CARBOHYDRATE MANAGEMENT NARRATIVES
Dr. Paul Marik STAYING HEALTHY vitamin D3 benefits and usage
CARBOHYDRATE MANAGEMENT NARRATIVES
Dr. Paul Marik STAYING HEALTHY vitamin D3 benefits and usage
https://mindandmatter.substack.com/p/good-carbs-bad-carbs-how-good-is
Good Carbs, Bad Carbs: How good is "good" when it comes to insulin?
Send to Kindle
sliced bread on white table
Type II diabetes is a chronic metabolic condition in which cells of the body no longer utilize energy normally. Insulin resistance is a key component. Insulin is a hormone produced by the pancreas, important for growth and energy storage.
When we ingest foods that elevate blood sugar, insulin is released to promote absorption of glucose from the blood into tissues. The liver is a key site of glucose uptake. Glucose is primarily stored as glycogen (carbohydrate), but excess glucose that exceeds glycogen storage capacity can be converted to triglycerides (fat). In essence, insulin mobilizes tissues to store excess sugar, to be burned for energy later on if dietary energy sources run low. For wild animals facing scarce and unpredictable food supplies, this is a useful trick—hours, days, or even weeks can elapse between meals. Best to save surplus energy for later.
Diagram depicting how insulin regulates blood sugar (glucose) levels. High blood sugar stimulates insulin release from the pancreas, which tells the liver to store the excess blood glucose as glycogen. From Singh et al. (2022)
Food scarcity is rarely an issue for domesticated animals like modern humans. We have the ability to eat what we want, whenever we want it. Excess calorie consumption (positive energy balance) elevates insulin—the body’s hormonal signal that energy is plentiful and should be saved for a rainy day. If that rainy day never comes and you continue eating excess calories day after day, insulin remains chronically elevated and your growing energy stores never get burned—you get fatter.
When insulin levels remain elevated for extended periods, insulin resistance can develop. This is not a terminal disease state. It’s an adaptive, reversible cellular response. Cells turn down their sensitivity to insulin when they have been over-stimulated by it—an attempt to compensate for excess insulin by decreasing their ability to respond to it. The problem is that this compensatory decrease in insulin sensitivity impairs glucose uptake. Cells become metabolically dysfunctional, unable to properly regulate glucose levels. A hallmark of diabetes is hyperglycemia—abnormally elevated blood sugar.
Insulin-resistance beyond diabetes
Insulin resistance is closely associated with type II diabetes but also a wide range of other conditions. Metabolic dysfunction of our cells can have diverse negative consequences.
Compensatory responses like this are common in biology. Consider the phenomenon of tolerance in drug addiction. A low dose of, say, an opioid can elicit a strong physiological response. With repeated exposure, brain cells turn down their sensitivity to the drug (e.g. by reducing the number of opioid receptors). A higher dose is now needed to elicit the same effect.
Insulin resistance is not exactly like drug tolerance, but both involve the body adapting to elevated levels of a stimulus by reducing responsiveness to it. Excess insulin causes its own problems, but so does our cells’ adaptive response of limiting insulin sensitivity. Their ability to use energy to power normal, healthy functions is impaired, giving rise to problems that manifest as symptoms. Drugs can be taken to mask those symptoms, but reversal of insulin resistance requires removal of its cause: excess insulin, driven by excess caloric intake.
Eating too much food is (often) the cause of the problem. But not all foods are created equal. Different macronutrients stimulate different patterns of insulin release.
The three major macronutrient classes—carbs, fats, protein—can all stimulate insulin release. In general, carbs stimulate more insulin release than fats and proteins. The simple sugar glucose is the most potent stimulator of insulin release. “Complex carbohydrates,” composed of many sugar molecules chained together (e.g. starch), get broken down into simple sugars by the body. This takes some time, causing a shorter peak in blood glucose and insulin, spread out in time.
Fiber, an indigestible complex carbohydrate, cannot be broken down to simple sugars by humans. This is why consuming carb-rich foods with high fiber content results in a blunted insulin response. Qualitatively, here’s how insulin levels respond to different carbohydrates: simple sugars (glucose), complex carbohydrates (starch), and complex carbs with high-fiber:
Insulin and Insulin Resistance – CuttingCarbs.co.uk
A qualitative cartoon depiction of how different forms of carbohydrate stimulate insulin release. Graphic from cuttingcarbs.co.uk.
People often talk about “good” and “bad” carbs in terms of glycemic index, which describes the relative rise in blood glucose levels after eating. “Bad carbs” quickly turn into simple sugars, causing a rapid peak in blood glucose followed by a crash (high glycemic index). “Good carbs” have a lower glycemic index—peak blood glucose levels are lower, following a slower time-course. The patterns of insulin release will therefore be different for each.
Here’s some blood sugar data comparing Coca-cola to instant oatmeal . Notice that the coke causes a taller peak in blood glucose, followed by a crash. The oatmeal response has a lower peak but remains elevated longer. The total area under the curve, which will correspond to total insulin release, is actually comparable for each carb sources. Both differ dramatically compared to eggs, which contain mainly fat and protein.
Can insulin resistance cause hypoglycemia? - Quora
Blood glucose response to three different foods: Coca-cola, instant oatmeal, or two poached eggs. Blood sugar dynamics are different for each. Graph from pathways4health.org.
Fat and protein can also raise blood sugar and insulin. Like carbs, it’s the smaller, simpler components of larger molecules that do this. With fats, triglycerides get decomposed into fatty acids. Proteins are broken down to amino acids. These simpler molecules can trigger insulin release. Unlike glucose, the blood sugar and insulin spikes are smaller. Moreover, glucose must be present for this to happen. If blood glucose levels are too low, amino acids generally won’t trigger an insulin spike. The amino acid leucine is an exception, which is why concentrated protein powders with high leucine content can trigger insulin spikes. Bottom line: fats and proteins trigger lower (and slower) insulin spikes than either “good” or “bad” carbs.
Enzymes braking down food into nutrients Vector Image
Dietary macromolecules (carbs, proteins, fats) get broken down to smaller components through digestion. These simpler molecules (simple sugars, amino acids, fatty acids) can then stimulate insulin to different degrees.
We are interested in insulin resistance, which is caused by too much insulin. In terms of macronutrients, carbs tend to cause the biggest glucose and insulin responses. But not all carbs are equal: some contain mostly simple sugars and little fiber, driving large insulin spikes and crashes (“bad carbs”); others contain complex carbohydrates and fiber, driving slower absorption and gentler fluctuations. How good is “good,” exactly?
Bread & Insulin: how good is “good”?
Here’s blood glucose data someone measured after eating a variety of bread types:
Blood glucose levels recording by an individual in response to consumption of several different types of bread. Graphs from diabetesdaily.com.
White bread clearly causes the biggest glucose spike. No surprise there—the other breads contain different combinations of protein, fiber, and resistant starches (complex carbs which break into simple sugars more slowly). More glucose means more insulin, so white bread is the worst option here for anyone trying to minimize insulin. In relative terms, we could call white bread “bad” and the others “good.” But are they really “good” or are they just better than white bread, which is terrible? That’s an important distinction, requiring us to look more closely at the relationship between blood glucose levels and insulin.
Share
Unfortunately, the relation between blood glucose and insulin isn’t one-to-one. For example, it’s long been known that dietary glucose causes only slightly greater insulin rises than an equal amount of carbohydrate in the form of cooked starch. And doubling the dose of carbohydrate causes only small increases in the glucose response, but a larger change in insulin. For this reason, we need to look at insulin levels directly, rather than assuming blood glucose tells us exactly what insulin responses will be.
Here’s some insulin data from healthy adults (n=28) who ate two types of muffin tops matched for total carbs, sugars, protein and fat. One contained a resistant starch with fiber, the other did not:
As expected, the high-fiber muffin leads to less insulin release. However, insulin levels are still much higher for the control muffin than they would have been to a low-carb food rich in protein or fat. There’s no question that the high-fiber option is better for insulin control relative to the alternative. But is it a “good”? Should we recommend it to diabetics? Based on both common sense and the data on bread we saw above, it would be natural to recommend whole wheat breads over white breads to those with diabetes, right?
Let’s look at some more data, this time from a small group (n=11) of adults with type II diabetes. They ate different bread and had blood glucose and insulin measured. Here’s the glucose data:
Blood glucose responses to four different types of bread consumed by n=11 type II diabetes patients. Data from Breen et al. (2013).
Small differences in blood glucose dynamics. Surprisingly, the white bread did not result in the biggest glucose spike. What about insulin?
Insulin responses to four different types of bread consumed by n=11 type II diabetes patients. Data from Breen et al. (2013).
Not what I expected. Wholegrain brain spiked insulin levels more than the others, including white bread. Also notice that the differences in insulin response are more striking than the glucose responses, further emphasizing why it’s important to look at insulin directly.
This result confuses me. White bread is supposed to be a “bad” carb, whole grains “good.” Is this result anomalous? Here’s data from another study of adults with type II diabetes (n=12). They ate 50 grams of bread across two meals, for four different bread types: 3-grain sprouted sourdough, whole-grain sourdough, white sourdough, and white bread. Naively, I would expect the glucose and insulin responses to be highest for white bread. The data:
Blood glucose and insulin responses from n=12 type II diabetes patients, to four different breads consumed across two meals each. Data from Tucker et al. (2013).
There is no significant difference between any of the breads for the first insulin spike. For the second spike, the sprouted sourdough and whole-grain sourdough show only a modestly lower insulin peak than the others. In all cases, total insulin release is comparable across breads and far higher than it would be with a low- or zero-carb meal.
Good carbs, bad carbs: comparing carb-rich whole foods
Below is a result where blood glucose and insulin measurements were taken from n=8 adult diabetics across a variety of carb-rich foods. It’s from 1987, illustrating that these basic patterns have been known for some time.
Blood glucose and insulin response following ingestion of several different whole foods, each containing 50 grams of carbohydrate. Data from Krezowski et al. (1987).
Notice again that blood glucose is an imperfect proxy for insulin release. Straight glucose consumption led to significantly higher blood glucose levels than other foods, but this was not the case for insulin. Despite driving smaller blood glucose spikes, bread, oatmeal, rice, and potatoes drove comparable levels of insulin to glucose consumption. If “bad carb” is going to mean anything, it would refer to pure glucose. And yet, we often see comparable levels of insulin release to various carb-rich whole foods, at least in diabetes patients.
Here’s another study showing comparable insulin responses to consumption of five different breads, this time in obese men. Again, similar or even higher insulin spikes are seen in response to whole-grain compared to white bread. Whole grains are commonly said to be better for metabolic health and insulin sensitivity than refined grains. I don’t dispute that, but have been surprised at how modest differences in the insulin response are when they’re there. Oftentimes, they’re not. For example, this meta-analysis found no overall difference between whole and refined grains when it comes to fasting glucose, fasting insulin, or insulin resistance, despite other positive effects on post-meal measures of glycemic control.
a white plate topped with slices of cake and strawberries
The studies above mostly looked at people with metabolic conditions like diabetes and obesity. What about healthy adults? In this study of health adults (n=20), white bread caused a greater insulin response than two other types, although the differences were fairly modest. In this one, soft pretzels and rye, wheat, and sourdough breads all caused comparable insulin responses, not much lower than to glucose itself.
This meta-analysis compiled studies comparing whole to refined grains. It found that, in aggregate, whole grains tend to drive a lesser insulin response than refined grains. However, many of the individual studies compiled found no difference. Among other things, discrepancies between studies are likely due to the specific grain-based foods studied.
Other carb-rich foods, such as rice, seem to consistently result in lower insulin responses than grains. My goal here is not to provide a comprehensive map of how different carb-rich foods affect insulin release. I’m simply pointing out that many carb-rich whole foods, including grains, often produce insulin responses comparable to or only modestly less than pure glucose. This can include various whole grains, often considered “good carbs.”
Share
It’s also important to keep in mind that dietary components can promote insulin resistance without causing significant insulin spikes. Unlike glucose, fructose does not drive significant insulin release. Nonetheless, meta-analyses have found that fructose facilitates insulin resistance in the liver, where it is selectively metabolized. (For more detail on how fructose affects the liver, see my conversation with Dr. Robert Lustig).
If our goal is to improve insulin sensitivity and ultimately reverse insulin resistance, then we want to reduce insulin. We don’t want to do reduce insulin a little bit. We want to reduce it a lot. Even though various “good” carbohydrates do indeed evoke a smaller insulin response than “bad” carbs like glucose and white bread, they still often produce a larger insulin response than low-carb foods rich in fat or protein.
Here’s data from a study that calculated an insulin index for a large variety of foods. Insulin responses were measured in response to energy-matched portions of each, and plotted relative to white bread (insulin score=100):
Image
First, notice what triggered more insulin than white bread. Sugary candies come as no surprise, but this was also seen for yogurt, potatoes, and beans. High-sugar, carb-rich sweets like doughnuts and cookies were comparable to, or even slightly lower than white bread. Specific high-carb foods, like pastas and grain bread, had lower insulin scores.
The overall point: it’s often not obvious which foods are “good” vs. “bad” in terms of insulin response. As a general rule, complex carbs trigger less insulin than simple sugars, but the differences are sometimes much smaller than you might expect. Fiber also matters—all things being equal, more fiber means less insulin. Protein and fat tend to produce lower insulin responses than carb-rich foods of any kind, which is why eggs have one of the lowest insulin scores overall—they’re nutrient dense and low in calories, with virtually none coming from carbohydrates.
If there’s no surefire way to know exactly how much a given food will affect your blood glucose and insulin levels. In fact, the same foods can lead to distinct responses for two different people. How you consume them also matters—eating high-fiber or high-protein foods before more carb-rich foods during a single meal will generally blunt the glucose and insulin spikes triggered by the latter.
As we’ve seen, just because a carb-rich food has some protein or fiber in it does not mean it will lead to a substantially lower insulin response than something consisting mainly of simple sugars. This makes it very difficult to put much faith in pre-ordained labels like “good carbs,” often based solely on the fact that they contain some amount of fiber or non-carb nutrition.
At the end of the day, the only way to know how you respond to a given food is to measure your response. Continuous glucose monitors are one tool for doing this, giving you near real-time data on blood glucose levels. These are a useful tool not only for diabetes patients but for anyone motivated to get a handle on their metabolic health.
a person holding a small device in their hands
Testing your blood is the only way to directly understand how foods affect your blood glucose or insulin levels.
