During the 10 weeks in which CIRCLE members convened after first responding to this question, we created diagrams and recorded dialogues in response to further inquiry and reflection of this question. During two final meetings, 9 topics were identified, shaped into questions and ranked (by survey) into level of MCC research priority.
The themes that informed these ranked research priorities are listed below. To see CIRCLE member responses to the What Matters Most question please click on the link provided under each group of themes/headers.
Everything I (patient) has on 1-2 page "resume" (list of allergies, drs., updated routinely by patient)(F,0)
Universal Access to preventative and regular care without repercussion (M,3)
Provide checks and balances for patients and providers when conflicts arise (F,3)
Providers must be supported in questioning their biases, assumptions and subconscious stereotypes about chronic conditions. (F,1)
Listening to and considering the whole person while spending time getting to know the patient and situation because everyone and each situation is unique and different. (M,8)
Not making assumptions (T,0)
MCC Patients are unique and need support to bust assumptions and remove stereotyping in order to influence decision making and build trust (F,4)
Advocacy is a lifelong journey and depends on speaking up (everyone needs an advocate or to be a self advocate) (W,1)
Advocacy-assisted to explain options throughout and after the care process. Patients and parents talked with, not at using many modes of communication that support 2 way learning. (T,2)
Physician, provider, staff humility and respect for the nature of PAIN (R, 2)
Comprehensive normalizing of whole person health (M, 1)
Affective skills that demonstrate active listening and active encouragement of genuine receptive and expressive communication (W,3)
Physicians demonstrate a strong interest and persistent focus on resolving root causes of physical concerns (R,2)
Education from a young age to ask questions and understand the system, self advocacy and reduce pressure on the sick person when they can't advocate for themselves. Advocacy includes patients, providers and family. (M,1)
Both physician and patient educated and empowered on the condition and the treatment and practical contingencies needed for working together on an agreed goal. (R,1)
What actually works to educate and/or support providers in implementation of comprehensive interprofessional teamwork for MCC health management (W,3)
Providing a knowledge base for decision making (T,1)
Access to education (R,0)
Access to care. (T,0)
Time and $ affordability (W,2)
Effectiveness of Technology (1)
Telehealth (effectiveness) (R,2)
Team humanistic approach that includes all clinical members and matches skills to needs (M,2)
Provide patient, peer and healthcare team relationships through empathy and understanding with follow-up, consistency, communication and continuity. (F,0)
Universal provision of care for all (accountable to the team) and includes a Patient Bill of Rights with advocates and a communication contract. (F,5)
Caregiver included communication. It's more than medication. All providers, caregivers, patients on the same page and team communication. (T,5)
Coordination of Care (R,1)
Education from a young age to ask questions and understand the system, self advocacy and reduce pressure on the sick person when they can't advocate for themselves. Advocacy includes patients, providers and family.
Women's health and geriatric medicine
Encourage use of notes by nurses who see patients first and encourage GPs to read them.
Follow up support
Transparency between healthcare providers and patients to develop more trust
Consult other doctors if necessary
1st** #1 & #2 are almost the same topic or question. We should combine those (2) into one topic & or question . 2nd** I look at the Health care system of today. We are years away to a universal health communication and/or records system! We need to be asking questions that apply to what can change now or six months or a year from now!
I ranked the nine questions based on patient interaction with a single provider, then interaction with multiple providers. I didn't think that #9 and 10 were significant enough to make the list. If Medicare continues reimbursement for Telehealth visits, older patients with transportation issues will continue to have the choice between in-person vs. Telehealth visits. Although all hospice placements do not result in end-of-life, the emphasis is palliative care and not the cause of the medical condition. The patient's medical record should have a more prominent role in the interactive relationship between provider and patient. The electronic medical record has always been considered the provider's record when it should be regarded as the patient's. Current medical records are written for the provider's use and other physicians rather than the patient. It contains excessive medical acronyms, and lacks explanation for abnormal lab results. and is devoid of any narrative from the patient's perspective. It should be crafted for the patient's understanding and should contain a separate section to document patient input of what is important to them for their health. This section could contain a standard set of questions which the provider uses to interview the patient and records the input. Questions could be about what is important to the patient, any disagreements, new patient concerns, correction of errors, concurrence with treatment. These changes would make the medical record a useful tool for the patient to become a care partner.
the sooner we get to a universal healthcare system the better for everyone.
I had a hard time prioritizing the questions, because after reading all of them I was confused. I think some of the questions could/should have been combined. The wording of the questions did not make sense. The questions need help.