A student was taking an Art History class in college, and he wrote a paper in which he misquoted some expert in the field of Impressionism. When he got the paper back, the professor had written in the margin near the quotation, “I think you have misrepresented what so-and-so said. He actually feels…” And then, after his explanation, the professor wrote, “I should know— he’s my brother-in-law.”
The point: There is a community of scholars, experts in various academic fields, and they make their living writing about, analyzing, academic subjects. They know each other, they all have different biases and approaches, some are more well-regarded than others, and everyone in a particular field of study pretty much reads what everyone else in that field has written. Whether we are assigned a lab report, a literary research paper, an oral presentation, or a political cartoon, it is necessary to read what these experts have to say and, at times, quote them directly, because what they have to say often helps support whatever point we are trying to make.
When you complete a research assignment, you are part of that community. You are joining a never-ending conversation about the subject you are exploring. This is why, when you write, you need to consider your audience the community of scholars who might be interested in reading your commentary. Just like in a real conversation, you need to have paid attention to the prior comments, and it should be evident that you have done so. You wouldn’t participate in a conversation in which you didn’t know the subject, or what the last several people have said. If you did, people wouldn’t want to talk to you anymore.
Research sometimes looks different in different disciplines, and indeed the objectives of a research assignment in an English class may vary from those of an assignment in a science class. This is owing to the very different nature of these subjects, though, and not to some inherent inconsistency in what research is. When you get to the core of any research assignment, you are really engaging in the same processes: asking questions, investigating, drawing conclusions. Below are some ideas about research from the perspective of three different academic subjects.
We all research questions informally, without even being aware of it. You might be at a friend’s house and hear an unfamiliar song by a band you’ve never heard of. Your first question might be, “who is that?” At home you might look up the name of the band online and listen to the rest of the album, which might lead you to watch their videos. You might also wonder about, and investigate:
• What other groups have influenced this band?
• What’s their background? Have the band’s musicians played in other groups?
• Who directed their videos? Who illustrated their website?
• Where are they performing?
• How do listeners interpret their lyrics (or how does the band explain their lyrics)?
• What have critics written about them?
If you end up learning all about the band, you are joining a community of experts (fans), and earning the right to participate in it.
This manual should serve as a guide and handbook as you engage in the research process. Read through the chapters in order to learn best practices, what to avoid, and how to thoroughly investigate your subject matter. Check that you know how to properly format your Works Cited list and sources throughout your assignments and review writing-process steps and guidelines. Your teachers will help you apply this manual to particular assignments.