I’m in good metabolic health and once used a glucose monitor. With just one week of use, I learned a lot. For example, the food that triggered the largest blood sugar spike for me was a whole-grain breakfast cereal, marketed as a healthy alternative to “sugary” alternatives. (Despite the “healthy” designation bestowed upon it by marketers, it contained high-fructose corn syrup as an ingredient).
It’s also advisable to get bloodwork done, including fasting glucose and insulin levels. As we saw, blood glucose responses are an imperfect proxy for insulin levels. I personally get bloodwork done every 3-4 months, using an at-home test. Metabolic dysfunction is a growing problem, with insulin resistance at the heart of it. I personally don’t place much weight on the sloganeering that food companies and diet “experts” use to promote their favored foods.
If you take your metabolic health into your own hands by monitoring it directly, you may develop a different kind of resistance—a resistance to the language games people play to get you to eat what they want.
Share
To learn more about the topics covered in this essay, try these episodes of the Mind & Matter podcast:
M&M #134: Omega-6-9 Fats, Vegetable & Seed Oils, Sucrose, Processed Food, Metabolic Health & Dietary Origins of Chronic Inflammatory Disease | Artemis Simopoulos
M&M #132: Obesity Epidemic, Diet, Metabolism, Saturated Fat vs. PUFAs, Energy Expenditure, Weight Gain & Feeding Behavior | John Speakman
M&M #140: Obesogens, Oxidative Stress, Dietary Sugars & Fats, Statins, Diabetes & the True Causes of Metabolic Dysfunction & Chronic Disease | Robert Lustig
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
carbohydrate management simplified
1. Carbohydrates are foods that give us energy, like bread, pasta, and fruit.
2. Some carbohydrates can make our blood sugar go up quickly, while others don't.
3. The glycemic index is a way to measure how quickly a carbohydrate food makes our blood sugar go up.
4. Foods with a high glycemic index can make us feel hungry again soon after we eat them.
5. Foods with a low glycemic index can help us feel full for longer.
6. The glycemic load is another way to measure how much a carbohydrate food affects our blood sugar.
7. The glycemic load takes into account both the glycemic index and the amount of carbohydrate in a food.
8. Eating foods with a high glycemic load can increase our risk of health problems like diabetes and heart disease.
9. Eating foods with a low glycemic load can help us stay healthy.
10. Some foods can be changed to have a lower glycemic index, like adding butter to bread.
11. Fructose is a type of sugar that can affect our blood sugar differently than other sugars.
12. Fructose is found in foods like fruit and high-fructose corn syrup.
13. Eating too much fructose can be bad for our health.
14. Eating a balanced diet with lots of fruits and vegetables is important for staying healthy.
15. Understanding how different foods affect our blood sugar can help us make healthy choices.
In summary,
the glycemic index and glycemic load are ways to measure how quickly carbohydrate foods affect our blood sugar.
Eating foods with a low glycemic load can help us stay healthy, while eating foods with a high glycemic load can
increase our risk of health problems.
DEFINITIONS
Prediabetic refers to a condition where a person's blood sugar levels are higher than normal, but not high enough to be diagnosed as type 2 diabetes. It is a warning sign that a person is at risk of developing diabetes in the future. It's important to make healthy lifestyle changes to prevent it from progressing to type 2 diabetes².
Type 1 diabetes is a chronic condition where the body's immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. Insulin is a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar levels. People with type 1 diabetes need to take insulin injections or use an insulin pump to manage their blood sugar levels. This type of diabetes usually develops in childhood or adolescence and requires lifelong management. When someone has this, it means their body doesn't make insulin. Insulin is like a key that helps sugar go into our cells to give us energy. When someone has type 1 diabetes, it means their body doesn't make a hormone called insulin. Insulin helps our bodies use the sugar in our food as energy. A person with this condition, the pancreas produces little or no insulin, a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar levels¹⁹.
Type 2 diabetes is a chronic condition where the body either does not produce enough insulin or does not effectively use the insulin it produces. This leads to high blood sugar levels. Type 2 diabetes is often associated with lifestyle factors such as obesity, physical inactivity, and poor diet. The blood sugar levels can be managed through lifestyle changes, such as eating a healther diet, exercise, being physically active, and, in some cases, taking medication or insulin.This is when your body doesn't use insulin properly or very well. It's like the lock on the cell door is a bit rusty, so sugar has a hard time getting inside. It's like our bodies forget how to use the insulin they make. In this condition, the body has trouble using insulin effectively or doesn't produce enough insulin. Insulin helps regulate blood sugar levels.
Glycemic load is a number that estimates of how fast and high a person's blood sugar level is raised by a particular food after being eating. (How fast and how much a certain food can raise your blood sugar). It takes into account both the quantity of carbohydrates in a food and how quickly those carbohydrates are digested and absorbed. Foods with a high glycemic load can cause a rapid increase in blood sugar levels, while foods with a low glycemic load cause a slower and more gradual increase. Managing glycemic load can help regulate blood sugar levels and is important for people with diabetes. Some foods make your sugar go up quickly, and some don't.. It takes into account both the quality and quantity of carbohydrates in the food⁸. Foods with a high glycemic load can cause a rapid increase in blood sugar levels, while foods with a low glycemic load have a slower effect⁸.
Glycemic index is a measure of how quickly a particular food raises blood sugar levels compared to a reference food, usually glucose or white bread. Foods with a high glycemic index cause a rapid increase in blood sugar levels, while foods with a low glycemic index cause a slower and more gradual increase. It is important for people with diabetes to be aware of the glycemic index of foods they consume to help manage their blood sugar levels.This is like a list that tells you how fast different foods make your blood sugar go up. Foods with a high glycemic index make it go up faster than foods with a low glycemic index. Similar to glycemic load, the glycemic index also measures how quickly certain foods can raise our blood sugar levels. It helps us understand which foods are better for keeping our blood sugar steady.It's a scale that ranks foods based on how much they increase blood sugar levels compared to pure glucose (sugar)¹¹. Foods are classified as low, medium, or high glycemic foods and ranked on a scale of 0 to 100¹². Foods with a low glycemic index have a slower effect on blood sugar levels, while those with a high glycemic index can cause a rapid increase.
Carbohydrate management refers to the process of monitoring and controlling the intake of carbohydrates in the diet to help regulate blood sugar levels. Carbohydrates are a source of energy for the body which can significantly impact blood sugar levels and managing their consumption is crucial for people with conditions like diabetes. and . Maintaining stable blood sugar levels can involve counting carbohydrates, portion control, and making informed food choices. Carbohydrate management involves choosing healthy foods and balancing different types of carbohydrates to keep our blood sugar levels in a good range. It refers to the process of monitoring and controlling the intake of carbohydrates in one's diet.
Low carbohydrate diet: A low carbohydrate diet is a way of eating that restricts the intake of carbohydrates, particularly those that are high in sugar and starch and the focus is on consuming foods that are high in protein and healthy fats. By reducing carbohydrate intake, the body is encouraged to use stored fat for energy, which can lead to weight loss. A low carbohydrate diet can be beneficial for some people with diabetes as it can help regulate blood sugar levels and improve insulin sensitivity. It's like you're choosing to eat foods that won't make your blood sugar go up a lot. A low carbohydrate diet means eating foods that have fewer carbohydrates. Carbohydrates are things like bread, pasta, and sweets. So, a low carbohydrate diet would include more foods like vegetables, proteins (like meat or fish), and healthy fats (like avocado or nuts). It's a dietary approach that involves reducing the intake of carbohydrates, especially those from sources like bread, pasta, and sugary foods¹². The goal is to limit the amount of glucose entering the bloodstream and help regulate blood sugar levels¹².
- The glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are measures of how carbohydrates affect blood sugar levels.
- GI measures the effect of a food on blood sugar levels compared to glucose, while GL measures the total amount of carbohydrates in a food that can affect blood sugar levels.
- Low-GI foods are thought to be better for people with diabetes because they cause smaller spikes in blood sugar levels.
- However, the GI and GL are not perfect measures of how a food will affect blood sugar levels.
- Some foods with a low GI can still cause large spikes in blood sugar levels, while some foods with a high GI can cause smaller spikes.
- It is important to talk to your doctor or a registered dietitian to find out which foods are best for you if you have diabetes.
- In general, it is best to eat a diet that is high in fiber and low in processed carbohydrates.
- This will help to keep your blood sugar levels stable and reduce your risk of developing complications from diabetes.
- Eating a variety of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains can help to ensure that you are getting the nutrients you need to stay healthy.
- It is also important to limit your intake of saturated fat, cholesterol, and sodium.
- These can all contribute to heart disease and other health problems.
- If you have diabetes, it is important to monitor your blood sugar levels regularly.
- This will help you to identify foods that cause your blood sugar levels to spike.
- You can then avoid these foods or eat them in moderation.
- Managing your blood sugar levels is important for preventing complications from diabetes, such as heart disease, stroke, kidney disease, and blindness.
- If you have diabetes, talk to your doctor or a registered dietitian to learn more about how to manage your blood sugar levels.
**Summary of the most important narratives**
The glycemic index and glycemic load are measures of how carbohydrates affect blood sugar levels. They are not perfect measures, but they can be helpful in choosing foods that are less likely to cause spikes in blood sugar levels. Eating a diet that is high in fiber and low in processed carbohydrates is best for people with diabetes. It is also important to limit your intake of saturated fat, cholesterol, and sodium. Monitoring your blood sugar levels regularly is important for preventing complications from diabetes.
Welcome to this information about the glycemic index and glycemic load! While they may not be the most effective low-carb strategy, they can still be useful in encouraging carbohydrate restriction. However, it's important to understand their limitations and potential inaccuracies. Here are three questions to consider:
How does the glycemic load differ from the glycemic index, and why is it important to consider both when evaluating the impact of carbohydrates on blood glucose levels?
Can the glycemic index be manipulated by adding certain foods or ingredients to a meal, and if so, how does this affect its usefulness as a guide for healthy eating?
What role does fructose play in the glycemic index and glycemic load, and how does this impact our understanding of the effects of sugar on the body?
How does the glycemic load differ from the glycemic index, and why is it important to consider both when evaluating the impact of carbohydrates on blood glucose levels?
The glycemic load (GL) is defined as the glycemic index (GI) multiplied by the grams of carbohydrate in a sample of a particular food . While the GI measures the effect of a food on blood glucose levels over a fixed time period after consuming 50 grams of carbohydrate-containing food, the GL takes into account the amount of carbohydrate actually consumed . This is important because two foods with the same GI can have different GLs depending on the amount of carbohydrate they contain . Therefore, it's important to consider both the GI and GL when evaluating the impact of carbohydrates on blood glucose levels.
Can the glycemic index be manipulated by adding certain foods or ingredients to a meal, and if so, how does this affect its usefulness as a guide for healthy eating?
The glycemic index (GI) is determined by the area under the blood glucose curve during the first two hours after consuming 50 grams of carbohydrate-containing food . While adding certain foods or ingredients to a meal can affect the GI of the meal, the overall impact on blood glucose levels may not be significant . For example, adding fat or protein to a high-GI food can lower its GI, but it may not have a significant impact on blood glucose levels . Therefore, while the GI can be a useful guide for healthy eating, it's important to consider other factors such as the overall nutrient content of the food and the individual's metabolic response to carbohydrates.
What role does fructose play in the glycemic index and glycemic load, and how does this impact our understanding of the effects of sugar on the body?
Fructose is a sugar that is partially converted to glucose in two hours, which is why the glycemic index (GI) of fructose is 20 and not zero . However, more fructose is converted to glucose after that time, which can compromise any assertion about the differences in effect of fructose and glucose on blood glucose levels . Sucrose, which is 50% fructose and 50% glucose, has a GI of 70, which is roughly the average of glucose and fructose . The impact of fructose on the body is a topic of current interest, as it is a major component of sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup . While the GI and glycemic load (GL) can be useful in understanding the effects of sugar on the body, they have limitations and may not fully capture the metabolic response to different types of carbohydrates . Therefore, it's important to consider other factors such as the overall nutrient content of the food and the individual's metabolic response to carbohydrates when evaluating the impact of sugar on the body.
NUTRITION IN CRISIS ..... BOOK EXCERPTS
Aspects of the nutritional crisis is probably best addressed by ignoring glycemic index altogether. The work of Volek and Forsythe provides a good reason to focus on the carbohydrate content of your diet.
The glycemic index and glycemic load are a weak form of low-carb strategy with questionable efficacy as a primary strategy, but they may still have some use in encouraging carbohydrate restriction. The glycemic index was originally intended to address the experimental effect of carbohydrate on blood glucose, but it turns out that the effect of foods on blood glucose is not easily predictable and must be determined experimentally.
Glycemic index (GI) is defined as the area under the blood glucose time curve during the first two hours after consumption of 50 grams of carbohydrate-containing food. GI is an intensive variable, meaning that it measures the amount of glucose per gram of carbohydrate, rather than the total amount of glucose consumed. This can be misleading, as a food with a low GI may still have a large effect on blood glucose if a lot of it is consumed. The glycemic load (GL) attempts to correct for this by multiplying the GI by the grams of carbohydrate in a sample of a particular food.
GL is also an intensive variable, and it still requires knowing how much of a food is consumed to determine its effect on blood glucose. Additionally, the overall character of using GL must be considered, as a slice of white bread has a high GI, but the GI will go down if butter is added to it. This is because fat slows the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates.
One final ambiguity with GI is that it measures blood glucose, not fructose. Fructose is a sugar that is partially converted to glucose in two hours, which is why the GI of fructose is 20 and not zero. However, more fructose is converted to glucose after that time, which compromises any assertion about the differences in effect of the two sugars. Sucrose has a GI of 70, which is roughly the average of glucose and fructose. This means that ice cream has a lower GI than potatoes, but it is not recommended due to its high fructose content.
The glycemic index has evolved into a politically correct form of carbohydrate restriction, but it is questionable whether it has any value at all. Eric Westman, who has experience with both kinds of diets, put it well: “if low-GI is good, why not no-GI?” In comparison to simply reducing carbohydrate, low-GI strategies are complicated and require looking up and calculating values, which may be appealing to some but annoying to most.
