Level(s) is the European Commission’s voluntary framework for assessing and reporting the sustainability performance of buildings. It provides a common methodology and core indicators to evaluate environmental, social, and economic impacts throughout a building’s life cycle — from design to demolition.
Unlike certification systems like LEED, BREEAM, or DGNB, Level(s) is not a rating system. Instead, it offers a flexible structure for consistent sustainability evaluation across Europe.
🇪🇺 EU27
Widely promoted by national green building councils (e.g., GBC Italia, DGNB Germany, IGBC Ireland)
Integrated with EU policies like the EU Taxonomy, CSRD, and Green Public Procurement (GPP)
Used in public tenders and renovation projects to align with climate goals and circular economy principles
Supported by tools and eLearning from the European Commission to help professionals apply it effectively
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
While no longer an EU member, the UK continues to align with Level(s) through organizations like the UK Green Building Council
UK frameworks such as BREEAM and Home Quality Mark are increasingly referencing Level(s) indicators to maintain compatibility with EU standards
UK professionals working on EU-funded or cross-border projects often use Level(s) to ensure consistency
Six Macro-Objectives:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions — full life cycle carbon footprint
Resource Efficiency & Circularity — materials, waste, reuse
Water Efficiency — consumption and management
Health & Comfort — air quality, lighting, acoustics, thermal comfort
Climate Resilience — adaptation to extreme weather
Life Cycle Cost & Value — financial sustainability over time
Each objective includes indicators with three levels of depth:
Basic: for early design
Intermediate: for detailed planning
Advanced: for post-construction and operational phases
CSRD: Level(s) indicators support ESG reporting for real estate portfolios
EU Taxonomy: Helps demonstrate compliance with sustainable economic activities
GPP: Public authorities use Level(s) to set sustainability criteria in tenders