How do you encourage a student to invest in an already mapped out, independently led online course? How do you encourage co-planning to works toward mastery and not just completion? How do you provide environmental changes that offers more flexibility? These are all questions that drive my interactions with the students I support. With my role serving as a liaison between student, online instructor, and local school; I am continually listening and working toward meeting all party's needs.
At the start of this semester, I worked toward encouraging students to share with me their interests and talents. As I build rapport with my students over time, I find out fascinating tidbits that I am able to share with their content instructor. For instance, I have learned of students traveling overseas, competing in national tennis tournaments, signing for a full football scholarship to the University of Alabama, starting/running a nonprofit to raise money & awareness of Cerebral Palsy, and so much more. It's in these instances of putting the human element behind the computer screen that learner agency is fully supported.
Since I am not the content instructor, I have little say regarding their ability to co-plan and choice in showing mastery of standards. However, I have worked to provide student choice in pace of course and ability to work towards mastery for larger assessments. Working closely with the content teacher and providing rationale regarding making reasonable accommodations to the student in these instances are also necessary. In these instances of working as a team to support learner agency, I have witnessed 180 degree shifts of student motivation and buy in.
Strategies Used with Students to support Learner Agency in the Online Classroom
Adjusting Pace Plan
The Learning Management System my organization currently utilizes is Canvas. Within Canvas, the course instructor can set individualized Pace Plans for students. During the initial course set up, the course instructor determines the best way to spread out the assignments over the duration of the course. The instructor can choose to have assignments due in clumps or can have one assignment due at a time. In addition, they can choose how many days are needed between the deadlines. As students enter the course over a period of 6 weeks with the use of an algorithm, the assignments are evenly distributed over the duration of the time within the course. Although the Pace Plan can be adjusted at any point in the semester, my organization set a policy to only allow one Pace Plan adjustment per semester and no later than 6 weeks before the course closes.
The policy in place encourages students to make progress and participate regularly within their course while also providing a second chance when students fall behind for whatever reason. When students take a number of courses at a time, I have found it is helpful for the student to look over their various Pace Plans to look for patterns such as all assignments for 3 courses are always due on Mondays. Gathering their input as to when would be optimal for their deadlines to be set provides the student a chance to express what works for their schedule as many have additional obligations such as family, work, and extra curricular. By having the student review their Pace Plans and communicate with their instructors, this shows the student that we care about their input and understand the complex nature of their lives.
Providing Second Attempts to Work Towards Mastery
I have seen a recent trend in educators shifting toward wanting mastery over completion. While this is still not overly employed, I am encouraged that there is a shifting in this direction. So many instructors focus on seat time and pass/fail grading system, however with all of the tools available there is a great opportunity to encourage students to focus on attaining mastery and not just what they can learn in a set amount of time. In instances with the student advocating for their desire for another attempt to work towards mastery and their plan for completing additional steps in order to attain mastery, I often work with the student and their course instructor to determine a doable plan.
Conducting One-on-One Meetings
While it is not always possible to meet one-on-one with students, there are situations in which one-on-one meetings can provide the most direct route to effective and efficient communication and problem solving. Within my role of working with a diverse group of students, I understand that some students enjoy this synchronous time to convey problems and work toward solutions. However, I have a number of students who suffer from anxiety and depression and asynchronous communication is their preferred choice and what makes them feel most comfortable. When students are agreeable to meet one-on-one, they often feel immediately better and more engaged because of the great grounds we can cover immediately without having to wait for emails to go back and forth and with being able to hear tone and have a better understanding of the situation.
Adjusting Pace Plan
One of the main supports I provide to my students is to adjust their Pace Plan so that they have the opportunity to submit missing assignments for the full earned grade. Instead of just making the adjustment, I have instead asked that the student communicate with me first regarding what would work best for them and if they are willing to complete the missing assignments. This approach to communicating first with students and providing them with choice and voice has worked much better than my previous method of immediately making changes without their input.
Providing Second Attempts to Work Towards Mastery
Even though I am not the content expert instructor for the students that I support, I often use my influence with my colleagues to encourage mastery over grades. In addition to instructors, I also have to work with parents and their expectations. As students move to higher level courses as well as more rigorous courses than what they are familiar with, I also have to point to mastery over the specific grade. We are a very grade-focused, grade conscious culture that there needs to be move to a more mastery based mindset. If our culture is wanting to encourage life-long learning, then it is important as educators to change our goal from pass/fail outlook to mastery driven outlook.
Conducting One-on-One Meetings
A recent example of a collaborative one-on-one meeting I had with a student was discussing their taking 7 full courses with GaVS and their difficulty with keeping up successfully in any of them. After looking over the students progress, I reached out to the student to set up the meeting. The student (and parent) were happy to be able to talk through what was working and what wasn't working and then determine a solution for moving forward. The student indicated their desire to focus on a couple courses at a time instead of trying to do all 7 at once. I allowed the student to choose which courses they would like to focus on first and then a plan for adding the additional courses back in to the mix throughout the duration of the semester. The student chose the courses that they enjoyed most and were the most on top of. Building on the success provided motivation to have that success snowball in to the other courses. The content teachers were happy to be flexible with the plan that the student and I made together.
References:
Bruno, J. (2021, November 5). How to build student agency in your classroom. Teach. Learn. Grow. Retrieved April 5, 2022, from https://www.nwea.org/blog/2021/how-to-build-student-agency-in-your-classroom/
Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute. (2020, December 8). How Implementing Voice & Choice Can Improve Student Engagement. Michigan Virtual. Retrieved April 5, 2022, from https://michiganvirtual.org/blog/how-implementing-voice-choice-can-improve-student-engagement/#:%7E:text=Voice%20is%20when%20students%20are,take%20ownership%20of%20their%20learning
Phillips, Lori. (2020, January 6). Cultivating Learner Agency Through Authentic Voice and Choice. Retrieved April 5, 2022, from https://knowledgeworks.org/resources/cultivate-learner-agency/
Zeiser, K., Scholz, C., & Cirks, V. (2018, October 1). Maximizing Student Agency Implementing and Measuring Student-Centered Learning Practices. American Institutes for Research. Retrieved April 5, 2022, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED592084.pdf