Two bowls of cereal have the same GI as one. If there is not much carbohydrate (or really much glucose) in a food, it will have a low GI, but it could still have a large effect if a lot of it is consumed. The glycemic load attempts to correct for this problem. The glycemic load (GL) is defined as the GI multiplied by the grams of carbohydrate in a sample of a particular food. Obviously, GL is still an intensive variable. You still have to know how much is consumed. There is also the overall character of using GL: a slice of white bread has a high GI. The GI will go down if you smear a tablespoon of butter on the bread. It will go down still further if you add two tablespoons of butter.
If you could somehow butter infinitely, until for all intents and purposes you have pure butter, you would have a GI = 0, which is probably not helpful for those who want to use the GI as a guide to eating. One final ambiguity: GI measures blood glucose. Fructose, a sugar of great current interest (because it is 50 percent of sucrose and slightly more than 50 percent of high-fructose corn syrup), is partially converted to glucose in two hours, which is why the GI of fructose is 20 and not zero. In fact, more is converted after that time, severely compromising any assertion about the differences in effect of the two sugars. Sucrose has a GI of 70, which is roughly the average of glucose and fructose. Thus, ice cream has a lower GI than potatoes. Yet now we can’t recommend ice cream because of the high fructose. Lower GI or lower fructose?
How can you do both without saying “low-carbohydrate” out loud? This tangled web is woven out of the failure to face scientific facts. This aspect of the nutritional crisis is probably best addressed by ignoring glycemic index altogether. The work of Volek and Forsythe provides a good reason to focus on the carbohydrate content of your diet. What about the type of carbohydrate, though? In other words, is glycemic index important? Is fructose as bad as they say?
(WEBMASTER NOTE: Richard Feinman simply says that eating not more than carbohydrate 100 grams of carbohydrates a day is the simplest and most effective strategy for avoiding chronic diabetes)
Welcome to this informative PDF file about the glycemic index and glycemic load! While they may not be the most effective low-carb strategy, they can still be useful in encouraging carbohydrate restriction. However, it's important to understand their limitations and potential inaccuracies.
Here are three questions to consider:
1 How does the glycemic load differ from the glycemic index, and why is it important to consider both when evaluating the impact of carbohydrates on blood glucose levels?
The glycemic load (GL) is defined as the glycemic index (GI) multiplied by the grams of carbohydrate in a sample of a particular food . While the GI measures the effect of a food on blood glucose levels over a fixed time period after consuming 50 grams of carbohydrate-containing food, the GL takes into account the amount of carbohydrate actually consumed . This is important because two foods with the same GI can have different GLs depending on the amount of carbohydrate they contain . Therefore, it's important to consider both the GI and GL when evaluating the impact of carbohydrates on blood glucose levels.
2 Can the glycemic index be manipulated by adding certain foods or ingredients to a meal, and if so, how does this affect its usefulness as a guide for healthy eating?
The glycemic index (GI) is determined by the area under the blood glucose curve during the first two hours after consuming 50 grams of carbohydrate-containing food . While adding certain foods or ingredients to a meal can affect the GI of the meal, the overall impact on blood glucose levels may not be significant . For example, adding fat or protein to a high-GI food can lower its GI, but it may not have a significant impact on blood glucose levels . Therefore, while the GI can be a useful guide for healthy eating, it's important to consider other factors such as the overall nutrient content of the food and the individual's metabolic response to carbohydrates.
3 What role does fructose play in the glycemic index and glycemic load, and how does this impact our understanding of the effects of sugar on the body?
Fructose is a sugar that is partially converted to glucose in two hours, which is why the glycemic index (GI) of fructose is 20 and not zero . However, more fructose is converted to glucose after that time, which can compromise any assertion about the differences in effect of fructose and glucose on blood glucose levels . Sucrose, which is 50% fructose and 50% glucose, has a GI of 70, which is roughly the average of glucose and fructose . The impact of fructose on the body is a topic of current interest, as it is a major component of sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup . While the GI and glycemic load (GL) can be useful in understanding the effects of sugar on the body, they have limitations and may not fully capture the metabolic response to different types of carbohydrates . Therefore, it's important to consider other factors such as the overall nutrient content of the food and the individual's metabolic response to carbohydrates when evaluating the impact of sugar on the body.
poe.com
1. According to science, the biological requirement for carbohydrates is that they are the body's main source of energy.
2. According to science, the metabolic requirement for carbohydrates is that they are broken down into glucose, which is then used for energy.
3. According to science, the biological requirement for sugar is that it is a simple carbohydrate that can be broken down into glucose quickly.
4. According to science, the metabolic requirement for carbohydrates is that they are broken down into glucose, which is then used for energy.
Here are some of the most relevant published medical studies which I am using to formulate an answer to your questions:
- Carbohydrate Intake and Glycemic Index: Effects on Insulin Resistance and Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Adults
- The Role of Carbohydrates in Human Health
- Sugar Consumption and Cardiometabolic Risk
- Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load: What Do They Mean for Health?
- The Effects of Carbohydrate Intake on Blood Sugar Control in People with Diabetes
Carbohydrates are broken down into glucose in the body through a process called digestion. Digestion begins in the mouth, where saliva breaks down carbohydrates into smaller molecules. The carbohydrates are then further broken down in the stomach by stomach acid and enzymes. The partially digested carbohydrates are then passed to the small intestine, where they are further broken down by enzymes from the pancreas and bile from the liver. The glucose is then absorbed into the bloodstream through the walls of the small intestine.
[user]:why is a high protein diet good for weight loss?
[assistant]: A high protein diet can be beneficial for weight loss for several reasons:
- Protein is more satiating than other macronutrients, meaning it can help you feel full and satisfied after eating, leading to reduced calorie intake.
- Protein can help preserve muscle mass during weight loss, which is important for maintaining a healthy metabolism and preventing muscle loss.
- Protein can boost metabolism, as the body expends more energy digesting and processing protein compared to other macronutrients.
- High protein diets can help regulate appetite hormones, such as ghrelin and leptin, which can help control hunger and fullness.
- Protein can help improve insulin sensitivity, which can aid in weight loss and prevent the development of type 2 diabetes.
- Protein can help reduce inflammation, which is linked to obesity and weight gain.
It's important to note that while a high protein diet can be beneficial for weight loss, it's not a one-size-fits-all solution and may not be suitable for everyone. It's always a good idea to consult with a healthcare professional before making significant changes to your diet.
[user]:Explain the difference between an LLM and a language model
[assistant]: A language model (LM) is a statistical model that can generate text, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer your questions in an informative way.
A large language model (LLM) is a language model that has been trained on a massive dataset of text and code. This allows it to generate more fluent and informative text, and to perform more complex tasks such as summarization and question answering.
The main difference between an LLM and a language model is the size and complexity of the model. LLMs are typically much larger and more complex than language models, and they have been traineI'm not able to help with that, as I'm only a language model. If you believe this is an error, please send us your feedback.
Here are 20 practical processes that a 70-year-old American male can engage in to maintain homeostasis:
Stay hydrated by drinking plenty of water throughout the day.
Eat a balanced diet that includes plenty of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains.
Get regular exercise, such as walking, swimming, or cycling, to maintain cardiovascular health.
Get enough sleep each night to allow the body to rest and recover.
Manage stress through relaxation techniques such as meditation, deep breathing, or yoga.
Maintain a healthy weight to reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease.
Avoid smoking and limit alcohol consumption to maintain lung and liver health.
Practice good hygiene, such as washing hands regularly, to prevent the spread of illness.
Get regular check-ups with a healthcare provider to monitor overall health and detect any potential issues early.
Take any prescribed medications as directed by a healthcare provider.
Wear protective gear, such as helmets or seat belts, when engaging in activities that could cause injury.
Use sunscreen to protect skin from harmful UV rays.
Practice safe sex to reduce the risk of sexually transmitted infections.
Stay up to date on recommended vaccinations to prevent illness.
Avoid exposure to environmental toxins, such as air pollution or chemicals, as much as possible.
Practice good oral hygiene to maintain dental health.
Use assistive devices, such as hearing aids or glasses, as needed to maintain sensory function.
Stay socially engaged to maintain mental and emotional health.
Engage in mentally stimulating activities, such as reading or puzzles, to maintain cognitive function.
Take breaks and rest as needed to avoid overexertion and fatigue
Maintaining homeostasis is crucial for overall health and well-being, especially as we age. Here is a list of 40 practical activities, practices, and processes that you can engage in to maintain homeostasis as a 70-year-old American male:
1. Regular exercise: Engage in aerobic exercises, strength training, and flexibility exercises to maintain muscle strength, cardiovascular health, and joint flexibility.
2. Balanced diet: Eat a well-balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean proteins, and healthy fats to provide essential nutrients for your body.
3. Hydration: Drink an adequate amount of water throughout the day to stay hydrated and support various bodily functions.
4. Adequate sleep: Get enough sleep each night to allow your body to rest, repair, and rejuvenate.
5. Stress management: Practice stress-reducing techniques such as meditation, deep breathing exercises, or engaging in hobbies to manage stress levels.
6. Regular medical check-ups: Schedule regular check-ups with your healthcare provider to monitor your overall health and address any potential issues.
7. Medication management: Take prescribed medications as directed by your healthcare provider and follow up regularly for medication adjustments if needed.
8. Maintain a healthy weight: Maintain a healthy weight through a combination of a balanced diet and regular exercise to reduce the risk of chronic diseases.
9. Stay socially active: Engage in social activities, maintain relationships, and participate in community events to support mental and emotional well-being.
10. Brain exercises: Engage in activities that challenge your brain, such as puzzles, reading, learning new skills, or playing musical instruments.
11. Maintain good oral hygiene: Brush and floss your teeth regularly and visit your dentist for regular check-ups to maintain oral health.
12. Practice good hygiene: Maintain good personal hygiene by regularly bathing, washing hands, and keeping your living environment clean.
13. Sun protection: Protect your skin from harmful UV rays by wearing sunscreen, protective clothing, and avoiding excessive sun exposure.
14. Regular eye check-ups: Schedule regular eye exams to monitor your vision and address any age-related eye conditions.
15. Limit alcohol consumption: Drink alcohol in moderation or avoid it altogether to reduce the risk of liver damage and other health issues.
16. Quit smoking: If you smoke, consider quitting smoking to reduce the risk of various health conditions, including cardiovascular diseases and lung cancer.
17. Maintain proper posture: Practice good posture while sitting, standing, and walking to prevent musculoskeletal issues and maintain balance.
18. Fall prevention: Take measures to prevent falls, such as removing tripping hazards, using assistive devices if needed, and maintaining good balance through exercises.
19. Regular stretching: Incorporate regular stretching exercises to maintain flexibility and prevent muscle stiffness.
20. Maintain a positive mindset: Cultivate a positive outlook on life, practice gratitude, and engage in activities that bring you joy and fulfillment.
21. Limit processed foods: Minimize the consumption of processed foods high in added sugars, unhealthy fats, and sodium.
22. Practice portion control: Be mindful of portion sizes to maintain a healthy weight and prevent overeating.
23. Engage in hobbies: Pursue hobbies and activities that you enjoy to reduce stress and promote mental well-being.
24. Stay mentally active: Engage in activities that stimulate your mind, such as reading, puzzles, learning new skills, or taking up a new hobby.
25. Maintain a healthy social network: Stay connected with friends, family, and loved ones to foster a sense of belonging and support.
26. Practice good hand hygiene: Wash your hands regularly with soap and water or use hand sanitizer to prevent the spread of germs.
27. Practice safe sex: If sexually active, practice safe sex by using condoms and getting regular check-ups for sexually transmitted infections.
28. Manage chronic conditions: If you have any chronic conditions, work closely with your healthcare provider to manage them effectively.
29. Stay mentally and emotionally resilient: Practice stress management techniques, seek support when needed, and prioritize self-care.
30. Stay informed: Stay updated on current health guidelines, vaccinations, and preventive measures recommended for your age group.
31. Maintain a healthy heart: Follow a heart-healthy diet, manage blood pressure and cholesterol levels, and engage in regular cardiovascular exercise.
32. Practice good foot care: Keep your feet clean, wear comfortable and supportive shoes, and check for any signs of foot problems regularly.
33. Stay up to date with vaccinations: Get recommended vaccinations to protect against preventable diseases and infections.
34. Practice safe driving: Follow traffic rules, wear seatbelts, and avoid distractions while driving to reduce the risk of accidents.
35. Stay mentally sharp: Engage in activities that challenge your cognitive abilities, such as puzzles, memory games, or learning new skills.
36. Practice deep breathing exercises: Deep breathing exercises can help reduce stress, promote relaxation, and improve lung function.
37. Maintain a healthy gut: Eat a diet rich in fiber, probiotics, and prebiotics to support a healthy gut microbiome.
38. Practice good hand-eye coordination: Engage in activities that require hand-eye coordination, such as playing sports or musical instruments.
39. Stay physically active throughout the day: Avoid prolonged sitting and incorporate movement into your daily routine, such as taking short walks or stretching breaks.
40. Stay positive and embrace aging: Embrace the aging process, maintain a positive attitude, and focus on the things you can control to promote overall well-being.
Remember, it's always a good idea to consult with your healthcare provider before making any significant changes to your lifestyle or starting new activities.
