Embedded Files
General Assessment Criteria
General Assessment Criteria
Sets Clear Goals- objectives are defined clearly, realistic, & achievable, material is important
Demonstrates Adequate Preparation – understanding of existing scholarship in the field of leadership theory
Applies Appropriate Methods– educational methods fit goals and are used effectively; methods are modified as necessary to accommodate situational changes
Effective Presentation– appropriate style and methods are used to communicate results
Educational Scholarship - General
Educational Scholarship - General
Medical Education Scholarship Outlets - from AAMC Regional Group on Educational Affairs. An Annotated bibliography of journals for educational Scholarship
Enduring Educational Materials Are REAL Scholarship
ABCDE's of Medical Education - slide presentation by John Burkhardt
Scholarship, research and conceptual frameworks - slide presentation by Hilary Haftel
Pursuing Scholarship Handout - a two page handout summarizing how to get started, potential barriers, finding funding and publishing scholarship
Thoughts on scholarship by John Burkhardt and Larry Gruppen - Summary of monthly call-in discussion on scholarship on October 7, 2015.
Copyright and educational resources slide presentation by Ana Enriquez, January 19, 2017 MHPE Winter retreat
Web Based Resources
The Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) Collaboration (Harden et al., 1999) is an international group of individuals, universities and professional organizations committed to the development of evidence informed education in the medical and health professionsWebinar - Educational Scholarship
Webinar - Educational Scholarship
Deputy Editor for the Journal of Graduate Medical Education and a recent member of the board for the Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers, the Psychiatry Residency Review Committee and the ACGME Task Force on Physician Well-Being.
Objectives
Objectives
Define scholarship and distinguish it from scholarly
Evaluation as a form of scholarship
Outline the typical peer review process for a medical education journal
Have some fun!
Questions
Questions
What is scholarship?
How does it differ from scholarly
What distinguish evaluation scholarship vs scholarly?
Can Educational Innovation be scholarship?
Where does dissemination/publication fit in?
What happens once you hit “submit”’ in most medical education journals?
What are upcoming opportunities for quick scholarship?
Background Reading
Background Reading
A Standards-Based Checklist for Program Evaluation as a Scholarly Activity. Balmer DF et al. JGME 2022 (early to press)
Innovation—Defining Key Features for Medical Education Manuscripts. Baker A, et al. J Grad Med Educ 1 April 2022; 14 (2): 133–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00071.1
Recording Coming Soon!
Resources mentioned in discussion
Tweetorials for Medical Educators. Brau AC, et al. J Grad Med Educ (2021) 13 (5): 723–725
Getting Started in Medical Education Research
Getting Started in Medical Education Research
Getting started in medical education scholarship. Cook DA. Keio J Med 2010;59(3):96-103.
What's next? A guiding question for educators engaged in educational research. Eva KW, Lingard L. Med Educ 2008;42:752-754. DOI: 10.111/j.1365-2923.2008.03135.x
Twelve tips for undertaking a focused systematic review in medical education. Gordon M, Grafton-Clarke C, et al. Med Teach 2018. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1513642
Books
Underlined book titles contain links to the electronic version of the book via Taubman Health Sciences Library. You may be asked to enter your unique name and kerberos password to access the book.Reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In How to Report Statistics in Medicine. Lang TA, Seic M. . Philadelphia: American College of Physicians. 2006.
Summing-Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Light R, Pillmer D. Harvard University Press, 1984.
Reviewer Perspective
Reviewer Perspective
Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Bordage G. Acad Med 2001;76(9):889-896.
Review criteria for research manuscripts 2nd edition. Durning SJ, Carline JD. AAMC 2015.
The reviewer is always right: peer review of research in medical education. Eva KW. Med Educ 2009;43:2-4.
The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. Polak JF. AJR 1005;165:685-88.
Literature Search
Literature Search
Informationist, Research & Informatics
Taubman Health Sciences Library
Session Notes
Session Notes
Comprehensive vs not comprehensive searches - vary in rigor and effort.
3 steps: identify search terms, define relationships between terms, qualifying the search with database features and filters.
Search terms: what are key concepts (terms). Consider variations in wording, synonyms.
Define relationships among terms - boolean operators (AND, OR), syntax (detailed and precise grammar for searching - specific to database. Quotations force search for specific spelling - “problem-solving” or “problem solving” or “problemsolving” - all different results
Qualify terms (varies with database) - Includes fields (title, author, abstract, MeSH terms). Controlled vocabulary - MeSH, for example. MeSH is powerful but can become complex.
PubMed is not the only (or even best) database for health professions education questions. However, medical or educational jargon may require translating for different databases that focus on different disciplines and fields
UM informationists are available to help you in your searching dilemmas! Dawn can help connect you.
A Guide to Database Searching is available through the Taubman Health Sciences Library (you will need to log in using your umich unique name and password)
Practical Tips for Submitting Articles
Facilitator: Larry GruppenPractical Tips for Submitting Articles
Practical tips for raising the chances that an article submitted for publication will be accepted. The discussion compares the principles of grant writing and article writing.
Practical Tips for Submitting articles for publication [mp4]
SQUIRE Guidelines [pdf] [website link]
The SQUIRE guidelines provide a framework for reporting new knowledge about how to improve healthcare.Checklist of Review Criteria [pdf]. Academic Medicine 2001. Vol 76 (9); 958-959
Page updated
Report abuse