Children’s Health – Acute Abdominal Pain
Guidance and Resources – Acute Abdominal Pain
Case Introduction – Acute Abdominal Pain
Further Case Information – Acute Abdominal Pain
Background Science – Acute Abdominal Pain
Case Conclusion – Acute Abdominal Pain
Formative Assessment – Acute Abdominal Pain
This case looks at possible causes of abdominal pain in children. As you work through the case, you will be asked to consider how you would gather the appropriate clinical information, investigate the patient, and interpret the results of your investigations.
Guidance and Resources – Acute Abdominal Pain
In case Children’s Health – Acute Abdominal Pain
Guidance
Intended learning outcomes:
By the end of this case, you should be able to:
1. Formulate a differential diagnosis for a child with acute abdominal pain
2. Recognize the clinical presentations of some common causes of acute abdominal pain in children
3. Understand the assessment of a child with acute abdominal pain
4. Discuss the assessment of a child with a functional GI disorder
5. Recognize red flag features which would make an organic pathology more likely in a child with chronic abdominal pain
6. Apply clinical reasoning methodology to distinguish between different causes of abdominal pain in children on the basis of clinical assessment.
7. Describe how to approach initial management of a child presenting with abdominal pain including investigation and treatment
Resources
Textbooks
· Nelson Essentials of Pediatrics:, Marcdante MD, Robert M. Kliegman MD
· Illustrated Textbook of Pediatrics 4th Lissauer (Mosby Elsevier)
Guidelines( For reading only)
· Rome III Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: read the section of functional GI disorders in infants/ toddlers and in children (pages10-14)
·
· NICE guidelines- Constipation in children and young people: Pages 10- 24
·
· NICE guidelines- Bedwetting in under 19s: Pages 11- 27
Web Links
· Spotting the Sick Child(free access but need registration)
Very helpful recourse: go to videos: symptoms (select: abdominal pain and work through) then test yourself (my waiting room section: short cases- patient stories)
CASE COMPONENT
Case Introduction – Acute Abdominal Pain
You are working in a children’s assessment unit. Your next patient is a 6-year-old girl called Jenny. The nurses tell you she has been brought up with acute abdominal pain.
You have a few minutes to consider the possible causes of acute abdominal pain.
You have a few minutes to consider the possible causes of acute abdominal pain. Consider what your differential diagnosis may include.
You could try using the acronym VITAMIN CDEF.
The differential for acute abdominal pain is extremely broad, and the possible causes should be considered as you take your history in order that you elicit the appropriate information.
You could try using the acronym VITAMIN CDEF.
Vascular: GI bleed is rare but can occur in children - could be secondary to a number of pathologies such as gastric ulcer, angiodysplasia (more commonly painless bleeding). Vasculitides can affect the GI tract, such as henoch-Schonlein purpura, which can cause abdominal pain in itself or can act as a lead point for intusussception.
Infection/inflammatory: gastroenteritis is a common cause of abdominal pain in children. Urinary tract infection is not uncommon. Hepatitis can occur in children, but is not common. Infections outside the GI tract can present as abdominal pain, particularly in younger children who may find pain more difficult to describe/ localise- classically lower respiratory tract infection can present as abdominal pain. Inflammatory bowel disease should be considered. Acute appendicitis should be considered and ruled out.
Trauma: if trauma is reported, then this is an obvious cause to be considered, however when assessing a child, non-accidental injury should be considered as a possible cause of pain. Features which could suggest non-accidental injury as a cause of pain should be considered during the history/ examination.
Autoimmune: Systemic autoimmune conditions could include abdominal pains as a presenting feature- these conditions are rare
Metabolic: DKA can present with abdominal pain- you may elicit a history of weight loss/ polyuria/ polydipsia but the presenting symptoms may be vague. All children with acute abdominal pain should have a BM check.
A child who looks very unwell or who has an abnormal PEWS (particularly with tachycardia/ tachypnoea) needs careful assessment.
