Throughout a whole world’s history, among the most crucial pivot point for millenniums in a world was topic about countries, and r a c e s. And in a world r a c e s, and e t h n ic s, and countries, proved to be a driving force of masses which is kept people together, especially long time ago in old ages. And r a c e talk can be used to humiliate certain people too, to make such feel bad, and thus to demoralize an enemy. Like you can see, r a ci s m are been, and even today being, crucial topic, especially on a global scale in a world of politic, in certain countries and areas, historically, and in everyday lives too. I to bring all intel about r a ci s m which are exist, I mean which I myself actually know. It is actually divided into few groups:
One is a certain stereotypes, like a general popular opinion about certain e t h n ic s.
Another is a country like propaganda, which is usually a deformed intel to smear and offend a certain e t h n ic, with intention to mold it into profitable tool for country's tyranny regime.
Another type of r a ci s m is a famous Hhitler's g e e r m a n y r a ci s m of a world war 2 times, which is have narrowed down the bad people just to a few e t h n ic s among a whole world of thousands of e t h n ic s.
And another is a real facts of an ancestral true connections between much people of a world. Based on an ancestry which is strictly on their e t h n ic s and blood ancestry. And like a best true ancestry test are a facetypes. Good like examples of it are parents. And a kid are a combination of their ancestry thus it is got a facetype which is look like parents too like. And a facetypes the most obvious and easy proof of a true ancestry.
The stuff like r a c e s and an e t h n ic s are very extensive topics, and exist much of theories of all kinds about it. Among such is a theory of certain evolution process. And it is seems being the most logically coherent and scientifically correct, opinion which anyone can do in relation to e t h n ic s ever. It is actually being used in one way or another all the time in all disputes about either certain e t h n ic s being good like or bad like, but just it's can be done without going deep into it. The Darwin's evolution theory, and evolution theory overall, involves examination of living forms, among which certain species being akin to others. And certain species obviously inferior, and other certain species superior, in certain aspects. And it is definitely a fact about a living creatures. With it evolution theory claim like certain huge evolution process have happened, and it's influenced totally every living creature. And while thus, the evolution theory itself are just a theory, about a progress of life forms by certain types of evolution and transformation processes of species throughout huge scope of time. Which is frequently being accepted as a legit science hypothesis of all living forms. About people it is say like, blacks being black because Africa's people was exposed to prolonged hot sun due to their land locations. And whites being white due to north with cold white snow, which was predominant location for many years of n o r d s people. And stuff alike it. At first sight it does seems like it is logically fitting just right, and making sense. If you to go further in such direction you can assume anything which is look true enough. Thus it is being said m o n g o l oi d s got slim eyes due to an eye damaging sand, which was flying into eyes of m o o n g o l s and c h in e s e people for millenniums, or even for millions of years in their sandy steppes. And of a r r a b s and j e e w s hook nose form are anyone's guess.
If you to watch more closely on evolution notion, then you to see exist such a thing about it as devolution. The fact which much of evolution proponents do not mention much in right ways. And it's the fact which is can either back up as a good like evidence for evolution, or either to contradict it and to dispute a whole global evolution theory. Evolution like process are seems can work as a devolution too, and wolfs can be an example of it. The wolfs seems got devolution by physical strength, agility and toughness of a body, and got into weaker dogs. Then same thing could have happened to panthers and tigers, which have devolved into cats. Strong boars could turn into weak pigs. And more in such manner. It is can exhibit evolution can go in two different directions such as progress and regress, in kind of a toughness, agility, and strength of a body. I myself same as anyone else, never have seen evolution, neither devolution, of any kind of living being in action in real life. And I do not much care about it anyway really. But it is obvious the theory about global and big evolution are got much of flaws and contradictions, and just look isn't true.
The main and obvious argument to dispute the evolution theory are such as: Who ever was the very first living form? And whoever it was, it is completely impossible by applying evolution theory, just the very existence of such. Existence of the very first creature of life, which is got out of emptiness and nothingness. It is just blatantly impossible by applying evolution theory.
I myself as a kid have heard a riddle, which is by popular opinion being called as an impossible riddle for all humanity. It is say:
"Who was the first, chicken or egg?"
