Greentown Campus Schools

Greentown primary school is a mere 5 minutes walk from the HZCIS residential building and even though we share a campus with Greentown Yuhua school, our interactions are sadly limited. We started this Greentown Debate initiative to promote communication and cooperation between our schools, to build an unbreakable bond and partnership that can last for the many years to come. In the program, HZCIS students teach debate basics to Grade 4 Greentown students, with the core focus of instilling confidence and critical thinking skills. Goals include learning how to structure a persuasive speech and deliver it confidently. The partnership culminates in a bilingual debate competition. Greentown students use English while CIS students speak Chinese, which provides an exciting twist to traditional debate. We hope this will become an annual event that helps foster cross-cultural ties for years to come.

Links Leaders: 

Lily Liang & Kaitlyn Liu (HZ11)

Nick Shi (HZ10)

Tom Tang (HZ9)

Darin Lee & James Wang (HZ8)

Hangzhou 11

March 20, 2024

In today’s visit to Greentown Primary, we created a lesson with a balance of fun activities and productive learning, to provide an enjoyable yet informative session for the kids. We started the session off with a fun game called, “If I ruled the world”. Each student had some time to brainstorm ideas, and they each took turns putting on a paper crown, then sharing their idea to the class. This little game was incredibly effective in getting students excited for the lesson and entering a “creative thinking” mindset. As for the main part of our lesson, we focused on some debate vocabulary and sentence structure learning. For the past few sessions, we’ve mainly focused on structure and the basics on how to give an argumentative speech. Thus, taking the advice of Ms. Uttam (who very briefly watched the end of our previous session), we chose to incorporate some more technical, english-based learning. In this way, students would be able to get an all-rounded understanding of debate—in skill, structure and language. To make the information easier to retain, we also created a handout with a summary of all the vocabulary or sentence structures they can use in speeches. After the main lesson, we split off into smaller groups and conducted a few debates. To encourage students to put their newly learned knowledge into practice, we told them that they would receive a piece of candy if they utilised those vocabularies in their speeches. Overall, it was a very effective tactic (as expected), and I had lots of fun this session! In terms of the plan for the next visit, we will devise fun and challenging activities to provide the students with an extremely memorable last lesson!

- Kaitlyn Liu

March 13, 2024

Today marks the second last session of Links Group A. In order to maximise engagement, we bought candies as a reward incentive system, which effectively brought everyone together. Utilising a hand crafted golden paper crown, we played a highly interactive game called “If I ruled the world…”. This game likely encouraged participants to think creatively and express their ideas about changes they would make if they had the power to rule the world. The crown added an element of fun and excitement to the activity. Another highlight of this visit was an activity which involved students having to pick and run towards one out of the four corners of the classroom, depending on their answer. The active nature of this game made for an immensely enjoyable experience, for both us and the students! Furthermore, students fortunately recalled significant amounts of the PEEL structure and vocabulary from previous sessions. Ultimately, this built up to a relatively competitive debate after we split up into two rooms. For the majority of this session, I was filming on my camera in order to achieve a final introductory film for Debate Links, so the other students in my group took charge. They did a phenomenal job in maintaining high energy and spirit, which we will definitely aim for in our last session!

- Lily Liang

March 6, 2024

This week, our lesson was centred around how to create an argument. While brainstorming ways to teach this in a simple, engaging way, we decided to go with the acronym PEL (Point, Example, Link). In our lesson, we started off by reviewing what we learned previously (prop/opp), and taught the kids how to build an argument through PEL. We then split into smaller groups and did an activity where the teacher would provide a “point” (argument), and the students would have to come up with the “E” and “L”. In this process, we made sure that every student could understand this structure. Furthermore, this small group activity allowed every student to easily contribute to the discussion. After this activity, we explained the structure of a debate (speaker orders, speech structure) and we then split off into two rooms to conduct debates. We had 6 students per debate/3 students per side and gave them some time to each write a “PEL” regarding the motion that we decided on. After they were done preparing, they each got up to the front of the classroom to give their speech, and we allowed for open discussion of the topic between prop/opp teams after each student had delivered their PEL speech. Overall, I would say that it was a very successful session. The students were incredibly engaged throughout, they all successfully gave PEL speeches and had argumentative discussions with each other. For next time, rather than simply focusing on debate/argument skills, we could incorporate a vocabulary/sentence-structure learning segment as well. As evidence of our impact, our CP actually sent us a photo of one of his students utilising the PEL structure we had taught in her classwork. I am more than ecstatic that our hard work is bearing fruit, and we can’t wait to return!