Iatrogenic/idiopathic: Iatrogenic causes may be deliberate poisoning (eg deliberate self harm in an older patient, induced illness in a younger child), or excessive medication use may be linked with the pain (eg excessive NSAID use could lead to secondary complications). Idiopathic causes include constipation which is extremely common in the paediatric population and should be actively considered in the history taking, pancreatitis (rare). Intussusception can occur as either an idiopathic phenomenon in young children, or secondary to a condition which gives rise to an area which can act as a lead point (eg HSP, lymphoma).
Neoplasm: abdominal pain could be one of the presenting features of neuroblastoma- there would likely be other systemic features and often a palpable mass on palpation.
Congenital: Meckel’s diverticulum more usually causes painless PR bleeding, but could present with abdominal pain if there is perforation/ intussusception.
Degenerative: children with chronic degenerative diseases could develop any of the acute causes of abdominal pain, and may be more difficult to assess so care must be taken, and carer concerns must be closely considered.
Endocrine/environmental: DKA as above.
Functional: Children with functional GI disorders could present with an exacerbation of their chronic pain.
You meet with Jenny and her mother to make your assessment. You start by asking about the history of her abdominal pain.
What questions would you ask about the abdominal pain?
You need to get a detailed history of the pain - you could use any appropriate mnemonic (e.g. SOCRATES: site, onset, character, radiation, association, time course, exacerbating/relieving factors, severity), but need to accurately characterise the pain and any associated features.
With this, mum tells you that:
Jenny has had severe abdominal pain for the last 24 hours. The pain is in her lower abdomen. She cannot accurately describe it, but mum feels it seems to be a crampy pain, which comes on suddenly and lasts up to 30 minutes. No exacerbating factors noted, but appears to be relieved by opening bowels.
She had some nausea initially and a couple of vomits.
The vomiting has now settled, but she is passing frequent loose stools.
What further information do you need about the vomiting and stools (what are you trying to exclude)?
It is important to elicit specific information about each symptom, as this will help you to narrow down the differential.
Vomiting: any blood? Any bile? (haematemesis is uncommon in children, and when it does occur often due to Mallory-Weiss tear but other causes need to be considered; bilious vomiting is always abnormal and indicates a surgical pathology) - Jenny has had no blood or bile in the vomits.
Stools: details of bowel habit needed including:
Frequency - need to be specific- how many stools?, during both night and day? (opening bowels at night makes a colitis more likely)
Consistency - Consistency of each stool- are they variable? Are they mixed? Patients may describe stools as ‘normal’ which means different things to different people - can be helpful to use pictures to clarify e.g. Bristol Stool chart.
Presence of blood - if fresh blood is present is it on the outside of a hard stool? (possible constipation), is it just on wiping? (possible constipation, possible other local cause), is it mixed through a soft stool? (possible infection- more likely bacterial if blood in stool, possible colitis).
Presence of mucus - may indicate inflammation.
Jenny’s mum tells you that she has passed 8 stools in the last 24 hours, they are brown and very watery (type 7), there has been no blood/ mucus in the stools
Which of the following do you think is the most likely cause of these symptoms?
· Inflammatory bowel disease
.
The history is too short for a diagnosis of IBD to be reached.
· Infectious gastroenteritis - viral
.
Correct answer.
· Infectious gastroenteritis - bacterial
.
There are no particular features suggestive of a bacterial infection (such as bloody stools) and this is less common than a viral cause but risk factors for bacterial infection should be sought in the history.
· Acute appendicitis
.
Acute appendicitis could present with a similar history, and should be considered as you proceed on with the assessment.
· Urinary tract infection
.
Urinary tract infection is less likely in absence of urinary symptoms, and the pain is in the lower abdomen and consistent with colicky pains associated with bowel movements. However, urinary tract infection can present in a number of ways and if the abdominal pain on examination was significant you may want to consider checking a urine dip test.
· Intussusception
.
