mp3 excerpts from mileswmathis.com

miles mathis - Bob Dylans real link to the rolling stones 26min mp3

see text of above mp3 below

PAPER UPDATE, added 2/11/19, Bob Dylan. I have found out more about where Bob came from. See page 2.

this is a mp3 file from audio mp3 books dot com. this audio file is form a pdf file entitled " Bob Dylan's real link to the rolling stones" which can be found at miles w. mathis dot com.

listen to find out how bob dylan and the rolling stones were projects by the trillionaire financiers whose goal was to accelerate social change in a direction they determine would maximize their wealth.

miles mathis - Bob Dylan's real link to the rolling stones.

[Addendum February 11, 2019: in the research for my later Titanic paper, I tripped across billionaireEugene Zimmerman of Cincinnati, railroad tycoon who was on the board of Standard Oil. Hisdaughter Helene became the Duchess of Manchester (Montagu), and Zimmerman not only arranged themarriage but bought the entire Dukedom, including castles and lands.

Helena is now called the real Downton Abbey heiress, since the BBC show was based in part on herlife. {Also remember that in Downton Abbey, Elizabeth McGovern's character is named CoraLevinson.} Helena later divorced Montagu and married Keith-Falconer, Earl of Kintore. This links usto my paper on Ben Franklin (See Governor Keith). Helena's son the 10th Duke married Sydney

VereStead, a close relation of British spook William Stead. Eugene Zimmerman also worked with Marconi,alleged inventor of the radio (although we now know it was really Tesla). Given the misdirection we already found concerning Bob Dylan's paternal grandparents, I would saythey have scrubbed the link between Dylan and Eugene Zimmerman. For proof of that, see below,where we find Bob's father Abe

worked for Standard Oil. Coincidence? Not a chance. My guess isthat Eugene Zimmerman was a 2great-uncle of Bob Dylan, and that Bob's grandfather ZigmanZimmerman did NOT come over from Odessa in 1905. Rather, he came from Cincinnati. ] Before we move on to the big cities, let's look a little closer at Hibbing. A list of prominent peoplefrom Hibbing throws up some real head-

scratchers, including Vincent Bugliosi, Bruce Carlson, GusHall, and Chi Chi LaRue. Gus Hall is the former leader of the US Communist Party. If you want toknow why I see that as a red flag here, consult this recent paper, which exposes Marx himself as anearly Intelligence asset. Bruce Carlson is a 4-star general and director of the NRO. The NRO is oneof the big-5 Intelligence agencies, along with CIA, DIA, NSA

and NGA. Carlson is also one of theheads of the Mormon Church. And of course Vincent Bugliosi was the attorney who prosecutedCharles Manson—who we now know was just an actor. [If you haven't read those linked papers, youwon't get far into this one. Read them, come back to this one, and you will feel differently than you doright now.]So some strange things appear to be coming out of Hibbing. We

find more strange things from theZimmermans. Bob's father Abe worked for Standard Oil. That is Rockefellers, of course. You willsay, “So what, maybe that means he owned a gas station.” No, we are told he was management levelby 1941. Besides, any link to the Rockefellers is a red flag. I suggest this was the main link to NewYork City. But let's skip ahead a bit. In Bob's highschool yearbook, next to his

picture, it says, “To join LittleRichard.” That's curious phrasing. Not “To be the next Little Richard,” or something like that, but “Tojoin Little Richard.” To join him in what? Wearing mascara? Being a drag queen? Remember, thesephrases aren't chosen by the kids themselves. They are chosen by the yearbook writers, who areusually making a joke. So the choice of Little Richard is both strange and

telling. It appears his

classmates knew something about Bob we didn't and maybe still don't. But even if we assume Bobwanted to “join Little Richard” in the ranks of famous musicians—as the phrase is usually read—thechoice of Little Richard is still strange. As with the Bobby Vee connection a few months later, itdoesn't really make any sense. What did

Dylan ever have in common with Little Richard or BobbyVee? We can see the connection to Woody Guthrie, which we are sold in 1961, but Little Richard andBobby Vee? C'mon! In 1959, Bob Dylan was 18 and Bobby Vee was 15. You should have a raft of questions at this point,like, “How does a 15-year-old boy from Fargo, North Dakota, sell a song to a record company, andthen get a contract with

the even larger Liberty Records in that same year?” Do you really think therecord companies were that desperate for talent? Or do you think maybe Vee had some connectionsdue to his family? Of course we aren't told what those connections were (although I would bet goodmoney someone in the Velline family {Bobby's Vee's real name} had married a Rockefeller orVanderbilt or something).

According to his official bio, Vee's career started in 1959 when he waschosen to fill in for Buddy Holly, etc. on “the day the music died.” But that was in Moorhead, MN.Why would they choose a 15-year-old boy from Fargo to play in Moorhead, across state lines? Veewas a minor and couldn't even get across state lines legally without someones help. He couldn't drivehimself, and anyone but his parents could

be stopped for transporting a minor. Yet we are told Vee andhis band volunteered to fill in, and were accepted. Is that at all believable? Age 15 isn't even highschool. That is middle school. This is a middle-school band filling in for Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valensand the Big Bopper. Do you think the ticket holders would stand for that? We are told the gig was asuccess. Is that believable? Three major stars dead in a

cornfield, and the show goes on with a middleschool band? Who writes this stuff? Want to hear something else weird? What did these middle school boys supposedly call themselves?The Shadows. Cue Twilight Zone music. Here are Vee's own words on this, from the liner notes to his1963 tribute album I Remember Buddy Holly:About a week before this, I had just organized a vocal and instrumental group

of five guys. Our style wasmodeled after Buddy's approach and we had been rehearsing with Buddy's hits in mind. When we heardthe radio plea for talent, we went in and volunteered. We hadn't even named the group up to that time, sowe gave ourselves a name on the spot, calling ourselves "The Shadows". What a lucky coincidence, right? A week before Buddy Holly dies in a plane crash near Fargo, ND,

agroup of middle school boys in Fargo, ND, start a Buddy Holly band and begin rehearsing his hits.Their lead singer memorizes all his lyrics in just one week, and when Holly dies, this 15 year old fillsin for him at the local dance, becoming an overnight sensation. You may buy that, but I don't. This isjust a cover story for something underhanded, the least sinister of which is that some rich family usedthe