- Kaitlyn Liu

February 28, 2024

Content-heavy with analysis on argumentation and the basic building blocks of debate, today was a thorough educational experience for us all. Beginning the session with a review of our very first session, we ensured students were familiar with proposition and opposition by playing an interactive game. Today’s session focused on the well-known PEEL structure and analysis which is commonly applied when formulating arguments in competitive debate. Through the analogy of a multi-layered cake, we introduced and provided examples of Point, Example, Explanation, Link. After a practice activity in smaller groups, we showcased and explained the general debate format and rules, which they seemed familiar with in Chinese! Following this interactive exercise, we did a friendly debate with teams of 3 — two debates going on simultaneously. Natalie, Alyssa, and Isabella supervised one room, whilst Dora and I were in charge of another. 

The purpose of the friendly debate was to provide an opportunity for the kids to utilise and implement their newly learnt analysis approach. Therefore, prep time was quite difficult as the PEEL structure required more complex critical thinking, thus more challenging to digest than our first session. Finally, Rita filmed short videos as exit tickets for the kids, who told us topics/motions they would like to debate next time! I think this fun activity allowed us to end on a light note whilst we also successfully gathered their input. On a more critical angle, I think our last few visits could involve more interactive games and thus more fun. Ultimately, the goal of our Links is to build authentic passion for English speech and critical thinking, and we aim to inspire such interest through fun, creative methods of teaching. I look forward to meeting up with my group and Mr. Pollock to plan and make the best out of future sessions!

- Lily Liang

January 17, 2024

Today was my first day teaching at the Greentown Debate links location, and I would say that it was definitely a huge success. The moment the kids walked into the classroom, I could already feel their energy, curiosity and enthusiasm. They were all smiling as they took their seats, and immediately, with an excited mindset, the four of us started the lesson. In today’s class, we started off with some self-introductions, then moved on to ice-breakers. We had all the students make their own card-paper name tags, including drawings of different things that they liked. Right after I showed them an example name tag, they quickly got to work drawing, laughing and conversing with each other. After they finished creating their name tags, we had everyone introduce themself and share 1 thing about themself. Just in this little sharing activity, I could sense how eager they all were to participate in group discussions. Then, we moved onto the next activity. We had prepared different motions (statements) to display on the slideshow (e.g. cats are better than dogs/there should be no school uniforms), and Miya stood on the left side of the classroom with a sign saying “No”, while Lindsay stood on the other side with a sign that read “Yes”. We then asked the students to stand next to the side that they agreed with. We repeated this process with 5 different relatable opinion statements, and I noticed that many of the students were already starting to debate with each other during the exercise. After going through all the motions, we went back to the first one (cats vs. dogs) as we noticed it seemed to be the one the students found most interesting and were already starting to argue about. Now that the students had chosen their sides (“Yes” or “No”), we introduced the debate terms of Proposition and Opposition to them. Thereafter, we split off into the two teams in two separate classrooms; with two teachers on Proposition and two teams with side Opposition. We then took around 10 minutes to have the students discuss their points. We prepared large papers and had them create a mind map that included their reasons as to why they think their side is better. During this discussion, every student had something to contribute to the mind map, and they all had such creative ideas! They were all able to clearly articulate their points, but also weren’t afraid to ask questions when they were confused. In this brainstorming exercise, I found myself barely having to direct the discussion at all; other than the occasional vague guiding question, the students were completely on task, coming up with all kinds of clever reasons and even sharing their own personal experiences. As the brainstorming came to a close, we had everyone go back to the main room and begin a mini “debate”. Essentially, students would sit with their respective teams and would take turns sharing some of the points they had come up with as to why their side of the argument was better. Once again, they were highly engaged and energetic - students were getting up onto their feet to shout out their points, furiously rebutting arguments coming from their opponents in a heated debate, and there really wasn’t a single moment of silence. Every student was laughing the whole time, and I could tell that they were genuinely having fun. Later on, we repeated this same activity but with another motion. To end the class, we had everyone write an exit ticket, including 1 thing they learned and 1 topic they would like to discuss in a next class. In conclusion, I think we did a great job with creating fun, engaging activities to capture the interest of the students. We made sure to talk slowly, make instructions clear, and be patient with all their questions. Throughout group discussions, we made a big effort to try and include every student, so that they all had a chance to share and make a contribution. For next time, we could definitely work on having more structure in the activities, and incorporate more hands-on, debate-specific “learning” exercises into the lesson. Overall, I am really grateful that I was given the opportunity to share debate with a group of such welcoming, talented students.