And about it, I even as a kid obviously could say:
"Considering what I've heard and seen at the time, it is obviously look like a certain mix of a different animals which is non chickens, have created a first chickens and cocks from an eggs. Thus the first was an egg from a different animals which are intermixed and have done an egg and out of which appeared chicken."
It is seems as a correct assumption to me even now, when I all got old. And then like you add evolution, and devolution theories. And its main core of moving force which are changes through certain evolution transformation of living forms. And it is compliment it, and making it even better. The theory of a different animals non chickens, which is through certain intermixing, and/or evolution transformation processes have resulted in a creation of first chicken from an egg. And it is look true enough really. And to assume it do not look impossible. And even if a damn aliens have created the first chicken, it is all the way got to be from an egg. An egg are obviously was way before chicken in whatever scenario really. And a chicken and an egg are actually answerable riddle. While existence out of nowhere, of the very first of all, a living form creature, nevertheless look totally impossible, by applying evolution theory.
And then like additional arguments to dispute evolution theory are such as:
How it is ever happened such a random scope of living forms, all out of a same living organisms, and out of a same conditions to evolve?
Why not all monkeys got humans?
Why just a certain type of animals getting randomly evolved, or devolved, while others stay always the same?
If evolution really do exist, why ever devolution exist? And isn't devolution just totally refute evolution theory?
And additionally to it, can exist even more of certain arguments which could dispute evolution theory.
Thus it is seems to me like a global big scale evolution for all creatures which have happened to great extend, are not true, but a wrongly took assumption theory. Which is comes from a seemingly credible base of a noted example of a small evolution or devolution processes. Backed by obvious seed out of seed ideology, of an obvious relations and kinship and similarity between living forms. And it is all been stretched too much into impossible, into a wrong theory of a massive global evolution, which is claims to have influence on completely every living being. I do not mean it is necessary a lie, but it is sure does look to me as a lie.
Now back to r a c e s and to r a ci s m. The fact like certain living species are being inferior or superior to certain other living species, and it's definitely a fact. Thus it is making ideas, and concepts about people and e t h n ic s to go free, and to fantasies without boundaries about who and how could be superior or inferior. Who and how could evolve and devolve, and in what aspects. And who can be just an underdeveloped human s p e e c ie s. And about exactly what event, of what year, have molded a whole e t h n ic of people into certain character for millenniums, either it good like, or bad like. Or just to bring an event which is being an example of manifest, of good like or bad like inner character features of certain e t h n ic, which is either was acquired through a passed time, or which exist all by itself as original thing which is being by default attributed to e t h n ic s. And exist very much of events of any kinds. And you may talk whatever about it and never be wrong, since people have experienced and good like and bad like throughout millenniums of history. And you can pick whatever event out of it which you like, or just whatever you may see fit to mention for whatever purpose, and to bring it into talk as a huge winning argument, and thus to bring an end to a noisy and hot dispute about e t h n ic s once and for all. Thus the topic is free for all to talk whatever. While the truth is this...
Afterword.
The stuff I have said in current article, is like the most scientific, morally good like and coherent opinion about r a c e s which I myself actually know. While in reality r a c is m can be motivated just by selfishness, flock mentality, stupidity, and other ugly stuff alike it. I myself just with all those global news, historical global significance of r a c is m, and by r a c is t talk which I have seen about my e t h n ic s few times, and because of all of it, I got really deep into such topic and by now I've said all I knew about it. I myself in my life all the way before I got 17 years old, never knew r a ci s m exist at all. And r a ci s m just look obviously isn't true, since all people are different. It is possible r a ci s m was an ancient primitive stuff, and in really ancient times, it was one of many attributes of ancient people, same as stick fights, ape brutal disputes and screams, and stuff alike. While later once people got more civilized and in medieval times, and further on all the way to contemporary times, r a ci s m was used by politicians as yet another leverage on stupid crowds of people to control stupid crowds of people. And yet can be certain r a c e talk is good like and bring people together too like. I do not know it really. And then like it's just stupid to ignore the stuff which is exist. Thus just need to know it's exist really.