Whether vaccines or other medicines to be developed, the principal commodum ex injuria non oritur, makes sense. Moreover, what constitutes a vaccine viz the vaccine itself, especially if what constitutes a vaccine is questionable such as has the possibility to cause harm, is not the determinant of social standing.

Commodum ex injuria non oritur, Latin:

'Benefit does not arise from wrongdoing [https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195369380.001.0001/acref-9780195369380-e-378]

'An advantage or profit cannot arise from the violation of a legal right. Bird v Holbrook (Eng) 4 Bing 628' [https://ballentine.en-academic.com/7493/Commodum_ex_injuria_non_oritur]

Bird v Holbrook, was in 1825.

We developed laws to protect our citizens, this one some time after the War of 1812, and before the Civil War.

Because something is a trend, does not necessarily make it law.

Aspects of the 3 current COVID-19 vaccines, as of this date October 25, 2021, can be perceived as potentially harmful. That one must take the vaccine to benefit from other provisions in society, can involve compromising, especially principles that should not be.

The main point out for now, post to be edited soon.

October 25, 2021