- Kaitlyn Liu

January 10, 2024

With eager participation and the presence of five enthusiastic student mentors, deeming today's Links trip a mere "success" would be an egregious understatement. Following coordination with Mr. Pollock, the Greentown English teacher, as well as the students involved, I consider myself exceedingly fortunate to have been blessed with a cohort of eager student volunteers to teach Debate at Greentown. 

After a brief five-minute walk to the Greentown campus, we arrived 30 minutes ahead of schedule, utilizing the spare moments to reiterate our meticulously crafted plans and ensure that each member of the team grasped their responsibilities. James, the English teacher from Greentown, generously granted us an exceptional degree of autonomy, allowing us to conduct the session precisely as we had planned, without the slightest interference on his part. Prior to departing the CIS campus, we carefully crafted and folded name tags for each of the 13 students, subsequently presenting them with an opportunity to decorate their tags as a warm-up icebreaker following our introductions. Throughout, the five CIS student mentors made a collective effort to engage each Greentown student in conversation, thereby acquiring knowledge about their respective interests and hobbies. Adopting a posture of humility, we either took a seat beside the students or knelt down to their level, recognizing that such an approach fosters an atmosphere of familiarity rather than intimidation. 

We presented a series of opinions (motions) on the screen, one by one, prompting the students to position themselves on opposite sides of the room based on their agreement or disagreement. Progressing through 6 motions,we ultimately gravitated toward the most contentious of subjects, one that elicited a remarkably even divide: "Cats are better than dogs." While Rita and Dora took charge of the "Cats are superior to dogs" team (Prop), "Dogs are superior to cats" team (Opp) were led by Alyssa and Natalie. In accordance with the groups they represented, Alyssa and Natalie left for a separate room with a sheet of A2 paper and pens. Both teams taught students the concepts of "Proposition" and "Opposition." To our utmost delight, these bright students exhibited a commendable level of attentiveness, diligently transcribing notes and even providing Chinese translations. I, meanwhile, drifted between the 2 rooms, capturing photographs, observing the proceedings, and occasionally offering subtle suggestions. Following approximately 10-15 minutes of productive brainstorming within their respective groups, we reconvened in the main room, where Team Proposition (advocating for cats) and Team Opposition (advocating for dogs) sat positioned opposite one another, eagerly awaiting the opportunity to articulate their views. Each student exhibited an extraordinary level of engagement, offering compelling counterarguments, responses, and follow-up statements whenever the occasion arose. With ample time at our disposal, we granted the students the liberty to select yet another motion of their choosing. This time, we divided them into smaller groups, assigning each of us the responsibility of facilitating discourse among 3-4 students. Such modification proved to be a resounding success, allowing students more opportunity to express their opinions and ensuring a more seamless flow of conversation. The unwavering commitment and manner in which they navigated the complexities of debate served as an immeasurably gratifying testament for us all.

