in a safe and anynomous medium. This feedback informs our decision making about our current coursework, field experiences, and collaborative efforts and partnerships.
University Supervisor Evaluation Results
University Supervisor Evaluation Results
Student teachers and Cooperating Teachers were invited to discuss the performance and impact of the assigned University Supervisr.
Ratings: 1. Unsatisfactory; 2. Needs Improvement 3. Satisfactory; 4. Good; 5. Excellent Scores were then averaged.
Key: CT: Cooperating Teacher/Clinical Faculty ST: Student Teacher
Cooperating Teacher Evaluation Results
Cooperating Teacher Evaluation Results
Student teachers and University Supervisors were invited to discuss the performance and impact of the assigned Cooperating Teacher.
Ratings: 1. Unsatisfactory; 2. Needs Improvement 3. Satisfactory; 4. Good; 5. Excellent Scores were then averaged.
Key: CT: Cooperating Teacher/Clinical Faculty ST: Student Teacher
Page updated
Report abuse