Purpose of this page is to help out.

This is a work in progress that may be ongoing indefinitely.

It is not to belittle big name search engines like Google, Yahoo, et al.

There are certain topics when you enter them into the computer, there are no results coming back. In some instances, some questions will almost crash your computer, the computer freezes or just stays a blank screen.

Online means everyday popular public accessible Internet, www, popular search engines.

There are multiple issues with what might be briefly referred to as questions too 'heavy' for certain strata. Obviously in social media spheres with umpteen different decadent advents that persons place on those pages per second, placing certain topics right in the same cyberspace platform could be disrespectful to the sphere the topic belongs to. A part of the reason why this topic list is set here and not on Facebook, Linkedin, etc. Standing question of who should have rare, high level knowledge.

Other evident issues include, if there are so many pieces of information uploaded into cyberspace storage of platforms like Google, why aren't the answers to these questions anywhere to be found?

Sometimes translating the answers into other languages might yield some results, or results which are closer to.

This is a project in progress. The thought to start this has been there for some years, the official date begun is June 12, 2022.

The answers to these questions were not found when searched, or not found at the date set here, answers are very hard to find or very few, scant information is actually out there online, but might be found later.

Exact word for word questions might be slightly revised or put in general for referent reasons.

List:

Most of the list immediately below are 2020-2022

Search query question: Cathexis to certain outward skin colors leading to adverse effects on myelin

Background: Cathexis meaning energy and attachment toward something. Is it whiteness, blackness, greenness, bluish; different subtleties over time have been the reason for tensions even war among people, note that they change over time, which can attest to the frivolty (frivolity). In other cases, such as attempting to look like a great Prophet, when not properly guided, could lead to illnesses not commonly understood.

Search query question: Did Musa know Nehemiah?

Background: Historical analysis of dates would indicate the key words were not that far apart. 'Court of Musa', etc.

Search query question: Maternal lines of ancestry of Prophet Muhammad sllahlahualyhewaslm

Background: The Internet, www, online et al is rife with information about his ancestry in general, and seems to choose certain lines of ancestry, and goes on and on with them, sometimes almost to the brink of underinformed babble. A straight outward from generation to generation pedigree is rarely found beyond just a few generations.

Search query question: List of shapes of nebula

Background:

Search query question: Plato, Aristotle line of teachers going back

Background:

Search query question: Anaximander himself, and his teachings

Background: A reference point, book author Heidegger, M

Entry date: February 12, 2023

Search query question: Ob region and Ob River, significance of region WWI, WWII, politics

Background: The region was significant, this post can be updated with more precise details. It is known that prison camps spotted areas that included Siberia and nearby for decades at least prior to 1970. Timelines and historical sequences are what they are, where we are today, political turmoil and tensions in many cases did not arrive as a sudden isolated event. To better understand the present, aspects of the past, although it may seem irrelevant at first, when learned can help in that effort.

Very scant information, with exception of large sites like encyclopedias, have anything at all about the Ob, in English.

Entry date: September 24, 2023, just before 10am EST

Search query question: 'Telyashayakh Mosque Wikipedia'

Background: It may be natural to wonder, that with all the information that Wikipedia has about a range of topics -this is not to bash Wikipedia-, why isn't there an entry for Telyashayakh Mosque, as in its own dedicated page in the English language in Wikipedia as of the date of this writing?

I considered putting it in there but, as lessons learned when I wrote about Lake Zamkaft (reference Isra, Miraj), where most of the content was removed, I will not [write or attempt to write the Wikipedia entry at this time]. Elders [my elders] have warned me about supplying upper level information into that [Wikipedia.org] website. It was an elder advanced in knowledge that apparently removed the additional* wording about Zamkaft. [My only comment is there may be a silent p in transliteration spellings found of Zamkaft, similar to the P in Pfizer, pharmaceutical company, German ruler.]

Why was there actual filth sitting there on the Wikipedia site instead of allusions to or partially blotted out? whereas that same site seems to set forth high level knowledge of religion, beliefs, and so on? The problem that some of us are having is putting to sets of information with differing 'adab' [proper apt courtesy] on the same table at the same time.

Going back to Telyashayakh Mosque Wikipedia, or Masjid, Khast Imam Masjid/ Mosque etc., if the set of papers is credited as one of the first compilations of Quran set there, and theoretically scholars that would be serious about seeking knowledge might look to that compilation as a source, it would seem logical that Wikipedia would have page after page about and the site. Instead, almost vapid.

Why?

In the meantime, further back in the background daubs, include Marcus Borg comment, '...this was the aftermath of Albert Schweitzer's... 1906'; do I agree or disagree with the comment?, more so, aside, to me it is words on a page, passed by in process of reading, but, it may have some rolling in to other comments by other authors about words on pages, in the latter case, where authors comment on other authors,  'words on pages' can be discussions that are presented as though they are 'Bible', whereat the actual way the Prophet Isa/Jesus lived his life and what he was teaching may not be speck for speck 100% in sync with words written for instance, recently in today's English with a label on it that says 'Bible'. There are other individuals and stories, including Musaylima al Kathzhab (transliteration attempt, Kathab, from Arabic translation of liar).

What may be 'evil purposes' for things like that generally to happen?, as in written material that is convoluted?

Straight down open-ended studies on the topic of convoluted written material having to do with 'good guidance' may yield search query results which of course may discuss Quran. The sites bring it up, but it does not appear that the whole job was completed. There it is readily shown,- where is the basic stepping stone of at least a couple of sentences about Telyashayakh in a place where it should be expected to be at?