In future trips, we aspire to cater to these students' willingness for knowledge by offering a more extensive array of debate-specific content, encompassing topics such as the debate structure, construction of persuasive arguments, and the ability to deliver coherent and compelling responses. We derive immense gratification knowing that each subsequent visit will grant us fresh experiences and opportunities for personal growth. Although the number of remaining Links trips for the year is regrettably limited, we will contribute our utmost dedication to making the most of each and every occasion, cultivating an atmosphere that fosters harmony, enjoyment, active participation, and intellectual engagement for all involved!

- Lily Liang

Hangzhou 10

March 22, 2023

Today was a fruitful conclusion to our links programme. We played a final game of mafia with the IVY students as per their request. We had a chance to review everything we learned, and they seemed to recall everything quite well. Looking back to the early stages of planning, we were hesitant to reach out to IVY back at the barbeque lunch and benchball activities, and we were close to coming to a conclusion that lessons with IVY weren’t going to work well. But as everything began unfolding, we managed to grow closer to them through a shared passion of debate. The IVY students turned out to be friendly and eager to learn debate skills. We enjoyed sharing the things we loved with them, and they also seemed to enjoy learning about them as well. It was ultimately a novel experience to be teaching a group of students older than us, especially seeing as how this first connection, this lesson with a few students, can lead to further future connections between HZCIS and IVY.

As for the Greentown primary students, things were way more heated. We assigned them to a final debate on the topic “This house would ban violent video games”, which allowed them to consider a variety of viewpoints, as well as to consider things like weighing and setting definitions and models. They started with the presumption that proposition was easier to argue for, considering the perspective from a child’s health, education and development, which could be understandable as these are all situations that would be relevant to their daily lives. After a practice amongst their own small groups, they were tasked with holding a 1V6 debate against us- their teachers. They were all eager to beat us in a debate with the skills they have accumulated over the previous months, and we obviously did not back down either. The final debate brought on interesting topics related to student health, differences between fiction and reality, as well as economics that could be affected by banning “violent” video games. Teaching Greentown has been a surreal experience, as it was quite tricky trying to explain technical terms to a group of fourth grade students. To our surprise, they turned out to be very intelligent and enthusiastic, and are always up to a challenge. Although they could be infuriating when they don’t pay attention, their positive and carefree energy was always present in the classroom. Applying our own knowledge to teach other students turned out to be quite effective and mutually beneficial. Ultimately, this Links was a fantastic opportunity to connect to our partner schools, find further applications to our own debate knowledge, and to have fun experiencing the role of a teacher (especially as we usually are students). We will definitely miss all the students we have taught, and the joyous memories will be very important to us. Thank you to everyone who supported our Links project and our learning journeys!


- Grace Ma

March 15, 2023

Today was a more laid-back review session for both IVY and Greentown. We started off in the morning playing Mafia with the IVY students to practice their skills with formulating points, logical deduction and rebuttals. These students would be preparing for a final debate on the last Links session next week, so a fun activity that would also be sufficient practice was beneficial for them.

In the afternoon, we worked with the primary Greentown students. We gave them more mock debate practices for them to finally reinforce the skills and debate structure. They formulated some very insightful points and had heated and well-organized rebuttals, to the point where they would be willing to continue rebutting each other even after the debate was over. 

Through this session, we also got to learn about the primary students’ personal lives and their experiences with academics so far. When waiting for the other students to arrive, they were all working hard on their Chinese and math homework, as they needed to get them done before after school tutoring. It is surprising how well they organize their time and how they still remain enthusiastic about learning English debate despite their significant amounts of extracurricular homework.

Ultimately, the sessions today were simple but they were still helpful preparation for the last Links session.


- Grace Ma

March 1, 2023

During this links session, we taught students from Ivy as well as students from Greentown primary school. In the morning, we worked with the Ivy students, who were taught second and third speaker speech structures, as well as the rebuttals, PEEL structure and weighing- vital parts to a professional speech. We practiced with the previous topic of banning capital punishment, and despite having a two-week break, the students still managed to deliver insightful points relating to economy, fairness and justice during the practices.

In the afternoon, we worked with the students from the Greentown primary school. In this particular lesson, we reviewed the structures for first, second and third speaker speeches. The students seemed to remember everything well and recalled the most important structural features accurately. After a short practice on rebuttals and third speaker speeches, an exciting mock debate surrounding whether or not video games should be banned was initiated. These kids, who resonated with this motion on a more personal level, managed to bring perceptive arguments surrounding addiction, student responsibilities, as well as mental and physical health.