Buddy Holly tragedy to promote their kids, and the most sinister of which is that they made ithappen. That was February of 1959. Before the year is out, Bobby Vee will have cut his own record—a BuddyHolly copy called “Suzie Baby”—sold it to a company capable of releasing it, and scored a hit with it.In that same year, he will be signed by an even larger record company, and will be touring. In thatsame

year, Bob Dylan will play with the band in Minneapolis under the stage name Elston Gunnn. You should not only ask yourself how Vee scored all that action as a 15-year-old boy in less than a year,but what the connection between Dylan and him was. Dylan was a rich Jewish boy just out of highschool. Why was he chosen over all others to play keyboards with Vee? Liberty records didn't know

anyone else in Minneapolis/St. Paul who could play the keyboards? And what is Elston Gunnn? Is that supposed to be clever? You should ask yourself this: does thecleverness of that stage name match in any way the cleverness of the person who wrote Shelter fromthe Storm or Like a Rolling Stone? The greatest folk lyricist in American music history starts out hiscareer as El Stun Gun? That would be like

finding out John Keats first choice as a nom de plume wasHolden McGroin.That name doesn't match the later Dylan hagiography, but it does match other things Dylan was doingat the time. He spent a short time at the University of Minnesota, where he pledged Sigma Alpha Mu.Yes, Dylan was frat boy. Surprised? You shouldn't be. It fits his medal acceptance from Obama in2012. Dylan was never the

rebel you thought he was. Rebels don't pledge fraternities, it pretty muchgoes without saying. Then we are fed the line about Dylan going to New York to visit his hero Woody Guthrie, who was inthe hospital with Huntington's disease. What we are never told is why Guthrie agreed to see him.Dylan was a college-dropout nobody. If you are a famous guy in hospital with a serious disease, doyou want to

see every stranger kid who knocks on the door? Does the hospital even allow it? I doubtit. And why would Ramblin' Jack Elliott “befriend” Dylan? Elliott was already a famous guy in thefolk music scene at the time, and Dylan was a 19-year-old nobody. I don't care how talented you are, itdoesn't work that way. High school kids don't just go to New York City and hook up with famouspeople. It doesn't happen now and it didn't happen then. You have to have some sort of entrée.

Youhave to be introduced. In the bios, they always skip over that. You are expected to believe Dylan justmet these guys in a coffeeshop or something and whipped out his harmonica, blowing them away withhis soul. Again, it doesn't work that way. They make you think these older guys are just sitting aroundstoops looking for new young talent. They aren't. Older guys are normally trying to snuff youngtalent,

since it is the young talent that will displace them. That is how the world really works. If Elliottwas really promoting Dylan, it is because he was being paid to promote him. It appears Dylan hadalready been chosen as the front for a big enterprise at that time, and people like Elliott were simplyused as cogs in that enterprise—to give it ballast and legitimacy. Elliott is also Jewish, the son of

awealthy New York surgeon, so it is not hard to find the first connection.

We see the same connection to Allen Ginsberg, who was also from a wealthy Jewish family. Thesepeople were connected in ways we aren't told, and it isn't just a Jewish connection. If you want toknow why I think Ginsberg is a red flag, you have to read this recent paper on the Beat Generation,where I show it was also manufactured by

US Intelligence. So just seeing Dylan hobnobbing withGinsberg was enough to give me the clue. Ginsberg, like most of these people, was a big creep and atowering phony, and no one would be hanging out with him who wasn't seeking promotion by theentertainment mafia (which wasn't just Jewish—see, for instance, Joseph Kennedy). We don't knowwho was really writing Dylan's songs (yet), but I assume

it wasn't Ginsberg. Ginsberg couldn't writefor sour apples. Ginsberg was in desperate need of ghost poets behind him, but he was stuffed too tightto use them. The songs attributed to Dylan most often aren't that great as poetry, either, but they aretop-notch as songs and are way beyond anything Ginsberg ever wrote. I will flesh out that opinionbelow, where we will look at a few of the songs line by line. We

see more red flags early on, when in 1961, at age 20, Dylan scored a review in the New York Times.As with Ezra Pound's meteoric rise in London in 1908, Dylan's meteoric rise in New York in 1961simply isn't believable. He had been playing in Greenwich Village for only about six months, had nooriginal material, hadn't written any of his great early songs yet, and somehow the New York Times doesa review of

him? He was the opening act for the Greenbriar Boys at Gerde's Folk City. Thereprobably weren't ten people in the audience. So let's ask the question begged. Who wrote the review?Robert Shelton, who was really Robert Shapiro, from another family of wealthy Jews. Who wasbooking Gerde's at the time? Charlie Rothschild. Does that name ring a bell? Do you think he mightbe Jewish also?

Wealthy family? Also remember who is behind the New York Times. The Sulzbergerfamily, extremely wealthy Jews who also founded the New York Stock Exchange. Even before theNew York Times and all other media were taken over by the CIA in the 1950's, that paper had beencontrolled by extremely vested interests, to say the least. So clearly, someone had a plan for Dylan. Or, we should say, he

was the front man for some operation.We will call it Operation Rolling Stone. We know Intelligence was running all sorts of secret operations in the 1960's. Many of them havesince been partially de-classified, like Operation Mockingbird, Operation Bluebird, Operation Chaos,MKULTRA, and many many more. But there appears to have been an even larger, more fundamentalOperation beneath all of them. This

was Operation Rolling Stone. It was the promotion of change inall forms. To what end? The promotion of trade. The Jews and Gentiles that would run the 20thcentury were masters of trade. They were money lenders and money changers and money makers.These families had always been very good at making money, but in the 20th century they discovered away to accelerate this money making beyond

even their own dreams. They discovered that acceleratedtrade depended directly on accelerated change. The more change of any kind they could introduce intosociety, the more money they would make. This is simply because change can always be accompaniedwith new products. New products = new wealth. More products = more wealth. Therefore, thefundamental and underlying Operation of the 20th

century has been CHANGE. This was revolutionary in every way, since humans don't really like change. Like cats and all otheranimals, they prefer things to stay as they are. Living creatures tend to equate change with discomfort.So to promote change was to go against human nature. It wasn't something that would happen on itsown. It had to be manufactured and constantly sold. It was revolutionary in

another way, since it went against all tradition. Tradition had always taught thatchange was something to be avoided. All the major religions sought balance and harmony, neither of

which could be maintained in times of rapid change. It was revolutionary in a third way, since traditionally trade had been considered dirty. Thoreau wasstill teaching in

the 1840's that “trade curses everything it touches.” Gentlemen in the early 19thcentury looked down on trade, as we see from reading Dickens or Austen, or watching DowntonAbbey. The English aristocracy mocked American wealth, since it came from trade. So you wouldthink it would be difficult to flip the world 180 degrees, taking us to the present where most believethat trade sanctifies everything

it touches. Well, it was difficult. It required hiring millions of people and spending vast amounts of capital overmore than a century. But the investment paid off, as we see. Accelerated change has made thebillionaires into trillionaires. They are now so rich they have to hide their wealth. The wealthiestfamilies won't even allow their names to appear on the Forbes lists, the totals are so obscene. Forinstance,

the Rockefellers are hundreds of times as wealthy as Bill Gates, but we are told they onlyhave a few billion. The truth is, the Rockefellers had made their first trillion by 1930 (in today'sdollars). We are told they gave most of it away and are now worth less than then. Don't believe it. But what does this all have to do with Bob Dylan? Dylan was just one player in a vast operation ofchange. And one of the clues is the