Certainly, maintaining homeostasis is essential for overall health and well-being. Here are 40 practical activities, practices, and processes that can help you achieve and maintain homeostasis as a 70-year-old American male:
1. Balanced Diet: Eat a well-balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains.
2. Hydration: Drink plenty of water to stay adequately hydrated.
3. Regular Exercise: Engage in regular physical activity, such as walking, swimming, or cycling.
4. Strength Training: Incorporate strength training exercises to maintain muscle mass.
5. Stretching: Practice regular stretching to maintain flexibility.
6. Cardiovascular Health: Monitor and manage your cardiovascular health.
7. Blood Pressure: Keep your blood pressure in a healthy range.
8. Cholesterol Levels: Monitor and manage your cholesterol levels.
9. Blood Sugar Control: Maintain stable blood sugar levels through diet and exercise.
10. Sleep Hygiene: Establish good sleep habits for restorative sleep.
11. Stress Management: Practice stress-reduction techniques like meditation or deep breathing.
12. Social Interaction: Stay socially active and maintain strong relationships.
13. Mental Stimulation: Engage in activities that challenge your mind, such as puzzles or reading.
14. Regular Check-ups: Visit your healthcare provider for routine check-ups.
15. Medication Management: Adhere to prescribed medications as directed.
16. Bone Health: Ensure adequate calcium and vitamin D intake for bone health.
17. Vision Care: Get regular eye exams and use corrective lenses as needed.
18. Hearing Health: Address hearing loss with hearing aids if necessary.
19. Vaccinations: Stay up to date on vaccinations.
20. Sun Protection: Protect your skin from sun exposure.
21. Dental Care: Maintain good oral hygiene and see your dentist regularly.
22. Cognitive Training: Try brain-training exercises and games.
23. Home Safety: Ensure your living space is safe to prevent falls and accidents.
24. Emergency Preparedness: Have a plan for emergencies and share it with loved ones.
25. Medication Organization: Keep medications organized and take them as prescribed.
26. Chronic Disease Management: Manage any chronic conditions with your healthcare provider's guidance.
27. Weight Management: Maintain a healthy weight through diet and exercise.
28. Emotional Well-being: Seek professional help if you struggle with mental health issues.
29. Annual Screenings: Schedule regular cancer screenings (e.g., colonoscopy, prostate exam).
30. Balance Training: Practice balance exercises to reduce the risk of falls.
31. Social Activities: Join clubs or groups with shared interests.
32. Volunteer: Engage in volunteer work to stay active and connected.
33. Limit Alcohol: If you drink, do so in moderation.
34. Smoking Cessation: Quit smoking if you smoke.
35. Medication Review: Periodically review medications with your healthcare provider.
36. Foot Care: Check your feet for issues and wear appropriate footwear.
37. Relaxation Techniques: Explore relaxation methods like tai chi or yoga.
38. Vision Exercises: Practice eye exercises to maintain eye health.
39. Digestive Health: Promote gut health through a balanced diet.
40. Laughter: Incorporate humor and laughter into your life for stress relief.
Remember to consult with your healthcare provider before making significant changes to your lifestyle or starting a new exercise program, especially if you have underlying health conditions.
Maintaining homeostasis is essential for overall health and well-being, especially as we age. Here are 40 practical activities, practices, and processes that you can engage in to help maintain homeostasis in your daily life:
Balanced Diet: Eat a well-balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains.
Hydration: Stay adequately hydrated by drinking plenty of water throughout the day.
Portion Control: Be mindful of portion sizes to avoid overeating.
Regular Meals: Eat regular, smaller meals throughout the day to stabilize blood sugar levels.
Fiber Intake: Ensure an adequate intake of dietary fiber to support digestive health.
Limit Sugar and Processed Foods: Reduce your consumption of sugary and highly processed foods.
Healthy Fats: Incorporate sources of healthy fats like avocados, nuts, and olive oil into your diet.
Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Consume fatty fish or take omega-3 supplements for heart and brain health.
Calcium and Vitamin D: Maintain bone health by getting enough calcium and vitamin D.
Multivitamins: Consider taking a daily multivitamin to fill nutritional gaps.
Regular Exercise: Engage in regular physical activity to promote cardiovascular health, strength, and flexibility.
Strength Training: Incorporate strength training exercises to maintain muscle mass.
Cardiovascular Exercise: Aim for at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise per week.
Stretching: Include daily stretching to improve flexibility and reduce the risk of injury.
Balance Exercises: Practice balance exercises to reduce the risk of falls.
Sleep Hygiene: Ensure you get 7-9 hours of quality sleep per night.
Stress Management: Use relaxation techniques, meditation, or mindfulness to manage stress.
Social Interaction: Stay socially engaged to support emotional well-being.
Cognitive Stimulation: Keep your mind active with puzzles, reading, or learning new skills.
Regular Check-Ups: Visit your healthcare provider for regular check-ups and screenings.
Medication Management: Take medications as prescribed and discuss any concerns with your doctor.
Blood Pressure Monitoring: Keep an eye on your blood pressure and manage it within healthy ranges.
Blood Sugar Monitoring: If you have diabetes, monitor blood sugar levels and follow your treatment plan.
Weight Management: Maintain a healthy weight through diet and exercise.
Smoking Cessation: If you smoke, seek help to quit and improve lung health.
Alcohol Moderation: Limit alcohol consumption to reduce the risk of health issues.
Immunizations: Stay up-to-date with recommended vaccinations.
Sun Protection: Use sunscreen and protective clothing to prevent skin damage.
Dental Care: Maintain good oral hygiene with regular dental check-ups.
Vision Care: Get regular eye exams and wear corrective lenses if needed.
Hearing Health: Have your hearing checked regularly and use hearing aids if necessary.
Foot Care: Pay attention to foot health, especially if you have diabetes.
Fall Prevention: Remove hazards at home to prevent falls and injuries.
Medication Review: Periodically review medications with your doctor to avoid interactions.
Chronic Disease Management: If you have a chronic condition, follow your treatment plan diligently.
Relaxation Techniques: Practice relaxation methods like deep breathing or progressive muscle relaxation.
Mindful Eating: Pay attention to hunger and fullness cues while eating.
Gardening: Engage in gardening for physical activity and stress reduction.
Hobbies: Pursue hobbies and interests to keep your mind engaged and motivated.
Volunteer Work: Consider volunteering to stay socially active and find purpose.
Remember that it's essential to consult with your healthcare provider before making significant changes to your lifestyle or starting a new exercise program, especially if you have underlying health conditions or concerns. They can provide personalized advice based on your specific health needs and goals.
I am a 70 year old American male. List 40 practical activities, practices and or processes that I can engage in to maintain Homeostasis
Maintaining homeostasis as a 70-year-old American male involves a combination of physical, mental, and lifestyle practices. Here are 40 practical activities, practices, and processes to help you achieve and maintain homeostasis:
Physical Health:
Regular exercise: Incorporate both aerobic and strength training exercises into your routine.
Stretching and flexibility exercises: Maintain joint mobility and flexibility.
Balance training: Prevent falls and improve stability.
Healthy diet: Consume a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, lean protein, and whole grains.
Hydration: Drink enough water to stay properly hydrated.
Regular sleep: Aim for 7-8 hours of quality sleep per night.
Annual check-ups: Visit your healthcare provider for regular health assessments.
Vaccinations: Stay up-to-date with recommended vaccinations.
Medication management: Take prescribed medications as directed.
Blood pressure monitoring: Keep an eye on your blood pressure and manage it as needed.
Cholesterol management: Control cholesterol levels through diet and medication.
Diabetes management: Monitor blood sugar and manage diabetes effectively.
Vision and hearing checks: Regularly get your eyes and ears checked.
Dental hygiene: Maintain good oral health with regular dental check-ups.
Skin care: Protect your skin from sun damage and stay vigilant about skin changes.
Bone health: Ensure adequate calcium and vitamin D intake for strong bones.
Posture awareness: Maintain good posture to prevent back and neck problems.
Pain management: Seek treatment for chronic pain if necessary.
Regular bowel habits: Maintain a healthy digestive system.
Breathing exercises: Practice deep breathing for lung health.
Mental and Emotional Health:
Stress management: Learn stress reduction techniques like meditation or yoga.
Social engagement: Stay connected with friends and family.
Hobbies and interests: Pursue activities that bring you joy and satisfaction.
Cognitive stimulation: Challenge your mind with puzzles, games, or learning new skills.
Emotional expression: Express your feelings and emotions in a healthy way.
Mindfulness and meditation: Practice mindfulness to stay grounded.
Gratitude journaling: Cultivate a positive mindset by focusing on gratitude.
Therapy or counseling: Seek professional help if dealing with mental health issues.
Avoid excessive alcohol and tobacco: Limit or quit these substances.
Stay socially active: Join clubs, groups, or volunteer to stay engaged.
Set and pursue goals: Keep a sense of purpose and direction in life.
Manage chronic stressors: Address ongoing stressors to improve overall well-being.
Lifestyle Choices:
Stay organized: Maintain a structured daily routine.
Time management: Prioritize tasks and manage your time effectively.
Financial planning: Ensure your financial security and plan for retirement.
Reduce clutter: Declutter your living space for a sense of order.
Stay informed: Keep up with current events and developments.
Stay safe: Be cautious to prevent accidents and injuries.
Foster positive relationships: Surround yourself with supportive people.
Laugh and have fun: Enjoy life and maintain a sense of humor.
Remember that maintaining homeostasis involves a holistic approach to health and well-being. It's essential to consult with healthcare professionals for personalized guidance and to adapt these practices to your individual needs and circumstances.
verlana summary
1. Balanced Diet: Eat a well-balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains.
3. Regular Exercise: Engage in regular physical activity, such as walking, swimming, or cycling.
5. Stretching: Practice regular stretching to maintain flexibility.
6. Cardiovascular Health: Monitor and manage your cardiovascular health.
9. Blood Sugar Control: Maintain stable blood sugar levels through diet and exercise.
10. Sleep Hygiene: Establish good sleep habits for restorative sleep.
11. Stress Management: Practice stress-reduction techniques like meditation or deep breathing.
12. Social Interaction: Stay socially active and maintain strong relationships.
13. Mental Stimulation: Engage in activities that challenge your mind, such as puzzles or reading.
21. Dental Care: Maintain good oral hygiene and see your dentist regularly.
22. Cognitive Training: Try brain-training exercises and games.
23. Home Safety: Ensure your living space is safe to prevent falls and accidents.
24. Emergency Preparedness: Have a plan for emergencies and share it with loved ones.
26. Chronic Disease Management: Manage any chronic conditions
31. Social Activities: Join clubs or groups with shared interests.
32. Volunteer: Engage in volunteer work to stay active and connected.
36. Foot Care: Check your feet for issues and wear appropriate footwear.
40. Laughter: Incorporate humor and laughter into your life for stress relief.
Portion Control: Be mindful of portion sizes to avoid overeating.
Regular Meals: Eat regular, smaller meals throughout the day to stabilize blood sugar levels.
Fiber Intake: Ensure an adequate intake of dietary fiber to support digestive health.
Limit Sugar and Processed Foods: Reduce your consumption of sugary and highly processed foods.
Healthy Fats: Incorporate sources of healthy fats like avocados, nuts, and olive oil into your diet.
Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Consume fatty fish or take omega-3 supplements for heart and brain health.
Calcium and Vitamin D: Maintain bone health by getting enough calcium and vitamin D.
Multivitamins: Consider taking a daily multivitamin to fill nutritional gaps.
Regular Exercise: Engage in regular physical activity to promote cardiovascular health, strength, and flexibility.
Strength Training: Incorporate strength training exercises to maintain muscle mass.
Cardiovascular Exercise: Aim for at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise per week.
Stretching: Include daily stretching to improve flexibility and reduce the risk of injury.
Sleep Hygiene: Ensure you get 7-9 hours of quality sleep per night.
Fall Prevention: Remove hazards at home to prevent falls and injuries.
Medication Review: Periodically review medications with your doctor to avoid interactions.
Mindful Eating: Pay attention to hunger and fullness cues while eating.
Gardening: Engage in gardening for physical activity and stress reduction.
Hobbies: Pursue hobbies and interests to keep your mind engaged and motivated.
Volunteer Work: Consider volunteering to stay socially active and find purpose.
Regular exercise: Incorporate Both aerobic and strength training exercises into your routine.
Stretching and flexibility exercises: Maintain joint mobility and flexibility.
Skin care: Protect your skin from sun damage and stay vigilant about skin changes.
Bone health: Ensure adequate calcium and vitamin D intake for strong bones.
Posture awareness: Maintain good posture to prevent back and neck problems.
Pain management: Seek treatment for chronic pain if necessary.
Regular bowel habits: Maintain a healthy digestive system.
Breathing exercises: Practice deep breathing for lung health.
Social engagement: Stay connected with friends and family.
Hobbies and interests: Pursue activities that bring you joy and satisfaction.
Cognitive stimulation: Challenge your mind with puzzles, games, or learning new skills.
Emotional expression: Express your feelings and emotions in a healthy way.
Mindfulness and meditation: Practice mindfulness to stay grounded.
Gratitude journaling: Cultivate a positive mindset by focusing on gratitude.
Therapy or counseling: Seek professional help if dealing with mental health issues.
Stay socially active: Join clubs, groups, or volunteer to stay engaged.
Set and pursue goals: Keep a sense of purpose and direction in life.
Manage chronic stressors: Address ongoing stressors to improve overall well-being.
Stay organized: Maintain a structured daily routine.
Time management: Prioritize tasks and manage your time effectively.
Financial planning: Ensure your financial security and plan for retirement.
Reduce clutter: Declutter your living space for a sense of order.
Stay informed: Keep up with current events and developments.
Stay safe: Be cautious to prevent accidents and injuries.
Foster positive relationships: Surround yourself with supportive people.
Laugh and have fun: Enjoy life and maintain a sense of humor.
https://chat.yqcloud.top/#/chat/1689557503602
list 4o things anyone can do for optimum health
Sure, here are 40 things anyone can do for optimum health:
Drink plenty of water.
Eat a balanced and varied diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean protein.
Limit processed foods, added sugars, and saturated fats.
Exercise regularly, including both cardio and strength-training workouts.
Get enough sleep each night (7-8 hours for most adults).
Manage stress through relaxation techniques or meditation.
Quit smoking and avoid exposure to secondhand smoke.
Wear sunscreen and protect your skin from the sun's harmful UV rays.
Get regular check-ups and screenings with your doctor.
Take any prescribed medications as directed by your healthcare provider.
Practice safe sex and use protection to prevent sexually transmitted infections.
Stay up-to-date on vaccinations and immunizations.
Use protective gear during sports or other activities that could result in injury.
Maintain a healthy weight and body mass index (BMI).
Limit alcohol consumption to moderate levels or avoid it altogether.
Wash your hands frequently to prevent the spread of germs.
Keep a positive outlook and practice gratitude regularly.
Surround yourself with positive and supportive people.
Engage in hobbies or activities that make you happy.
Volunteer and give back to your community.
Learn to manage your time effectively and prioritize self-care.
Focus on building healthy relationships and resolving conflicts in a constructive manner.
Avoid excessive screen time and embrace the outdoors and nature.
Limit caffeine intake and stimulate your mind in alternative ways.
Embrace life-long learning and personal growth.
Practice proper posture and ergonomics to reduce the risk of back pain and repetitive strain injuries.
Pursue mental health counseling or therapy if needed.