The most remarkable moment of the lesson was the engagement of the primary school students- even after the third speaker's speeches had ended, the students were still eager to continue with the rebuttals. Although they replied to each other using Chinese, it was clear that they were interested and caught up in the flow of the conversation, and understood all the arguments in English after our translations. We ended the lesson with a casual discussion about the most enjoyable parts of debate: some students talked about being able to connect the information taught in debate class to in-school English lessons, while some talked about being able to effectively rebut and win an argument, which was quite hilarious. It was touching to learn that the students have been enjoying and making the most out of these lessons, which gave us more motivation to continue them in the following Links sessions, and to eventually plan an exhilarating debate competition!

- Grace Ma

February 22, 2023

Today was our fourth lesson for the Greentown students where we taught them the essentials of a second and third speaker: rebuttals. 

We first started off with some light review work of how to construct an argument with a PEEL paragraph. This was something that the students learnt last week, therefore, they got the hang of it really quickly. Then we introduced them to the structure of a second speaker, which is basically just a first speaker speech but with rebuttals and one less point. The students, who were split into smaller groups each then wrote a brief second speaker speech outlining a rebuttal to a point on gun control. Lastly, we taught them how to do third speaker speeches. Our plan for the following week is to have the students engage in more debate practices such as a full 3v3 debate. 

At the end of the session, James, the co-ordinator from the greentown side came to us and told us that even more students from greentown wanted to join our class! This to us was delightful news because it validated our efforts to teach meaningful debate lessons to the Greentown students. Though the new students may lead to a bit more work - as we need to teach them the basics all over again - we’re still looking forward to our next session! 

- Nick Shi

February 15, 2023

With all the scheduling inconvenience behind us, we managed to find a time suitable for both schools. This allowed us to teach the Ivy students in the morning and the Greentown students in the afternoon. 

With the lesson plans all planned out beforehand, we went into our first class with the ivy school. We brought their students over to our campus where we taught them the basics of debate, which was the first proposition and first opposition speeches. Though they had a little bit of struggle understanding the concepts of different motion types, such as this house would, or this house believes that motions, they soon got the gist of how things worked at aced the final speech. 

After a brief lunch break, we began our second session of teaching the Greentown students. For these students, we had a larger student to teacher ratio, therefore, we decided that we would divide them up into 6 different groups in order to maximise the understanding ability of the class. The students were all extremely co-operative and eager to learn about new debate topics, and participated very well in the speech activities.

Overall, I’m extremely happy with how the day went, and I want to replicate today again in the following weeks! 

- Nick Shi

December 7, 2022

Not everything goes as well as you plan. This was the exact scenario which we were put into this week. With the times slots provided by Ivy and Greentown conflicting each other, we were forced to split into two groups to simultaneously teach the two classes. 

Though we were put in an undesirable situation, we still managed to successfully run through both lessons. Furthermore, the Ivy student’s english levels were allot higher than we expected, therefore, this will be much easier for us to teach them more complicated concepts in the classes to come next semester. 

We’re all really looking forward to resuming our lessons! 

- Nick Shi

November 23, 2022

Today might not be as exciting as visiting a new school or teaching greentown students debate, but it was still an essential part of making the next lesson with greentown a success. 

At the start of the day, we met in the library at 10:30 where we began to plan and brainstorm how we wanted this lesson to be. Initially, many ideas were thrown around, but in the end, we decided that our end goal for this semester was to introduce debate to the greentown students and not necessarily to teach them. This led the direction of our lesson preparation.

The first two and a half hours of the afternoon were spent on lesson planning, where we decided on the warm-up activity that we wanted to do. After that, we constructed two exercises which were meant to slowly push the students to the deeper end of the pool where they would come into contact with actual points in debating.

The rest of the time that afternoon was spent practicing how we wanted to present this lesson, we each took turns teaching and the rest of us pretended to be the students who we were planning to teach. 

