Cognitive biases are mental shortcuts that help our brains process information quickly but can sometimes lead to thinking errors. Think of them like your phone's shortcuts - usually helpful, but occasionally misleading.
No! Most cognitive biases actually help us make good decisions efficiently. They evolved to keep our ancestors safe and help us handle massive amounts of daily information.
When biases help:
Making quick safety decisions
Processing information efficiently
Saving mental energy for complex tasks
When biases can cause problems:
Complex decisions requiring careful analysis
Unfamiliar situations
When quick judgments might be wrong
Cognitive biases affect:
Academic Work: Study habits, research methods, confidence levels
Daily Decisions: Course selection, time management, relationships
Information Processing: News consumption, source evaluation, opinion formation
The Goal:
You can't eliminate biases (nor should you try). Instead, learn to recognize when slowing down and thinking more carefully would lead to better decisions.
The Roberts et al. (2020) study on racial inequality in psychological research found that the field itself had a systemic bias, leading to a lack of published research on race. The study highlighted how non racialized editorship and authorship contributed to a preference for research that did not focus on race, and a tendency to use caucasian participants. This demonstrates how cognitive biases can exist not just on an individual level but can also become part of an entire system, affecting what knowledge is created and shared.
Key Takeaways
Everyone has cognitive biases - they're normal and often helpful
Awareness is the first step to better decision-making
The goal isn't perfect thinking, it's better thinking
Cultural backgrounds may influence how biases appear, but the core strategies work universally
What's Next?
The following sections will cover specific biases common in student life, with real examples and practical strategies to recognize and work with them effectively.
Confirmation bias means we only look for information that agrees with what we already think. We ignore information that disagrees with us.
How This Affects Students
School Work: Only using sources and quotes that agree with your ideas, not reading research that disagrees with you
Social Media & Choices: Only following people who think like you, sharing news without checking if it's true
Working in Groups: Only listening to people who agree with you, not hearing different ideas
Look for Different Ideas
For every source that agrees with you, find one that disagrees
Read news from different places that are trustworthy
Question Your Own Ideas
Before making big choices, ask: "Am I wrong about this?" and "What facts would make me change my mind?"
Check Your Facts
Use many different sources and check who wrote the information (e.g., a reputable news site vs. a Tik Tok video)
Be Okay with Being Wrong
It's good to change your mind when you learn new things
Quick Questions to Ask Yourself
Am I only looking for information that agrees with me?
Have I looked at other ideas?
What would someone who disagrees with me say?
Remember: Smart people change their minds when they learn new facts.
Planning fallacy means we think tasks will take less time than they actually do. We are too hopeful about how quickly we can finish things.
School Projects: Starting assignments the night before they're due, thinking "I can finish this quickly"
Study Time: Planning to study for 2 hours but needing 4 hours to actually learn the material
Daily Schedule: Packing too many activities into one day and running late for everything
Look at Past Examples
Think about how long similar tasks took you before and ask: "How long did my last essay actually take to write?"
Add Extra Time and Break Tasks Down
Whatever time you think you need, add 50% more (if you think 2 hours, plan for 3 hours)
Write down each step needed and guess how long each small step will take
Plan for Problems
Expect that some things will go wrong or take longer than expected
Quick Questions to Ask Yourself
How long did similar tasks take me before?
What could go wrong or slow me down?
Am I being realistic about my time?
Remember: Good planning means expecting things to take longer than you first think.
Sunk cost fallacy means continuing something bad because you already spent time, money, or effort on it. We think "I can't quit now because I already put so much into this."
School Activities: Staying in clubs or sports you don't enjoy because you already spent time joining them
Study Methods: Keep using study techniques that don't work because you spent time learning them
Relationships: Staying in unhealthy friendships because you've been friends for a long time
Focus on the Future, Not the Past
Ask: "What choice is best for me going forward?" instead of "How much have I already invested?"
Set Clear Stop Points
Before starting something, decide when you will quit if it's not working
Write down your limits: "If I'm still struggling after 3 weeks of tutoring, I'll try a different approach"
Get Outside Opinions
Ask friends or family what they would do if they were starting fresh with your situation
Remember: Past Time is Gone
Time, money, and effort you already spent cannot be gotten back, so don't let them control future decisions
Quick Questions to Ask Yourself
If I were starting this decision today, what would I choose?
Am I continuing this because it's good for me, or because I already invested in it?
What would I tell a friend to do in my situation?
Remember: The best time to make a change is when you realize the current path isn't working - no matter how much you've already invested.
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Peetz, J. (2010). The planning fallacy: Cognitive, motivational, and social origins. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43001-4
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366
Fasolo, B., Heard, C., & Scopelliti, I. (2025). Mitigating cognitive bias to improve organizational decisions: An integrative review, framework, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 51(1), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241287188
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00058.x
Jhang, J. H., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Schwartz, J. (2023). The impact of childhood environments on the sunk-cost fallacy. Psychology & Marketing, 40(2), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21750
Johnson, D. D. P., Blumstein, D. T., Fowler, J. H., & Haselton, M. G. (2013). The evolution of error: Error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(8), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.014
Korteling, J. E., Paradies, G. L., & Sassen-van Meer, J. P. (2023). Cognitive bias and how to improve sustainable decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1129835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129835
Marshall, J., Trimmer, P. C., Houston, A. I., & McNamara, J. M. (2025). Confirmation bias is adaptive when coupled with efficient metacognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378(1871), 20200131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0131
Morewedge, C. K., Yoon, H., Scopelliti, I., Symborski, C. W., Korris, J. H., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Debiasing decisions: Improved decision making with a single training intervention. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600886
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
Olivola, C. Y. (2018). The interpersonal sunk-cost effect. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1072–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617752641
Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D., & Mortenson, E. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709
Roy, M. M., Christenfeld, N. J. S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2005). Underestimating the duration of future events: Memory incorrectly used or memory bias? Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 738–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.738
Sanna, L. J., Parks, C. D., Chang, E. C., & Carter, S. E. (2005). The hourglass is half full or half empty: Temporal framing and the group planning fallacy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(3), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.173
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717