Intussusception is unlikely at this age unless there is a predisposing condition.
Considering the previous question, which other questions do you want to ask about the history of presenting complaint?
You need to elicit other possible features of infection - has there been a temperature?
You need to consider whether she is at risk of dehydration - is she still eating and drinking? Is she still passing urine?
You need to consider whether there are risk factors for any specific infections/ bacterial illnesses or if there is a history of contact with viral gastroenteritis, making that more likely. Ask about - infectious contacts, foreign travel, contact with farm animals, eaten any foods out of the ordinary, any contacts with similar symptoms.
Mum tells you that she felt a bit warm earlier today but no temperature was recorded. She has not eaten much but still drinking well and is still passing normal volumes of urine.
There are no known infectious contacts, no recent contact with farm animals, no recent foreign travel.
You go on and take the rest of the history:
Birth history – delivered by SVD at term after an uncomplicated pregnancy, no neonatal problems
Past medical history – been seeing GP for past 6-months with abdominal pain
Drug history – paracetamol as needed for pain, No allergies
Family history – Mum has Crohn’s disease. Jenny is an only child. Father is fit and well.
Social history – mum is 36 and works as a primary school teacher, dad is 36 and works as an accountant. They have no pets. Jenny attends the local primary school, but mum has been concerned as her attendance has dropped to only 85% this year due to the problems with the abdominal pain.
Mum tells you that the current problem is very different to her normal abdominal pain. She has seen a Paediatrician previously for assessment of the pain, and they have diagnosed her with non-specific abdominal pain of childhood/functional abdominal pain.
Consider the diagnosis of a functional GI disorder. Which of the following features would you consider to be ‘red flags' to prompt further investigation?
· Blood in the stools
· Symptoms regularly waking child from sleeep
· Weight loss
· Poor growth
· Age <5 years
· Blood in the stools
.Correct answer.
· Symptoms regularly waking child from sleeep
.Correct answer.
· Weight loss
.Correct answer.
· Poor growth
.Correct answer.
· Age <5 years
.Correct answer.
Recurrent abdominal pain in childhood is a common presentation. It may be defined as at least one episode per month for at least 3 consecutive months of pain which is severe enough to interfere with routine functioning. Studies have suggested that 10-15% of all children aged 5-15 will suffer from this at some point, but the numbers may be even higher.
By definition, children with a functional GI disorder have no underlying pathology. History taking and examination must therefore be aimed both at eliciting features which may be consistent with this diagnosis and also at excluding organic underlying pathology.
Red flag features to prompt consideration of further investigation include:
(Reference: Pediatric Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease; R Wylie et al, 4th edn, 2011)
History:
· age <5
· systemic symptoms such as weight loss, recurrent oral ulcers, fever; dysphagia; vomiting (especially haematemesis, bilious)
· nocturnal symptoms awakening child from sleep (be sure to differentiate waking from sleep vs stopping child from getting to sleep)
· persistent right upper or right lower abdominal pain
· dysuria/ haematuria/ flank pain
· chronic NSAID use
· family history IBD/ coeliac/ peptic ulcer disease
Examination:
· growth deceleration
· delayed puberty
· Jaundice
· pallor
· rebound/ guarding/ organomegaly
· perianal disease
· blood in stool
Investigations:
· raised WCC
· raised inflammatory markers
· anaemia, hypoalbuminaemia
It is important to try to make a positive diagnosis of a functional GI disorder using symptom based criteria and minimising investigation where possible in order to try to move on to management of the child’s symptoms rather than excessive/ unnecessary investigation. The ROME III criteria may be used- link.