“Rolling Stone” meme. We see it coming up several times, inthings that don't appear to be related. We see Dylan's famous song, we see the band the Rolling Stones,and we see the magazine Rolling Stone. All came out in the 1960's. Why? Have you ever asked thatquestion? Maybe. Has anyone ever explained that to you? I don't think so.To understand it, we have to go back to the maxim that

started them all:A rolling stone gathers no moss.That is attributed to Publilius Syrus, from the first century BC. That just means little citizen of Syrus,so the person is anonymous. He is said to have been a slave from Syria, later freed, so he may havebeen a Jew. However that may be, the maxim was suggestive to those would control the 20th centurybecause it was the perfect expression of change as the

engine of wealth. A rolling stone gathers nomoss, but it gathers something else green: money. This is what Don McLean meant when he said inAmerican Pie, “moss grows fat on a rolling stone, but that's not how it used to be.” The moss there ismoney. A rolling stone gathers no moss, but it grows fat on money. Robert Heinlein cryptically suggested the same thing as far back as 1952, in his story The

RollingStones. It is about a family in search of adventure and money. So the Rolling Stone meme was a creation of Intelligence. It was likely the title of their biggest andlongest running Operation. In this way, it linked Dylan, the Rolling Stones, and the magazine. Allwere fronts for British/US intelligence. Their prime directive was the creation of rapid change. Do you think it is a coincidence that one of Dylan's

most famous songs is “The times, they area'changin”? Yes, they were and are, but who was changin' them and why? Let's look more closely atthe lyrics. Come writers and criticsWho prophesy with your penAnd keep your eyes wide

The chance won't come againAnd don't speak too soonFor the wheel's still in spinAnd there's no tellin' whoThat it's namin'Curious. Dylan is telling writers and

critics not to speak too soon. In other words, to keep quiet. Togo with it. This is curious because a lot of the change going on in the 1960's wasn't for the better.These people conspicuously tied themselves to the civil rights movement—which was the positivechange happening at the time; but far bigger things were going on which we now can see werenegative: the rise of Intelligence, the rise of the

corporate media, the rise of the police state, thecontinued rise of the war economy, and the permanent entrenchment of a secret government. And, wecan now add to that the permanent acceleration of society, which would create both huge sums of newwealth and the complete dissolution of culture. Also curious are the lines “And there's no tellin' who that it's namin'”. The songwriter is giving us a bitof a clue

there, telling us there are unnamed people behind the spinning wheel. With very littledigging, we have seen those names come up already: Rockefeller, Rothschild, Sulzberger, etc. This is also curious:Come senators, congressmenPlease heed the callDon't stand in the doorwayDon't block up the hallFor he that gets hurtWill be he who has stalledSenators are being told that they will get hurt if they stand in the

way of this change. That's not really aprogressive sentiment in a Republic or Democracy, is it? Congressmen are supposed to berepresentatives of the people, and these representatives are being threatened here. Why does anyonethink this song is progressive? Your sons and your daughtersAre beyond your commandYour old road isRapidly agin'Please get out of the new oneIf you can't

lend your handThis is no better. It is fascism posing as progressive politics. If your sons and daughters are no longeryour charges, who are they the charges of? That's right, the State. The financiers want control of yourkids, because they can then sell them things more easily and directly. That is precisely what hashappened. Kids are now raised by the corporate media, to the benefit of no one but the billionaires

andtrillionaires. The line it is drawnThe curse it is castThe curse it is cast? What does that mean? How could positive change be a curse? If Dylan is justtalking about civil rights here, as is the common interpretation, how is any curse being cast? Ask

yourself that. The order isRapidly fadin'And the first one nowWill later be lastThe old

order is rapidly fading. What was the old order? The aristocracy. In the 20th century, we haveseen the aristocracy replaced by the financiers as the controllers of society. The Jews, who wereformerly last, will be first, and the aristocrats will now be last. The old houses will be pulled down andreplaced by new mansions. These lines are usually read as Biblical references, as in the meek willinherit the Earth. But

that hasn't happened, has it? No, because that was never the plan. That isn'twhat these lyrics mean. No one ever gave a damn about the meek. The same can be said of Lennon's song Imagine, which is commonly misread as progressive. It isbeautifully arranged and performed, which makes it so seductive, but it isn't progressive at all. Imagine there's no heavenIt's easy if you tryNo hell below

usAbove us only skyImagine all the peopleLiving for today...Sounds great on a cursory reading, but if you read it in context of recent history, it becomes far moresinister. As I show in my paper on Theosophy, the financiers have been trying to destroy all religionsin order to co-opt their tithe. If the religions are gone, you have no one to go to but your government.The government becomes your priest and

confessor, your father, brother, sister and mother, and all youralms go to it. Imagine there's no countriesIt isn't hard to doNothing to kill or die forAnd no religion tooImagine all the peopleLiving life in peace...No countries. Does New World Order mean anything to you? Without countries, there are no lawsexcept the laws the financiers impose on you. For them, anything goes. That is precisely what we

haveseen in the past 50 years, and especially since the 1990's, when NAFTA and GATT gutted all local lawsin favor of corporate rapine. Imagine no possessionsI wonder if you canI can. After they take all your possessions, you are left with none. That's what we've seen in the pastdecades, as the superrich have sucked the middle and lower classes dry with various grand thefts likeLIBOR, quantitative easing,

corporate bailouts, and a raft of others. And you don't even possess yourprivacy anymore, since they are spying on you all the time, with satellites, appliances, street cameras,web snooping, illegal phone tapping, open emails, and so on.

The song only appears to be progressive. It is really fascism posing as progressive politics. It ismisdirection. Which brings us to The Rolling Stones. If you will recall,

one of the Stones early albums was titled“Their Satanic Majesties Request.” That was 1967, and the band members were supposedly facingdrug busts and jail time and so on. They were being sold as the worst of the bad boys, attacking the oldworld order and every other form of order and decency. So how is it that Mick Jagger got knighted byPrince Charles in 2002 for service to the Empire and Crown?

