Embedded Files
Anthropometric Dimensions of Nasopalatine Canal measured by Cone Beam Computed Tomography among Kurdish population
Dler Abdulrahman Mohammed
College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10063
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find anatomical variation of nasopalatine foramen (NPF) and nasopalatine canal (NPC) in different age and gender groups among Kurdish people on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. This research included one hundred CBCT images obtained from patients visiting privet clinics with a specialty in dental and maxillofacial radiology in Sulaimani, Hawler, and Dhok governorates within a period between 2014 to 2016. Subjects were divided into three age groups (18-34, 35-49, 50-75) years old. The first group were included 15 males and 15 females, the second group 20 males and 20 females, and the third group included 15 males with 15 females. PaX i vatech digital CBCT machine was used to obtain the images by radiographers. The following measurements were estimated; number of openings of NPC at nasal fossa, mesio-lateral diameter of NPF at nasal fossa (axial section), mesio-lateral diameter of NPF at palatine fossa, anteroposterior dimension of NPC at: its upper border; middle level, and lower border, and lastly the height of NPC in sagittal section. 100 subjects (50 males and 50 females) with age range 31 years were included in this study. 69% had single NPF at the nasal fossa. 23% had two openings, and 8% had three openings. Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the mesio-lateral diameter of NPF at nasal fossa, and palatine fossa were 2.60±0.69mm, and 4.11±2.09mm respectively. NPF diameter at the palatine fossa showed significant differences between genders (P < 0.05). But age group differences did not reach the significant level (P > 0.05). The means and SD of the anteroposterior dimension of NPC were 3.46±1.53mm. There were no significant differences between genders and among age groups concerning this dimension (P > 0.05). Mean and SD of the height of NPC was 13.14±3.11mm. Males demonstrated the significantly greater length of NPC than females (P < 0.05). It is concluded that there is variation in the anatomy and morphology regarding various parameters of NPC among Kurdish population. This should be considered in mind in preoperative planning to reduce the number of complications in implant and other maxillofacial surgeries in the anterior palatine area. Also, it’s obvious that CBCT has an important role in obtaining accurate measurements of NPC different dimensions which have importance to differentiate between normal and abnormal NPC and NPF.
Keywords: Nasopalatine foramen, CBCT, dental implant, maxillofacial surgeries.
References:
1. Mardinger O, Namani-Sadan N, Chaushu G, Schwartz- Arad D. Morphologic changes of the nasopalatine canal related to dental implantation. A radiologic study in different degrees of absorbed maxillae. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1659–62.
2. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Principles and Interpretation. 6th ed. St Louis: Mosby Co. Oral Radiology. 2009; 152–8.
3. Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, Hu Y, Adriaensens P, Quirynen M, et al. Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal. J ClinPeriodontol. 2009;36:598–603.
4. Kraut RA, Boyden DK. Location of incisive canal in computedtomography machine for dental use with multi detector row helicalCT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod. 2003;95:371377. Dent.1998;7:221–225
5. Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Bitlitum I, Segal P. Displacement of the incisive foramen in conjunction with implant placement in the anterior maxilla without jeopardizing vitality of nasopalatine nerve and vessels: a novel surgical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:505–510.
6. Suma Jacob, PhD; BethanneZelano, BA; Anil Gungor, MD; David Abbott, MD; Robert Naclerio, MD; Martha K. McClintock, PhD. Location and Gross Morphology of the Nasopalatine Duct in Human Adults. ArchOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(6):741-748.
7. Bornstein MM, Balsiger R, Sendi P, vonArx T. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: A radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:295–301.
8. P. A. Monsour and R. Dudhia. Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Den J. 2008;53(1): 11–25.
9. R. Jacobs, N. Mraiwa, D. van Steenberghe, G. Sanderink, and M. Quirynen. Appearance of the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs, Surg Radiol Anat.
10. O. Mardinger, G. Chaushu, B. Arensburg, S. Taicher, and I. Kaffe. Anatomic and radiologic course of the mandibular incisive canal. Surg Radiol Anat. 2000; 22(34):157–161.
2004;26(4) :329–333.
11. Ricardo Raitz, Elisabeth Shimura, Israel Chilvarquer, and Marlene Fenyo-Pereira. Assessment of the Mandibular Incisive Canal by Panoramic Radiograph and Cone-Beam
ComputedTomography.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/18708
5,6 pages.
12. Shear M, Speight P. Cysts of the oral and maxillofacial regions. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell. 2007. pages. 108–118.
13. Bodin I, Isacsson G, Julin P. Cysts of the nasopalatine duct. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:696–706.
14. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracyof linear measurements obtained by cone beam computedtomography(CBCT-NewTom).
DentomaxillofacRadiol. 2004;33:191–194.
15. Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S,Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam
16. SamanRokhRezaian. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal with cone-beam computed tomography in an Iranian population. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015; 12(1): 14–19.
17. Song WC, Jo DI, Lee JY, Kim JN, Hur MS, Hu KS, et al. Microanatomy of the incisive canal using three- dimensional reconstruction of microCT images: an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod. 2009;108:583–590.
18. Jacob S, Zelano B, Gungor A, Abbott D, Naclerio R, McClintock MK. Location and gross morphology of the nasopalatine duct in human adults. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:741–748.
19. ArpitaRai Thakur, Krishna Burde, Kruthika Guttal, and Venkatesh G Naikmasur. Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent.2013;43(4):273–281.
20. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Sanderink G, Schutyser F, Suetens P, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. DentomaxillofacRadiol. 2004;33:396–402.
© The Authors, published by University of Sulaimani, College of Dentistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page updated
Report abuse