I've read classical literature time ago, and certain stuff of it are actually was clever and cultured and good like. And certain stuff was actually incorrect, misleading and wrong.
The road and cause for me time ago using my time to actually read certain classical literature and philosophy, was such as, my dad stupid and he was reading bad literature and he was saying bad philosophy, which I was not liking. And I was depressed as a teen, and reading books actually was not bad for me back then like. I have read a lot of Russian literature. Greek literature. English literature. And more. Among good like literature I've read which I consider good like to mention and good like to read, was literature of Plato. Literature about Sherlock Holmes with his clever deductive method. Literature of O Henry with his fun and twisting plot and endings, and with heroes fraudulent scoundrels with mean hustle of street life and with it clever enough to know cultured intellectual crafty long words. And more. Thus I've read a lot of literature, and it was all like in my teen years. And just thus I by now know, actually exist certain books which are indeed may be clever. But good like clever books are just certain books actually. Since certain other books seems just totally unneeded waste of time, which are boring, and which are even may have inaccuracy and untrue intel too.
I do consider reading of certain good like classical literature, are to make you clever at least slightly, and to extend your vocabulary and you be able to talk in extensive ways, and you be able to watch and analyze stuff by deep insight, by numerous angles, in much words and ways, and it's just can have certain useful intel too. While certain pretentious freaks say classical literature are stupid. They say they being those which are clever, since they read just a science books of certain formulas and numbers and stuff, and not classical literature. And by listing formulas and certain numbers, they say they being very clever very much, while classical literature being stupid. And it's the stuff about which I myself do not agreed really. Of science formulas and certain numbers, mean nothing at all by itself. And to memorize it are actually a waste of time and useless. Since it's explain nothing and mean nothing. I mean formulas and numbers explaining nothing at all and totally useless, without trying to apply it in certain scientific experiment and actually to be successful about it. And if you are not doing scientific experiments and does not have breakthrough about it, those formulas and numbers are totally useless. Thus it's just a memorized stuff which totally useless, and it's a waste of time to memorize those numbers and formulas. And those stupid individuals which are actually have memorized those useless numbers and formulas, claim they being very clever and like the only clever books readers at all. And just the point is, science books about formulas and numbers are very stupid and a total waste of time, unless you being an actual scientist and work in science and try to apply science formulas and numbers you have learned and memorized in actual science experiment work. And if you does not work in science facility, science books are seems useless.
Although classical literature indeed can be incorrect and wrong in certain instances, but it do can have clever or good like intel too really. And it can make you more clever by expanding your vocabulary, and by making you watch and analyze stuff by deep insight, by numerous angles, in extensive words and ways, and you actually can get certain useful intel too like.
Among a lot of books I've read, among tons and tons of books which exist, I myself like just few authors and books, while I actually able to appreciate and note certain good like qualities of certain additional authors too really, without necessary liking their individualities and/or works. Later I plan to get physical hard cover of certain specific book I like, and to read it scrupulously, under candle light, in cozy room, to study it, and stuff really. And this book to be Plato. Complete Edition. The book of Plato is seems among most deepest and true books I've read. Occasionally, it required certain time for me to grasp the essence of Plato's discussion and arguments, since it intricate and subtle and deep and stuff, and once I got it all, I got blown about how clever and true it's seems for me. And Plato being among the very first authors ever at all, which have lived in little society of few people which despite tremendous handicap by technology, development, etc, and which yet culturally seems was different from any other later societies. And it's seems really extraordinary for me, the live of society and people in which are lived Plato, and Plato himself, among the first authors of all, which is happened to be among the best too really. Billions and billions have lived after him, throughout thousands years, and despite their huge society advantages in technology, development, population size, and more, and yet their culture levels and philosophical thought was obviously primitive and stupid and often was targeting stupid masses by blatant heresy and lies, to further their political and monetary gains etc. And of among the very first human societies philosopher Plato was different than philosophers of future human societies, even after throughout thousands years. My mind blown.
About other books and authors, usually I ain't had need to read it scrupulously and I was able to grasp essence of themes and talk fast and easily all the time like. Certain authors I like, or just I able to appreciate their literal merit and value and abilities which they have as writers. And about such I to say few words. And I to say few words about authors which I dislike too really.
Anton Chekhov sucks. Despite much praise and acclaim which he received, he actually sucks. Few Checkhov's plays was not the worst. I ain't like Checkhov.
Leo Tolstoy in Russia language actually mean Fat Lion. He was certain rich nobleman with big wealth landowner. His name fit and to his titles, and to his life style, and to his literature style and capabilities. While Tolstoy despite his monetary richess, seems wasn't been arrogant or nasty, nonetheless, I ain't like Tolstoy as a human. Neither I like Tolstoy as philosopher. But I do able to notice and to appreciate Tolstoy's vast magnitude of literal capabilities at writing really. In such aspect, Tolstoy seems being opposite of Hemingway (read further below more intel about it).