Exactly what service did he ever dothem? Given the mainstream interpretation of the Stones, it makes no sense. But given myinterpretation, it makes all the sense in the world. Jagger and the Stones manufactured and promotedaccelerated change of all kinds, which financially benefited the Empire and Crown enormously. Given that the Stones (and the

Beatles, too, after 1967) were sold as wildly anti-establishment, youwould expect the Royals and the British/US governments to be against them all the way. And yet wefind the Secret Services in both countries promoting them with every trick available. In my paper onLennon, we saw the BSC (the US arm of British Intelligence) promoting these bands as part of the“mobilization of pro-British opinion.” Given what we have been taught, that makes no sense. Butgiven

Operation Rolling Stone, it makes complete sense. Both governments wanted accelerated changeand societal dissolution, because both governments were being run by the financiers. Change anddissolution have proved to be engines of stratospheric levels of profit for these very few families.

---------------------------------------------

MM Musings And Commentaries part1 43min mp3

7/20/14, What I Finally Understood. Commentary on famous people, gun control, Smith&Wesson, and Larouche.

I am now almost 51, and it took me this long to figure out how the world really works. This is what I finally understood: all famous people are there to misdirect you. ALL OF THEM. They didn't accidentally get famous. They don't accidentally get on TV or in movies or in books or on CDs or on the internet.

And they certainly don't earn their way into these positions, as is now clear. So how did they get there? Why do you have to see them and hear them all the time? Why do you know who they are? Because they were placed there. They were chosen to fill that position, and they were chosen in order to misdirect you from the truth.

Look at it this way: say you wanted to control everyone in the world. Well, people are at different levels. They have different interests and beliefs and levels of intelligence. So if you want to control everyone, you have to place your guys at all these levels, on all possible paths.

If you are a football coach setting up a defense on the field, you don't put all your tacklers in the middle of the field, or all on one side. You spread them out. You want to block all possible paths to the goal. You have to defend against the run and the pass, the short ball and the long ball.

It is the same with government.

If you want to govern people, you have to keep them on the path you have chosen for them. That is how the governors understand government. You may think government is about keeping people employed and building highways and educating children, but it isn't. It is about “governing” them. Moving them around at will.

Think of a governess. She keeps the kids out of trouble and molds them into the sort of adults her employer or her society requires. Same thing with the governors. They keep you from troubling them and mold you into someone who can make them richer. That is what our society requires, and very little else.

With that goal in mind, the last thing the governors want is “enlightened” people or “self-actualized” people. Those people might make money for themselves, think for themselves, and govern themselves. People like that make very poor clients. People like that are just trouble. So the governors have to head them off.

Since people take many different paths, the governors have to place their blockers and tacklers everywhere. They have to have blockers for smart people and dumb people, lazy people and ambitious people, caring people and uncaring people, progressive people and conservative people, men and women, young and old.

And they have to have blockers and tacklers up and down the field, on the fifty-yard line as well as on the five-yard line. If you get past one line of tacklers, they have to have another line ready for you.

To switch the visualization, no matter how high up the mountain you climb, they have to have some guru on a goat-ledge positioned there to shunt you off on the wrong path.

No matter how deep down the rabbit hole you have climbed, they have to have some bearded caterpillar waiting for you to give you bad advice in solemn tones, recommending you eat the wrong cake or try the wrong door.

I admit it took me a while to figure this out. Over the past decade I have lost more and more of my old heroes. I got around them and moved on up the mountain. But then I came to another set of heroes perched up there, and instead of learning from my past mistakes and looking at these heroes with suspicion, I instead protected them from questions like that.

I didn't want to lose them, so I didn't look closely at them. I nodded politely in the old ways and knelt down for the next lesson.

But eventually they said something that didn't fit the script, and the curtain was torn. I then felt like Jim Carrey in The Truman Show, when his car radio accidentally picks up the director's channel. I was forced to pick up my bamboo mat and kettle of fish and move further up the mountain.

No matter how high I got, I was always met by a new expert, pointing sideways along a path and smiling knowingly.

Finally, I figured out the game. I figured it out by noticing that all these guys popped up there like jack-in-the-boxes, rising up from underground tunnels dug centuries earlier by an army of evil moles.

They knew I would come eventually—me or someone like me—and they had made plans. The entire mountain and rabbit hole had been trapped and mined, and I began to look around for David Bowie in the Labyrinth.

Like Bowie, these pretend sorcerers gave themselves away to a keen eye, since they got more desperate the nearer you got to the truth. The longer I stayed on the right path, the less likely I was to be fooled by the next trap, and they knew that.

That doesn't mean any of this is easy. Maybe the hardest part is that you have to pass through a treacherous middle level on the mountain. Once you pass the halfway point on the mountain, the gurus get more clever.

You already know a lot by that time, so they have to take that into account. They have to lead the lesson by re-teaching you a lot you already know. This makes you trust them. One of their greatest tricks is unmasking gurus on lower levels, although those gurus are really their colleagues.

They say, “Oh, by the way, you know that the gurus at level 42, 43, and 44 are working for the man, right? They were trying to keep you from climbing up to this level, because they are jealous of the view I have from here.

Beautiful, isn't it?” Guru 45 then subtly suggests his view is superior to views from even higher, and that you have no need to climb up further. He has to say that in just the right way, though, at the right speed, with the right inflections, or you remember that guru 44 just told you pretty much the same thing.

You hit another hard part when you realize all the gurus are planted. As soon as that sinks in fully, they stop sending you gurus. The jack-in-the-boxes stop popping up from the mountain ledges, and you find yourself alone with the birds and the bears.

That is scary not only because you have no one to talk to, but even more because your trick of doing the opposite of what you were told no longer works. You can no longer wait for the guru to point left and then move right. You have to decide on your own, without the help of negative evidence.

I know some of you are laughing, but do you understand how hard that is? If you are a good ways up the mountain, just think how many of your decisions were decisions of avoidance. Compare the number of paths you refused because they looked bad to the number of paths you chose because they looked good.

If you are like me, most of your progress has been due to the former. Given ten paths, you chose number 7 because 1-6 and 8-10 all stank. And they all stank because you could see lots of stinky people clogging up those paths. The choice was easy.

But once you get past the gurus, you no longer have stinky people showing you how not to live. Up above you are only empty paths, none of them either beckoning you or offending you. All is silent. With the mountaintop draped in cloud, how do you know which way to go?

Let us transport ourselves back down the mountain some ways, where the gurus are as thick as flies on a summer dunghill. At this level, I will not find many who wish to learn my lesson. The students are in thrall to the teachers, and do not wish to fall out of thrall.

These students will tell me that one side or the other must be right. Given a certain question, they can't all be wrong, can they? Well, if they are all paid to be wrong, they can. Neither side is ever telling you the truth, because they are both trying to make a buck off of you.

