8 April 2026
Hewa Khedir, a Local Authority Research Practitioner from Birmingham City Council, shares his experience of attending the LARIA one day conference and awards on 26 March in London.
I had the pleasure of joining colleagues from across the country at the annual Local Area Research and Intelligence Association (LARIA) conference in London[1].
Across the diverse presentations, several bright themes consistently stood out:
Whether improving economic inclusion in London[2], amplifying children’s voices in Manchester[3], reducing smoking inequalities in Essex[4], or addressing women’s health in Nottingham[5], presenters emphasised the same message: effective services must be rooted in local research and lived experience.
It was refreshing to see local authorities translating findings into action, designing more inclusive economic policies, improving healthcare access for asylum seekers and refugees[6], and tackling long‑standing health inequalities. Research was not treated as an abstract exercise but as a genuine tool for change.
Many speakers focused on groups often overlooked in policy conversations: children, women, homeless populations, asylum seekers and refugees. Their work highlighted that improving equity requires understanding, empathy and data that reflects real lives.
Alongside the success stories, presenters highlighted a range of policy and research challenges:
global instability and local impact – conflicts, displacement, economic shocks and market uncertainty are increasing pressure on local systems
more demand, fewer resources – local councils are expected to do more with shrinking budgets and greater scrutiny
shifting political landscapes – changing priorities require quick adaptation without losing sight of long term needs
fear of reputational risk – hesitation to share where things haven’t worked, even though failures can be powerful learning opportunities
fragmented working (“atomisation of policy ”) – when teams operate in isolation, policies are duplicated, disconnected or less effective
data gaps – inconsistencies, limited representation in datasets and duplicated data continue to hinder robust insights
The discussions pointed to clear areas where I believe future focus is needed:
We need more space to reflect on methods, data limitations and whether we are asking the right questions. Good evidence starts with good questions and methods.
Research should be inclusive, safe and attentive to power dynamics. Recognising our own biases—individual and organisational—helps ensure our work authentically represents communities.
Not every intervention succeeds; transparent learning cultures—supported by senior leaders and funders—help us build better services over time.
The conference was a valuable reminder of the need for a more collaborative approach to policy and research. It offered an invitation to view research and change through a lens of collective responsibility, with a commitment to achieving tangible improvements in the living conditions of the most deprived members of our communities.