[There is a general concern here that religious matters are being used for wrongful purposes, this includes techniques of directing masses of people to look at something, or point them into the direction of something, then hiding other things.] Considered was making this a post with a URL name, a statement, however, (search results will come back with URL name, the way most Internet systems currently work), to connect a weighty topic to personal name and site might be burden; -- are all pages of the 'Samarkand Kufic Quran' been viewed, a prior, a priori..., at the level you can say your behavior is at the level of.. at the level of..., well probably not at this time, so holding off on that. I am going to hit on this very briefly, while the topic is still active.

~~

Entry date: January 10, 2024

Search query question: 'quare homines capiuntur in utendo terra ad visualize Creatoris loco infinitorum galaxiarum'

Search query date: January 7, 2024

Background: The query is the Google translate into Latin for the question asked in English: why people are caught up in using earth to visualize the Creator instead of infinite universes galaxies

Why is this question significant? A few reasons; one, as has been hackneyed, there are literally millions of webpages that have content which may be summarized as worthless trash. Today in 2023, the number of websites which glorify violence and fornication, a lot of which is simply ignorant, starring actors and actresses not born before the start of this millennium, is shocking. It might not be surprising that many of these actors and actresses do not even understand that what it is they are doing is worthless. It is evident there is a serious lack of being educated. If the cycle continues, trash input in, trash output, instead of putting some webpages out there, or greatly increasing webpages that discuss the guided way right way of life and the steps  that involve distinguishing 'religion' from belief and way of life, the trash in trash output cycle is bound to continue.

Author Alfred N. Whitehead has discussed religion and that events surrounding this earth were used [often] in history to help out with the cause of understanding the Creator, Worshipped One, and other titles, and leads into the reason why is it [just] earth chosen. Going back, to Latin speaking times, coinciding with some of these early startup eras... here comes the question in Latin, why was this going on, instead of using the galaxy, or universe, larger body etc.?; the layout can be a prelude, which 'begs the question'. Ok, let's ask the question in Google in Latin. What happened when the question was asked, ...capiantur.. terra.. visualize...? A blank page as far as links to webpages the computer feels is relevant to the question, is essentially what happened. There was one article which appeared. What the almost nil amount of search results goes to show is, there is far too little of what is needed to improve, youth and society, mind, understanding, for instance, and far too much worthless trash that cannot really help anyone, as matter of fact, may even be harmful.

A screenshot, first of the query result, below that is an English translation of the top of the webpage that did show:

Entry date: June 27, 2024

Search query question: etiology of production of taraxein

Background: Taraxein is supposedly a chemical isolated in blood studies of individuals that 'supposedly' had 'schizophrenia'. It was hard to replicate it. Referent studies started to become popular around the 1950s. Roughly 70 years later, there is hardly an article found on the Internet that even references taraxein, moreover an article, paper, or paper about a paper, on the topic that does not reference Dr R. Heath, founder of Department of Psychiatry and Neurology at Tulane. What does this show? It shows a severe lack in the progress of a much needed area of mental health. Pertinent to here in the USA, as much progress in this area is encouraged. Nevermind that the Internet is way behind the productivity curve. This is intended to help stoke some flames and get some progress going. We here in the USA, as a nation, are ahead of so many others. One could imagine, or not imagine, why there are people in less well to do places in the world that are absolutely dismal. (Sometimes persons with mental health problems make their way to the USA, such as through illegal immigration or outrightly illegally entering, barging, or sneaking in, and we are left to pick up the pieces after they go into 'attack mode', reference dynamics of 'alters', refer for instance content in Dr Duncan's Fractured Mirror. The described scenario, when illegal immigrants with psychiatric problems entering the US, don't get treatment, attack someone, in no particular order, then leave or try to leave. Part of the battle to combat that cycle is improving the mental health system, which includes building up of knowledge and understanding of subject matter that may be in it.) About a quarter of hospital beds have been filed by people possibly diagnosed with 'schizophrenia' as of about 1960. Doctors and specialists in the field [that encompasses mental health/ schizophrenia], reportedly barely know what each other are talking about, and there are multitudes of meanings of schizophrenia, the status in brief is mental illness runs rife 60 and 70 years later, whereat, there might be 2 or 3 articles on the web on the subject of taraxein. 

Increasing understanding of the science that is being propagated, whether that science is to propagate foolishness, or in other cases is viable, or to propagate propaganda; to propagate foolishness, to propagate propaganda... ongoing spiral, down a road of a doom, whatever -- it is pathetic that there is only a scant amount of information about the subject in the bragged about big pool of websites. 

The conversation about going the opposite direction of Dr Heath, regardless whether everything he did was approved by al schools of thought, has been had more than enough times; the philosophy (of suppressing science, medicine, health and healing, for the purpose of making room for decadence, ipso facto, is self-destructive). 

Yeah, right now, 2024, filth is mainly what hogs up the websphere. It does not have to be that way. The Internet, WWW, et al., has barely begun yet. Check this out, there is one video found on Google using English query, remotely touching on the subject, a movie tenuously what one expects out of a movie, but an audio with one slide sitting behind it, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkcEOL9h73w, Adrenochrome Effects: 1962 Canadian Study Unveils Psychology.  Repeat, 1962.

[Afterword

There are members of law enforcement and others in positions of wisdom that know how to recognize potential dangers of the community, intervene appropriately, and preempt possible incidents; therefore, there is a degree of if the shoe-fits here.]

Entry date:

Search query question:

Background:

Entry date:

Search query question:

Background:

Entry date:

Search query question:

Background:

Entry date:

Search query question:

Background: