Schmidt & Brown (2021). Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses:
Chapter 2.4: Keeping It Ethical
Identify five unethical studies involving the violation of the rights of human participants or falsification of data
Discuss international and national initiatives designed to promote ethical conduct
Describe the rights of participants who volunteer for research studies
Describe the three ethical principles from the Belmont Report that must be upheld when conducting research
4 major studies involved the violation of the rights of human participants:
1. Nazi Experiments
2. Tuskegee Study
3. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study
4. Willowbrook Studies
An example of misconduct involving falsification and fabrication of data:
5. Red Wine Studies
1. Nazi Experiments
= An example of unethical research using human subjects during World War II
Examples
Exposed prisoners of war to mustard gas, made them drink seawater, exposed them to high-altitude experiments
Study the body's response to hypothermia by making people frozen or nearly frozen to death
Follow the natural course of disease processes by infecting prisoners with diseases
Sterilize Jewish, Polish, and Russian prisoners through x-ray and castration
The War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg
Indicted 23 physicians
7 physicians sentenced to death
16 physicians imprisoned
Guilty for their willing participation in conducting "crimes against humanity"
Nuremberg Code
A result of the War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg
See below for more details
2. Tuskeegee Study
= An unethical study about syphilis in which participants were denied treatment so that the effects of the disease could be studied
Conducted by the U.S .Public Health Services in 1930's to examine the natural course of untreated syphilis
Black men recruited from Tuskegee, Alabama, without informed consent
Many believed procedures (e.g. spinal taps) were free special medical care
Two groups:
Group 1: 399 men with syphilis
By 6 years, more complications compared to men in Group 2
By 10 years, higher death rate compared to men in Group 2
Group 2: 201 men without syphilis
The study continued until 1972
Although penicillin was found to be effective for the treatment of syphilis in the 1940s, participants were neither informed about nor offered treatment with penicillin
3. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study
= Unethical study involving injection of cancer cells into participants without their consent
Began in 1963 to examine whether the body's inability to reject cancer cells was due to cancer or the presence of a debilitating chronic illness
Hypothesis: debilitated patients would reject the cancer cells at a substantially slower rate than healthy participants did because earlier studies indicated that injected cancer cells were rejected
Researched failed to inform participants about the injection of cancer cells to avoid fear
Oral consent obtained but not documented consent
Also failed to inform physicians caring for the patients about the study
Reviewed by the Board of Regents of the State University of New Work
Researchers found guilty of scientific misconduct, including fraud and deceit
Learn more about the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study
4. Willowbrook Studies
= A series of unethical studies involving coercion of parents to allow their children to participate in the study in exchange for admission to a long-term care facility
Conducted in 1960s to observe the natural course of infectious hepatitis by deliberately infecting children admitted to the Willowbrook State School
Willowbrook State School = institution for children with mental disabilities
Parents were coerced to allow their children to participate the hepatitis program in exchange for admission
Only few facilities available at that time to care for children with mental disabilities
5. Red Wine Studies
= Unethical studies involving the fabrication of data about the effects of red wine on heart health
Conducted by Dr. Dipak Das at the University of Connecticut in 2008 to study the beneficial health effects of red wine and other foods on cardiac health and longevity
Falsified data in more than two dozen papers and grant applications
Created public distrust of research findings
Can inhibit researchers' ability to recruit participants
Do you think the findings from those unethical studies should be still accessible to the public through publications and other forms? Or, do you think all findings from those unethical studies should be deleted and not be accessible to the public? Why?
International:
1. Nuremberg Code
2. Declaration of Helsinki
National:
3. Belmont Report
Three major principles of ethical research:
(1) Respect for Persons
(2) Beneficence
(3) Justice
4. The Nurse in Research: ANA (American Nurses Association) Guidelines on Ethical Values
5. Institutional Review Board (IRB)
1. Nuremberg Code
= Ethical code of conduct for research that uses human participants
Contained in the written verdict at the trial of the German Nazi physicians accused of torturing prisoners during medical experiments
Voluntary consent is absolutely necessary for participation in research
2. Declaration of Helsinki
= An international standard providing physician guidelines for conducting biomedical research
Adopted by the World Medical Association (WMA) in 1964
Informed consent
= An ethical practice requiring researchers to obtain voluntary participation by participants after they have been informed of possible risks and benefits
The Hallmark requirement for the conduct of ethical research
The Declaration of Helsinki offers more specific detail about what constitutes ethical scientific research than does the Nuremberg Code
3. Belmont Report (Three Major Principles of Ethical Research)
A report outlining three major principles: (1) Respect for Persons, (2) Beneficence, and (3) Justice
Issued in 1979 by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
(1) Respect for Persons
Principle that individuals should be treated as autonomous and that those with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection
Autonomous
= Having the ability to make decisions
(2) Beneficence
The principle of doing good
(3) Justice
The principle of equity or fairness in the distribution of burdens and benefits
4. The Nurse in Research: American Nurses Association (ANA) Guidelines on Ethical Values
Approved by the ANA board of directors in 1968
Emphasized the rights of human participants in three ways:
(1) right to freedom from harm
(2) right to privacy and dignity
(3) right to anonymity
5. Institutional Review Board (IRB)
= Committees that review research proposals to determine whether research is ethical
The U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare published the first set of proposed regulations about the protection of human rights in 1973
One of the most important regulations to emerge was the mandated implementation of IRBs
Two types of review:
Full review
= A type of review by IRB that requires all members of the board to participate; an IRB conducts a full review if there is potential risk to human participants
Expedited review
= A type of review by IRB that can occur quickly; an IRB may conduct an expedited review if there is minimal risk to human participants
Minimal risk
= The probability and magnitude of harm from participating in a research are not greater than those encountered in daily life
Exempt
Certain studies may be low enough risk not to require consent from individuals
One-sentence description of the article
Ethical issues concerning AIDS research in developing countries
Children's Environmental Exposure Research Study accused of ethical violations
Ethical and safety concerns of a gene-editing study in China
A tobacco industry's strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke
The U.S.'s role in Japan's medical studies during World War II
Premature infants develop health problems while participating in an oxygen therapy study (note: article begins at the end of the first page)
MMR vaccine controversy
Two studies testing the effect of radiation on spermatogenesis in male prisoners