Overall, I think that this was a session that may not seem important, but is actually imperative to have in order to ensure our success.

- Nick Shi

November 15, 2022

Today we hosted an Ivy and Cis HZ Mixer where we invited the Ivy students to come over and play an edition of benchball, called zoneball. During this event, the students slowly warmed up to each other. As time went on, more and more students from both schools started talking to each other. Chrys and a student from Ivy even started comparing their muscles with each other. 

After the benchball games, we went to the canteen together as a whole to enjoy a barbeque lunch. At first, the students were still very hesitant to sit with each other even after the zoneball game, but in the end, most students were integrating very nicely together. 

Some even decided that they wanted to have a tour in our school!

Our plans for the future with Ivy is a mutually beneficial co-operation between the two schools where we can host activities together. We are planning to do this by first talking to their head teacher about whether it would be possible to do our links debate program with them on Tuesday next week. 

Wish us luck! 

- Nick Shi

November 9, 2022

Our first interaction with the Greentown students was beyond successful. We went in there with the mindset that we had to guide the students, but they were so quick to warm up to us that we forgot that this was even the first class. 

The first thing that we did as we entered the classroom was to introduce ourselves through a game of 2 truths and 1 lie, even though the original plan was to have everyone give 2 truths and a lie, it ended up being only us who introduced ourselves that way due to the time constraints. Despite this slight annoyance, the kids still thoroughly enjoyed their time through the first activity. 

The second activity that we ran was the “tell us why” exercise where we got the kids we were teaching to tell us why they should be the ones to get the packet of Oreos which we set on the table. Though they were still a little shy, some of them had already begun to come out of their shells through the conversation. 

The last activity that we ran was the hot air balloon exercise where we gave them futile jobs such as ant trainer and made them defend why they shouldn’t be thrown off the hot air balloon because of this occupation.  At this point, basically all the kids were fully engaged in the discussion and some of them even managed to go one step further in rebutting and pointing out why someone else should be thrown off the hot air balloon! 

Though our next session has to be held in 2 weeks, but I’m already looking forward to the surprises that we can get from these kids. 

- Nick Shi

October 26, 2022

We started off today by splitting into two groups, one in charge of gaging an understanding about IYV school’s language abilities, and the other for planning an interactive session between CIS and IVY. Mr Pollock helped us a great deal by contacting IVY’s lead english teacher and allowing two of our members, Tony and Grace to sit in in one of the IVY english classes. 

On the other hand, Jimi, Junyang and Nick planned out in detail the logistics of the interschool barbeque that we were planning to host by finding the right materials on Taobao. 

After lunch, the two teams came together and discussed what the best possible solution moving forward was. This discussion was mainly led by 3 questions: 

Throughout the first question, we learnt from Mr Pollock and his chats with the Greentown English teacher that they would be roughly done with all their courses on November 9th, and that was when we could start. This was great news for us as that meant that we could start planning out the first meeting with the greentown kids. The only problem that we had was a shortage of staff(members who were in the debate links), but we are working to gain another member in the coming weeks. 

Under the second question, we briefly talked about the english levels of the IVY kids and whether that would affect the debate class in any way. The conclusion that we came to is that though they may not have perfect english, but if they really wanted to join, they were always going to be welcome. 

Last, we talked about the logistics of the BBQ session. We agreed that it would be best if the BBQ session was hosted on a Friday two weeks from now(11/11), but if IVY turns out to be a week school where kids go home for the weekend, we may have to hold the BBQ session on the 9/11. Whatever happens, we’re working hard to ensure the best possible outcome! 

- Nick Shi

October 19, 2022

Our visit today was to IVY which is the newer school on the Greentown campus. This is a school which we have never had any interactions with, therefore, we wanted to use debate as a platform to form valuable bonds between the two schools. The meeting went quite smoothly, the lead English teacher and the headmaster were very supportive of our ideas. 

Despite gaining the support of the teachers at IVY, it’s always a personal choice whether or not the students want to join the debate links program at the end of the day. With that being said, due to the students at IVY being our age, we need to work a lot harder for them to actually want to come to our links. 