Stretch regularly throughout the day to improve flexibility.
Limit exposure to toxins and pollutants in your environment.
Incorporate healthy fats like omega-3 fatty acids into your diet.
Take breaks and practice relaxation techniques during long stretches of work.
Prioritize quality sleep over merely hours slept.
Socialize with friends and family regularly.
Take care of your oral health by brushing, flossing, and seeing a dentist regularly.
Reduce the amount of sodium/salt intake.
Incorporate probiotics/prebiotics for gut health.
Include bone-friendly foods to increase calcium intake.
Connect with nature and get outside in green spaces.
Reduce food waste and eat sustainably.
Practice mindful eating to help you tune in to your body’s hunger and fullness signals.
https://chat.yqcloud.top/#/chat/1689557503602
Certainly! Here is a list of 100 things you can do to maintain homeostasis in your body:
Eat a balanced and nutritious diet.
Drink plenty of water throughout the day.
Get regular exercise.
Maintain a healthy body weight.
Get enough sleep every night.
Manage stress through relaxation techniques or meditation.
Practice good hygiene habits.
Avoid smoking and limit alcohol consumption.
Limit caffeine intake.
Avoid excessive use of electronic devices.
Take breaks and rest when needed.
Practice deep breathing exercises.
Maintain a regular sleep schedule.
Practice good posture.
Stretch and engage in flexibility exercises regularly.
Incorporate regular cardiovascular exercises into your routine.
Include strength training exercises to build muscle and bone density.
Get regular check-ups and screenings with your healthcare provider.
Take prescribed medications as directed.
Follow a regular skincare routine to keep your skin healthy.
Protect your skin from the sun using sunscreen and protective clothing.
Practice good oral hygiene by brushing and flossing daily.
Limit exposure to toxins and pollutants in your environment.
Create a clean and organized living space.
Use natural cleaning products when possible.
Practice safe food handling and storage to prevent foodborne illnesses.
Maintain a well-ventilated home environment.
Control indoor humidity levels to prevent mold growth.
Install carbon monoxide and smoke detectors in your home.
Monitor and control indoor air quality.
Reduce noise pollution by using ear protection when needed.
Practice safe driving habits.
Wear protective gear during activities that could result in injury.
Practice safe sex and use protection to prevent sexually transmitted infections.
Stay up-to-date on vaccinations and immunizations.
Practice safe handling of chemicals and hazardous materials.
Use ergonomic furniture and equipment to support proper body alignment.
Take breaks from prolonged sitting or standing positions.
Practice good eye health by taking regular breaks from screens.
Maintain a balanced and diverse gut microbiome through a healthy diet.
Limit processed foods and added sugars in your diet.
Reduce sodium intake to maintain proper fluid balance.
Consume adequate dietary fiber to support digestive health.
Include probiotics in your diet to promote a healthy gut.
Eat foods rich in antioxidants to help protect against cellular damage.
Incorporate omega-3 fatty acids into your diet for brain and heart health.
Avoid excessive alcohol consumption, which can disrupt homeostasis.
Limit caffeine intake, as it can affect sleep patterns and stimulate stress responses.
Practice portion control to maintain energy balance.
Listen to your body's hunger and fullness cues.
Eat mindfully, paying attention to the taste, texture, and satisfaction of each meal.
Incorporate regular relaxation techniques such as meditation or yoga.
Engage in hobbies and activities that bring you joy and reduce stress.
Spend time outdoors in nature to promote mental and physical well-being.
Cultivate healthy relationships and social connections.
Practice gratitude and positive thinking to promote emotional well-being.
Seek support from friends, family, or therapists when needed.
Practice forgiveness and let go of grudges to reduce emotional stress.
Set realistic goals and prioritize self-care.
Engage in regular self-reflection and introspection.
Establish a routine and stick to it to promote stability and balance.
Develop effective time management skills to reduce stress and maintain productivity.
Practice good financial management to reduce financial stress.
Engage in lifelong learning and intellectual stimulation.
Foster a positive and supportive work environment.
Practice effective communication and conflict resolution skills.
Take breaks during work to rest and recharge.
Engage in regular hobbies or activities that bring you joy and fulfillment.
Establish and maintain boundaries to protect your physical and emotional well-being.
Stay informed about current events and engage in civic participation.
Volunteer or engage in acts of kindness and service to others.
Take time for self-care activities, such as taking a bath, reading a book, or getting a massage.
Express your emotions in a healthy way, such as through journaling or talking to a trusted friend.
Practice mindfulness and being present in the moment.
Cultivate a sense of purpose and meaning in your life.
Practice deep relaxation techniques such as progressive muscle relaxation or guided imagery.
Engage in creative activities such as painting, writing, or playing a musical instrument.
Surround yourself with positive and supportive people.
Seek out opportunities for personal growth and self-improvement.
Engage in regular physical activity that you enjoy.
Set realistic goals and celebrate your accomplishments.
Practice good time management to reduce stress and avoid procrastination.
Prioritize self-reflection and self-awareness.
Cultivate a positive and optimistic mindset.
Maintain a regular daily routine to promote stability and balance.
Practice forgiveness and let go of grudges.
Engage in activities that promote mental stimulation and cognitive function.
Practice deep breathing exercises to reduce stress and promote relaxation.
Incorporate mindfulness practices into your daily routine.
Engage in activities that bring you joy and happiness.
Maintain a gratitude journal to focus on the positive aspects of your life.
Take breaks from technology and digital devices to promote mental well-being.
Cultivate healthy coping mechanisms for dealing with stress and negative emotions.
Practice good time management skills to reduce stress and increase productivity.
Engage in regular social interactions and maintain supportive relationships.
Take breaks and vacations to recharge and relax.
Embrace nature and spend time outdoors.
Engage in activities that promote creativity and self-expression.
Practice empathy and compassion towards yourself and others.
Continuously learn and seek personal growth opportunities.
Remember, these are general suggestions, and it's essential to consult with a healthcare professional for personalized advice based on your specific needs and circumstances.
The President of the Lords' Witnesses was diagnosed Type 2 Diabetic in November 2012. 2.9 million people in the UK and 26 million in the US are diagnosed as Diabetic as of 2019. A further 850,000 in the UK and 7 million in the US are Diabetic but do not realise it. If you are over 50 you have a 15% chance of being diabetic. If you are over 65 you have a 25% chance. There are over 350 million diabetic people in the world as of 2019. It is a lethal and painfully debilitating disease if untreated or badly treated. So please get a blood sugar test now! Visit your doctor or ask any diabetic friend to give you one. Type 2 Diabetes can be cured please visit www.cureddiabetes.com.
Gordon and his friend Brian are now completely cured of type2. We discovered that it is caused by a yeast present in rotten meat. A very very strong and long term Ketogenic, Paleo, Antifungal and Oligosaccharide (Orafti Inulin) Prebiotic Diet will fully cure it. This is not merely a reversal of sugar numbers. It is a removal of the yeast overgrowth which causes the disease. Gordon can now eat carbs and no longer has to do regular exercise to keep his sugar numbers low. Brain does not follow the regime fully and so needs to do a walk every day for good sugar and has to be more careful with carbs.
Together with a Destruction of the Medical Orthodoxy which is Preventing any Cure
Traditionally the writer of such a piece as this (in the absence of Randomised Clinical Trials) is supposed to recite his medical credentials in an attempt to convince the reader by his standing in the Profession that his treatment protocol is efficacious.
In other words he declare: You can trust me because I am a doctor.
The writer on the other hand in this topsy turvy world says: You can trust me because I am NOT a doctor and I am not shackled to a big pharma business model by corrupt public sector regulators and heartless medically illiterate politicians
Nobody in the medical professional knows or admits to knowing either the cause or the cure for type 2, indeed the Mayo Clinic (the pre-eminent US medical facility) describes the condition as....
"In type 2 diabetes, there are primarily two interrelated problems at work. Your pancreas does not produce enough insulin — a hormone that regulates the movement of sugar into your cells — and cells respond poorly to insulin and take in less sugar.
Type 2 diabetes used to be known as adult-onset diabetes, but both type 1 and type 2 diabetes can begin during childhood and adulthood. Type 2 is more common in older adults, but the increase in the number of children with obesity has led to more cases of type 2 diabetes in younger people.
There's no cure for type 2 diabetes, but losing weight, eating well and exercising can help you manage the disease. If diet and exercise aren't enough to manage your blood sugar, you may also need diabetes medications or insulin therapy"-
In other words: You cannot cure Type2. So you have to take more and more pharmaceuticals until you drop dead . Brian, a Diabetic friend of Gordon's called me in 2018 after having had 2 diabetic related strokes and having been told by his GP that his sugar numbers were so bad that he would soon have to go onto insulin. He was on over a dozen different types of Pharmaceuticals to manage his 'incurable' condition at that time. He was off all medications with a normal HbA1c (2 months average sugar number) within a 18 months. Not because the cure takes 18 months. But because it took us 12 months to discover what the cause and the cure were..
1. Extreme tiredness
2. Diabetic Neuralgia in the feet, the hands, the reproductive organs (This is nerve damage that eventually becomes irreversible. It starts as a numbness or a tingling all day long but can progress to periods of excruciating pain which prevent sleep)
3. Bad peripheral blood circulation (the blood is too viscous due to the excess sugar in it). This can lead to gangrene which can kill you. 20,000 Germans each year have leg amputations due to gangrene from diabetes and in 2004, 71,000 people in the US had lower limb amputations due to diabetes.
4. Heart attacks and strokes - due to the extra work that the heart has to do in pumping sugary blood around and due to the circulatory blockages that sugary blood can cause. 80% of Type 2 diabetics die of cardio vascular problems.
5. Erectile Dysfunction - 75% of diabetic men experience this to some extent.
6. Blurred vision due to sugar coating on your lens
7. Skin sores (yeast or fungal or cuts) or infections take ages to heal due to bad circulation and due to the infecting bacteria having a nice lunch on your blood sugar
8. Foot leg and hand pain due to bad circulation. This is especially true at night and can prevent sleep.
9. Irreversible retina damage and blindness
10. Hearing damage and deafness.
11. Mood swings related to blood sugar highs and lows.
12. UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections) and Genital Itching. Yeast and bacteria love blood sugar!
13. Kidney disease or failure in 25-50% of Type 2 diabetics.
Simply put, a 50 year old type 2 diabetic with badly managed blood sugar will probably be dead within 25 years and will have a bad quality of life within 5. Here is a good paper showing a direct correlation between bad blood sugar management and cardiovascular events (strokes and heart attacks) and death - http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/34/10/2237.full.pdf+html. Summarizing, if you manage you sugar negligently the probability is that you will get a cardiovascular event within 14 years and if you manage it baldy the chances are you will die within 14 years.
Please address all Nobel Nominations to https://www.nobelprize.org/contact . Here is the Jigsaw. I will give you the pieces first, so that you can come up with the cure and burn down the drug pushing medical orthodoxy for yourself
1. Most Type2s know that a glass of red wine reduces the sugar rise after a meal. They also know that a glass of whisky does not.
2. Many dietary and exercise interventions improve sugar numbers temporarily. But the disease always fights back and no long term progress normally results.
3. If you eat out of date ham your sugar numbers go up a lot. If you eat roast pork they only go up a little.
4. The first meal that I ever ate which did not put my sugar up was an expensive curry.
5. Turkey puts sugar numbers up considerably less than all other meats
6. A western city lifestyle (takeaway food) causes an increased incidence of Type2
From these 6 observations it is possible to deduce the cause of Type2. No diabetic ever made that deduction because they have hitherto been blinded by the medical orthodoxy that the disease is caused by obesity and insulin resistance. But today, our experience with Covid, has much reduced our faith in that orthodoxy. So perhaps readers of the Expose and infowars and the daily skeptic and the UK Column at the least, will see through it to the cause. No doctor ever made the connection because let's face it, they are no longer permitted to be Doctors. They are in the business keeping their practicing licenses by following protocols designed by the stakeholders in present medical orthodoxy - Big Pharma and assorted Megalomanic billionaries.
If you have not yet got there, here is one more clue which makes it more obvious. It is my prayer that many doctors will have already made the connection. My heartfelt advice to them is stop reading now and start thinking. If you work it our for yourself you will never forget it and more importantly you will have intellectually destroyed the medical tyranny under which you presently practice.
7. An romantic competitor of mine developed a penchant for Stinking Bishop. It is the smelliest blue cheese on the market. Prior to this addiction he never had a sweet tooth and never choose to eat sugary deserts. A year after he started regularly eating this cheese he was on Holiday in Turkey and his wife noticed that he was thirsty all the time and had started asking to eat ice cream and other sweet deserts. When they returned to the UK he was diagnosed with Type2.
Have you got there? Allow me to explain...
1. It is not the alcohol which reduces the post prandial sugar numbers because there is more alcohol in whisky than there is in wine. It is the potassium sorbate in the wine which is used to prevent it getting mouldy as it ages. Wine has to survive in dark cellars for years. It therefore needs to have a small amount of fungicide in it to prevent it going off.
2. Whatever is causing type2 diabetes can fight back. Obesity cannot fight back. Insulin resistance cannot fight back. Type2 is caused by a living organism, which fights for its livelihood, which is your sugar.
3. Out of date ham is full of microbes. Roast pork is not.
4. A good curry contains freshly ground spices. These are anti microbial.
5. Turkey is the driest of all the meats. It therefore has the least fungal infection. It also has the least amount of fat. But the leanest cut of beef will still put sugar up much more than turkey.
6. Takeaway food spends longer after being cooked before it is eaten, than does home cooked food, which is generally eaten immediately. Therefore it carries more meat eating microbes, some of which cause Type2
7. If you are addicted to a food, then after several months of excessive consumption of the same thing you start to alter the composition of your gut flora, by giving them so much of this new food. Stinking Bishop is full of mould which is to say fungus or yeast. Eating a lot of fungus/mould/yeast and a lot of fungus food (cheese) gives your gut fungi the upper hand over the gut bacteria and other gut microbes. It is some particular strains of yeast which are the cause of Type2
So there it is. Incidentally taking lots of antibiotics also gives yeast the upper hand in your gut which may or may not cause Type2 depending of which yeasts are dominant in the gut.
Having said all of that, my friend and I did NOT deduce that particular strains of yeast cause Type2 from the above. We were just as caught up in the orthodoxy as everyone else. We were forced to that conclusion by the following chain of events.
