The circuit is full of response-shaping RC combinations that indicate the designers clearly crafted the amp to produce the sound coming out of it. My experience was that the best sound came from the amp when you’re at high volume and high distortion. Now, that’s fine some times, but I don’t want to play that way all the time. The amp at low volumes and low distortions sounds tinny and scratchy. Maybe I’m too demanding, but I expect an amp to handle a range of tones and styles and to do them all well (
see the section on tube sound). Eventually, I ran an analyzer on it and the response curves confirmed that at low or modest levels, there is almost no low end (therefore the tinny quality) and the treble boost is huge. Basically, above about 150 - 200Hz, the response curve showed sharp gain increases with frequency. Even with the bass control at maximum, there was at best a thin and weak low end. Furthermore, the amp had an annoying “scratchy” quality as the tubes were driven into large-signal distortion. Normally, amps produce a smoother transition into initial breakup. The Univalve produced a non-harmonic scratchy breakup that I found grating and annoying at times. At this point you’re probably wondering why I even used the amp or why I didn’t send it back. I can only say that while it was bad at times, I kept telling myself there was no obvious reason for the limited sound range and there were qualities I liked about it. As I said, the amp presents itself as a well designed unit.