Bibliografia

  • Aakerlund, N.F. 2000."Contingent ranking study of Danish preferences of forest characteristics" The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University (KVL), and AFK.

  • Adams et al. 2008. "The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil)"" Ecological Economics, Volume 66, Issues 2–3, 15 June 2008, Pages 359-370

  • Adger, W. Neil; Brown, Katrina; Cervigni, Raffaello and Moran, Dominic. Total economic value of forest in Mexico. Ambio. Vol. 24, No. 5 (Aug., 1995), pp. 286-297

  • Aevermann Tim & Schmude Jürgen (2015). "Quantification and monetary valuation of urban ecosystem services in Munich, Germany". Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, De Gruyter, vol. 59(3), pages 188-200, December.

  • Anaya-Romero, M.; Muñoz-Rojas, Miriam; Ibáñez, Beatriz; Marañón, Teodoro (2016). “Evaluation of forest ecosystem services in Mediterranean areas. A regional case study in South Spain”. Ecosystem Services, Volume 20, 82-90.

  • Anne D. Guerry , Mary H. Ruckelshaus , Katie K. Arkema , et al. (2012) Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8:1-2, 107-121, DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2011.647835

  • B. Martín-López, M. García-Llorente, I. Palomo, C. Montes 2011. "The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1481-1491, June.

  • Ba, C.O., Bishop, J. et al. 2006. "The economic value of wild resources in Senegal: A preliminary evaluation of non-timber forest products, game and freshwater fisheries" IUCN, The World Conservation Union

  • Baral H, Jaung W, Bhatta LD, Phuntsho S, Sharma S, Paudyal K, Zarandian A, Sears RR, Sharma R, Dorji T and Artati Y. (2017). Approaches and tools for assessing mountain forest ecosystem services. Working Paper 235. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.

  • Baral H., Manuel R. Guariguata, Rodney J. Keenan (2016) “A proposed framework for assessing ecosystem goods and services from planted forests”. Ecosystem Services, Volume 22, Pages 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.002

  • Barrio, M., Loureiro, M., Chas, M.L. 2007. Aproximación a las pérdidas económicas ocasionadas a corto plazo por los incendios forestales en Galicia en 2006. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 7(14), 45-64.

  • Bateman, I.J., Jones, A.P. 2003. Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: Expectation consistency in U.K. Woodland Recreation Values. Land Economics 79(2), 235–258.

  • Bateman, I.J., Jones, A.P. 2003. Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: Expectation consistency in U.K. Woodland Recreation Values. Land Economics 79(2), 235–258.

  • Bateman, I.J., Lovett, A., Brainard, J.S. 1999. Developing a methodology for benefit transfers using geographical information systems: Modeling demand for woodland Recreation. Regional Studies 33(3), 191-205.

  • Bernard, F., R. S. de Groot, J. J. Campos (2009). 'Valuation of tropical forest services and mechanisms to finance their conservation and sustainable use: A case study of Tapantí National Park, Costa Rica' Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 11, Issue 3, May 2009, Pages 174-183

  • Bellù, L. G., Cistulli, V., and CSERGE (1997). “Economic Valuation of Forest Recreation Facilities in the Liguria Region (Italy)”. Technical report.

  • Bhandari, A.R., Khadka, U.R. and Kanel, K.R. 2018. Economic value of cultural ecosystem services: an assessment from Panchase protected forest of Nepal. International Journal of Science and Research 7 (1):2068-2071.

  • Bienabe, E. and Hearne, R.R (2006) "Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments" Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 9, Issue 4, 31 December 2006, Pages 335-348

  • Bösch et al. 2018. Forest ecosystem services in rural areas of Germany: Insights from the national TEEB study. Ecosystem Services 31, p. 77–85

  • Bostedt, G. and L. Mattsson (2006). 'A note on benefits and costs of adjusting forestry to meet recreational demands'. Journal of Forest Economics Volume 12, Issue 1, 14 March 2006, Pages 75-81

  • Brander, L.M., van Beukering, P., Herman, S.J.C. 2007. The recreational value of coral reefs: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 68, 209-218.