The gurus are screwing you from both ends. The people they are hiring to debate gun control in the media on both sides are working for the banks. The escalation benefits them from all directions.

So make a list of all the famous people selling both sides of this argument. No, really. Make an actual list. Write down all the people you love to hate who are on the other side. Then write down all the people that you think are on your side.

Then ask yourself, “Are any of them speaking any sense?” Or are they all promoting this escalation one way or the other? This is how it goes, on all topics.

I say that not as a champion of capitalism or of the US system in general, but only as a champion of reason. I am all in favor of trade unions and worker-owned companies; but at the same time I would not like to see a co-op of Walmart, McDonald's, and USPS employees running the country. While the system we have doesn't put the best people at the top, Marxism wouldn't either.

They want you to think there is a lot of political violence going on, even though there isn't; just as now they want you to think there are mass murders every month, although there aren't. The billionaires love a manufactured world of fear and chaos, because fear and chaos keep all markets brisk. In a world of love and satisfaction, all sales would plummet.

This is why we saw George Bush telling people to go out and buy stuff after 911. They found that they had overplayed that one by a tad, and that people were so shocked they had stopped buying. You want to scare people just enough to make them buy stuff to decorate the bunker, but not enough to send them down into it.

They learned their lesson there, and they keep the security level at a constant bright orange now, instead of blinking red. At orange, most people will be at Walmart every other day stocking up on toilet paper, baking soda, and camouflage pants; at red they will have pad-locked the shutters, armed the booby traps, and lit the candles.

Some will say, “What about you? How do we know you aren't another posted guru, planted to misdirect us?” Well, I'm not famous, am I? I am not on TV, am I? I am not promoted by some studio or consortium or publisher or think-tank. No one is sending you here: if you got to these pages you got here on your own, probably by lucking out in a websearch.

Coverage is coverage, you know, positive or negative. As they say, all press is good press as long as they spell your name right. Normally, Wikipedia blackwashes people it doesn't like unmercifully. Although we see large parts of his page spun negative, we see surprisingly large parts spun positive.

You will say those parts were written by his acolytes, but that is to ignore how Wikipedia normally works. Normally, if you go on a page of someone the institutions hate, you will find a complete blackwash. If you try to add any positive remarks or correct the negative ones, your comments will be deleted immediately.

You shouldn't trust anyone, especially someone you haven't met in person. You should read everything closely and make a decision based on continuity and logic, not on trust.

So how far back does this rule go, you will ask.

Is every famous person in history a plant, or just the living ones? I intend the rule to apply to only the living ones, and the recently dead. I have shown in recent papers that we can take the rule back to the Civil War, but the further back we go the more exceptions there will be. My research is limited, of course, so I can't address every famous person who ever lived.

But any famous person from the past who is still promoted heavily should immediately fall into your bag and ring a bell. Since the broad control of media didn't take effect until recently, there will no doubt be many exceptions to the rule even in the late 19th century and early 20th century. There may be some few exceptions still.

But don't make the mistake of assuming that just because you have gone back before 1947 that the control no longer exists. It was less perfect and less broad, but it has existed for many

centuries, and perhaps forever

-----------------------------------------------

6/9/18, Miles' Comments. At Cutting through the Frog, I mean Fog. I have had several requests for a compilation of my comments at the recent party. I edited these down myself, so hopefully this will be useful to someone.

I see zero indication of a violent uprising, so it looks like they will just continue on with the blue pill and the matrix, which have worked so well for so long. Basically, they brought this on themselves with 911 and Homeland Security, and they would be facing harder times even without me.

Their response to push back against Operation Chaos was to create even more chaos, but they are beginning to see that isn't working. At some point I expect them to see some amount of reason and begin scaling back to 1990 levels.

Nobody wants to live in the current world, including them. Just witness Hollywood to see the sort of blowback they are getting from their own projects. Do those rich privileged people seem happy to you?

No, they have to try to have relationships in the same manufactured climate you do, which is impossible no matter who you are.

You don’t want any insulators beneath the floors. You want charge rising naturally. It can do that through rock and I assume concrete, and of course wood, but it can’t do that through insulation.

The human body is notoriously weak compared to other animals, and is weaker now than it has ever been in history. It has been weakened by purposely polluted air, water, and food, and heightened levels of unnatural radiation can only add to the toxic mix.

I don’t believe that radiation from Fukushima has irradiated the entire Pacific, or that it is threatening the West Coast of the US. The last thing you want to do is block heat rising out of the ground, since that is the same as charge. You are a charge engine, just like everything else.

So don't insulate subfloor and don't wear shoes around the house,

except leather soled. It is easy to opt out of the scanners at the airport. Every time I travel I simply request an opt out.

The solution is to quit reading and following this stuff. People need to boycott the media from top to bottom. Don’t watch it on TV, don’t subscribe to any mags or newspapers, and don’t click on it online.

Make the ad revenue go to zero. Use adblocker. The other solution is to face down your

friends. Don’t tee off on the first hole and move on. Tell them they are dead wrong and that you expected more of them.

If people want to be stupid or corrupt, they should have to play golf with other stupid and corrupt people, not us. If these people lose all their intelligent friends, maybe they will be forced to reassess their positions.

And if they don’t, at least you won’t have to look at their stupid faces. I bring not peace but a sword. It is time for the 5% to assert themselves and lead. If we don’t do it nobody will. 1984 and Brave New World, which we now see weren’t warnings, they were brags.

I am not helpless to any commands, ESPECIALLY of a physical nature. I command, I don’t get commanded. Social problems, yes, due to stupid comments from everyone around me. Blind to manipulation? You have to be kidding! I am not impressed by crocodile tears, and tend to laugh when I see them.

I don’t read poetry anymore. I’ve read all the good stuff many times and there is nothing new worth reading. Google lists my recent paper 2nd, but Bing doesn’t list it at all. Very strange.

I know that just leaves you with Google, but for some reason Google is the only one not seriously interfering with my numbers and not uplisting my critics.

No, it’s going the same speed as the other ball, since they go the same distance in the same time. They both go 4. But the ball in the curve will APPEAR to slow down in the curve, so you are right. You are not seeing wrongly. It appears to slow down because it is no longer going forward only.

It is going forward and sideways at the same time. Your eye sees the distance as shorter than it is, so you think it has slowed down. The analogy is a ball in a pinball machine, having to take a complex path to move a short distance. Your eye slurs over the path and sees only the total distance, so it looks like the pinball is slowing down in the machine. But it isn’t.

