Large organization interventions are designed to address issues that affect almost every member.
Characteristics of Contemporary Large Scale Interventions
Participation
Tends to include the involvment of a wide variety of participants
This change occurred in the early 1990s (Second Generation OD)
Prior to this, decisions were announced by top leaders
Subordinates were expected to follow, and there was little buy-in from those lower in hierarchy
Timeline
Greater timeline of the intervention
Even when rapid change is needed, many interventions that focus on a whole organization rarely consist of a single intervention activity
They often involve multiple activities over a longer period of time
Practicioner Role
Change has occured within the consultants role
Practitioner's do not need to gather and interpret data
Organizational memners can generate their own data and then be taught and assigned how to analyze/interpret it
(Anderson, 2019)
Strategic Change
Strategic Planning and Real-Time Strategic Change
Involves making decisions about the organization's purpose, products, vision, direction, and action plans
Involes trade-offs and choices about customers and markets
Involves introspective analysis about the organization's competetive advantage and challenges in its current environment
Integrated Strategic Change Process
Strategic Analysis
Assessment of organization's readiness for change
Understanding of organization's values and priorities
Diagnosis of organziation's current strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, mission, goals, and processes
Strategy Making
Leaders analyze organization's environment, performance, and core competencies
Determine whether minimal revision of the strategy is appropriate or needs more change
Strategic Change Plan Design
Outlines major activities that will be implemented or changed when strategy is adopted
Outlines the impact the strategy will have on stakeholders within and outside the organization
Strategic Change Plan Implementation
Leaders communicate the vision and strategy, as well as the rationale for the change and how leadership team arrived at major strategic decisions
Real-Time Strategic Change
Can be applied to many areas that require commitment throughout the organization
Participants work on present-day concerns
These change events are generally structured over a 3-day period
Day 1: Focused on "building a common database of strategic information"
Next, presentations are given to expand the group's perspective
Conculsion asks team members to work on action plans as a team, take feedback, and make decisions
(Anderson, 2019)
Scenario Planning
Developed in the late 1960s and 1970s (First Generation OD)
Helps to "inform decision making, learn through challenging the currently held mental models, enable organziational learning, and enable organizational agility (p. 299)
Beneficial when:
Uncertainty is high relative to manager's ability to predict or adjust
Too many costly surprises have occurred in the past
The company does not perceive or generate new opportunities
The quality of strategic thinking is low
The industry has experienced significant change or is about to
There are strong differences of opinion, with multiple opinions having merit
Steps in Scenario Planning
Getting Started
Formation of scenario planning team
Group determines the time, focal point, and agrees on the process and outcomes
Laying the Environment-Analysis Foundation
Group members gather quantitative and qualitative data
Group explores external factors
Creating the Scenario
Factos discussed prior are now analyzed and compared for predicatbility and influence on the organization
Moving from Scenario to a Decision
Scenario planning gorup and leadership team discuss implications of scenarios (including opportunities and threats)
Current decisions are tested and debated
Group makes decisions about what action to take
(Anderson, 2019)
Interventions
Search Conferences and Future Search
Broad group of stakeholders meet over a short period of time to develop agreements and action plans to move the organization to a desired future
Features:
Size, length, and subject
2.5 - 3 days, about 60 participants, to create action plans for an issue or concern that participants share
Attendance
Data gathering and interpretation
Exploring the wider context
Structure
Total Quality Management
Gained widespread attention in 1980 (Second Generation OD)
"Creating and implementing organizational architectures that motivate, support, and enable quality management in all the activities of the enterprise" (p. 307).
Five Basic Activities of TMQ
Identify customers and what they value at all levels
Identify products and services provided
Define processes
Simplify the process
Continuously approve
Six Sigma
Statistical measure and business process improvement initiative that uses statistical methods
Refers to projects that are undertaken to measure and improve an organziation's processes
Three steps to implement and sustain a Six Stigma Program
An honest assessment of the organization's readiness to implement
Willingness to expend the needed resources
Reflection on the objectives, scope, and timeframe for the program
Reengineering
A rebuilding process where entire organziational operations are created anew
Rather then make small incremental changes to existing processes, companies could save more time/money by rethinking and restructuring entire operations
(Anderson, 2019)
Cross-Team/Department Integration
Common Problems in Integration
Newly formed team works at cross purposes, missing handoffs or duplicating work
There is confusion about which team handles tasks
Employees are unclear about the strategy, and there is little buy-in to the strategy
Organizationwide Integration
There is gridlock. failure to make changes over time, and an inability to realize competetive opportunities
Two companies still remain
Goals and Interventions
Goal:
Develop cooperative interactions between leaders and teams
Interventions:
Intergroup/Interteam Interventions
Strategic planning and goal setting to jointly develop superordinate goals
Leadership development to promote cross-functional networks and share values
Organizationwide Integration
Goal: remove gridlock and promote future potential
Intervention: orgnaization design and large-group interventions
(Anderson, 2019)
Transorganization Development
Application of OD concepts to situations in which mulitple organizations join together in networks or collaborative relationships with a shared purpose (p. 320).
Develop in a Three-Step Process
Identification
Focus is on reasoning for forming the system and finding/inviting members who have a stake in the issue to participate
Convention
Soliciting input on each member's perception of the problem, members' objectives and motivations to join, and developing a commitment to taking action to address the issue
Organization
Members explore and agree on the desired future they would like to see
Includes action each would agree to take to reach that future
(Anderson, 2019)
Transorganization Development vs. Typical Organizations
Transorganizational systems have special characteristics that make the application of traditional OD interventions particularly challenging and in many cases demand a different approach (Anderson, 2019, p. 322):
Hierarchy and structure are different in transorganziational systems from those in typical organizations
Group members participate on equal footing with no hierarchical relationship between them, and no higher level member to resolve disputes
Members conduct their own activities in self-regulating fashion
Membership relationships are unique compared with most organizations in which employees all have the same relationship to the organization
Membership in a transorganizational system can be voluntary
This helps to know members motives for participating and individual members' goals and objectives
Trust and collaboration are special concerns in transorganizational systems and political issues are likely and can be highly charged
Members may suspect other members' motives and hidden agendas for their choices, contributions, or opinions
Lobying, voter-trading, power struggles, and coalitions are likely results
(Anderson, 2019)
Dialogic OD Consultation and Interventions
Interaction and conversation are the priority
Participants are given ownership and responsibility to bring up the issues and topics that matter most to them
Interventions:
World Cafe Intervention
Designed to bring large groups together in the discussion of issues important to them
Based "on the assumption that people already have within them the wisdom and creativity to confront even the most difficult challenges" (Anderson, 2019, p. 325).
Looks at an organization as an "evolving web of conversations."
Based on seven integrated design principles:
Set the context
Create hospitable spaces
Explore questions that matter
Encouarge everyone's contribution
Cross-pollinate and conect diverse perspectives
Listen together for patterns, insights, and deeper questions
Harvest and share collective discoveries
Open Space Technology
Often used when a "diverse group of people must deal with complex and potentially conflicting material in innovative and productive ways" (Anderson, 2019, p. 326).
Powerful when nobody knows the answer and the ongoing participation of a number of people is required to deal with the questions.
This intervention is inappropriate in a situation where a decision has already been made.
Four Principles of Open Space:
Whoever comes is the right people
Whatever happens is the only thing that could have
Whenever it starts is the right time
When it's over, it's over
One Law
The Law of Two Feet
Intended to give everyone the freedom to move to another discussion where they find they may have more interest, passion, or commitment
(Anderson, 2019)