https://umich.zoom.us/j/96613548814
Meeting ID: 966 1354 8814
Passcode: 091285
Click thumbnail to access recording
2nd Wednesday of every month
2026 Dates
May 13 noon
June 10 6PM
July 8 noon
August 12 6PM
September 9 noon
October 14 6PM
November 11 noon
December 9 6PM
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis Ch. 10: Scoping Reviews - Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2024. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01
PRISMA 2020 - PRISMA and its extensions are reporting guidelines. Use PRISMA in combination with methodology guidelines for your review type. Cite both guidelines in your manuscript
Responsible use of AI in Evidence Synthesis (RAISE 2026)
"Search 101 - SR Database Cheat Sheet." 2020 by Taubman Health Sciences Library is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Last updated: January 2026
COVIDENCE @ UM - Covidence streamlines evidence synthesis with a gold standard process for creating high-quality systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.
Monica Lypson (mll2215@cumc.columbia.edu)
Key Leadership Resources
Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership 8th Edition by Lee G. Bolman (Author), Terrence E. Deal (Author)
Reframing Organizations provides time-tested guidance for more effective organizational leadership. Rooted in decades of social science research across multiple disciplines, Bolman and Deal's four-frame model has continued to evolve since its conception over 25 years ago; this new sixth edition has been updated to include coverage of cross-sector collaboration, generational differences, virtual environments, globalization, sustainability, and communication across cultures.
Harvard Business Review 10 Must Reads on Emotional Intelligence (with Featured Article What Makes a Leader? by Daniel Goleman) Amazon Link to Paperback – May 5, 2015
Leadership Feedback Tools
The VIA Character Strengths Survey (Free)
The only free, scientific survey of character strengths in the world. Take this simple, 10 minute character test and discover your greatest strengths.
Multi-Rater 360 Review Template (Free Microsoft Template from Strawbridge CFO Consulting Group)
The purpose of a 360 review is to provide comprehensive feedback from multiple perspectives to enhance self-awareness, personal development, and performance within an organization
Qualtrics 360 Feedback (if you have access to Qualtrics)
Strengths Finder 2.0 (for purchase)
Completing the online talent assessment (StrengthsFinder®) is your way to:
discover what you naturally do best
learn how to develop your greatest talents into strengths
use your personalized results and reports to maximize your potential
(SME: Deb Rooney dmrooney@med.umich.edu)
Miller’s Pyramid of Skill Development. Witheridge A, Ferns G, Scott-Smith W. Revisiting Miller's pyramid in medical education: the gap between traditional assessment and diagnostic reasoning. Int J Med Educ. 2019 Oct 25;10:191-192. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5d9b.0c37. PMID: 31655795; PMCID: PMC7246123. [NOTE: Can find many resources via a search on-line, Pubmed link]
Bloom’s taxonomy (to support learning objective writing):
Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Book
A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001. Book)
Kirkpatrick’s Four levels of Training Evaluation. Kirkpatrick JD & Kirkpatrick WK. (2016) (Available through UM Library – log in using UM uniquename and password)
Assessment in Health Professions Education (2nd ed.).Yudkowsky, R., Park, Y. S., & Downing, S. M. (Eds.). (2019).Routledge. (Available through UM Library – log in using UM uniquename and password)
Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. . 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016 (Available through UM Library – log in using UM uniquename and password)
Kirkpatrick’s Four levels of Training Evaluation. Kirkpatrick JD & Kirkpatrick WK. (2016) (Available through UM Library – log in using UM uniquename and password)
Evaluation: A practical Guide for Medical Educators (presentation by Deb Rooney)
The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (Standards) is a joint product of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), the American Psychological Association (APA), and the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). PDF free here
What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment. Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R, Brydges R. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 May;19(2):233-50. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9458-4. Epub 2013 May 2. PMID: 23636643. [NOTE: Based on Messick, Standards, Pubmed link]
Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality. Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R. Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):872-83. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdcf. PMID: 23619073. [NOTE: Based on Messick, Standards, Pubmed link]
A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework. Cook DA, Brydges R, Ginsburg S, Hatala R. Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):560-75. doi: 10.1111/medu.12678. PMID: 25989405. [Based on Kane, Pubmed link]
No audio recording for the above session available
Access the audio recording to follow along in the slide deck.