There is plenty of evidence to go to court on 911, and I would like to see that happen. If it were up to me, I would take them to court myself tomorrow. So I don’t think we should “get past it” in that sense. Not in the “move on” sense. We were at the “move up” phase years ago, and subpoenas should have been passed out by the thousands. But that didn’t happen.

What we need is a vast boycott of all major media, all useless products, all companies with any ties to the gov, all gov, and anything else that comes to mind. Just say no to everything you can say no to.

Start by recycling your cellphones and going back to groundlines. I live without them easily. ANd so did you for years.

All crypto-currencies are crap. It is all another project, stay away from it!

Those who don’t wish to believe will always come up with some lame explanation or pushed math, as they did with the ball bearings. THe friction argument against pi=4 doesn’t work at all, as I show. Besides, most people can follow a ball easier than fluid, in my opinion. Fluid just confuses most people, since it brings up the question of fluid mechanics.

I believe each of our actions is etched in time somehow, and can’t be destroyed. That achieves the same thing, without the need to relive the same life over and over. The past can’t be destroyed, and always remains a part of the present. So you build on your past lives and past actions.Everything you do remains eternally important, without reoccuring eternally.

I don’t want to talk about aliens, since I don’t know anything about them. It is like talking about gods. There may be aliens, but the gov alien projects are all misdirection. I see a lot of evidence of higher powers, but it is all pretty murky beyond that. If they wanted us to know, we would know.

Whether gods or aliens, they DON’T want us to know, and I don’t see it as a code we are going to crack. Life is some sort of test, and if we had the answer sheet, the test wouldn’t work, would it? You know enough to know right from wrong, but you are never going to be told all the secrets.

If you knew all the secrets, the fun would be gone from the game anyway. So stick with the questions that have answers and leave the other ones be. I have shown there are lot of questions that can be answered that haven’t been. Those are the ones I am interested in looking at.

By 1988 I was doing some pretty decent work and was already starting to get some commissions.

Josh would have to admit he is the first Jew to blow the Dreyfus affair. . . ever? WHich doesn’t say much for Jewish openness. Of course, I am the first Gentile to blow hundreds of projects, which is also difficult to explain. It doesn’t say much for the perspicuity of Gentiles, does it?

So you seem to have your pick: lying manipulators or dumb-as-dirt sheep. All of us here are choosing the third route, but despite the numbers in the counter above, we are not quite a majority, are we?

Doesn’t really matter, as I have said before. Life isn’t about majorities or political wins. It is about private wins. It is about setting yourself (and those around you) up for your next life and all the next lives down the line.

In other words, your longterm relation to the Gods or Muses or whatever you wish to call them is important. Far more important than your relation to the current ruling party.

Life may seem long but it is really rather short. It is just a page in a much longer book. All the wise have known that, and it doesn’t take a guru to see it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

1/12/19, Reader Feedback. The results are in.

Above 100 voted Here are the results:

Best of 2018:

Titanic (49 votes)

Best of all time:

JFK/Hidden Kings (22 votes)

Best Physics:

Pi=4 (17 votes)

Best Guest Paper:

Ancient Spooks (37 votes)

Silliest/Most Absurd Hoax of 2018:

1st place: Tesla Roadster......in......space! (9 votes)

Worst Crisis Actor of 2018:

1st place: David Hogg and his schoolmates (7 votes)

I think the most important fake events paper I have written would be the one on the

Crusades . Who would have thought that the Popes, Kings, Crusaders, Templars, and Byzantine Emperors would all be from the same family?

The research there covered many centuries, and it tells us what is going on now, since the same family is still in charge.

Since the near future is always more important than the past, I think many of my science papers are more important than any of my history papers. The pi paper is bigger than most people realize, since it will allow for the correction of thousands of bad equations.

The correction to the calculus will allow for the correction of even more equations, The Unified Field papers are fundamental, and will create a revolution in physics by themselves.

The most important is my diagramming of the nucleus , since it uses what I discovered about unification to rewrite the Periodic Table .

It links physics and chemistry, taking my ideas out of the theoretical and firmly into the practical. The future applications are nearly endless, and even I can’t begin to imagine what they will be.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

1/12/19, A Salvator Mundi Update. I despin some of the most recent propaganda, including the link to Trump-Russia.

Putin is the Russian equivalent of Trump, Gates, or Buffett: a minor billionaire listed to keep your eyes off the trillionaires. In the US these are the Rockefellers, Vanderbilts, and a few others. In Russia they are . . . I don't know, Oppenheimers, Rothschilds? Only a few families own the entire world, but I am not privy to the current divisions. I don't know who runs Russia right now.

Given that election oversight is non-existent, it doesn't take much to steal an election. You just make up some numbers and report them. the President is just a Teleprompter-reading stooge,

Who would be paying Saudi Arabia half a billion in 2017, and for what? This one is easy: it was for the bombing of Yemen. Well, since the war in Yemen is about maintaining US/Saudi control of Yemen and making sure that Yemenis have no say in their own governance, the answer to that is also easy. The US and Russia aren't enemies and never have been,

Mueller is another crypto-Jew from the same families, playing Judy to Trump's Punch. As with Starr's investigation of the Clintons, nothing will ever come of it. The investigation is manufactured to keep your eyes on Trump and Russia, while all the real action is elsewhere.

Blackwater was a major part of the coalition that bombed Yemen starting in 2015. They now call themselves Academi, but it is the same people. The US doesn't need any help in stealing an election, hacking social media, or in psychological operations in general.

Yes, Mossad is also good at these things, but it is always a junior partner in these US/UK/Israel worldwide projects. In many of them—see 911—it is glad to act the fall guy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

(http://mileswmathis.com/potter.pdf).

“If, by unfortunate means, non-magical people do happen to observe the working of magic, the Ministry of Magic sends Obliviators to cast Memory Charms upon them causing them to forget the event. [From the Wiki page on muggles].

Just substitute “agent” for “Obliviator”, “non-agent” for “non-magical person”, “Intel hoax” for “magical event”, CIA for “Ministry of Magic”, and “propaganda blitz” for Memory Charm.

If, by unfortunate means, non-agents do happen to see through obvious hoaxes, the CIA sends agents to confuse and misdirect them, causing them to forget the event.

As you see, the Harry Potter project is stupidly transparent in a thousand places, and only readers that had been sucking on blue pills their whole lives could fail to see through it.”

-------------------------------------------------------------------

2/13/18, Beyond Velikovsky.

More unravelling of the Velikovsky project.

The modus operandi of these people is to tell as much truth as the project will bear, so the trick is to unwind the project, discovering where the truth ends and the misdirection begins. This is another “eyes-off” project, in which the audience is given a partial reading of data to prevent them from a fuller reading. With Velikovsky and Worlds in Collision, the main physical theory involves Venus settling into its current orbit.

