Originated in: 1960's
Scientists/Theorists Related to Base:
Lenneberg (1960's) - Formed the Critical Period Hypothesis theory and believed that we are born with language abilities, but we must learn it before puberty or our ability to learn diminishes.
Chomsky (1960's) - Hypothesized that people are born with a natural set of rules called 'Universal Grammar' which can be learned at any age with the right environment.
Bloom (1970's) - Believed that language is a reflection of how children understand and interpret their non-linguistic knowledge. Learning a language requires effort, but a child's interaction with their surroundings encourages them to put in that effort.
Fodor (1980's) - Argued that human language can be classified as a module - a distinct and specialized mental organ that has developed to process specific information.
Bates (1990's) - Believed language acquisition and other forms of development are not based on specific brain modules but on a range of broader mental abilities such as visual, motor, and concentration skills. For example, people are able to drive cars because of the combination of these skills, not because of a specific driving module in their brain.
Pinker & Jackendoff (1990's) - Believes every language is based on a universal grammar inherent in the human brain, and he disagrees with the idea that we are born with empty minds.
Language is an innate ability in humans. Our brains are built to learn language!
Many parts of our brains coordinate and work together to produce and understand language. Although our brains are not completely compartmentalized, certain processes are more strongly correlated to specific parts of the brain.
The frontal lobe is important for producing written and spoken language as well as planning and initiating voluntary motor movements
The parietal lobe is important for language and holding verbal information in one's mind
The temporal lobe is important for processing auditory information, language comprehension, learning, and memory
The occipital lobe is important for processing visual information
Most are language dominant in their left hemisphere
Important for semantic knowledge
Includes:
Broca's Area: expressive language (highlighted in yellow)
Wernicke's Area: receptive language (highlighted in blue)
Figurative language
Facial recognition
Understanding prosody of speech
Supporting inhibition
Holistic processing
If certain parts of the brain are not developed correctly for any reason, there's any damage, there's a disease, or brain damage due to trauma, there is a likelihood that the child might present with language difficulties.
Critical Period Hypothesis: It is important a child is exposed to language and many social opportunities in their first few years of life so that the areas of the brain that are critical for language properly develop. Although it is possible to gain language after this period, without any language input, it would be much more difficult
Humans have an incredible system of language!
The human brain is elaborate from thousands of years of evolution that led to humans having this complex language system. We have advanced neural networks working to create meaningful connections from the external input they get from senses, connecting each area of the brain to create speech and language. Mechanisms in the brain allow us to use these connections and strengthen the important ones needed in our surroundings. Each system or function has its own job, but together, they work to create the incredible system of language that we all use one way or another!
Originated in the 1950's & 60's
Scientists Related to Base:
George Armitage Miller - Developed the Information Processing Theory that used computer processing as a metaphor for how the human brain works. He was also one of the original founders of cognition studies.
Richard Shiffrin - Developed the Atkinson-Shiffrin model (multi-store model/modal model) which is a memory model that says the human memory has three components: short-term store, long-term store, and sensory register.
Richard Atkinson - Developed the Atkinson-Shiffrin model (as noted above).
Charles Osgood - His model builds on the theory that we communicate in a two-way street with a sender and receiver in conversation taking turns. Suggested that communication is not linear but is instead circular. Also suggested that the language acquisition process involved coding and decoding of psychological structure in a language.
How does information processing describe the nature of language?
Attending- listening and paying attention
Encoding- taking in those words
Storing - entering memory (short or long term)
Retrieving - the ability to bring them into awareness at a later time
When participating in conversation with a communication partner we are using all of these processes at once. In order for us to engage in conversation, make comments, or ask questions we must be attending, encoding, storing, and retrieving information at the same time. These executive functioning skills allow us to divide cognitive resources and focus on several things at once.
Charles Osgood, 1963 (Left)
Atkinson-Shiffrin Model, 1968 (Right)
What your base suggests about why humans might be particularly gifted at language?
Support for Innate Language
Osgood proposed that language areas in the brain have crucial or sensitive times for human language development.
Sensitive Period
There is a development window that corresponds to the maturation of a certain portion of neuroanatomy/neurophysiology, where language skills in humans are learned via a sensory and/or motor capacity.
