Intimate Relationships and Interracial Marriages

Introduction

Marriages and intimate relationships are important in many societies, and this is also the case within many different Aboriginal clans. In many Aboriginal Australian cultures, marriage and intimate relationships have the ability to unite more than just two individuals but it can also unite two families, and two separate clans to create one larger, stronger entity.

Kinship is a key term used within many clans in Indigenous Australia, a term that is often referred to in songlines and songspirals which in some indigenous cultures is used as a guide to know how to behave, treat the country, and live their lives. The frequent referral to kinship implies the importance of intimate relationships and marriages within many of these cultures (Burarrwarja 2019). Before the arrival of the First Fleet on the coast of Australia in 1788 many indigenous cultures would form intimate relationships and marry between themselves. However, shortly after the arrival of the First Fleet some interracial relationships began to form, some consensual and some not. There have been reports of successful relationships and marriages, and reports of sexual violence. In this page we look at the success and the failures behind interracial marriages and intimate relationships and reasons behind them.

Violence upon Arrival of First Fleet

Retrieved from: Australian History 1770-present timeline | Timetoast timelines

Arrival of the First Fleet

Retrieved from: First Fleet Sydney Cove 1788 (thinglink.com)

Australian Assimilation Policy

Retrieved from: Pre-1945 - Rights and Freedoms (weebly.com)


Sexual Violence

Sexual violence was unfortunately a terrible reality for many indigenous people as they were originally given no respect or rights by the colonizers. Upon first contact from the First Fleet relations were formed almost immediately between some of the white colonizer men and indigenous women. Some of these relationships were seen to be genuine and naturally formed, however, some of the other relationships were often a result of coercion, sexual violence, and an abuse of power. According to Broome (Aboriginal Australians 2019) many indigenous women were victims of sexual violence such as rape and assault upon the arrival of the first fleet in 1788. There are many potential explanations for this show of violence and aggression. Sexual violence could have been a method which the white colonizer men believed they could attain dominance and be portrayed as the people with authority. In the Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History (McGrath 2005) McGrath believes there were three parts of a pact which in the eyes of the Colonizers legitimized “white over black”, one of these three aspects being the “sexual contract” which at the time white colonizers believed they were entitled to act in a certain way as they believed themselves to be superior. Another possible explanation for the brutal behavior of colonizer men sexually exploiting indigenous women could have been, in their eyes, a sign of control. A method to show many indigenous cultures the violence they were capable of and why they should be listened to. According to History Matters, one of the most infamous cases of rape involving a colonizer white male and an indigenous female was the Ern Scat case. Ern Scat was a Scottish colonizer who was known for continually raping two of his Nyoongar wives and wrongly justifying his actions by claiming he was trying to “breed out” their color (Smith 2020). This was one of many horrific cases later documented. A.O Neville also continually made it clear that Australia's white policy was the way forward and that Australia should be an all-white country, this is exemplified in Rabbit-Proof fence (Noyce 2020), with the government clearly enforcing this mindset through civilizing missions. At the time this could have given white colonizer men, what they believed to be, an excuse for their behavior towards indigenous women.

Sexual violence was particularly high in Queensland, at the time this state had the highest disproportion of indigenous women and white European colonizers. When reported in 1861, there were only 100 indigenous women for 201 white male colonizers (McGrath 2005). This imbalance led to a clear white colonizer dominance over the Indigenous women as well as many white colonizer options for indigenous women and fewer options for the males.

A further reason for sexual violence and relationships between indigenous women and white colonizer men was to prevent the indigenous women going back to their original tribes and clans. By getting into relations with Indigenous women, the chances of them trying to escape and go back to their original homes decreased. Indigenous women were also used as rewards for white workers who worked on farms and cattle ranches, they were seen as the prize for hunts and a motivation for the workers. This mindset dehumanized indigenous women and resulted in some of them being extremely exploited (Behrendt 2010).


Assimilation

Many relationships between white colonizers and indigenous women in the late 19th century and early 20th century were purely based on the assimilation policy (Ellinghaus 2003). This extremely racist Australian assimilation policy was the idea of “breeding out” traits until Australia had a pure white race. The idea was that every set of offspring would have less black in them and eventually everyone would look the same color the black traits would be eliminated. Colonizer men intentionally impregnated indigenous women, whether it was consensual or not, knowing their offspring would be half white and then if this pattern continued then eventually the race would be fully white. This concept is known as biological absorption (Ellinghaus 2003). This assimilation policy increased the number of interracial relationships as white males saw it was a way to “breed out” the indigenous black cultures. The assimilation policy was taken extremely seriously in the nineteenth and twentieth century. The policy involved wrongfully taking children from their families and sending them to mission institutions with the intention of assimilating them as part of the colonizers Civilizing and Christianizing missions. This is clearly documented in the film Rabbit-proof Fence (Noyce 2002) which is a film roughly based around the true story of three aboriginal girls who got taken from their families and places in Moore River Station. The idea of these mission camps was to make the indigenous Australians look and act like the colonizer Australians so they would “fit in” with the "ideal" Australian society.


