Schmidt & Brown (2021). Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses:
Chapter 15: Appraising Evidence to Determine Best Practice
Identify strategies used to reduce uncertainty when making decisions about best practice
Explain the importance of critically appraising evidence
Rank the strength of evidence using a hierarchy of evidence
Identify tools that can be used to appraise the quality of evidence
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has established important domains for grading the strength of evidence:
Study limitations
The degree to which included studies examining a specific outcome have adequate protection against bias
Directness
The degree to which evidence links interventions directly to a health outcome of importance and whether comparative studies are based on head-to-head studies
Consistency
The degree to which included studies find the same outcome or a similar magnitude of effect
Precision
The degree of certainty surrounding an estimated effect with respect to a given outcome
Reporting bias
Selective publishing or reporting of research findings based on the favorability of study direction or magnitude of effect
Evidence hierarchies
Predetermined scales that guide decisions for ranking evidence; levels of evidence
See the Evidence Hierarchy page
There are 8 critical appraisal tools that are designed to be used when reading research:
CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist
CASP Systematic Review Checklist
CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist
CASP Cohort Study Checklist
CASP Diagnostic Study Checklist
CASP Case Control Study Checklist
CASP Economic Evaluation Checklist
CASP Clinical Prediction Rule Checklist