Neural Plasticity
The brain's malleability:
Synaptogenesis and synaptic pruning enable the brain to organize and remodel itself. This is observed in two situations:
Expectant plasticity: brain modifications that develop as a result of typical sensitivity periods and exposure (i.e. brain structures prepared for particular kinds of input).
Experience-dependent plasticity: changes in the brain that occur as a result of exposure to certain events and information (individually).
With age and input, the capacity for plasticity in the brain varies.
What do basic information processes suggest about language disorders?
As Charles Osgood researched, communication is not linear but circular, incorporating language processing, use, and development. The language acquisition process involves coding and decoding the structure of language, which suggests breakdown or difficulty acquiring information can happen at any level. The steps for acquiring language depend on underlying cognitive skills such as visual and auditory memory, visual reception and association, and auditory discrimination and closure.
References
G. Schwartz (Ed.) (2009). Handbook of Child Language Disorders (pp. 201-215). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Jean Piaget
References
Mcleod, S. (2023, June 9). Jean Piaget’s stages of cognitive development & theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
Jerome Bruner Theory of Cognitive Development & Constructivism. (2022, November 3). https://www.simplypsychology.org/bruner.html
In 1936 Piaget developed a theory stating there are 4 stages of development that a child goes through. Piaget theorized that regardless cultre, race and ethnicty children follow the same order of stages. However some children may go through these stages at different points of time during their development.
Piagets theory believes that children experience language differently than adults and that a child's language grows as they do. Along with this a child is not only gaining language they experiment with different models of language. An example of this is playing with symbolic forms of langauge that are not tangible like a child talking about their feelings.
This theory suggests that humans' possess the ability to think abstractly and in a broader context; this creates a strong foundation for language.
Piagets stages play a role in language disorders through the occurrence of a dealy or absences of completing a stage. Wihtout completing a stage a child is unable to advnace to the next stage, which can result in a language delay.
Birth-2 years of age
The goal of this stage is object permanence, which is the child's ability to know that an object exists somewhere in their spatial field even if it is not directly visible to them. In order to acquire this skill, children need to be able to create a representation of that particular object in their mind.
Substages of the Sensorimotor Stage
Reflexive Activity: 0-1 month of age
Innate reflexes of the infant
This is when infants rely on automatic responses (the sucking reflex, the moro reflex, crying) for basic needs
Primary Circular Reactions: 1-4 months of age
Actions are primarily focused on thier own body (ex: wiggling their fingers, kicking their legs)
They are refining and combining reflexive actions
Secondary Circular Reactions: 4-8 months of age
Infants become more aware of their surroundings
They repeat enjoyable actions that involve both their bodies as well as other objects (ex: a rattle, a toy)
They do not understand the cause and effect of these actions yet
Example: Shaking a rattle and enjoying the sound it makes (They do not know that this rattle is causing their positive mood)
Coordination of Secondary Schemes: 8-12 months of age
They begin to understand the cause and effects of thier actions.
Example: If I shake this rattle, it makes a noise and I like it.
They begin to develop object permenance (they drop objects to and start to understand that they exist when they cannot see them)
They begin to engage with the parent by creating a lot of noises to communicate
Tertiary Circular Reactions: 12-18 months of age
They begin to experiment with certain behaviors to see what the outcome will be
They improve their problem solving abilities in this stage (trial and error)
Example: If I drop this doll, someone will pick it up for me
Mental Representation: 18-24 months of age
Can now form mental pictures or representations of objects (even when they are not in sight)
Increased initiation in imitation with caregiver
This results in an increase of pretend play with the caregiver
2-7 years of age
The goal of this stage is symbolic thought. The child presents as egocentric during this stage of their development but this characteristic subsides as they grow older. During this stage, children start to detach their thoughts from just their physical world. However, they do not yet engage in logical thoughts. In addition, children start to think about objects symbolically and give words/objects meaning in this stage. Nonetheless, their way of thinking is still very much intuitive and subjective.
7-11 years of age
The goal of this stage is logical thought. In this stage, the child begins to think in a logical way. In addition, they begin to understand that even though things can change their appearance on the outside, certain things about that object remain the same, which is also known as the concept of conservation.