Rome III Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
You move on to examination:
Her observations are as follows:
Temp: 37
HR: 102
RR: 22
Saturations: 99% in air
CRT: <2seconds
Conscious level: alert
Jenny's early warning score is as follows:
HR: 102 = 0
RR: 22 = 0
Saturations: 99% in air = 0
CRT: <2seconds = 0
Conscious level: alert = 0
TOTAL SCORE = 0
You proceed to examine her. Your findings are as follow:
Weight: 21kg
Height: 116cm
Growth Chart – Girl 2-18 years
Plot Jenny's weight (21kg) on the growth chart below by clicking on the relevant area
Plot Jenny's height (116cm) on the growth chart below by clicking on the relevant area
Consider your initial inspection/ general examination of the patient - what do you need to know?
Need to assess her general appearance - is she alert and responsive? Are there any signs of dehydration or shock? (e.g. reduced skin turgor, prolonged capillary refill, moist mucous membranes)
Are there any signs of chronic illness? (e.g. mouth ulcers, finger clubbing, jaundice)
Are there any features consistent with a surgical pathology?
Your findings on examination are as follows:
Initial inspection – she looks alert is responding to you appropriately (GCS 15/15)
She is warm and well perfused
No pallor, no jaundice, no rash
Skin turgor normal, mucous membranes moist
HS normal, no murmur
Chest clear
Abdo – no visible distension, no bruising. Soft on palpation, although complains of some discomfort on deep palpation of the lower abdomen (no guarding). Bowel sounds normal. Perianal inspection- NAD
Abdominal tenderness can be difficult to evaluate in young children - what other observations might help with ruling out an acute surgical complaint?
In younger children, observation of their general behaviour (both in the department and described by the parents) can be very informative, particularly if the child is worried about the examination or they are in pain as may find it difficult to cooperate with formal examination.
When observing Jenny, you notice that she is able to walk around and climb onto the bed without obvious abdominal pain. She is able to jump without pain.
Summary of the case so far:
Jenny is a 6-year-old girl with a 24-hour history of abdominal pain and loose stools. She has passed 8 loose watery stools in the last 24 hours with no blood or mucus. This has been associated with colicky abdominal pain. She vomited twice (no blood or bile) at the start of the illness, but is now tolerating fluids and is passing urine. She felt warm at home.
There is no history of infectious contacts, or recent foreign travel.
She has a background history of chronic abdominal pain which has been diagnosed as chronic recurrent abdominal pain of childhood.
Her mother has Crohn’s disease.
On examination: Her PEWS are green. There is no clinical evidence of dehydration. She has some mild abdominal discomfort on deep palpation of the lower abdomen.
What is the most likely diagnosis for this acute episode and what investigations would you like to carry out?
This is most likely infectious gastroenteritis.
She is tolerating oral fluids, and there is no suspicion of dehydration.
You decide that there is no indication for further investigation at this time.
You consider sending a stool culture, but you feel that, as she does not require hospital admission, and there is no clinical suspicion of a bacterial cause, and there is no foreign travel, that this would not alter the management at this time.
You explain your diagnosis to mum and explain the expected course of the illness. You advise mum to bring Jenny back if she deteriorates or is no longer tolerating oral fluids, or if the illness does not follow the expected course.
Further Case Information – Acute Abdominal Pain
In case Children’s Health – Acute Abdominal Pain
2-months later, you see Jenny in Paediatric outpatient clinic – she has been referred back to see you as the diarrhoea persisted and she has now developed blood in the stools.
When you review her in clinic, the history of her current symptoms is as follows:
After discharge, 2-months ago, Jenny improved for a few days- the stools reduced in frequency to 4 times a day and the abdominal pain subsided.
However, over the past 2 months, she has been passing 4-6 loose, watery stools a day.
Over the past couple of weeks, she has also been getting up at night 1-2 times to open her bowels.
Most of her stools have mucus, and there is a small amount of fresh blood in most of the stools. There is no history of any hard stools at any time.
She has some crampy lower abdominal pain when she opens her bowels, and this settles down once the stool has been passed.
Jenny has also started to feel quite tired and her appetite is poor.
Her school attendance has dropped to around 50%.
On examination, she looks slim and pale.
