Scapin 677 and 1033

Typical Korean insist that Scapin 677 and 1033 confirms Liacnourt Rocks was given to Korea. Ofcourse it is wrong information. Those SCAPIN order by GHQ is not the purpose of "change the soverignity status" from Japan to Korea. All the Scapin order attached suppliment explanation that "This order is not final soveriginty of Japan. it would confirmed by the Peace Treaty in the future."

Anyway, by the Scapin order of GHQ, temporary Liacnourt Rocks administrative area was separated from Japan to U.S 24th troops which administrate East Korean coast incruding Ulleungdo.

But, there are perfect clear record between Japan's ministery of Foreing Affairs and GHQ. They said SCAPIN is not the final determination of Territorial Soveriginty, but it is just a U.N military's administrative area. Final decisin of Japan's territory will have been on the Treaty of Peace, GHQ clearly answered it to Japan.

行政の分離に関する司令部側との会談

2. 行政の分離に関する第一回会談録（終戦第一部第一課）

（昭和二十一年）二月十三日黄田連絡官GS「ロッヂ」大尉及び「プール」中尉と標記の件に関し第一回会談を行ひたり要旨左の如し

黄「本日は領土の歸屬問題乃至は本指令の妥当性等に付いては触れさることとし単に疑義に付質問を為さんか為参上せり」

米「本指令は単なる連合国側の行政的便宜より出てたるに過きす従来行はれ来りたることを本指令に依り確認せるものなり即ち其の他はSCAPの所管するところにあらす例えは大島はCINPACの所管。鬱陵島は第二十四軍団の指揮下に在り従って本指令に依る日本の範囲の決定は何等領土問題とは関連を有せす之は対日講和会議にて決定さるへき問題なり」 （注：CINPAC(Commander in Chief, Pacific : 太平洋軍最高司令官)

Scapin677 have attached explanation about Scapin.

･SCAPIN 677-6. Nothing in this directive shall be construed as an indication of Allied policy relating to the ultimate determination of the minor islands referred to in Article 8 of the Potsdam Declaration. 29JAN1946

Also, Scapin1033, 22th of Jul, 1946 is about the so-called Mcarthor line and about Japan's fishery and whale hunting area. It is not territorial soverignity.

(b) Japanese vessels or personnel thereof will not approach closer than twelve (12) miles to Takeshima (37°15' North Latitude, 131°53' East Longitude) nor have any contact with said island.

Nothing different with other SCAP order, this is about U.S 24th administrative area and it is not final determinatino of Japan's soverignity. ofocurs there are attached explanation on SCAPIN 1033 also.

Scapin 1033-5. The present authorization is not an expression of allied policy relative to ultimate determination of national jurisdiction, international boundaries or fishing rights in the area concerned or in any other area.

Scapin1033 had abolished by the new scapin, Scapin 2046 it abolishes so-called Mcarthor line (Scap 1033)

Also, on the paragraph 6 of SCAPIN2046 there are description of "The present authorization is not an expression of allied policy relative to"

In addition, Takeshima-Liacnourt Rocks had listed up as Japan's administrative area again under the SCAPIN order e.g .SCAPIN1778 dated on 1947.09.06 and SCAPIN2160 dated on 1951.07.06

Those SCAP order isn't They never give Liancourt Rocks to Korea. It is because final de

It is not soverigninity matters from Japan to Korea about Liacnorut Rocks.

There are many evidence that Scapin didn't give Soverignity of Liacnourt Rocks from japan to Korea. also there are many records which shows same recognization after Treaty of Peace had concruded and Invasion of Syungman Rhee.(later I write it) The United States, main subscriber of the Treary they cleary explain that Korean claim, based on SCAPIN 677 is wrong during the reconfirmatin of San Fransisco Treaty and Rusk Notes.（c.f 1952.11.14.Confidential Security Information about Liancourt Rocks）

Conclusion; Scapin orders is not final decision of territorial soverignity of Japan ordered by GHQ. Sometimes Korean shows those maps below in their website. Ofcours we know it is just a SCAP's administrative area and it is not final determination. We know it is Treaty of Peace with Japan (San Fransisco Treaty) that decides Japan's territorial soverignity ,it is not Scapin 677.

To be Continued to the Draft Treaty of Peace with Japan, and the attached memoramdom, communications.-Liacnort Rocks is clearly territory Of Japan.