Feydor Dostoevsky I like. Dostoevsky, despite certain solemn, grave, depressive fame he seems have, and yet Dostoevsky actually seems was of tender nature gentleman of Russia intelligentsia, with sharp sense of humor, with not the worst logical insight. Dostoevsky seems was good like writer.
Exist Soviet authors, which I ain't have read much. Soviet government seems was totally oppressing any philosophical thought at all. Soviet government was highlighting work over anything else. Thus, literature and mass media and whole live in Soviet Union was one sided, blunt, simple propaganda about more work for workers, and more of political power for politicians and for their tyrannical regimes. It's all was pushed with utmost stupidity and naivety, in extremely uncanny and dense ways, pushed more and more into masses. Not much of philosophy existed at all to dug into, in Soviet Union. I ain't like Soviet literature.
Exist Russia's authors, which I ain't have read much. Once Russia have abandoned Communism, Russia was absorbed and overtook by Capitalism and money power, and money power rule the world. Have not much of clever deep philosophy about it either. Same goes about contemporary authors of USA and other countries too really. Tons of upstart freaks which have money, and thus receive fame and acclaim. Tons of shitty literature and just shit. Excessive capitalism/money power/stupid boldness/nasty brag/political tyranny/nasty celebrities tyranny/big money tyranny/no end of shitty contemporary literature which is yet receive acclaim and fame/nasty culture of stupidity, money rule, excessive consumerism = no good contemporary literature.
Hemingway is among worst authors of all I ever have read. Later I have stumbled over certain expert opinion, which have claimed "Hemingway, despite his numerous books, is not even an author, since he have zero literal abilities. Hemingway just have written a manual alike shit book, names with phone numbers alike shit book. Just shit which being manifest of extreme stupidity, boring writing about nothing." I mean once I've read such expert opinion, I felt like he just nailed those my feelings and opinion which I had, in distinct true verbal shape, and he did it as a true critic. A years long expert of his job, which know where to watch and how and what to say. A real craftsmen of ink and feather, typewriter, computer. An artist of words, and master of scapes. Wise expert. Etc. Hamingway indeed was not a writer in my opinion, by his writing abilities, and actually by everything else. Hamingway as a human individual, seems was mentally handicapped, arrogant freak.
Mark Twain sucks. Humour itself often being witty and sharp and stuff, unless it's humor books of Mark Twain, and of Mark Twain twins alike freaks. Even humour of kids more deep and clever and fun. Mark Twain suck ass.
Woodhouse I like. Exquisite and refined, fine humor of high class gentleman, butler. Exist lots of rich freaks which may attempt to look highly cultured and dignified as if of high class breed culture, but Woodhouse and his butler, sincerely seems had exactly correct words and a temper just fit for it.
O Henry I like. Clever and fun and twisted plots. Actually quality cultured speech and manners and intel, being mixed with poor people's street life hardships and sly schemes and twists. I've heard certain solemn and grave literature stories being dubbed as realism, but it's untrue, since different people obviously have different lives and different realism of their lives. Thus, realism cannot be all bad and solemn really. And those fun humorous stories of O Henry, actually seems being among the most realistic and relevant to reality literature I've read. Among most true realism for real.
Arthur Conan Doyle I like. Seems main Grandfather of detectives, deduction, and clever quality mind fuck. Was really intriguing, entertaining and even useful and educative, to read his books about Sherlock Holmes. Arthur Conan Doyle actually have took side of occultism at his old age. Just fun fact about Grandfather of clever deduction and quality mind fuck.
Certain books of certain authors which I've read, which I dislike, and which I already have mentioned on my website in certain articles, being of Nietzche, Darwin, Hhitler, Jeesus. They are authors which I ain't exactly like, but since I've read such authors, and due to huge influence they did in specific aspects/impact on politic/impact on ideologies/impact on world/ impact on literature/impact on whole philosophical movements and branches/etc, I already have mentioned quite extensively such authors and their certain books. I've mentioned certain good like writers authors on my website in certain articles too really.
Articles which got additional intel which directly mention certain writers authors/material of books:
Mention Hhitler, Darwin. Humans and evolution.
Mention Darwin. Science.
Mention Silman. Chess library.
Mention Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Jeesus. Movie: Stalker.
Mention Dostoevsky. About Manga.
Mention Tolstoy. Death.
Mention Plato, Aristotle, Aesop, Sun Tzu, additional ancient authors. Sites I like.
Mention Plato, Nietzche. Literature of philosophy: Discussion.
Mention Plato, Aristotle. Paradoxes.
Mention Plato. Universal science. Broad wide, long deep, talk with AI.
Mention ghost and me. My book: Ghost art.
And, due to a lot of written material, due to truth, due to certain artistic elements of my individual authorship style and literal certain features which I got throughout certain articles, my whole website is like a certain literature material, book. This.