Observational Play-Based Sample: The clinician will assess how the child not only uses nonverbal communication, but also how the child responds to others using nonverbal communication. In this case, it would be ideal for the caregivers to participate in the play-based assessment because they are familiar to the child.
Strengths
Can see how the child reacts and uses nonverbal communication with no parameters or "rules" as there would be in a standardized test
Requires less attention from the child than standardized tests
Weakness
There is no way to statistically measure if the child is in the same range as their peers in terms of nonverbal communication
The Rossetti Infant Toddler Language Scale: A play-based assessment used to identify at-risk and developmentally delayed children.
Strengths:
Easy to administer
Play-based
No set time to administer
The test is available in Spanish
Included gestural subtest
Severity ratings that compare a child to their peers
Weaknesses:
Does not provide standardized scores
Subjective scoring
McArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MBCDI): A parent report instrument used to gain information atbout the childs early language development (vocabulary, comprehension, production, gestures and grammar)
Strength:
The test is available in Spanish
Adaptation in other languages are available
Includes caregiver
Targets current and emerging developmental behaviors
Short administration
Weakness:
Manual is difficult to comprehend
Includes a long form for the caregiver to fill out
Routine-Based Intervention: Embedding instruction into the everyday activities of the child
Strengths:
Naturalistic
Involves caregivers
Easier carryover to everyday activities due to the child learning in familiar contexts
Weaknesses:
The client will have to use nonverbal skills in all contexts not just familiar places
More effective when used in conjunction with coaching
More effective when toys from home are brought into the sessions
Milieu Communication Training: Builds upon three parameters;
Environmental Arrangement: The use of the client's natural environment to promote the use of specific forms or functions
Responsive Interaction: Frequent responses from clinicians and caregivers
Conversation-based contexts: The use of a child's interests along with opportunities for modeling in prompting communication that occurs every day
Strength:
Naturalistic
Allows the use of:
Incidental teaching: Environment is manipulated so the child has to rely on requesting followed by a response from the clinician
Mand-Model: If a child shows interest, the clinician prompts the child for an utterance
Communicative Temptation: The clinician manipulates the toy in order to get a response from the child in any form
Targets clients interests
Weakness:
Requires a lot of involvement from the clinician and the child's caregivers
Need to be extremely familiar with the client
An alternative approach can be teaching these children to advocate for themselves by asking their communication partners to explain what they are thinking and feeling when they use nonverbal communication. In addition, communication partners can be trained to overtly tell the child what they mean when they are using nonverbal communication!
References
DeLuca, Z. (2023). Setting Language Goals and Interventions. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Southern Connecticut State University.
Fenson, L., et al. (2007). The MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory: Technical Manual. CDI Advisory Board.
Rossetti, L. (2005) The Rossetti Infant-Toddler Language Scale: Technical Manual. LinguiSystems.