I have shown in previous papers that this excess heat is explained by the charge field, and planetary recycling of charge. Due to the bipolar nature of the field, all planets pull in charge at both poles, but since part of this charge is upside down (spinning opposite) to the other part, we get photon spin-ups—which are the same as a heat increase.

It is a magnetic effect that creates heat in a very simple way, the field is what causes spin to begin with. creating her heat by a sort of photon friction. Infrared is heat. In 1950 the Families were consolidating their control over all parts of society via the CIA and other institutions and programs.

They are teaching their converts that there are no photons. They also misdirect at all times away from the charge field and to the EM field, though the two aren't the same. Solar System was not gravity-only.

It appears that charge had become a classified secret sometime in the first half of the 20th century, and the governors didn't want to divulge any of it to the public or to academic scientists. They wanted to keep it for a few military scientists.

It {Velikovsky and Worlds in Collision} was part of the project. It acted to squelch discussion and research in these fields for decades, especially in academia. Why? Because if you got beyond Velikovsky, you would be like me. You would be looking in your rear view mirror at most mainstream science in all fields.

Obviously, they couldn't have that. To maintain control of science, they had to keep everyone penned in the gravity-only, shut-up-and calculate, Relativity/QED fog that defined the 20th century. If your average academic scientist had understood the charge field, the revolution would have been quick and fatal.

All the big names at the top of all fields would have been guillotined, and their pet projects would have fallen with them— including black holes, Big Bang, gravity waves, inflation, Higgs bosons, spooky forces, and all the rest.

Since this mainstream fraud not only hides many classified projects but also allows for billions in theft from worldwide treasuries, you have a pretty clear cui bono for any misdirecting projects like Velikovsky.

This was another big blackwashing of the truth and Velikovsky was another Anti. The ideas to be blackwashed were 1) charge, 2) serious reading of historical texts as honest physical accounts, 3) “amateurs” as scientists, 4) the public as a serious player in the history of science.

As far as 4) goes, the governors were tired of having to answer questions, about science funding or anything else, so they wished to jettison any and all public participation in science, except as a prostrate consumer.

Before WW2 and especially before WW1 the public had maintained some education in science. Consult old issues of Scientific American to get a taste of this. Back then, the magazines had to treat their audiences with some respect, since those audiences had been partially educated. Those same magazines can now treat their audiences as ninnies, since in almost all cases they are.

They know nothing but the current propaganda. Read back to back the first issue of Scientific American from 1845 and the latest issue, and you will have a capsule of the precipitous drop in intelligence of the average American science reader—a drop planned and abetted over the past century and a half.

But back to Velikovsky. He was the Anti here because he was hired and set up specifically to fail. The entire series of books was written to fail and the surrounding controversy was composed to blackwash all the ideas he promotes.

Did he help the cause of charge, or of a serious reading of ancient texts, or of planetary influences, or of anything else? No, he damaged them irreparably at a time when they were on the rise, and I am telling you that was no accident. I am just surprised they didn't later blackwash him as a pedophile, Satanist, or wife beater.

Had the project peaked fifty years later, they probably would have, but the 50s were not the time for that. Velikovsky was a spook, but he was an old-world spook who thought too much of himself to put his name through that kind of sewer. Now, the spooks are not so proud or elevated. They will do whatever it takes to promote the old projects, as long as it pays handsomely.

As usual, it looks like they saw me coming, since the Velikovsky Affair was the perfect preblackwashing of all my discoveries. Via charge, I can be fatuously linked to Velikovsky and flushed without a second—or even a first reading—and this is just how the mainstream wants it.

I don't really think anyone predicted my coming, and my guess is someone like me was probably on the rise in 1950. They have since buried him so completely not even a gravestone remains. Probably he didn't have my tenacity. But what was created for him can be retuned overnight for me, and it has been via the Thunderbolts and other players.

However, as you have seen their projects aren't working against me, and there are many reasons for that. To start with, the projects have lost all subtlety. Used to getting their way, the spooks have become overconfident and lazy, and they have lost their edge. Beyond that, the anti-education project has turned out to be a two-edged sword, cutting back on its makers.

Meaning, the governors have gotten stupider along with the rest of us. They can't recruit the talent they used to, because it simply doesn't exist. They have had to breathe the same polluted air the rest of us have, and it appears they forgot to install the fluoride filters at Langley.

But the main reason they have failed is that they didn't predict or prepare for someone like me. How could they? When in history have they had to? My method of advancement is unprecedented, and I doubt you can point to any analogue in history.

I have piggybacked on their own tools like the internet, which didn't exist until recently. So there is no way anyone could have predicted my form of attack. It has been so serendipitous and unorthodox, even I failed to plan it or predict it. As an almost overnight creation of the Muses, I have turned out to be as unanswerable as a talking unicorn.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11/27/18, Solar Cycle 25 has already begun.

My revolutionary prediction of 2014 has come to pass, sending the mainstream even further under the bed.

In September of 2014, I was the only one predicting (doing all the math and mechanics) that Solar Cycle 25 would begin in 2018.

Everyone else was predicting 2019 or 2020. It was revolutionary since it would prove I was right and the mainstream was wrong.

While they are admitting I was right, they are sure to continue to pretend I don't exist. The fact that the mainstream feel the need to hide—not only failing to publicize my work but failing to publicize

the Solar Cycle itself—proves they are running scared.

They have been forced to bury an entire Solar Cycle for at least

eight months, just to avoid facing the truth. The mainstream cannot deal with me on any level, so the only thing they can do is bury their heads and pretend that history is not proceeding without them.

After all, the Sun is not going to quit doing his thing just because they decide not to report it. And, likewise, I am not going to stop doing my thing just because they fail to report it.

Lenny's Notes:

MAINSTREAM INCORRECT PREDICTION AND LATER ACKNOWLEDGING THAT SOLAR CYCLE 25 HAS BEGUN https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle_25

Wikipedia graph mainstream science prediction that solar cycle 25 would end no sooner then 2019.

SOURCE OF MILES PREDICTION MADE IN 2014

http://milesmathis.com/cycle.pdf

On page 8 Miles cites a article by NASA as follows:

“People make their predictions for when this solar cycle will end and the next one will start," said Leamon."Sometime in 2019 or 2020, some people will be proved right and others wrong."

On page 9 Miles writes "According to my analysis, the next minimum should be before 2019. Since I only need to predict 2018 to beat the mainstream prediction, that is what I will do here".

On page 14 Miles explains why he is able to accurately predict the start of Solar Cycle 25 while the mainstream cannot:

" The only “physical” influence they have have been taught is the gravity field, or perhaps the Lagrangian; and since they don't realize both the gravity field and the Lagrangian have always contained the charge field (and have been unified), they could not do what I am doing".