  • Brenner et al. An assessment of the non-market value of the ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean & Coastal Management 53 (2010) 27–3838

  • Brouwer, R., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.A., Turner, R.K. 1999. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Regional Environmental Change 1(1), 47–57.

  • Brouwer, R., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J., Crowards, C., Turner, R.K. 1997. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Global Environmental Change Working Paper No. 97-20. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE). University of East Anglia, Norwich and University College London.

  • Campos Palacín et al. 2008. ''The enviromental value of the forests''. Arbor-Ciencia Pensamiento Y Cultura CLXXXIV 729 enero-febrero (2008) 57-69 ISSN: 0210-1963

  • Campos, Caparros et al. 2019. "Bridging the Gap Between National and Ecosystem Accounting Application in Andalusian Forests, Spain" Ecological Economics, Volume 157, March 2019, Pages 218-235

  • Caparrós et al. 2003. ''An operative framework for total hicksian income measurement - Application to a multiple-use forest''. Environmental and Resource Economics, October 2003, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 173–197

  • Carranza, C.F., B. Alyward, J. Echevarría, J. Tosi and R. Mejías (1995). “Valoración de los servicios ambientales de los bosques de Costa Rica”. Centro Científico Tropical

  • CIM Alto Minho. Municípios Associados. http://www.cim-altominho.pt/gca/?id=348

  • CIM Alto Minho. Dados populacionais. Via mail (20/07/2018).

  • CIM Alto Minho. Dados ativos na pecuária. Via mail (20/07/2018).

  • CIM Alto Minho. Dados atividades económicas. Via mail (20/07/2018).

  • CIM Alto Minho. Dados hectares queimados. Via mail (16/08/2018).

  • CIM Alto Minho. Dados Usos do Solo. Carta de Ocupação / Uso do Solo (COS, 2015). Via mail (11/07/2018).

  • Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). Available at: https://cices.eu/

  • Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., O'Neill, R.V. et al. (1997). “The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital.” Nature 387, 253–260

  • Cruz, A de la, Benedicto, J. 2009. “Assessing Socio-economic Benefits of Natura 2000 – a Case Study on the ecosystem service provided by SPA PICO DA VARA / RIBEIRA DO GUILHERME. Output of the project Financing Natura 2000: Cost estimate and benefits of Natura 2000” (Contract No.: 070307/2007/484403/MAR/B2). 43pp.

  • Dubgaard, A. 1998. Economic valuation of recreational benefits from Danish forests. In S. Dabbert, A. Dubgaard, L. Slangen, & M. Whitby (Eds.), The economics of landscape and wildlife conservation (pp. 53-64). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

  • E.R.M. (1996). Valuing Management for Biodiversity in British Forests: Final Report for the Forestry Commission, April 1996.

  • European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS). http://effis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ . Dados hectares queimados obtidos: http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/dfci/inc.

  • Fire Information for Resource Management System (2018). NASA: Earthdata. URL: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/firms-faq#ed-active-fire-burnedarea

  • Garber-Yonts, B., Kerkvliet, J. , Johnson, R. 2004. "Public values for biodiversity conservation in the Oregon Coast Range" Forest Science 50(5)

  • Garrod, G.D. and Willis, K. G. 1997. 'The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: a contingent ranking study.' Ecological Economics Volume 21, Issue 1, April 1997, Pages 45-61

  • Getzner, M.; Meyerhoff, J.; Schläpfer, F. 2018. Willingness to Pay for Nature Conservation Policies in State-Owned Forests: An Austrian Case Study. Forests, 9, 537.

  • Ghermandi, A., van der Bergh, J., Brander, L., de Groot, R., Nunes, P.A.L.D. 2008. The economic value of wetland conservation and creation: A meta-analysis. Nota di Lavoro No 79.2008. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

  • Glass, G., McGaw, B., Smith, M.L. 1981. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Sage Publications. Beverley Hills. CA.

  • González-Díaz, P.; Ruiz-Benito, P.; Gosalbez Ruiz, J.; Chamorro, G.; Zavala, M.A. A Multifactorial Approach to Value Supporting Ecosystem Services in Spanish Forests and Its Implications in a Warming World. Sustainability 2019, 11, 358.