RR: 24
HR: 125
BP: 98/62
CRT: <2 seconds Saturations: 99% in air
Conscious level: alert
She has lost 1kg in weight since her last assessment.
She is warm and well perfused. No bruising or rashes.
Heart sounds normal, chest clear.
Abdomen – soft, no distension, no masses, complains of generalised discomfort on deep palpation, normal bowel sounds.
Perianal inspection – no skin tags, no bleeding, no fissure.
Recalculate Jenny's PEWS score - why might this have changed?
RR: 24 = 0
HR: 125 = 1
BP: 98/62 = 0
CRT: Saturations: 99% in air = 0
Conscious level: alert = 0
TOTAL SCORE = 0
Still green - She is now scoring just into amber for heart rate. This could be for a wide variety of reasons including: pain, anxiety, pyrexia… the trend of the heart rate over time is likely to be more informative than a one-off measurement.
Which aspects of the history do you think are significant?
The aspects of the history which are particularly concerning and indicate that further investigation is required are:
· blood in stools
· weight loss
Getting up at night to open bowels makes an inflammatory pathology more likely.
The drop in school attendance is a significant concern - in itself, this would not discriminate between a physical/psychological problem, however in this case the other features make an organic cause more likely.
What do you think is now the most likely diagnosis?
· Coeliac disease
· Infectious gastroenteritis - bacterial
· Appendicitis
· Lactose intolerance
· Constipation
· Inflammatory bowel disease
· Intussusception
· Infectious gastroenteritis - viral
· Coeliac disease
.This doesn’t present with blood in stools (unless with constipation), but could cause loose stools and weight loss. Can send blood test to exclude, but fits with clinical picture less well than IBD.
· Infectious gastroenteritis - bacterial
.Can have some types of infection which can become chronic- would need to send a stool sample, but this is uncommon and given lack of foreign travel, a less likely diagnosis.
· Appendicitis
.History is too long
· Lactose intolerance
.Lactose intolerance can occur following an infectious gastroenteritis. This is usually temporary, and can be treated with a lactose exclusion diet for up to 6-8 weeks. In this case, the blood in the stools, and weight loss make this an unlikely diagnosis.
· Constipation
.Can cause blood on the outside of a hard stool, but there is no history here of any hard stool. Mucus, weight loss, systemic upset do not fit with this as a diagnosis.
· Inflammatory bowel disease
.Correct answer.
The history of the loose, frequent stools with blood and mucus, passing stool overnight, weight loss especially in the context of a family history of IBD makes this the most likely diagnosis.
· Intussusception
.Not likely with this length of history
· Infectious gastroenteritis - viral
.History is too long
What investigations would you like to carry out?
· U&E - normal
· LFT - normal other than a borderline albumin of 30
· CRP - 54
· ESR - 62
· Hb - 105
· WCC - 7.8
· Plt - 542
· Coagulation screen - normal
· Coeliac screen (IgA anti tissue transglutaminase) - negative
What further investigation does she need?
These bloods indicate active inflammation, stool is negative on culture and, as the calprotectin is high, this provides further evidence of likely bowel inflammation. The results are consistent with likely IBD.
Further investigation for IBD would include OGD and colonoscopy (this would be carried out under general anaesthesia in a child of this age), and she may also need small bowel imaging such as a barium study. Small bowel MR enterography can be used in place of a barium study, but can be technically challenging in young children.
Should she have had further investigation at first presentation?
At first presentation, the most likely diagnosis is still infectious gastroenteritis. Further investigation would not be indicated at this stage with this history/ examination. It may have been that she had an infectious illness which ‘unmasked’ the IBD, or a first presentation of IBD. Investigation was warranted once the history was no longer consistent with a simple infectious illness (i.e. prolonged duration, weight loss, blood in stools). It is important to explain clearly the expected course of an illness when giving a diagnosis to a patient, in order that they can seek advice if there is deterioration or the illness does not follow the expected course- ‘safety netting’.