Worth clarifying

When I first drew the model called “The Prime Model” back in 1995, I quickly came to the conclusion it was of no use. So, I put it away. I made the two oppositions, vertically and horizontally, and I named the four realities.

And I drew a picture of myself sitting in front of the PC to illustrate it. The reason why I put the model away, was that extragenous reality cannot be a thing. If extragenous reality is a thing, the model illustrates a closed being, and if so, it is a way, a mode. And extragenous reality is in the model what is divine. And God cannot be made a thing.

The reason why I chose to publish the model, was that the truth can be specific. The truth can be a calculation, or a verdict. And if so, extragenous reality is to relate to. When making the model, though, with extragenous reality as something to hold on, there will always be one relating. If extragenous reality is the father, who this is, who is relating, will be mother, son or daughter. And the one relating is not a thing.

Also, I have seen that endogenous reality is the reality which is the most foreign to extragenous reality. It is not objective and it is not ideal, and so endogenous reality is taste.