Restrictions

In 1901, the Australian government implemented restrictions which forbid the cohabitation between Indigenous women and white men, these restrictions were tightly monitored and if broken they could result in a criminal offense, and it done more than once often resulted in imprisonment. In 1905, The Western Aboriginee Act was passed, which had the intention of intervening and preventing interracial relationships when they were becoming more prevalent (Ellinghaus 2003). This law made it harder for colonizers and indigenous people to come into contact with one another by setting restrictions such as creating reserves that aboriginal people had to have formal permission to enter and sending mixed race children to go and live with protectors. In the Northern Territory, there was a similar dislike for interracial marriage as it was believed that they would be growing an “undesirable race” (Ellinghaus 2003), this led to another act which put restrictions on marriages, The Northern Territory Act, 1910. This specific act meant that Aboriginal women were unable to celebrate any marriage unless the marriage was between an indigenous female and an indigenous male.

Indigenous women who were involved in the missionary programs were advised on their marriage choices. A journal from an aboriginal woman comments on her life and her choices of marriage and how it was frowned upon by white missionaries. Bessy Cameron, an indigenous missionary, took Donald Cameron hand in marriage who was a mixed-race laborer, choosing him over a white colonizer prospective husband. The white missionaries widely disapproved of this choice and said it was a step “backwards” in their civilizing mission and were outwardly against this marriage and her choices (Grimshaw, 2002). Due to the disapproval of the white colonizers this marriage saw many obstacles and many negative consequences for the couple as well as their children, one consequence being they were unable to enroll their children in school.

In 1911, Charles MacKeller further restricted Indigenous women by implying thy were incompetent breeders or children, naming them to be a “source of contamination and a threat to the white society” (Goodall 1995). These accusations made it harder for successful interracial relationships to be successful as these off-putting false rumors were being spread about indigenous women making them seem less attractive as prospective partners for white colonizer men. The constant hateful government claims and accusations made it harder for interracial relationships to work as they were portrayed so negatively and were highly frowned upon.


Successful Relationships

Despite laws and restrictions, in Queensland 1901, interracial relationships were common and many of these relationships were true and compassionate. When the first fleet originally arrived in Australia the fleet was majority men and few women, this means that majority of the women available were aboriginal women which flowered some interracial relationships. Some relationships were successful and led to white colonizer men joining their indigenous partners living in the country. Indigenous women were popular prospects for a wife due to the survival skills they showed living in the bush and what they could provide for the white colonizer men. These were attractive qualities for men looking for wives as it showed that indigenous women had the skills required to look after their husbands and their families. Indigenous women had as high set of skills which included living and thriving off of the country, as well as sexual companionship making them ideal wives (McGrath 2005). This indigenous women with white colonizer male relationship was much more common than a relationship between a white female and an indigenous male. The laws and restrictions placed upon the indigenous men were much stricter. Furthermore, indigenous males were often low income as their jobs and income went through the colonizers and this was seen to make males “poor prospects” for white women who were looking for a husband (McGrath 2005).



References

Behrendt, Larissa. 2000. “Consent in a (Neo)Colonial Society: Aboriginal Women as Sexual and Legal ‘Other.’” Australian Feminist Studies 15(33):353–67. doi: 10.1080/713611984.

Broome, Richard. 2019. Aboriginal Australians: A History since 1788. 5th ed. St Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

Ellinghaus, Katherine. 2003. “Absorbing the ‘Aboriginal Problem’: Controlling Interracial Marriage in Australia in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries.” Aboriginal History 27:183–207.

Grimshaw, Patricia. 2002. “Interracial Marriages and Colonial Regimes in Victoria and Aotearoa/New Zealand.” Frontiers 23(3):12–28. doi: 10.1353/fro.2003.0008.

McGrath, Ann). 2005. “Consent, Marriage and Colonialism: Indigenous Australian Women and Colonizer Marriages.” Journal of Colonialism & Colonial History 6(3). doi: 10.1353/cch.2006.0016.

Noyce, Phillip. 2002. Rabbit-Proof Fence. Australia : Rumbalara Films · The Australian Film Commission · Australian Film Finance Corporation (AFFC) · Lotteries Commission of Western Australia · Olsen Levy · Showtime Australia.

Smith, Zoe. 2020. “‘The Great Australian Silence’: Sexual Violence in Australian History.” History Matters. Retrieved December 5, 2022 (http://www.historymatters.group.shef.ac.uk/the-great-australian-silence-sexual-violence-australian-history/).



Additional Sources

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkRh4oisaGA - Kinship and Family in indigenous cultures

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q4Sjny62EI&t=187s - Sexual Violence in indigenous communities in the Northern Territory today

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244013518931 - Responding to Indigenous Australian Sexual Assault