Our next step of action is to first make the IVY students warm up to cis students by holding a barbeque, and then hopefully, they will be willing to join and support us with our debate program because they now know a lot more about us.  

- Nick Shi

October 12, 2022

Today we went over to Greentown and discussed what we planned to do with the lead facilitator of this program there. The discussion went smoothly and we managed to gain the support of the facilitator. The discussion from today generally boiled down to four things which the facilitator is finding out for us. 1. How many kids we will be able to get. 2. Where would we do our class. 3. Would it be possible if we were to do an interview/English corner with them. 4. Whether it was possible to have a whole day dedicated to a debate tournament which will be held between the groups. 

- Nick Shi

Hangzhou 9

April 8, 2022

Today we had the culminating event for our cohort 1. We invited year ten students from CIS to come to Greentown and debate against these students we’ve been teaching for the past few weeks. It’s truly a pleasure to see how much this cohort has grown and how they utilized the knowledge they have learned to have debates on essential issues of the time against people who are almost double their age. The maturity, courage, and critical thinking they have demonstrated is genuinely admirable, and the enjoyment they all felt during the event fills our heart with warmth. Also huge thank you to the 30 students from our school who came to debate and supported this initiative. Their presence and insights have widened the perspectives of our young Greentown students. Finally, we are just super proud to put together this huge inter-school event involving more than 40 people. We truly hope that this is an excellent ending to our classes with cohort one and that it will inspire these young individuals to continue pursuing debate in the future!

- Tom Tang

March 30, 2022

In this week’s class, we hoped to organize a more official debate and take our students through the entire experience, from prepping to speaking and then feedback. In previous classes, we realized that students’ thoughts are often disorganized, and their points tend to be repetitive due to the lack of clear communication. Thus, we felt the need to introduce our students to the concept of a prep structure, from individual brainstorming to the sharing and ranking of argument points as a team. The outcome was just fabulous. Each group developed more insightful arguments thanks to the individual brainstorming sessions. Because of their effective communication beforehand, students didn’t repeat any already mentioned points and elaborated on arguments that weren’t touched upon. The structure of the debate was just so much more organized and higher-leveled.

Furthermore, we also used this lesson to introduce our students to the idea of rebuttals. We have seen them subtly do rebuttals in the previous debates already, so we felt like today was the right time to make it official so that they could incorporate rebuttals into the beginning of their speech in a more structured and deliberate manner. Our students embraced this new concept incredibly well and utilized this new knowledge immediately at the end of the class debate! Since we had a lot of content to go over today, we paid special attention to keeping our students engaged by asking them questions and just walking around the classroom to let them feel our physical proximity. This method worked like magic, and we realized that a zoning out student would “wake up” immediately when we walked behind them! We are super glad that we were able to learn from last time and make this class more engaging for our students!

- Tom Tang

March 23, 2022

After stalling our classes for over one week due to COVID restrictions, we were extremely excited to teach the Greentown students again. This week, we planned to pick up from the little debate we had last time and introduce our students to debate terms such as motion and reasoning to help them become more persuasive in our practice debates. Learning from last time, we made sure to divide the class into two groups and have two separate debates happening simultaneously so that each student receives more attention and opportunities to contribute. The actual class started quite smoothly, and our students were excited to be back. Thus, we decided to jump straight into the lecture part of the class. We focused greatly on using simple language, emphasizing the critical words, and making constant eye contact with students to encourage full engagement and comprehension. The nod and smile on our students’ faces confirmed the validity and effectiveness of the changes we made to our teaching style. In the second part of the class, we split into two groups in preparation for the end of the class debate. A major challenge we encountered in this phase was that the students who were not speaking got distracted easily. This is a problem that we would be trying to tackle next time through positive reinforcements and physical proximity next to the distracted students. Finally, we had quite an exciting seating set up so that two debates could go on simultaneously at the end of the lesson. However, there was a point when people spoke over each other, and it became messy quickly. We will separate the students into two rooms for the final debate next time to solve this problem. Overall, it’s so nice to see our students again and witness their passion for debate increase with each lesson. We’ll definitely reflect on today’s experience and strive to make next time an even better experience for our students!

