Embedded Files
The AR_Rubric is a set of evaluation criteria used to assess the viability of an AR focused technology in the classroom. Although we cannot know all of the various contexts, requirements, and constraints an educator may be faced with, the goal is to provide a foundational framework that can assist educators in decision making. The rubric is intentionally broken out into separate version — one for hardware, one for software. This rubric is integrated in the AR_Rubric Application and can also be downloaded and used as a worksheet. You can use the application here.
AR Rubric Hardware Assessment Categories
AR Rubric Hardware Assessment Categories
Cost-Effectiveness: The total cost of ownership including: purchase, support, updates, training.
Ease of Use: Setup, learning curve, and user interface for both educators and students.
Durability & Lifespan: Physical durability and update support.
Pedagogical Value: How well the device supports learning outcomes and curriculum integration.
Classroom Integration: Compatibility with existing tools, classroom management, and instructional flow.
Transferability: How well the device adapts across subjects, grade levels, and learners.
Technical Support and Training: Vendor and institutional support for implementation.
Maintenance & Upgradability: Ease of updates, parts replacement, and software compatibility.
Student Accessibility & Comfort: Assesses ergonomic design, usability for diverse learners, and inclusivity.
Data Privacy & Security: Compliant with student data protection standards.
AR Rubric Software Assessment Categories
AR Rubric Software Assessment Categories
Cost and Licensing: Evaluates affordability, scalability, and long-term licensing flexibility.
Usability and Accessibility: Measures ease of use for teachers and students, including diverse needs.
Pedagogical Alignment: Assesses how effectively the software supports learning goals and curriculum outcomes.
Interactivity and Engagement: Evaluates how immersive and engaging the AR experience is for learners.
Integration and Compatibility: Considers compatibility with school hardware, LMS, and network infrastructure.
Lifespan and Updates: Assesses software support cycle, update frequency, and feature longevity.
Data Privacy and Security: Reviews protection of user data and compliance with privacy standards.
Support and Training: Evaluates vendor help resources and availability of training materials.
Adaptability and Transferability: Reviews applicability across subjects, age groups, and instructional contexts.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse