FEEDBACK ASSISTANT is an AI-based tool designed to provide feedback on students' written activities based on a rubric created by the professor.
To set up the activity, the professor needs to upload:
the activity statement,
a rubric (based on a template),
and optionally, additional documentation.
Students will receive feedback on their submitted work.
If you need help to configure the tool , please contact us faculty.training.support@ie.edu or connect to our office hours.
We look forward to receiving your comments on the tool
Press the plus + icon under the COURSE CONTENT area
Press CONTENT MARKET
Select AI FEEDBACK TASK
Write the task title
Short description.
If you wish, select: Provide students with more detailed feedback for each section of the rubric.
Upload the assignment description or statement
Upload the rubric
Upload any extra documents
Press SAVE
You will have to confirm you have the intellectual property of the documents provided
EVALUATION RUBRIC TEMPLATE
EVALUATION RUBRIC
Subject Learning Objectives
Learning Objective 1 Title
(Learning Objective 1 description)
Learning Objective 2 Title
(Learning Objective 2 description)
…
…
Learning Objective N Title
(Learning Objective N description)
Criterion: Criterion 1
- Points: …
- Objective: …
- Learning Objectives Covered:
o Learning Objective X
o …
- Performance Ranges:
o 75 – 100 %: ….
o 50 – 75 %: ….
o 25 – 50 %: ….
o 0 – 25 %: ….
Criterion: Criterion 2
- Points: …
- Objective: ...
- Learning Objectives Covered:
o …
- Performance Ranges:
o 75 – 100 %: ...
o 50 – 75 %: ...
o 25 – 50 %: ...
o 0 – 25 %: ...
[…]
Criterion: Criterion N
- Points: …
- Objective: ...
- Learning Objectives Covered:
o …
- Performance Ranges:
o 75 – 100 %: ...
o 50 – 75 %: ...
o 25 – 50 %: ...
o 0 – 25 %: ...
https://help.blackboard.com/Learn/Instructor/Ultra/Grade/Rubrics
As a student:
upload the assignment
press Submit Task
Visualize the feedback provided by the tool from the student profile.
Quality of the feedback provided by the tool:
Is the feedback correct / does it make hallucinations?
Does it use or reflect the rubric proposed by the professor?
Is it precise / ambiguous?
Is it useful and valuable / not valuable?
Length of the feedback: Correct / too long
Etc.
Usability of the tool: improvement comments...
Please send it to Learning.innovation@ie.edu Thank you for your colaboration!!