The horizontal line identifies how well teachers are able to implement caring and learning relationships (whanaungatanga) (Low at left and high at right.)
The vertical line identifies how well teachers can make use of effective pedagogies, that are known to make a difference for student learning. (Low at bottom and high at top.)
In his 2019 book, Teaching to the North-East: Relationship-based learning in practice, Russell Bishop identified how Māori and other marginalised students—such as the children of migrant, refugee, and faith-based groups and neuro- and gender-diverse children—can benefit from a North-East relationship-based pedagogy.
Bishop describes a scatterplot representation of positions teachers can take in two main areas.
Relationships.
Teaching skills.
"It is the positive interaction between these two variables that creates the conditions within which Māori students are able to become successful learners" (Bishop 2023:p7)
These teachers are located in the North-East of the scatterplot; they score high in both successful relationships and employ effective pedagogies.
As per the image above, in his work on the Te Kotahitanga project, many teachers were located in the South- East; that is they were able to have successful relationships with students but not implement effective teaching pedagogy with fidelity.
Bishop makes this point - it is not a dichotomy - we need both high levels of observable caring and learning relationships (whanaungatanga) AND high levels of effective pedagogies (effective teaching practices).
Now in Leading to the North-East (2023), he demonstrates how North-East leaders ensure teachers are able to implement and sustain the North-East relationship-based pedagogy with fidelity by- :
- setting goals for equity, excellence, and cultural sustainability
- implementing a pedagogic approach that ensures these goals are realised
- implementing in-school support systems that ensures the pedagogy is implemented with fidelity over time—these systems include infrastructure, leadership, inclusion, and evidence
- taking ownership of the approach by planning, resourcing, and reviewing teaching and school-wide leadership practices to ensure support systems work as intended, over time
The book includes three case studies that demonstrate how this process of reform was able to successfully raise Māori student achievements to match that of their non-Māori peers, enable Māori students to do so “as Māori”, and benefit other marginalised students.
"The impact of this persistent pattern of the variable implementation of literacy teaching means that going to school for a Māori child is actually a lottery"
Russell Bishop (2024)
https://wheelofnames.com/
Bishop (2023) identifies some key areas to ensure embedded effective pedagogy:
ensuring formative assessment is part of explicit teaching delivery (Explicit instruction does have more likelihood due to much more student responses able to be used for feedback loops, in fact explicit teaching methods are designed with assessment built in)
providing on-going PLD support for teachers to implement with fidelity (more likely now the MOE is providing training but crucial that resourcing is given to this by schools)
moving beyond the teaching of the mechanics of literacy practices to the use of these for learning (this is more likely if students are able to be fluent in the mechanics first and teachers teach right across the reading and writing ropes)
Implementation fidelity is likened by Bishop to the Māori concept of tikanga. Tika being the right or correct way to do something.
What might this look like in practice?
All staff are involved in the discussions and problem solving about impact of teaching practice on student performance.
Whole staff discussions about expectations of what a year's growth for a year's input looks like (and what accelerated progress looks like).
"Learning is not something caught in a conducive environment, it is taught in a culturally responsive context." (Bishop 2023:11)
"Relationships" and "interactions" are defined as meaning the relational rights and responsibilities one would find in an extended family (whānau). (Bishop 2023:7)
These look like:
rejecting deficit explanations for Māori student educational performance
demonstrating high expectations for learning
improving Māori students feelings of self-worth and identity
knowing what students need to learn and how best to ensure this happens
Interactions - ones shown to make the most difference for learners:
build on student prior knowledge
using formative assessment feedback and feed forward (to monitor progress)
co-constructing processes (cooperative learning)
power-sharing strategies
Interactions (as above)
respecting and valuing Māori culture - valuing and drawing on the prior knowledge and cultural capital of Māori children and young people
incorporating bi-cultural dimensions within their teaching practice
increased risk-taking and experimentation in class with new pedagogies
Creating a family-like context for learning and a well-managed learning environment
Teachers holding and voicing high expectations for all their students
Student knowing what they need to know and learn
Ensuring that all new learning draws on prior knowledge and learning
Embedding Assessment for learning across all lessons so that students know where they are at in their learning, what is working well and where they need to go next
teachers collectively analysing Māori student achievement data with others and using such data to plan teaching interventions
co-construction or power-sharing strategies with students, whereby students voiced their own ideas and made decisions in the classroom
Co-operative learning activities and those that focus on focus on peer tutoring, group work
Utilising student-generated questions as a powerful means for deepening and extending the learning
Utilising a narrative curriculum (using stories as a way for students to make sense of the world and to prompt new learning)
Tātai Aho Rau (CORE education) model of Structured Literacy
Tātai Aho Rau outlines the key areas of Pedagogical Content knowledge and Practice crucial for effective teaching.
Read about how the Better Start Literacy approach (BSLA) https://betterstartapproach.com/ used He awa Whiria to inform its design.
“Ignite-Chunk-Chew-Review,”
Zaretta Hammond:
Neural pathways are built during application. We have 24-48 hours to revisit, review, and apply.
Macro level instructional strategies:
Ignite - Get the brain's attention
Chunk - Make information digestible
Chew - Actively process new information
Review - Apply new learning
Other Science of Learning strategies can be found on the Cluster 28 RTLB Literacy website on this page here:
https://sites.google.com/wellingtonrtlb.school.nz/rtlbliteracyproject/science-of-learning