  • Gordillo, F.; Elsasser, P; Günter, S. 2019. "Willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ecuador: Results from a nationwide contingent valuation survey in a combined “referendum” – “Consequential open-ended” design". Forest Policy and Economics Volume 105, August 2019, Pages 28-39

  • Guerry, Anne D; et al. (2012) Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8:1-2, 107-121, DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2011.647835

  • Gurluk, S. 2006. 'The estimation of ecosystem services' value in the region of Misi Rural Development Project: Results from a contingent valuation survey' Forest Policy and Economics Volume 9, Issue 3, 1 December 2006, Pages 209-218

  • Hamid Amirnejad, Sadegh Khalilian, Mohammad H. Assareh, Majid Ahmadian. 2006. "Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a contingent valuation method" Ecological Economics 58 665– 675

  • Hanley, N., Willis, K, Powe, N, Anderson, M. 2002. 'Valuing the benefits of biodiversity in forests.' Report to Forestry Commission. Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal & Management University of Newcastle

  • Haynes-Young and Potschin (2018) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. Available online at: https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/lg23_cices_v5.1_final_revised_guidance_03-10-2017.pdf

  • Horne, P., H. Karppinen, E. Ylinen. 2005. 'Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment'. Forest Ecology and Management Volume 207, Issues 1–2, 7 March 2005, Pages 189-199

  • Instituto de Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas (2018). ICNF: Mapas de áreas ardidas. URL: http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/dfci/inc/mapas

  • Inventário Florestal Nacional 6 (IFN 6). Disponibilização de dados. http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/ifn/ifn6#dad Resultados preliminares: http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/ifn/resource/ficheiros/ifn/ifn6-res-prelimv1-1

  • Kenneth J. et al. (2013). “A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation”. Ecosystem Services, Volume 5, Pages 27-39

  • Kniivila, M. 2004. “Contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis of nature conservation: a case study in North Karelia, Finland”. Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu. 69 p. + appendices.

  • Kniivila, M., Ovaskainen, V. and Saastamoinen, O. 2002. 'Costs and benefits of forest conservation: regional and local comparisons in eastern Finland'. Journal of Forest Economics Volume 8, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 131-150

  • Kramer, R.A.; Holmes, T. P.; and Haefele, M. 2015. "Using contingent valuation to estimate the value of forest ecosystem protection" Chapter 18, Sills and Abt (eds.), Forest in a Market Economy, 303-320

  • Loomis, J.B., Douglas, S. 1996. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: Summary and meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 18, 197–206.

  • Manual de Valoración de Pérdidas y Estimación del Impacto Ambiental por Incendios Forestales. Ministerio de Medioambiente, España. https://www.mapama.gob.es/es/desarrollo-rural/temas/politica-forestal/manual_valoracion_tcm30-278886.pdf

  • Martin Gutsch et al. (2018). "Balancing trade-offs between ecosystem services in Germany’s forests under climate change” Environmental Research Letters, 13, 045012

  • Martín-López, Berta & García-Llorente, Marina & Palomo, Ignacio & Montes, Carlos, 2011. "The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1481-1491, June.

  • Mogas, J., Riera, P. and Bennett, J. 2006. Comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with secondorder interactions. Journal of Forest Economics, Volume 12, Issue 1, 14 March 2006, Pages 5-30

  • Nelson et al. (2009).”Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment; 7(1): 4–11, doi:10.1890/080023

  • Ninan, K.N.; Inoue, Makoto (2013). “Valuing forest ecosystem services: Case study of a forest reserve in Japan”. Ecosystem Services, Volume 5, Pages 78-87

  • Ninan, K.N.; Kontoleon, Andreas (2016). “Valuing forest ecosystem services and disservices – Case study of a protected area in India”. Ecosystem Services, Volume 20, Pages 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.05.001

  • Nowak, David J.; Wang, Jun; Endreny, Ted. (2007). “Environmental and economic benefits of preserving forests within urban areas: air and water quality”. Chapter 4. In: de Brun, Constance T.F., ed. “The economic benefits of land conservation”. The Trust for Public Land: 28-47.

  • Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Pennington, D. et al. (2011) “The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota”. Environ Resource Econ 48: 219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0

  • Potschin, M. and Haines-Young, R. (2016): Defining and measuring ecosystem services. In: Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R. and Turner, R.K. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services. Routledge, London and ä New York, pp 25-44.