11 years of age and up
The goal of this stage is scientific reasoning. Children begin to think in an abstract manner and think more sophisticated. Children also understand and work through hypothetical problems and offer solutions in this stage.
Similarly to Piaget, Bruner theorized the course of cogntitive developemnt through stages. However, unlike Piaget, Bruner did not believe that these stages were condemned to a person's age.
Mildred Parten Newhall was a sociology professor at the University of Minnesota. In 1932, she completed a study that created the stages of play development in children. The six stages are solitary play (0-2 years), spectator and parallel play (2-3 years), associate play (3-4 years) and cooperative play (4-6 years).
Solitary Play (0-2 years)
This is when the child often plays alone.
They will interact with adults and caregivers They love to copy adults and play simple games like peek-a-boo
At this point they are learning about their environment through trial and error
As the child approaches the age of 2, they will notice and acknowledge other children but still choose to play alone
Spectator and Parallel Play (2-3 years)
Spectator play: they watch another child play but doesn't join and they sit or stand within speaking distance
Parallel play: the child plays alongside another child but doesn't join, they participate in a similar activity as the child around them and again they sit or stand within speaking distance of the other child
Associate Play (3-4 years)
The child interacts with other children
They begin to develop cooperative play skills like sharing, however not always consistent
They continue to develop imaginative and pretend play
They play with both genders and may even begin to develop preferences in who they play with
Cooperative Play (4-6 years)
They play with other children in a shared activity
Typically prefer to play with others of the same gender
Begin to understand simple rules of game play (Ex: turn taking, winning vs losing)
Toys and Activities to Support Play Development
Peek-a-boo
Toys that appeal to the senses: various sizes, textures, shapes, and colors
Toys that are musical, stackable, or spin to promote trial-and-error learning and exploration
Toys with buttons, levels, and cranks that show cause and effect
Toys that pair together
Food and a plate
Train and a track
Toys that promote sharing of materials
Blocks
Art supplies
Imaginative play sets
Kitchen and food
Dress up clothes
Baby dolls
Barn and animals
Age-appropriate board games
Tic-tac-toe
Memory
Games with simple rules
Simon says
iSpy
(CDC, 2023)
There is a relationship between cognition and language. Westby (1980) explains that the development of cognition is vital to the development of language in which good cognitive skills drive meaningful and purposeful language skills for communication. During play, a child is required to mentally represent reality using toys in a symbolic way such as playing with a doll to represent a baby. These symbolic play skills are not adequate to develop abstract language skills but they are the prerequisites or building blocks in which children will develop meaningful communication skills.
Westby, E., Carol. (1980). Assessment of cognitive and language abilities through play. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 11(3), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.1103.154.
Why might humans be particularly gifted at language?
Play becomes more complex with age, therefore the language included becomes more complex as well. Through the various stages of play, a child is soaking in a lot of the language and interactions that are happening around them. Children will be able to apply this language during more complex play later on. A child might be particularly gifted at language if they are able to watch and absorb all of the interactions happening around them to be able to use when the time comes. In addition, having the ability to observe what is happening around them gives the child more opportunities and access to grow their language.
What does socio-communicative play suggest about language disorder?
There is a lot to be said about a child that interacts and engages with kids around them. It provides them with social skills such as turn-taking, pretend or imaginative play, or sharing of materials that otherwise aren't specifically taught. Socio-communicative play is designed as stages of development, with age there are more complex interactions and knowledge being built. In the first six years of a child's life, their play goes from primarily independent to working with their peers on shared activities and games. Children with autism often have difficulty joining in with their peers to play or are overwhelmed with the idea. Around age 3-4, children should be interacting with their peers and completing shared activities. If some of these actions are not happening it could lead to further questions and concerns about their social developments regarding play.
Joint attention refers to the ability of two or more individuals to share and coordinate attention around a central object, event, or topic. Joint attention is a fundamental social-communicative skill that typically develops in infancy (usually emerging at around 6 months) and plays a crucial role in human communication and social interactions. The idea of joint attention was first described by three researchers: Vygotsky, Adamson, and Chance.