DEFINITION OF SOLAR CYCLE From Wikipedia

"The solar cycle or solar magnetic activity cycle is the nearly periodic 11-year change in the Sun's activity (including changes in the levels of solar radiation and ejection of solar material) and appearance (changes in the number and size of sunspots, flares, and other manifestations)".

"Solar maximum and solar minimum refer respectively to periods of maximum and minimum sunspot counts. Cycles span from one minimum to the next. They have been observed (by changes in the sun's appearance and changes seen on Earth, such as auroras) for centuries. Changes on the Sun cause effects in space, in the atmosphere, and on Earth's surface".

-------------------------------------------------------

11/29/18 Jerry Saltz Hits New Lows. Do you really want to ask this guy “How to be an Artist”?

My readers are already aware that Modern art critics are the scum that scum scrapes off its shoes. Supposing we make it through the current cultural nadir without going extinct from pure vileness, someday the writing of today will be taught in schools as an example of all to avoid.

We now laugh at 19th c. writers like Bulwer-Lytton, but his purple prose (“it was a dark and stormy night”) was just cliché. It was never reprehensible. Art criticism began hitting lows never before imagined by writers of any stripe by the early 1900s, and it has continued to devolve and deconstruct decade by decade since then.

Every year I think we have hit the abyss, but somehow these semi-lettered fellows find a way to go deeper. They find new ways to combine crashing insincerity with technical clumsiness and an ignorance of every field they address.

But as we have discovered in the past five years, it is even worse than that. Art criticism isn't where it is by sheer accident or incompetence. Being from the Families (art critic Jerry Saltz) demanded his due, so they had to find some way to make him semi-famous. So they inserted him into art criticism, which even they know is the bottom of the barrel.

Here he can thrash about all he wants. It is hoped that any self-destructing he does as an art critic will likewise further besmirch art history. They have to drive off all real artists and all real art connoisseurs and all people with intelligence, because if they happen to spend too much time in the room, they will see through the smoke and mirrors.

They will see what I finally saw: Modern art is a magnificent and long-running con, a fake of monstrous proportions, used mainly for money laundering, but also as an important part of Operation Chaos. It allows the bankers to launder astonishing amounts of money with no oversight, while helping tear society apart at the seams.

A ruptured society is far more profitable, for any number of reasons I don't need to repeat here. As I have told you, the sexual recession—like the death of art—is no accident. This splitting of the sexes has been planned and manufactured over many decades, all to increase profits. Sexually repressed people spend far more money to compensate, and this has been known for almost a century.

What they would have taught you in the 19th century. if you had taken an art class, It would have been understood that any possible thing you might try to do—not just art—should be good, make sense, and not be stupid.

He (art critic Jerry Saltz) failed because his rank in the Families was too low. If he had been the son of a duke or a Cohen, he could have become successful no matter what. They might have even allowed him to paint flowers or figures. art was promoted because it was bad. Those in control of the art world kept real artists out of the field, which kept real art connoisseurs and all other intelligent people out of the field, which allowed it to continue to be coopted by the bankers and propagandists.

If you are like most modern people, you probably don't even know how to write. You know how to text, but probably have a hard time signing your name. And odds are there is nothing artistic about your writing, and that is because you have never practiced making it artistic. In the time of my grandparents, they had entire classes devoted to penmanship. I have my grandfather's high school yearbook, and almost everyones cursive is beautiful. Now, yearbook notes are just scribbles, mostly illegible.

If you are from a family of dukes or Cohens, absolutely anything you do, no matter how paltry, stunted, or malformed can be called skilled art. And if you are not from those families, nothing you do, no matter how skilled, creative, or artistic, will ever be called art or ever be promoted.

Art critic—the least artistic people that have ever existed. Their misunderstanding of art is so complete it is surprising they can remember how to spell it.

Art should express emotions. That is what it does best. But whether they are easy to understand is beside the point. Understanding is done by the viewer, not the artist. The artist has no control over the sensitiveness or intelligence of a viewer. Some viewers will understand more than others, but the artist is not responsible for misunderstanding or lack of understanding.

Cats are more picky about people. They are a finer judge of character than dogs. As for my cats, they come when I call them. They go on walks with me. They run to be picked up and then purr and rub on my beard. They hate to be put down. They sleep next to me or on top of me at night, the three of them often trapping me to where I can hardly move. This is because they know I am a fellow artist. We all have good taste. We all know what beauty is, and we know it is important.

All the famous Modern artists were from rich families. Yes, some of them are sold as coming from the lower middle class, just as they sell you many movie stars that way. But it isn't true. They are lying and I have proved it over and over. These people are all from the same families, and those families are very wealthy.

If you do your research, you will find that all famous Modern artists had an inside track. They were to the gallery born in some way. Most of them can be traced in a very short line to the major banks and investment companies. the art world is full of privileged people, who made it because they were connected. the art world is made up of them and only them.

There are no exceptions. No one got in strictly on talent, since none of them are talented. No one got in strictly on skill, since none of them are skilled. None of them got in on hard work, since none of the “art” displays any degree of hard work.

I hate what they are. I hate them as liars and cheats and frauds. I hate them for destroying real art and replacing it with their own garbage. That has nothing to do with envy. Envy is felt toward those who are better than us, and these people are better than no one. What I feel toward them is not envy, but revulsion. I literally thank the Muses every night that I am not part of the Modern art scene. I thank them for sparing me the company and kinship of such people.

Because those voices in your (art critic Jerry Saltz) head aren't Demons, Jerry. They are Furies, hounding you with the truth for your crimes against the natural order. You are faking it and aren't a genius. You and your cousins have inverted the natural order so that you can see yourselves in the media. You have stolen art for yourselves, driving real art underground. You have stolen literature for yourselves, driving real literature underground.

You have stolen science for yourselves, driving real science underground. You have stolen, squashed, perverted, killed, or redefined everything to suit your own pathetic sense of self, but it hasn't worked, as we knew it wouldn't. You know the truth despite everything and it haunts you. This is also the way the world works, on a deeper level. It is what the Families are in deepest denial about. It is what they cannot buy themselves out of, talk themselves out of, or con themselves out of.

I am not haunted by any such doubts. Just as my cats like me, my nights aren't haunted by Demons or Furies. My days and nights are watched over by Muses, who comfort me constantly. They guide me and protect me. They give me things to do and assure me my job is well done. No, they don't provide me with piles of money or fame, but it is because they know the true value of those things. They provide me with what I need, and in return I defend art to the best of my ability. I defend science to the best of my ability.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------