The revised Victorian Teaching and Learning model (VTLM 2.0) released in 2024, is informed by contemporary evidence about how students learn and the most effective teaching practices. This VTLM was developed in consultation with the Australian Education Research Organisation (AERO) to inform and enhance teaching practices.
Resources to support our delivery of The OSC INSPIRE model incorporate research from AERO and are found in this Playbook as AERO explainers, practice guides and research papers.
The OSC Instructional Model features:
How, Who and What We Teach.
‘Inspired’ by our motto and Rosenshine’s Principals (The OSC Big 10) this Instructional Model leverages evidence-based strategies, cognitive science, and the gradual release model to empower students to master essential skills, knowledge, and understanding.
Our primary focus of improving student outcomes is reflected in all aspects of the model through the How we teach, Who we teach and What we teach.
The INSPIRE Instructional guide
The OSC motto: ‘Learning together, learning to lead, together we INSPIRE’
The INSPIRE Instructional Guide outlines teacher actions through each of the steps of the model and reflects the alignment of The Big 10 to our Instructional Model.
OSC Lesson Plan template
Lesson sequencing using The Big 10
I’ve written about retrieval practice several times in other posts but here I just want to make it easy to lay out various alternative methods for the process of reviewing your students’ knowledge and understanding. Before doing that, I would suggest that there are some key principles:
Involve everyone: Good techniques involve all students checking their knowledge, not just a few and not just one at a time as you might do when questioning.
Make checking accurate and easy: it should be possible for all students to find out what they got right and wrong, what they know well and where they have gaps. Every technique involves students testing their knowledge and then checking their work for accuracy and completeness. (This is not the same as giving students extended mark schemes to mark longer assessments which, for me goes beyond a simple retrieval practice activity)
Specify the knowledge: Where appropriate, it’s better if students know the set of knowledge any retrieval will be based on, so they can study, prepare and self-check. It must be possible for students to check their own answers which has implications for the way the knowledge requirements are laid out.
Keep it generative: students need to explore their memory to check what they know and understand; this means removing cue-cards, prompts, scaffolds and cheat-sheets; it means closing the books and thinking for themselves.
Make it time efficient: The idea of each technique is that they can be used repeatedly in an efficient manner without dominating whole lessons.
Make it workload efficient: None of these methods involve the teacher checking the students’ answers, creating unsustainable workload. A teacher might choose to check the occasional test but that’s no use for routine practice.
Retrieval Practice – Tips, strategies and resources
Something to view:
Kate Jones on Retrieval Practice
Something to listen to:
The love to teach podcast: Episode 10 – Retrieval practice: the basics
Something to read:
10 Techniques for Retrieval Practice
Something else to read:
Retrieval practice: The most powerful learning strategy you’re not using
The Science of Learning | Pooja K. Agarwal, Ph.D.
Retrieval Practice — The Learning Scientists
Teach like a champion: