District: N/A
Owner: Taghrid S Mousa
HDLC Staff: Wendy Cargile
Rating: Landmark
Applicant: Zella May
Permit #: 25-29126-HDLC
Description: Demolition of a Landmark, two-story, commercial building to grade.
HDLC Guidelines:
Section 12, Pages 23-24 of the Guidelines for New Construction, Additions and Demolition states that the demolition of all or portions of historic resources within a local Historic District or Landmark site are considered drastic actions, since they alter the character of the area. Once historic resources or buildings that contribute to the heritage of the community are destroyed, it is generally impossible to reproduce their design, texture, materials, details and their special character and interest in the neighborhood. When reviewing demolition applications at properties located within a Historic District or at a Landmark site, the HDLC uses the following criteria in its evaluations:
The historic or architectural significance of the building or structure as designated by its “rating”: The building became a Designated Landmark on Dec. 11, 2009.
The importance of the building or structure to the tout ensemble of the area: The Landmark nomination of the building was based on its cultural and historical significance. The building, referred to as Joe Victor's Saloon, is a two-story, masonry corner building dating from the middle of the 19th century. The building is one of the last remaining structures from the Storyville neighborhood.
The alternatives to demolition that have been explored by the applicant: See case history.
The difficulty or impossibility of reproducing such a building or structure because of its design, texture, material or detail: The form and massing of the building would not be difficult to reproduce, but the materiality and history of the building cannot be recreated.
The special character and aesthetic interest that the building or structure adds to the local Historic District: As one of the few remaining historic structures of Storyville, the building continues to represent the neighborhoods early development. Its historic form, materials, and massing stand in strong contrast to the surrounding new constructions, warehouses, and RV park.
The condition of the building or structure: An HDLC Inspector conducted an interior and exterior inspection on May 14, 2025. This report describes the most historic parts of the building. The rear single-story addition is in poor condition and does not contribute to the historic significance of the building.
The vacant 2-story commercial building appeared to be in poor structural condition. The structural masonry building sits at grade and has wood framed interior walls, ceilings and roof structure. The R-panel metal roof appeared to be intact and in functional condition. However, visibility was limited, and an accurate assessment of the physical condition and age of the roof was not possible. The roof of the rear addition has also collapsed, as of January 2026.
The building is covered in stucco which showed signs of significant deterioration throughout. There were several areas on the exterior of the building that showed signs of water rot and wood destroying insect damage where the stucco was delaminating from the building. Significant vertical cracks were visible on the exterior faces of the masonry walls which indicated major structural compromise. The windows were in fair condition and appear to be functional, however none appear to be historic wood windows. The building has extensive Demolition by Neglect conditions which, if allowed to continue to deteriorate, could cause a state of imminent collapse of the building. The building is on a corner lot and close to both street adjacent property lines. A collapse of the building poses a significant threat to public safety in its current condition.
The interior of the building was accessible at the time of the inspection. The building is in very poor condition and was not habitable. The building had been gutted exposing the structure. There was mold, wood rot and insect damage visible on the exposed wood throughout. There was evidence of moisture intrusion throughout, with holes in the exterior through the masonry walls and roof. The space did not appear to have been conditioned for some time.
Overall, the building is in very poor condition, showing signs of neglect and a compromised building envelope. However, the PRC has submitted an engineer's report that outlines a path towards rehabilitation.
Staff Recommendations:
This building is in a very precarious situation; it is heading towards a dangerous condition that will pose a life-safety issue, however, it is also incredibly important to the history of New Orleans. As a path towards rehabilitation has been put forth, Staff cannot in good faith recommend the approval of the demolition of a Landmark building. Staff does recommend that the non-contributing rear addition be removed in its entirety due to the collapse of the roof, with precautions to protect the historic structure.
Recommendation: Deny
Previous Commission Motion:
03/11/26: Defer action on this application until the next Commission meeting to provide the PRC more time to find another solution to maintain the building
02/04/26: Defer action on this application until the next Commission meeting to provide the chance for the applicant to work with the PRC to determine the best path forward.
01/03/26: The Commission deferred the application for further review of the new engineering report.
12/03/25: The Commission deferred the application to allow the applicant to be present.
Permit Case History:
23-33060-DEMI: Safety & Permits building permit issued for interior demolition to expose structure.
19-13439-HDLC: HDLC application for retention of installation of two openings for through-wall AC units, modification of existing opening and installation of inappropriate window and roll-down security shutter, and installation of inappropriate light fixtures without a CofA. Commission denied at August 7, 2019 hearing. CofA not issued; application expired due to inactivity.
19-13414-HDLC: HDLC Certificate of Appropriateness issued for minor repairs at exterior. Permit expired due to inactivity.
Violation Case History:
24-05770-MPM: Minimum Property Maintenance violation from the Department of Code Enforcement.
24-05690-GRFF: Graffitti violation from the Department of Code Enforcement.
22-06057-VIONO: Working without Permits violation from the HDLC.
22-06056-DBNNO: Demolition by Neglect violation from the HDLC.
22-06055-VIONO: Working without Permits violation from the HDLC.
18-12525-VIONO: Working without Permits violation from the HDLC. Judgement on 10/13/22 found guilty with a $1,000.00 fine.
18-12524-DBNNO: Demolition by Neglect violation from the HDLC. Judgement on 10/13/22 found guilty with a $1,575.00 fine.
2006-2010: Several historical imports of Minimum Property Maintenance violations from the Department of Code Enforcement.