In October of 1858, Betsey Cornwell and her daughter, Caroline, sought freedom in the city of Lowell. Jesse Cornwell, Betsey’s enslaver, was Caroline’s father. While we don’t know the nature of their relationship, however we can say that it was not an equal one and Betsey would not have been able to deny Jesse’s advances. According to Betsey and Caroline, Mr. Cornwell left instructions upon his death that his friend Dr. Lewis Keyes should free the women, oversee their settlement in a northern community, and provide them with funds from the Cornwell estate. Keyes refused, keeping them enslaved. Keyes eventually moved to Lowell with the women in May 1858. While he kept a close eye on them and their movements, they were eventually able make their way to the law office of Isaac Morse, where they pleaded with him to accept a legal case against Dr. Keyes.
Dred Scott Case: Refers to the case in which Dred and Harriet Scott sued for their freedom because of their residency in the free state of Illinois and the free Wisconsin territory (established by a clause in the Missouri Compromise of 1850). Their enslaver had forcibly made them move along with him to military forts in those free territories. The US Supreme Court’s 1857 decision in their case denied the legality of Black citizenship in the US and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional, keeping the Scotts in bondage.
Isaac S. Morse, Esq.: A lawyer in Lowell and the Middlesex County district attorney
Sheriff: A county elected law officer
General Butler: Benjamin Butler was a Lowell lawyer and a general in the state militia. Later he served in the US Army during the Civil War.
Hon. J. G. Abbott: A lawyer in Lowell
A Dred Scott Case in Lowell! --Two Servants held in bondage claiming liberty! A smart mulatto girl,
whose father was her mother’s white owner, sues for her rights!
A case of extraordinary interest, involving as it does some nice points, some new and some rendered famous in the Dred Scott case, has been pending in this city for several days, but has been kept so still that no daily paper has got hold of it.
The case, as stated with apparent truthfulness, and at their own unbiased instance, is briefly this:--
Jesse Cornwell, a rich planter in Mississippi, had a smart favorite slave named Betsey, who was employed in the confidential labor of housekeeper, and with whom he cohabited. The result of this cohabitation was a daughter, who is now 24 years old, smart, capable, intelligent and good-looking. Her name is Caroline. Cornwell, on his death-bed, six years since, requested his friend, Dr. Lewis Keyes, to take charge of his effects, including a considerable sum of money; and especially charged him, as soon as he could arrange so to do, to take the woman Betsey and his and her child Caroline to a free State, and there see them comfortably located. For this special service Keyes was directed to take $5,000 cash, $4,000 of which was to be equally divided between mother and daughter, and $1,000 to be retained for his own services.
Instead of performing faithfully this last dying re-quest, it is alleged, Keyes immediately on the death of Cornwell, took the mother and daughter, and hired them out at $100 a year each, for a period of six years, when he finally brought them with him North, arriving in Lowell in the latter part of May last. They have been here with Keyes’ family, under strict surveillance, since that time.
On Saturday last the mother and daughter appeared before Isaac S. Morse, Esq., to whom they made a complaint, and told their story. Mr. Morse in their behalf instituted a suit against Keyes for the recovery of the money given by Cornwell, and also for their six years’ labor.
Keyes was arrested by Deputy Sheriff E. L. Shedd, and held to bail in the sum of $6000. It is unnatural to suppose a father, who, according to the testimony of both mother and daughter, never struck or caused to be struck a blow upon either of them, would consign his own child to the ownership of a man who has since, according to the same authority, flogged them both unmercifully, the marks of which the mother still bears.
We have seen and conversed with both mother and daughter at the house of the private family with whom they are now stopping, and we were impressed with the truthfulness of their story. The mother is a smart, intelligent woman, of about 45 years. The daughter, as before stated, is of prepossessing appearance, intelligent and modest, and among other acquirements, is a good dress-maker.
They will not suffer, though they are here without
money in a strange land, for in addition to District
Attorney Morse, we are happy to learn that General Butler has signified a willingness to lend a helping hand to protect them in their rights. Hon. J. G. Abbott has been retained by the defendant.
There are several nice legal points involved in this case, all of which will be in due time elaborated, to say nothing of the political and moral elements—exciting side issues—that will be forced upon it. Especially will the moral aspect of the case be interesting, as bringing directly before us a living witness and a practical demonstration of the worst feature of the ‘peculiar institution’ of the South.
The Dred Scott drama, with variations, is to be enacted again. The writ is returnable at the December term in Cambridge.
-- Lowell Vox Populi, Oct. 16
What caused Betsey and Caroline to seek assistance from a lawyer in Lowell?
How did Lewis Keyes treat Betsey and Caroline?
Why do you think the author was comparing Betsey and Caroline’s case to that of Dred Scott? What are the similarities between the two cases?
What do you think are the “legal points involved in this case”? What about the “political and moral elements”?