I had already realised (as did Tom Watson, the deputy leader of the labour party) that the Low carb diets (of Drs Bernstein, Westman etc) were more effective than the low calorie diets of Prof Taylor. - http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/5/1/9 (Dr Bernstein, Dr Feinman, Dr Westman and 18 others in desperate plea to use carbohydrate restriction as the primary intervention in Type2)
But the furthest you can get with low carb diets and good exercise regimes is a reversal in sugar numbers. That is to say you can bring your sugar numbers back to normal but only if you remain on a very strict and intrusive diet and exercise regime. Reversing diabetes means reversing your sugar numbers. It does not mean curing the disease to the point where you can sit on the sofa eating carbohydrates all day without suffering sugar highs. A full metabolic cure requires a readjustment of your gut microbes to be anti diabetic rather than pro diabetic So my friend and I became fed up with the dietary restrictions and the large amount of exercise needed to keep our numbers reasonable. We were looking for a full cure. Then I read the following paper given in 1854 by W Bird Herapath and published in precursor of the BMJ..
Association Medical Journal LXIX April 28, 1854 page 374 https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jBVAAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA374
Here is an excerpt from the paper given in 1854 at Bath.
On the employment of Torula Cerevisiae (modern name is Candida Robusta) in Diabetes Mellitus
By W. Bird Herapath MD London FRS Edinburgh.
Read at the Quarterly Meeting of the Bath and Bristol Branch March 25,1854
"These views led me to employ the torula in diabetes. And I am happy to say, that in the only case in which I have yet had the opportunity of trying this remedy, it answered fully the expectations which I had previously formed of it.
Under ordinary circumstance, glucose, at a temperature of 60 to 70 degrees Fahrenheit, would be converted into alcohol and carbonic acid by the fermentative agency of the torula cerevisiae or yeast, as is well known to most persons. But if the action were to take place in the dark, in the presence of albuminous substances or other protein compounds, and at a temperature of 98 degrees Fahrenheit, the products would be lactic acid and acetic acids, with possibly alcohol and carbonic acid.
It is clear therefore, that the former products would assist in the conversion of the protein compounds, as in the normal state of digestion, and would pass out of the system in combination with some alkaline or earthy base, and be eliminated by the kidneys, skin or other emunctories, whilst the alcohol and carbonic acids would act as agreeable vital stimuli, whilst existing in the system, and could eventually escape by the pulmonary mucous membrane, after having perhaps served to assist the respiratory process, being this converted into carbonic acid and water.
It is known that the yeast-plant, during fermentation, undergoes progressive growth and decay. And that after long action it become spent and exhausted, which it is found that the cells of which it consists have become ruptured, and its vitality destroyed. Presuming therefore that the yeast plant became no longer capable of continuing the process of lactic or alcoholic fermentation in the stomach, it would die. And then it would itself become a nutritive nitrogenous substance, like any other vegetable diet.
In January 1853, I determined to put these views in practice. And having a patient then under my care, I commenced the administration of the remedy. Before the treatment the patient had been voiding urine of specific gravity 1044, and containing 850 grains of sugar in the imperial pint. Within TWO DAYS of the employment of this substance, the specific gravity sank to 1020, and the sugar to 300 grains per pint. By steadily pursuing the same course during six weeks, the sugar eventually disappeared altogether. The urine assumed its healthy character, and the patient lost all symptoms of his ailment, regaining his usual health and strength. Since that time he has rapidly recovered his flesh.
It was exhibited, in this highly satisfactory case, in that form in which it is usually employed by confectioners, and known by them as German yeast. This is prepared on the continent by expressing ordinary yeast in linen bags, by which means all fluid portions are separated, and a semi solid mass remains, consisting entirely of the active vesicular structure of the plant. This is packed in bladders like lard and keeps fresh for some time. Supplies are sent to London confectioners regularly twice a week, and it can always be obtained from the trade in any large town, at a very moderate price - about 16 pence per pound.
The dose given in this case was one tablespoonful twice or three times daily in milk. It was thus rendered very palatable. At first the only inconvenience felt was a slight nausea, sometimes passing into actual vomiting, with eructaction of carbonic acid probably. By giving the remedy after a meal, these disagreeable symptoms disappeared, and it was borne very well.
It was further serviceable in removing the obstinate constipation which had previously existed and produce regularity in the alvine evacuations.
As diabetes is a comparatively rare disease in private practice, it is to be hoped that by communicating these results, even in their present incomplete shape, it may be the means of hastening the progress of the inquiry, and thus establish the real value of the remedy, as the attention of numerous experimenters will be called to the investigation, and the causes of success or of occasional failure will be at length ascertained.
Bristol March 1854."
So Bird, cured Type 2 by administering a large quantity of living Brewer's yeast. Bird reasoned that the yeast would turn the excess sugar that diabetics suffer from into Alcohol. I reasoned that Bird was not fabricating this cure, because there was no market for curing Type2 in 1854, when it was a very rare disease. I took him at his word. So my friend and I ingested 100 grams of live active Brewer's Yeast which we purchased from Amazon.
It nearly killed the pair of us. PLEASE DO NOT DO THIS. The result was that after 4 days our sugar become completely unmanageable. Exercise would only bring it down for half an hour and then up it would go again. In fact rowing was totally counter productive mainly because it increases the blood supply to the gut, where this pathogenic yeast was living. We had inadvertently given ourselves what is now known as Auto Brewery Syndrome. We had turned out guts into breweries.
But the good news was the we had discovered in the most obvious manner possible that yeast causes Type2. If we ate some carbs, we would start burping and farting as the yeast fermented those carbs and we could see our sugar numbers going up on our continuous Abbot Freestyle Libre glucose monitors. The burping would precede the sugar rise by amount 1 minute The more we burped the higher the sugar went. the less we burped the lower the sugar went. We now had an audio sugar meter and a visual continuous glucose monitor!
But we could not bring the sugar back down however much exercise we did and I got extremely worried because I am very intolerant of high sugar. I was prescribed Itraconazole 100 mg per day. Within minutes of taking the first dose, my sugar went flying back down to normal. But the effect only lasted for 15 hours not 24. So I knew the dose was too low. The trouble is that Itraconazole (and many of the azoles) can have actually lethal side effects. So one does not want to take too much of them. But my friend and I were desperate. So we went to St Thomas's A and E and were prescribed 200 mg each per day. That worked for my friend but not for me. I had to go back and went on the max permissible dose of 400 mg per day for 14 days. That just worked. But the Itraconazole wreaks havoc with your metabolism and my sugar was still crazy, not due to the yeast, but due to the Itraconazole. Then 26 days after I finished the 14 day course the last remnant of the drug finally left my system and Hey Presto! I was non diabetic. No burping no farting and no high sugar. I did not have to do any exercise at all. I would eat and my sugar would go up a tiny amount and then come back down like a normal person. The same was true for my friend. We were both ecstatic.
But this effect only lasted for 4 days and then my sugar started becoming diabetic again. So I decided to treat myself with natural antifungals, such as curcumin with piperine in low dose and decided to try two particular prebiotics, Bimuno and Orafti Inulin. The effect was astounding. I could see on the continuous glucose monitor that my sugar would go up after a meal and sit there unless I did some exercise. But after 3 days on the new regime, it would go up after a meal and sit there for an hour and then slowly start to come back down on its own accord. I had never seen that before other than in the 4 days post Itraconazole. I then got a duff batch of Orafti Inulin and the effect went away. I then changed supplier and got a good batch of Orafti Inulin (made by Beneo in Belgium) and the effect came back. So we were now pretty much non diabetic and feeling very pleased with ourselves.
Then disaster struck. The yeast came back. We both started burping on the same day around a month after the 4 days of cure. I was not going to go down the prescription drug route anymore because I was lucky to get away with taking such a large dose of Itraconazole and because of the bounce back we were experiencing and because both my GP and my clinical Doctor would not prescribe any more antifungals for me - they were both quite right! So I decided to go natural and try every possible antifungal supplement under the sun. The trouble with natural remedies is that you need to take very large quantities of them to reach even half the power of the pharmaceuticals. But the advantages of them are that they have no side effects and no bounce back.
After a lot of trial and error we found a protocol which killed the yeast and cured our Type2 completely. Bird cured his patient by feeding him a non diabetic yeast, which replaced the diabetic yeast which was causing his condition. We took one of the causative yeasts and had to kill it with various antifungals, rather than replacing it with a beneficial yeast. There is a lot of research than needs to be done here. But I am just happy to be able to eat a whole chocolate cake without doing any exercise and have my sugar deal with it - no problem.
The generic cure is a Ketogenic Low Carb, Paleo (low Omega6 and high Omega3 and high fibre) Antifungal, Prebiotic Oligosaccharide (Orafti Inulin and Bimuno) Spinach rich Turkeytarian Diet and Low Intensity Cardio Exercise Regime
What the cure does is recondition the gut flora to be anti diabetic rather than pro diabetic. When a diabetic eats carbs, the sugar from the carbs is not what puts their blood sugar up. It is the metabolism of that sugar by the pro diabetic yeast in the gut which puts the sugar up. We saw this from the burping and the farting after we ate a lot of live active Young's dried brewers yeast. We do not know the precise mechanism for this. But bad yeast winds the gut up and good microbes calm it down. The Orafti Inulin and Bimuno feed the gut calming microbes which compete with the diabetic yeasts.
The technical difficulty with the cure is getting the Orafti Inulin and the BImuno into the large bowel where the good gut microbes lie (that cause farting) without it being eaten by the bad gut microbes in the small bowel (that cause burping). One way to do that is to make a white Chia porridge which is extremely water absorbent and sucks up the dissolved Oligosaccharides and transports them to the large bowel. But the trouble with white Chia porridge is that black Chia is cheaper, more widespread and toxic in porridge quantities and people mix the two up. And that white Chia seed is heavily infected with fungi on its outer skin and so needs to be roasted at 105 degrees fan assisted for 80 minutes before being ground up and eaten with water and the prebiotics. If you roast it at too high a temperature it kills the Omega3 in the Chia. If you roast it at too low a temperature it does not kill the fungus.
Permitted food:
1. Eat one large or two medium meals per day and no snacking at all.
2. No Vegetable oil at all except a small amount of organic rapeseed oil (the best vegetable oil for type 2 - rich in Omega3: Omega6:Omega3 is 2:1). Cook in butter or rapeseed oil.
3. No Nuts at all. No sugar at all.
4. No Dairy at all except butter. No animal fat except a small amount of turkey fat with your fried or roasted or curried turkey.
5. 2 thick slices of flax seed and white chia seed bread per day
6. Eat 25-50 grams of spreadable butter which is butter with a small amount of rapeseed oil (such as Lurpak spreadable) Do not eat butter containing any other type of vegetable oil.
7. Eat fresh or frozen Turkey meat (least fat, least moisture, least fungus). And fry it or roast it well to remove most of the fat. Eat 300 - 500 grams per day of it. Eat no other meat. Do not eat tinned or smoked or otherwise preserved turkey meat. Do not eat turkey Bacon.
8. Raspberries
9. Eat at least 400 grams of spinach per day (for Vitamin A etc.)
10. Eat no raw food (it contains mould)
14. Permitted cooked vegetables are:
Spinach
Chard
French beans
Mangetout
Tomato
Cauliflower
Broccoli
Broccoli spears
Courgettes
Marrow
Sprouts
Spring onion
Rocket, Parsley, Mint, Coriander (cooked only)
Cabbage
EAT NO OTHER FOOD
Permitted drinks
Green Tea
Cinnamon and Clove Tea
Water
NO ALCOHOL. DRINK NOTHING ELSE
When you get up:
40 grams of 90 minute 105 C roasted white chia seed, 1 sachet of Bimuno and 10 grams of orafti inulin ground and mixed together when dry. Then add 400 cc of water and mix into a porridge.
3 grams (women) and 4 grams (men) EPA from molecularly distilled triple strength fish oil (it is important to limit the amount of other carrier oils in the pill which will be full of Omega6)
3 grams (women) and 4 grams (men) DHA from molecularly distilled triple strength fish oil (I use Holland and Barrett or Puritan's pride 5x 1360 mg capsules and Jarrow maxDHA 4x 600mg capsules)
5,000 IU Vitamin D3
The curcumin from 2500 mg of Turmeric (with 10 mg of black pepper). Oxford vitality is by far the best, but is stored is awful cardboard pouches. Best to buy the small pouches and restore in small make up jars with screw tops.
250 mg of vitamin C in a glass of water - no more (it increases the power of the curcumin)
400 mg Magnesium (we recommend Swanson premium triple magnesium complex - it stops all muscle cramps)
2 Candaway tablets (Nature's best)
3 Cloves
500 mg of citric acid in a small glass of water (to remove traces of alcohol in the gut from yeast fermentation). Yeast loves Alcohol and makes it. We must eliminate it from our guts to beat the yeast.
Carbonated water is the best to drink because it is acidic.
WARNING: Some national regulators advice to take a smaller amount of fish oil than we recommend. Eskimos however have traditionally taken 4x what we recommend every day. Opinion is divided. Consult your doctor.
If you develop a nose bleed (I got one on 8 Jarrow maxDHAs per day ) then reduce the number of the maxDHAs.
Women generally need less DHA than men because their bodies can synthesise it twice as effectively (babies brains are made out of it).
Before each of 2 meals
2 Candaway tablets (Nature's best)
3 Cloves
500 mg of citric acid in a small glass of carbonated water (to removed traces of alcohol in the gut from yeast fermentation) with half a sachet of Bimuno Daily stirred in.
After each meal
2 Candaway tablets (Nature's best)
3 Cloves
500 mg of citric acid in a small glass of carbonated water (to removed traces of alcohol in the gut from yeast fermentation)
When you go to bed
The curcumin from 2500 mg of Turmeric (with 10 mg of black pepper). (Oxford vitality is by far the best but is stored is awful cardboard pouches. Best to buy the small pouches and restore in small make up jars with screw tops.
400 mg Magnesium (we recommend Swanson premium triple magnesium complex - it stops all muscle cramps)
2 Candaway tablets (Nature's best)
3 Cloves
500 mg of citric acid in a small glass of carbonated water (to removed traces of alcohol in the gut from yeast fermentation)
Exercise starting 2 hours after each meal.