  • Rosales, R.; Kallesoe, M.; Gerrard, P.; Muangchanh, P.; Phomtavong S. and Khamsomphou S. (2005) “Balancing the Returns to Catchment Management: The Economic Value of Conserving Natural Forests in Sekong, Lao PDR”. IUCN Water, Nature and Economics Technical Paper No. 5, IUCN — The World Conservation Union, Ecosystems and Livelihoods Group Asia.

  • Rosenberger, R., Loomis, J.B. 2000. Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: In sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database. Water Resources Research 36, 1097–1107.

  • Ruckelshaus et al. (2015). “Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions”. Ecological Economics, Volume 115, Pages 11-21

  • Scarpa, R., S. M. Chilton, W. G. Hutchinson, J. Buongiorno. 2000. 'Valuing the recreational benefits from the creation of nature reserves in Irish forests.'. Ecological Economics Volume 33, Issue 2, May 2000, Pages 237-250

  • Sharp, R., Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, et al. 2018. InVEST 3.5.0.post358+he23ea3e79185 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.

  • Shrestha, R.K., Loomis, J.B. 2001 Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation. Ecological Economics 39, 67–83.

  • Siikamaki, Juha. 2007. 'Discrete choice survey experiments: a comparison using flexible methods.' Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Volume 53, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 122-139

  • Siti Dian Rosadi, Mufti Petala Patria and Nisyawati. 2018. "Economic Valuation of Mangrove Forest at Taman Ayu Village, West Lombok Regency" E3S Web of Conferences 68, 02009 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /20186802009

  • Smith, K., Kaoru, Y. 1990. Signals or noise? Explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(2), 419-433.

  • Sondak CFA, Kaligis EY, Bara RA. 2019. Economic valuation of Lansa Mangrove Forest, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20: 978-986

  • Tallis, Heather, Polasky, Stephen (2009) “Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Servicesas an Approach for Conservation andNatural-Resource Management”. The Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology. Ann. New York Academy of Sciences, 1162: 265–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x

  • Tiina Häyhä, Pier Paolo Franzese, Alessandro Paletto, Brian D. Fath. 2015. Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests. Ecosystem Services, Volume 14, August 2015, Pages 12-23

  • Tyrväinen, L. 1995. 'Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland'. Journal of Environmental Management (2001) 62, 75–92. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0426

  • Van der Heide, Paulo Augusto and Dias Nunes, C. Martijn and van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M. and van Ierland, Ekko C., Measuring the Economic Value of Two Habitat Defragmentation Policy Scenarios for the Veluwe, the Netherlands (March 2005). FEEM Working Paper No. 42.05. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=690146 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.690146.

  • Verma, M. (2000). “Economic valuation of forests of Himachal Pradesh”. Report submitted by the author to the International Institute for Environmental Development, London U.K. on Economic component of Himachal Pradesh Forestry Sector Review.

  • Walsh, R.G., Johnson, D.M., McKean, J.R. 1992. Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation demand studies, 1968-1988. Water Resources 28, 707-713.

  • Wang, X., Bennett, J., Xie, C., Zhang, Z., and Liang, D. 2007. ""Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the conversion to cropland to forest and grassland program: a choice modeling approach"" Ecological Economics, Volume 63, Issue 1, 15 June 2007, Pages 114-125.

  • Woodward, R.T., Wui, Y. 2001. The economic value of wetland services: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 37 (2), 257–270.

  • World Bank. 2019. Data. World Development Indicators https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=AG.LND.FRST.K2&country=

  • Xie, G., Li, W., Xiao, Y. et al. (2010). “Forest Ecosystem Services and Their Values in Beijing”. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 20(1) 051–058 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-010-0051-y

  • Zandersen, M., Tol, R.S.J. 2009. A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. Journal of Forest Economics 15 (1-2), 109-130.

  • Zarandian et al. (2016). “Anthropogenic Decline of Ecosystem Services Threatens the Integrity of the Unique Hyrcanian (Caspian) Forests in Northern Iran”. Forests 2016, 7, 51; doi:10.3390/f7030051