In the last two episodes, we explored the variety of styles in tango and vals recordings. Today, weβll continue this journey by looking at milongasβspecifically, how some share a near-identical essence, while others showcase striking differences.Β Β
Some milongas have been recorded in versions so similar that they offer dancers a consistent yet subtly distinct experience. A prime example is π΅π πππ ππππππ ππππ ππ πΓπ, recorded in 1939 by three major orquestas:Β Β
πππππππππ πͺπππππ (1939) Β
πππππππππ π³πππππ (1939)Β
At first listen, all three versions may seem identical, but if you pay close attention, subtle differences emerge. Canaroβs version has a stronger, more pronounced beat, while Lomutoβs interpretation is smoother and more rounded, staying true to his signature style of refining Canaroβs approach. De Caroβs version sits somewhere in between, offering a balanced blend of the two.
Interestingly, each orquesta highlights different instruments to emphasize the melodyβCanaro leans on violins, Lomuto brings the piano to the forefront, while Julio De Caroβs version offers a perfect balance of violins, piano, and bandoneons.
On the other hand, the milonga πͺππ ππ πππππ demonstrates how the same track can take on completely different personalities depending on the orquesta:Β Β
Troiloβs version is rich and expressive, Biagiβs is vibrant and syncopated, and Lomutoβs provides a smoother, more fluid interpretation.Β Β
Unlike tango, where DJs have an abundance of recordings to choose from, the number of milonga tracks is much smaller. This means that building a strong milonga tanda requires both knowledge and creativity. DJs often mix milongas from different orquestas rather than sticking to just one, selecting tracks based on their personal preferences and the energy they want to create on the dance floor.Β Β
In future episodes, weβll dive deeper into how to mix milongas from different orquestas to craft tandas that keep the dance floor alive.