30 mins on spin bike (best)
OR 30 mins on rowing machine (this will not work if you have a bad yeast overgrowth. It will work fine if you don't)
OR 45 mins walk outside (2nd best).
Alternate exercises as much as possible. Do not do the same one 3x in a row.
After 6-12 weeks you should be clinically non diabetic - in our experience. The writer can now eat what he wants and does not have to do any exercise at all. The diabetic yeast overgrowth that caused his type 2 has gone
If a moderately to severely diabetic person eats 200 grams of sugar his blood sugar will go up say from 1 gram per litre (100 mg/dl) to 2 grams per litre (200 mg/dl). This means that each litre of his blood will contain twice as much sugar as normal. It will contain 1 gram more sugar than normal. So his entire body (which has 5 litres of blood), will contain 5 grams more sugar than normal. One teaspoon of sugar is all that it takes to double your blood sugar! But this means that the type 2 diabetic has successfully stored 195 grams of sugar, and has failed to store only 5 grams of sugar.
If that same diabetic eats only 100 grams of sugar, then his blood sugar will go to say 1.5 grams per litre (150 mg/dl). So he has failed to store 2.5 grams of sugar (an extra 0.5 grams per litre in 5 litres) and successfully stored 97.5 grams of sugar. But we know from the thought experiment above (or indeed from a real experiment) with 200 grams of sugar, that he has the capacity to store 195 grams of the stuff. So his sugar is NOT rising due to a lack of sugar storage capability. Neither is it rising due to insulin resistance, because he has enough insulin even with his level of insulin resistance to store 195 grams of sugar. He is simply not producing that insulin and not storing the sugar by metabolic choice. This shows that insulin resistance does not cause type 2. It is a result of type 2. The cause of type 2 is a hack of the body's sugar regulation mechanism, which causes it to command your body to upregulate your sugar. This hacker is a yeast which eats sugar. The diabetic yeast is a true parasite. It turns you into a sugar factory for its benefit.
We know that viruses hack our DNA or RNA to turn our cells into virus factories. Well, now we see that yeasts hack our metabolism to turn our cells into sugar factories!
If you feed your yeast overgrowth with 100 grams of sugar, it produces enough toxin to put your sugar up to 150 mg/dl. If you feed your yeast overgrowth with 200 grams of sugar it produces enough toxin to put your sugar up to 200 mg/dl. The way to pass an oral glucose tolerance test (eating 150 grams of sugar in the form of Lucozade), is to dose up on antifungal first, to suppress the yeast, then drink the Lucozade, then take some more antifungal. This prevents the yeast overgrowth being fed by the sugar and your blood sugar will not go up as much and you will most likely pass the OGTT.
Similar protocols will exist for various Cancers.
Our diabetic protocol turns you into a one quarter Eskimo in diet. Eskimos on their traditional diet and Japanese on the traditional Japanese fish based diet have a really low incidence of Congestive Heart Disease. This is important for diabetics, who have a greatly increased susceptibility to Cardiovascular disease. One of the great tragedies of modern medicine is its divorce from natural remedies. This divorce suits the interests of Big Pharma
It is the hope of the writer, that people will wake up not only to the corruption of Covid protocols away from the health interests of patients and towards the financial interests of shareholders. But also to the corruption of Cancer, Cardiovascular and Diabetic protocols in the same way. In this vein I will finish with the story of a Diabetic acquaintance who went into a London teaching hospital to have her foot amputated due to it having congestive foot disease from her high sugar. Incidentally Kings College Hospital in Denmark Hill have a good treatment protocol for that which is to do a foot bypass operation just as they do for the heart if the blood supply to the heart becomes congested.
But this girl did not go to Kings. And she liked cake a lot. Whilst she was in hospital there was no diabetic menu. So she just ate the normal hospital food - which to her delight included cake. So the hospital diabetic ward was feeding her cake. She died in that hospital. She was in her early 50s. .
Diabetes attacks your feet. It is almost as if it knows that these are a danger to it. Whatever you do, keep walking and keep spin biking. If you are weak or old then get a set of magnetic pedals which you can use like a footstool whilst sitting in an armchair. Keep those legs moving and keep the circulation going in those feet. But remember this one thing. The correct antifungals are more effective than exercise, because they address the pathogen which is killing you.
We hope you enjoyed our Shakespeare's 18th, our Rossini's last, our Bach's 565th, our Wordsworth's Daffodils, and we hope it gives your immune system the victory over your diabetic yeast overgrowth that Medical Orthodoxy has so far denied it
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Purpose of (Public Health) Institutions
https://mindandmatter.substack.com/p/the-purpose-of-public-health-institutions
Send to Kindle
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” —Upton Sinclair
a pie sitting in a pan on a table
“Institutions will try to preserve the problem to which they are the solution.”
Named after writer Clay Shirky, the principle describes the general tendency of organized groups to prolong the problem they’re meant to solve. Once you grasp it, you start to see it everywhere.
Apparent examples abound. The Department of Homelessness in San Francisco keeps securing a larger and larger annual budget to fight homelessness, which nonetheless continues rising. More and more is spent on public education, but student literacy has declined. Per capita healthcare expenditures go up, the population gets more sickly. Are institutions actually facilitating these problems? Or are they trying harder and harder to combat problems that are independently getting worse? It can be difficult to say for sure, but the pattern is common.
Institutions naturally evolve to maximize their total level of influence because they are composed of humans—people who want secure, high-status positions with comfortable salaries. We want to be influential. We want cool jobs—positions that carry not only healthcare benefits and paid vacation, but bragging rights. Whenever someone tells a stranger, friend, or prospective lover what they do for a living, the preferred response is, “Oh wow! That’s impressive!”
As more capital is acquired by institutions meant to solve a societal problem, a disproportionate amount goes into growing the org itself rather than addressing the problem head-on. If our medical institutions were optimized for maximizing human health, we’d expect them to be good at preventing people from becoming unhealthy in the first place. They would additionally be effective at treating the sick through the efficient deployment of resources. Instead, capital tends to be allocated like this:
too many administrators in medicine
Same phenomenon, different institution: universities. Over time, more and more students have paid increasingly obscene fees to attend these institutions. And yet these places of “higher learning” aren’t producing graduates equipped for success outside their hallowed halls. The barista who handed you a latte this morning may have double-majored in something. So what, exactly, are universities doing with all that tuition money? Much goes into hiring non-teaching staff:
Is UC spending too little on teaching, too much on administration? – AFSCME 3299
The Shirky Principle captures a general tendency of organizational behavior over time, not an absolute law for how all orgs always behave. The tendency to prolong or exacerbate problems emerges as organizations grow, as their ability to acquire funding and grant social status to members increases. They may be founded with genuine intent to eradicate a problem, but literal success nullifies the orgs ability to bestow its members with larger rewards. A never-ending problem provides infinite fuel for growth and justification for more resources.
A commonly cited historical example of the Shirky Principle is the “Cobra effect.” In British colonial India, policymakers wanted to reduce the cobra population. Bounties were offered to anyone who brought in carcasses. An elegant solution—to get rid of cobras, simply pay people to kill them. Locals began hunting cobras and getting paid. Then they realized: more carcasses, more money. People started breeding cobras. Result: more cobras.
a close up of a snake on a rock
It’s not difficult to see why this tendency evolves. In the cobra example, people really did want to get rid of cobras—they’re scary, and they bite. Those who implemented the policy failed to anticipate how people would naturally respond to incentives. Their stated mission was to eradicate cobras, but people were compensated with money in exchange for cobra carcasses. When a company’s mission statement is misaligned with employee incentives, incentives win. This is common, occurring when those who engineer the incentive structure fail to understand how incentives motivate human action. Second-order incentives often emerge that conflict with the desired outcome.
Ignorance is one possible driver of the Shirky Principle. Corruption motivated by status-seeking is another.
Humans are social primates. We spontaneously organize ourselves into social status hierarchies. Status is how cool or important you are—your ability to command attention, the currency of social status. It’s more valuable to be higher status because it can be used to influence peoples’ attention to your benefit. Not everyone aspires to be Prom King or CEO, but no one wants to be unimportant or become less cool. Some do whatever it takes to acquire as much status as possible. Others seek security, content with the status they hold. Nobody wants to fall.
When you’re part of an organization, you naturally want to maintain or increase your status within it, especially when your livelihood is at stake. We want promotions, not demotions—bigger budgets, not smaller ones. The larger the problem an organization aims to solve, the more resources it can attract to solve it. What’s cooler? Running a tiny org with a modest budget and two staff members? Or heading a billion-dollar operation with hundreds of people on a mission to save the planet? Who will be more motivated to keep things rolling?
Big budgets and important jobs attract people who want a slice of the pie. People generally aren’t content with one small piece of pie—they want everlasting pie. Basic emotions drive our hunger for status—envy, greed, lust. We adapt to what we get. Hunger transforms into gluttony. Securing more status, we feel pride—when it’s threatened, wrath. With security often comes sloth. People work hard because they strive to get somewhere. That somewhere is a secure, high-status position. Lots of pie, little hassle. Nobody wants to be an intern forever.
Diabetes is a massive, global problem. Ballooning numbers of people are afflicted. Chronic illness is also very expensive, forcing people to spend a lot of money. The pie is very big. Big problems require big solutions. To motivate people, you have to offer them a big enough piece of the pie. According to the American Diabetes Association, their mission is “to prevent and cure diabetes.” An ambitious and noble goal.
The essential problem: if the mission is fulfilled, the pie is gone. Remember the cobra problem? People want pie.
red apple beside brown pie
From the Shirky Principle we would expect that, with time, an institution like ADA would adopt behaviors that prolong the problem of diabetes rather than those that hasten it’s resolution. But come on, can this really be the world we’re in? How on Earth could a nonprofit like ADA become structured to prolong the problem of diabetes? Are we to believe it’s run by a cabal of people who want more diabetes in the world?
The key to understanding the Shirky Principle is to recognize that it points to an organic tendency arising from the ways humans respond to incentives. No conspiracy is required, just basic emotions. The Cobra Problem was made worse because policy architects failed to correctly anticipate how human behavior would adapt to incentives.
Has the ADA evolved to prolong the diabetes problem rather than solve it? To prime our intuitions before analyzing this question in more detail, consider the size of the problem and how the ADA is positioned within society to engage it. In their own words:
“The ADA raised $122.3 million, including initial funding for Health Equity Now, our multi-year initiative that envisions a future without unjust health disparities. Our expenses totaled $108.6 million, 70% of which went directly toward our mission: to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.” —ADA, 2020 annual report
Among other things, that budget goes to pay the salaries of staff (which presumably counts as “directly toward our mission”). For executives, that means very comfortable six-figure salaries. According to Glassdoor, VPs and Senior Executives make anywhere from $124,000 to $297,000 annually (plus benefits). Directors often earn six-figures as well. According to LinkedIn, there are quite of few people carrying these titles. Not bad for a non-profit. Again, big problems require big solutions. Pie motivates.
Share
A thought experiment: through some miraculous breakthrough, diabetes disappears tomorrow. What happens to ADA? Does it dissolve itself? There’s no need to renew their annual budget or keep taking donations—diabetes is over. Do they sell off their assets to fund generous severance packages for executives and other staff, as a thank you for realizing their stated mission?
Many people seem to believe that ADA is indeed prolonging the problem of diabetes. They argue it promotes diets that make the condition persist, that it’s staffed by former employees of junk food makers, and takes money from private corporations that profit from chronic illness. These are reasons why, according to some, ADA makes poor diet recommendations to people.
Let’s start by unpacking a recent controversy that erupted in response to one of ADA’s meal planning strategies for diabetes.
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recently got lots of attention when it advertised the “Diabetes Plate Method.” Their widely shared video post amassed millions of views in short order:
From ADA’s website, the “Plate Method” works like this:
“The Diabetes Plate Method is the easiest way to create healthy meals that can help manage blood sugar. Using this method, you can create perfectly portioned meals with a healthy balance of vegetables, protein, and carbohydrates—without any counting, calculating, weighing, or measuring. All you need is a plate!”
—American Diabetes Association
The method is simple, as it should be. The goal is to influence the behavior of the masses, which requires a simple, easy-to-understand approach. Normal, everyday people are busy—jobs, children, and little time or inclination to get lost in the weeds of “nutrition science.” For this I commend the ADA. We need easy-to-follow methods ordinary people can put into action. No easy task. Anyone putting forward such plan will take heat, and people with public opinions on diet are often animated by a kind of religious zeal.
The Plate Method:
Half for non-starchy veggies. Vegetables with low carbohydrate content like asparagus, broccoli, or carrots.
One-quarter for lean (low-fat) protein foods, ranging from animal meat (beef, poultry, seafood) to cheese and plant-based protein sources (beans, lentils, nuts, tofu, etc.)
One-quarter for carbohydrate foods—“good carbs” like whole grains (brown rice, oatmeal, quinoa, etc.), starchy veggies (potatoes or green peas), beans and legumes. A small portion of fruit or low-fat dairy on the side.
Water or a zero-calorie drink. No sugar-filled sodas.
Diabetes Meal Planning | CDC
The ADA thinks this is good advice for managing diabetes. Others disagree.
So is the ADA providing good advice or bad? To approach this, we need to understand the basics of insulin resistance and how it relates to dietary macronutrients. Our main focus will be on which macros are the biggest drivers of insulin resistance. In particular, we need to understand how “good” and “bad” carbs differ with respect to insulin.
Insulin resistance is a key component of type II diabetes, obesity, and other bad things. You don’t want to be insulin resistant. Cells decrease their responsiveness to insulin when there’s too much of it for too long. It is a reversible cellular adaptation to chronic, excess insulin (although irreversible changes may occur with prolonged insulin resistance). The natural way to reverse insulin resistance is to lower insulin, which can be done by eating less, especially of foods that trigger lots of insulin release.
Diabetics suffer from poor glucose regulation, which is why their blood sugar levels can get dangerously high (hyperglycemia). To reverse large glucose spikes, triggered by poor dietary choices, they can inject themselves with insulin. This solves their short-term problem (high blood sugar) but exacerbates the underlying insulin resistance. It’s sort of like an opioid addict taking a large hit of heroin to relieve withdrawal symptoms. The immediate symptoms dissipate, but the underlying issue is made worse. Tradeoffs.