- Tom Tang

March 9, 2022

Today was our second opportunity to deliver a debate lesson to Greentown students. In the morning, we spent some time brainstorming and writing up our lesson plan for the day. Thanks to our better understanding of our student's abilities and interests, this process went smoothly, and all was ready before lunch. While making our lesson plan, we tried to incorporate feedbacks we received from our last session, such as using simple language and designing activities that encourage physical interaction from the students. Similarly, in the actual delivery of our class, we paid great attention to making our physical presence felt, building rapport with our students,  and making our stature less intimidating. Our enthusiasm and devotion were well received, and from the beginning, the students were all excited to share their ideas and engage in discussions. We chose the Four Corners to be our ice-breaker game, which got the students to start talking and engaged their critical thinking skills by asking them to justify their stance. We were surprised by the amount of ideas students wanted to share, and this activity ended up going over time as we tried to call on every student who raised their hands. In the future, we should try to find the right balance between giving students the opportunities to share and moving the class forward. A significant milestone we achieved in this class was hosting our first unofficial in-class debate. To encourage students to speak, we decided to use cookies as a reward. However, we quickly realized that upon receiving the cookies, students got distracted they stopped listening to their opponent. In the future, if we still want to use treats as a motivational factor, we should give them at the end of class. Overall, today has been a fruitful session. We are excited to keep up the excellent work and learn alongside our Greentown students!

- Tom Tang

March 2, 2022

Today, our LINKS group planned out and taught our first debate lesson to the grade 4 students in Greentown primary school. At around 1 in the afternoon, we had the pleasure of watching their English class, which was used to help us assess the student's English and cognitive abilities. We were amazed by the level of English proficiency and thinking as well as enthusiasm demonstrated by the Greentown students, which gave us the confidence to smoothly deliver our own lesson as well. At the same time, we realized that a lot of the material that we previously prepared overlapped with what they are learning in English class, so we used the next one and a half hours after their English class to revise our lesson plan and slides. Overall, it was quite a productive session and we were able to get our slides ready just in time before class. Finally, in the final delivery of our class, we encountered some challenges at the beginning, where the students were rather reserved and not as enthusiastic. However, we quickly adapted to the situation by projecting our voice, kneeling down to be on the same level as the students, essentially making our physical presence felt by our students. This combined with our creative ice-breaker game allowed us to get closer to our students and break down the barrier that was between us in the beginning. Our most important takeaways are the importance of giving praise, positive reinforcement, starting with easy questions, and making our physical presence felt, especially since we are dealing with primary school students. In our next session, we are going to try to keep our language more grade-level, as the most important thing is for the kids to understand us. Overall, it has been a very fun and rewarding trip and we learned a lot. 

- Tom Tang

Hangzhou 8

June 10, 2021

The first ever bilingual debate competition was held today. It was a massive success, with students from both schools challenging themselves in their second languages to create and deliver compelling arguments. This was the culmination of months of hard work and preparation by James and Darin, and I couldn't be prouder. 

- Mr. Pollock

June 9, 2021

Today the students built upon their successful first lesson to prepare the students for the first ever CIS/Greentown Bilingual Debate! The topics were chosen very carefully to create a terrific buzz in the classroom.

- Mr. Pollock

May 19, 2021

Today was our first session and it was absolutely unforgettable. We began the class by going in a circle and having everyone introduce themselves to test out their english level and we were blown away. They were extremely enthusiastic and willing to speak, being quite fluent in english and sharing their hobbies with the class. We then moved into some of the content we prepared, pairing each student up with someone in another class to allow them the opportunity to work with someone new. We allowed them to discuss their opinions on the motion “should zoos be banned”, examining their critical and logical thinking and finding out that they were extremely bright. They were able to convey their thoughts without much difficulty and brought up some points that even we had not thought of. Afterwards, we taught them some key terms in debate, such as a motion, side proposition, impact statement and more, teaching them the structure of a debate speech. We did a few highlighting and writing exercises

- Darin Lee