Vygotsky believed that language was a dynamic process that depended on a child’s zone of proximal development. His studies hypothesized that sophisticated thinking skills originate in some capacity from social interaction and the individual’s integration of experiences. Although Vygotsky passed away in 1934, his ideas reached Western audiences in the late 1970s.
Adamson and Chance outlined three phases of development in joint attention in 1998. The phases of development are emergence to social partners, emergence and coordination of joint attention, and transition to language.
Language is a socially shared experience that relies on the coordinated use and understanding of symbols among two or more conversational partners. Analogous to a game of Volleyball, communication requires that participants both transmit and receive units of information from one another in an organized and reciprocal manner. If both conversational participants are able to attend to the "ball" (referent) then the game can progress with intention and can adhere to the arbitrary structure of rules that govern it. However, if one or several participants cannot track the "ball" then the game devolves so that the objectives of the game cannot be achieved.
Joint attention is the foundation of any coordinated exercise, whether it be volleyball or conversation. Without it, no form of communicative intent can truly be realized. For each of the examples described below, consider how the communication function would be lost if one or more conversational partners were unable to direct attention to the object or subject of the utterance:
Instrumental: "Can you pass me the milk?"
Regulatory: "Wait for me by the door."
Interactional: "How are things going with you lately?"
Personal: "I'm not feeling well today."
Heuristic: "Where are we going for dinner?"
Imaginative: "Peppa is going to visit the doctor because she feels sick."
Informative: "Charlotte had her baby on Friday."
Additionally, through shared intent, children are able to understand the connection between word symbols and the ideas they represent, expanding their vocabulary and capacity to formulate ideas through symbols.
Joint attention can play a critical role in a social and pragmatic approach to language and is important for early word learning. This is related to the fact that joint attention goes just beyond visual modalities. Humans attend to objects based on all of their senses, not just what they can see. This is important when considering joint attention in blind babies who relied on touch and vocalizations to engage in joint attention with their parents. Moreover, joint attention allows humans to be particularly gifted at language because it encompasses early language acquisition by providing a nonlinguistic scaffolding of the child’s early language learning as well as by establishing semantic elaborations on what the child is equally engaged and focused on to eventually increase their utterance length.
It is expected from typically developing children to grow early language learning to communicate intentions and needs by using sounds and gestures in the context of joint attention. Children with autism have difficulties sharing attention for social goals (i.e., engage with others while paying attention to something). This can be a strong predictor of both current language competence and future expressive language development. Along with language development, other complex abilities like pretend play and theory of mind rely on the capacity for joint attention.
Video: Observation: Joint Attention: Noeliah 15 months.
This video from the CDC demonstrates aspects of joint attention in a toddler named Noeliah. She is pointing, making eye contact, and having interactions with her mom and older brother. These interactions set the foundation for pragmatics and word acquisition.
Akhtar, N., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). Joint Attention and Vocabulary Development: A Critical Look. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(3), 195–207.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00014.x
Advancing Social-Communication and Play. (n.d.). https://www.med.unc.edu/healthsciences/asap/#:~:text=The%20term%20%E2%80%9Cjoint%20attention%E2%80%9D%20describes,look%20at%20the%20book%20together
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2015, October 8). Observation: Joint Attention: Noeliah 15 months [Video]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLBuoOWdOdE
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023, June 6). Milestone Moments Checklist.
https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/actearly/pdf/LTSAE-Checklist_COMPLIANT_30MCorrection_508.pdf
Foundations of Language PowerPoint created by Zara W. DeLuca, PhD, CCC-SLP
Hanson, R. (2017, October 16). Joint Attention: A Foundation for Language Development. Kid Power Therapy Services. http://kidpowertherapyservices.com/uncategorized/joint- attention-a-foundation-for-language-development/
Joint attention – what it is and why it matters. (2021, May 18). Growing Early Minds. https://growingearlyminds.org.au/tips/joint-attention/
Mcleod, S., PhD. (2023). Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of Cognitive Development. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint Attention and Early Language. Child Development, 57(6), 1454. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130423
Toth, K., Munson, J., Meltzoff, A. N., & Dawson, G. (2006). Early Predictors of Communication Development in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Joint Attention, Imitation, and Toy Play. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(8), 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0137-7