Avalanche Closure sign from a ski area. Photo: Sean Zimmerman-Wall
Webcam Image of Avalanche Crossing Hwy 210 in UT. Adapted from Utah Department of Transportation. Retrieved 20210217 from https://udottraffic.utah.gov/CLALertViewer.aspx?CLType=3
North American Public Avalanche Danger Scale 2022. Retrieved 20221003 from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NationalAvalancheCenter/north-american-public-avalanche-danger-scale/main/1.%20Standard%20Danger%20Scale/For%20web/North%20American%20Public%20Avalanche%20Danger%20Scale.jpg
The tools an organization uses to communicate risk will vary by locale and may be mandated by governments or public safety offices. Leaders in the avalanche industry have been instrumental in the development process, which takes into account What, Where, How, When, and Why. The North American Pubilc Avalanche Danger Scale represents decades of refinement by researchers and practitioners across the continent. It takes into account a mobile element at risk that is quite vulnerable to the hazard and includes travel advice. An example from two distinctly different operations with mobile elements at risk, but with different vulnerabilities would be:
What- Avalanche Closure Sign
Where- Placed along a rope line within a ski area or at the permit boundary**
How- A physical gate with a sign indicating "Open" or "Closed"
When- Used to open or close segments of the resort based on the patrol's mitigation efforts
Why- To communicate to guests that the terrain beyond the gate is hazardous and/or unmitigated
What- Avalanche Area- No Stopping or Parking*
Where- Placed at pre-determined mile markers on either side of a known avalanche path**
How- Bright colors with distinct verbiage indicating restrictions
When- Stationary and utilized whenever there is snow on the ground. The sign may indicate a date range, e.g. Nov. 1- May 1.
Why- To communicate to motorists and other users that the highway can be impacted by avalanches
*Sign may be accompanied by a physical gate
**Sign and/or gate will be placed beyond the maximum known extent to provide a margin of physical distance to the hazard
In the modern era where communication can be pushed out through multiple channels to reach the target audience, operations may employ a coordinated campaign of social media, traditional television and radio broadcasts, websites, and overt signage.
Operational Risk Band. Adapted from The Avalanche Handbook. By McClung, D., & Schaerer, P.A. (2006). Seattle: Mountaineer Books. Annotated by AIARE.
Dealing with natural hazards requires accepting some risk. An operation will do everything possible to mitigate against high-frequency events and will strive to maximize operational gains. Depending on the context, restrictions may be mandated through zoning (occupied structures) (TASARM 2016).
The diagram shows operational gains maximized near the top of the risk band. In practical terms, this means accepting some risk. On the highway, this manifests as forecasters and work crews tolerating many small (D1) avalanches to the open road, and possibly an occasional D2, depending on the operation. In a ski resort, this would likely mean tolerating D1 sluffs or tiny (D 0.5) wind or storm slabs in steep terrain.