Your ongoing training as a professional rescuer fits into the larger context of operational risk management. Your preparedness, skills, knowledge, and ability to communicate and lead form a crucial layer of protection for you and your colleagues, clients, and in certain cases the general public.
Your role requires you to learn not only how to use your equipment, but also how to execute all the components of rescue under pressure, including taking in the overall scene, making a plan for how to allocate resources, and considering how you will connect to outside help.
The material presented below is outside the scope of the PRO 2 and included for reference. There is no evaluation component on the course. AIARE recommends pursuing ongoing rescue training with your home organization and through formal coursework such as Professional Avalanche Search and Rescue.
As a professional avalanche worker, you will be exposed to avalanche hazard for greater periods of time than recreationalists. Estimates of worker exposure to uncontrolled avalanche terrain vary by job category. Mountain guides in North America spend around 80 days in uncontrolled avalanche terrain. Highway workers are estimated to spend about 43 days in uncontrolled avalanche terrain. Ski patrollers are estimated to spend 55 days in uncontrolled avalanche terrain. In fact, between 1950 and 2014, 59 avalanche workers in North America were killed in avalanches. That is very close to one avalanche worker being killed in an avalanche each year. In the United States during that time, about 60% of worker avalanche fatalities occurred working for ski areas (Greene et al., 2014). Regardless of your profession, as an avalanche worker you must check and maintain your avalanche rescue gear and regularly practice avalanche rescue skills to ensure preparedness.
Over the course of your career it is also likely that you will participate in avalanche rescues. Working with your clients, your coworkers, or the general public, it is possible that you will need to perform a rescue of them. Ask yourself, “Am I prepared if I was to be the only rescuer in an avalanche?”
When working with your clients, your coworkers, or the general public, it is possible that they will need to perform a rescue of you. Ask yourself, “Am I prepared if I was to be caught in an avalanche?”
Photo: Sean Zimmerman-Wall
Photo: Utah Department of Transportation
Gathering quality information is crucial in all avalanche rescue scenarios. Deploying resources to an incorrect or hazardous location can make matters worse. In cases where there is a witness, remember to interview and retain the witness for as long as is reasonable. Once the location and safe access to the site have been determined, possibly by scouting parties, be prepared to search for people who are not searchable with beacons. Avalanche dogs, Recco Rescue Systems, and probelines are tools to add to the standard beacon, shovel, and probe kit.
Scenarios not witnessed by an avalanche worker but witnessed by bystanders should be given the same search treatment that an unwitnessed avalanche would be given - The debris must be cleared by all methods possible so that no victim is left behind. There are numerous ways this can take place and it is beyond the scope of this module to cover them in detail.
When considering a rescue of an unwitnessed avalanche with a known location, the number of victims will be unknown. The ability to search for or detect victims will be uncertain. Given these factors, the rescuer will need to thoroughly and systematically search the debris with all methods available: visual, beacons, avalanche dogs, RECCO systems, and probelines.
The beacon search should be completed promptly ensuring all debris was adequately covered. Professional searchers should be skilled in multiple, close proximity beacon burial scenarios and be able to apply marking functions or alternative search strategies (3-Circle method, micro-strip, micro-box techniques) and be prepared for the possibility of a deep burial. Understanding how to employ an alternative search strategy if marking functions fail requires routine practice with your specific beacon to become efficient and accurate. Once it is determined that all missing beacon victims have been found, the rescue can be continued with everyone in Transmit/Send.
Due to the number of resources and people necessary for clearing the debris of an unknown number of victims, able-bodied victims, witnesses, and bystanders can become rescuers. Outside agencies and nearby ski areas can become rescuers. Incorporating the Incident Command System as the rescue complexity grows to appoint an Incident Commander may become necessary.
When people and resources are limited, rescue and medical triage must be considered to ensure their most efficient use. Deep burials may need to wait so that shallow victims can be rescued. Victims rescued possessing an open airway and air pocket should be treated as though they are viable long after those with clogged airways are not viable (see ICAR Avalanche Victim Resuscitation Checklist). Resources should be allocated to ensure the maximum number of victims are recovered alive.
The Incident Command System (ICS) is a standardized approach to incident management that is used for all kinds of incidents by all types of organizations and at all levels of government. ICS is applicable to small incidents as well as large and complex ones. ICS has been tested for more than 40 years of emergency and nonemergency applications by all levels of government; and in non-governmental and private–sector organizations. ICS helps to ensure:
The safety of responders, community members, and others.
The achievement of incident objectives.
The efficient use of resources.
When employing ICS during an avalanche rescue, the Incident Commander controls the site and access to the site to account for all rescuers arriving and departing. The site must be controlled to avoid scene contamination or removal of clues that can lead to further victims. Access to the site can be controlled by mandating that all entrants follow a specified arrival and departure route and that all check-in and out with the Incident Commander or designee. One method to keep track of individuals is to collect an ID or season pass from each rescuer upon check-in and to return the ID upon check out.
The Incident Commander should consider creating a diagram of the debris and locations of clues and victims to help better direct resources. Field books are great for drawing maps of the debris search area and victim locations. Complex scenes may benefit from technology platforms and GPS. Such note-keeping will become a part of the legal record so it should be kept neat and accurate.
Utilizing the ICS to its full potential requires study, certification, and practice in realistic scenarios. Employment at various organizations may be contingent on ICS, and Professional Avalanche Search and Rescue (Pro AVSAR) courses also require a base level certification. You can locate more info and sign up for online certification courses on FEMA’s ICS website.
The International Commission for Alpine Rescue has established protocols for using colored wands or flags for marking the locations of an avalanche site. These protocols were created to address efficient site layout, create a unified system that facilitates cooperation among organizations, and reduces the potential for misunderstandings between rescue personnel. The color and configuration are as follows.
Orange- Safe ingress/egress
Yellow- Perimeter
Red- Areas probed
Blue- Finds by rescuers (objects, tracks, dog indications) - Also known as "clues"
2 Crossed Wands, Flags, or Poles- Point last seen
3 Crossed Wands, Flags, or Poles- Actual location of the recovered subject(s)
Depending on the context and circumstances of the avalanche, this stage may be short or protracted. Operational procedures will dictate when a site can be called clear and how personnel and victims leave the scene. If multiple agencies are involved, this process will correspond with the order of operations contained in the ICS. There are instances where a site may not be cleared for days due to avalanche hazard reduction, personnel constraints, or inclement weather.
Once the path has been cleared, the rescue team should set aside time soon thereafter to perform an after-action review. Reflecting on what went well and what can be improved helps refine and improve future avalanche responses.
Formally documenting an avalanche fatality or significant event is supported by industry standards laid out in the Snow, Weather and Avalanches Observational Guidelines (SWAG) Appendix H. This convention requires a more detailed investigation and can happen in-house or with the aid of outside agencies. Avalanche Centers are resources that can provide additional support when appropriate. The ability for avalanche involvements to become part of the public record serves to benefit the greater community, but may not always occur due to legal implications or privacy concerns.
Addressing the emotional needs of rescuers, and victims, after an avalanche should be a priority once everyone is safe and the scene has been demobilized. Emerging organizations such as Responder Alliance provide resources and training to help rescuers cope with the traumatic effects of first response. The development of the Avalanche Near Miss Database is yet another tool professionals can use to submit a personal involvement in an avalanche while remaining anonymous. The changing culture of the avalanche industry supports the continued creation and utilization of new tools based on research and community engagement. If you do this job long enough, you will see the ugly side of being an avalanche professional. Have a plan to address the issues that will surely follow and become an advocate for yourself and your colleagues.