Carbohydrates, especially simple sugars, generally raise insulin levels more than fats or proteins. I’ve previously dissected just how different so-called “good” carbs are compared to “bad” ones. Most people would agree that some level of carb restriction is needed to combat insulin resistance. There is disagreement on how much is enough and what “good” carbohydrates actually are.
Before proceeding with our analysis of ADA, let’s get a basic handle on what the literature says about the effectiveness of low carb vs. other diets in terms of insulin levels and diabetes management.
Low-carb diets and type II diabetes: how well do they work?
ADA often recommends low-to-moderate carbohydrate diets to patients, emphasizing what it considers to be “good” carbs. They do not recommend very low or no-carb diets (e.g. ketogenic), stating these can be difficult for patients to implement and maintain. They do emphasize low fat diets and “good” carbs in moderation. (For an analysis of why certain fats have been demonized as “bad” over the years, see my conversation with physician-scientist Dr. Orrin Devinsky)
We’ll start with a study of n=83 overweight adults (BMI>28), randomly assigned to three different isocaloric diets for several weeks (i.e. equivalent calories in each meal). The three diets:
Notice the basic differences. The very low-carb diet has full fat cheese, whole milk, meat, eggs, nuts, and salad. The other two diets have bread wholemeal as the primary carb source, together with things like fruit bars, skim milk, reduced fat dairy alternatives, and some kind of meat. These very low fat and high unsaturated fat diets above are roughly in line with ADA advice—low levels of “bad” fats together with “good” carb sources like whole grains, fruit, and beans.
Here’s how insulin responses looked at the beginning and end of the experiment for each meal group:
All groups experienced a modest decrease in insulin by the end. But for the duration of the study, the very low-carb meal group had much lower insulin levels, roughly one-third of what was seen with the other diets. The very low-carb diet was indeed very low—just 3% of calories from carbs. That’s one study.
Another study measured 24-hour blood glucose and insulin levels in adults with type II diabetes, half on a low-carb diet (~21 grams of carbs/day) and half on their usual high-carb diet:
Data adapted from Boden et al. (2008) and summarized in this paper.
Studies like this show that on low-carb diets, insulin levels not only rise less after meals but stay lower throughout the day, compared to high-carb diets.
These are just two individual studies in a vast sea of literature. It’s confusing to navigate, easy to cherry-pick results. To get a more general sense of how low-carb diets compare to others with respect to insulin resistance, let’s consider studies from the past ten years, limited to those with insulin measurements from trials where isocaloric diets were given for at least several weeks.
A 2021 meta-analysis compiled randomized clinical trials evaluating low and very low-carb diets compared to various control diets for at least 12 weeks in adults with type II diabetes. Compared to control diets, low-carb diets achieved higher rates of diabetes remission (57% vs. 31%). Very low-carb diets were less likely to be adhered to than low-carb diets, but were effective in those who stuck to them. The main result is worth repeating: many weeks on a low-carb diet led to remission of diabetes in many patients.
In this 2019 trial, n=28 adults with type II diabetes were randomized assigned to receive either a “conventional diabetes” diet (50/17/33 balance of carbs/protein/fat) or a “carb-reduced high-protein diet” (30/30/40 balance of carbs/protein/fat). The carb-restricted group saw lower levels of post-meal insulin (as well as other markers).
In this 2022 study, n=60 overweight or obese patients with newly diagnosed type II diabetes were given one of two diets for 12 weeks: A ketogenic diet vs. a variable control diet with limits on max carbs, protein, and fat such that carbs were the most abundant calorie source. Both groups saw significant, beneficial changes in most measured parameters, but the keto group generally saw larger shifts. This included fasting insulin at half the level seen in the control group.
A 2015 study looked at n=69 overweight/obese adults at risk for diabetes. They received either a low-fat or low-carb diet for eight weeks. In general, the low-carb diet had beneficial effects on measured outcomes, including a lesser insulin response following meals compared to the low-fat group.
The point here is not to argue that low-carb diets are the only viable strategy for lowering insulin and improving diabetes, or even that they’re superior to other approaches. The point is simply that, when people adhere to low or very low-carb whole food diets for several weeks, they generally see improvements in key health parameters relevant to diabetes, including lower insulin. These diets often perform better than alternative, higher-carb or low-fat diets, and can even lead to remission of type II diabetes.
cereals in bowl with spoon
None of this should be too surprising given what we know about the underlying biology. Carbohydrates generally drive a larger insulin response than fats and proteins, so it makes sense that carb restriction would help improve insulin sensitivity and help manage diabetes.
Nutrition is complicated. Biology, complex. But improving insulin sensitivity and reversing diabetes through diet probably has to involve some level of carb restriction for most people. The question is: how much? Is it more effective to be aggressive and promote very low-carb diets (e.g. the ketogenic diet), or is it enough to get people to swap out “bad” carbs for “good” ones?
One of the major problems with ultra-low carb diets like keto is that they’re difficult for the average person to stick to. If something works but people can’t stick with it, that’s not very helpful. On the other hand, we know that the divide between “good” and “bad carbs can be murky. Many so-called “good” carbs result in insulin responses comparable to, or even greater than, those of “bad” carbs.
Let’s look at the dietary recommendations and arguments of the ADA in more detail. We want to represent their perspective fairly, keeping in mind that we’re talking about dietary strategies meant to influence the eating habits of everyday people. Any viable strategy has to not only be effective if put into practice, but feasible for the average patient to implement.
Let’s point out what the ADA’s “Plate Method” does right. These things should not be controversial:
Simplicity. Anyone can comprehend this approach. Heroic efforts are not required for implementation.
Whole foods. With some exceptions, ADA is not recommending processed foods (at least not in this document).
Portion control. They’re laying out a simple visual for portion management, supplemented with basic measurements for how to portion out different foods.
Specific whole food recommendations are given for each class of foods in their document. Many would argue with various particulars, ranging from emphasis on low-fat meat and dairy to their characterization of seed oils as “healthy fats.” All valid points. For our purposes here, we’ll focus on their carbohydrate recommendations.
From the image above, you can see that ADA recommends several types of foods as carb-sources—whole grains and things like beans and lentils, as these contain protein or fiber. Consuming more protein or fiber together with a given carb-rich food will generally be beneficial in terms of blood glucose and insulin. But as I’ve explored elsewhere, many “good” carbs containing fiber or protein produce insulin responses comparable to, and sometimes even greater than, “bad” carbs like white bread. This can be true for everything from wholegrain breads to potatoes and beans. Recommending carbs be consumed with fiber or protein is directionally good advice, but is not a surefire method for managing blood glucose and insulin levels.
Stepping back, what about total carbohydrate consumption? With the Plate Method, 50% of the plate is for non-starchy vegetables, which are low in calories. One-quarter is for carb foods. In this post, one ADA employee cited data indicating that the average American consumes about 50% of calories from carbs, and that their meal plan would result in consumption of about half that level. Let’s just call it 25%—one-quarter of daily calories from carbs.
Based on the clinical literature, “low-carb” is often applied to diets with 25% or fewer calories coming from carbs. “Very low-carb” diets are typically 10% or less. There’s no universal definition for these things but it’s fair to call the ADA’s method a low-to-moderate carb approach. It certainly isn’t very low-carb.
Diet classifications based on carbohydrate content, from this review paper.
ADA seems to be recommending moderate carb restriction. They aren’t telling people to drink Coca-Cola and eat Sour Patch Kids, which would be insane and a dead giveaway that they’re completely off the reservation. Clearly that’s not what’s going on.
Recall the Shirky Principle. It does not state that institutions will blatantly try to make the problem worse, but that they will tend to evolve practices that preserve the problem. This can be accomplished by adopting strategies that don’t help very much, enabling the problem to persist for as long as possible. This is actually a good long-term strategy. Taking actions with little impact on the problem, rather than those that blatantly make it worse, helps to minimize any pushback that would undermine the org’s ability to expand. At the same time, an incremental, conservative approach provides a kind of protective veneer—it looks like you’re trying to do something. You’re being realistic, following established guidelines, and not promoting anything where the science isn’t settled. Talking points like this are important elements in the narratives constructed to justify an organization’s strategy (we’ll dissect the process of narrative selection in more detail below).
Think about it.
If ADA hired the Chief Marketing Officer of Sour Patch Kids as CEO and they began recommending three square meals of sugary candy per day, there’d be some kind of major reaction to such obvious absurdity. But what if it seems, to most people, like ADA is making reasonable, moderate recommendations in-line with USDA dietary guidelines? What if ADA staff really believe they’re doing good and promoting wellness? What if you hire from respectable organizations like the American Heart Association and recruit people with years of experience as dietitians? Aren’t all of those things what you would naturally expect, and hope, a major institution does?
ADA is recommending moderate carb restriction, portion control, and whole foods. Hardly damnable. Why are some people so worked up about their Plate Method? Let’s take a look at what critics have said and examine some of ADA’a specific meal recommendations more closely, including who sponsors them.
When ADA posted it’s Plate Method video on social media, many pounced. One example:
In essence, those critical of ADA’s diet recommendations argue that it’s promoting too much carb consumption. Given that carbohydrates spike insulin levels more than fat and proteins, this makes sense. Those with diabetes and prediabetes (now the majority of adults) need to lower their insulin levels, which means changing their diet. Since carbs spike insulin more than other macronutrients, it makes sense to focus on cutting down on carbs as much as possible.
The response to this reasoning, from the ADA’s Director of Nutrition:
“In my over 30 years of experience as a Public Health Nutritionist and Registered Dietitian, I’ve found that going from a high or moderate carbohydrate meal pattern to a much lower carbohydrate pattern for someone who has not paid much attention to their nutrition is extremely challenging. This often requires a stepwise and incremental approach, with the assistance of their health care team, as they learn all these new skills. As success is achieved, newer strategies can be added to continue moving along the continuum for further success.” -Stacey Krawczyk, LinkedIn (emphasis added)
My summary of the argument: many people have seen success, including diabetes remission, with very low-carb diets. The effectiveness of very low-carb diets at reducing insulin is well-documented and there are many anecdotal success stories out there. The counter-argument from ADA is that, although very low-carb diets may often be effective, they are not practical to implement and sustain for people who’ve eaten high-carb diets for many years—an incremental, stepwise approach to diet should therefore be taken to gradually nudge their eating habits in a new direction.
These points all seem pretty reasonable to me. After all, the average American has been eating a high-carb, processed food-rich diet for life. Many are true addicts who likely can’t regulate their own behavior enough to sustain a very low-carb diet. ADA needs to balance what’s most effective at treating diabetes with what people can actually manage in their lives.
Within the Shirky Principle framework, I’d expect an institution like ADA to evolve—it’s behavior should change over time, as it learns through trial-and-error which of its actions leads to growth. If it has morphed into an organization enabling the problem of diabetes to persist, then its dietary recommendations will have shifted away from approaches that help reverse diabetes, toward those that enable its persistence. I can imagine two potential drivers:
Accumulation of corporate sponsors who benefit from diabetes—providing revenue streams to fuel growth;
Infiltration of the org itself by former employees of such corporations.
ADA’s sponsored meal & snack plans.
There’s a difference between thoughtful, incremental dietary recommendations and enablement. When you start to look at ADA’s specific food recommendations, it quickly becomes clear why people call them out. A common point of criticism: ADA promotes snacks and meals containing added sugar. Here’s one from the ADA website, which it calls the “Power Snack Mix”:
Image
It’s questionable as to why ADA is promoting snacking at all, but this one is downright strange. Based on the ingredients, the primary macronutrient is carbohydrates. One of the four ingredients is chocolate chips, more or less just straight sugar. I’m doing my best to be fair-minded here, but this is just plain weird for an org whose mission is supposed to be eradicating diabetes. Snack on chocolate chips? What?
Things get more strange with further inspection of their meal recommendations. For example, here’s a carb-heavy pasta dish. Even if we accept the argument that pastas can be “good carbs” which don’t spike insulin levels as much as simple sugars, one of the ingredients here is… added sugar!
Image
Adding pure sugar to any dish is a bad idea for those interested in managing insulin levels, especially someone who is already insulin resistant. What could possibly possess an organization to recommend added sugar as an ingredient to an already carb-heavy meal? As many have pointed out, the answer appears to be: advertisers.
Carb-rich pasta with added sugar, brought to you by DaVita Kidney Care, proud partner of ADA!
DaVita is a private company. They run kidney dialysis centers. Many diabetics end up in these places due to kidney damage caused by chronically high blood sugar. The name “DaVita” is an adaptation of an Italian phrase meaning, “Giving life.” That’s their stated mission—“we are dedicated to an unwavering pursuit of a healthier tomorrow.”
Recall the Cobra Problem. If you want to understand real-world outcomes driven by human behavior, ignore mission statements. Think through incentives. The more people on dialysis, the more revenue DaVita generates. Some of that revenue is clearly going to ADA in the form of meal sponsorships promoting carb-rich meals with added sugar. Those are simple, empirical facts. Where do incentives point? How will humans behave?
Share
There are many such meal examples on ADA’s website, some of which are sponsored private companies whose revenue goes up the more people there are living with chronic metabolic illnesses like diabetes. You can find carb-heavy meals of all kinds, ranging from “fruit-filled pancake puffs” to “whole grain chicken & waffles” and fruit punches that contain added sugar on top of orange juice.
Again, there’s no need to assume anyone, in any of these organizations, is a cynical actor. No conspiracy required. Just consider the basic incentives placed on flesh-and-blood, status-seeking humans. DaVita Kidney Care wants its revenue streams to grow, not shrink. ADA wants bigger sponsorships and more donations to fund its important mission. Everyone wants promotions, demotions. There are sales targets to hit. Bragging rights are at stake.
A fun question to ponder: does the ADA award employees annual bonuses? If so, what kinds of metrics are these payouts based on?
ADA not only promotes carb-rich meals and snacks with added sugars, they receive multimillion dollar donations (presumably tax-deductible) from the some of the world’s top insulin makers, such as Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. These pharmaceutical giants produce the insulin that many diabetics inject. When do they shoot up? When their blood sugar spikes dangerously high. This happens when they make unhealthy dietary choices, like eating chocolate chips. More people with diabetes eating chocolate chips means more insulin sales.
Above, we listed two possible mechanisms that could drive ADA to adopt behaviors enabling the problem of diabetes to grow: (1) accumulation of corporate sponsors who benefit from a larger pool of diabetes patients (customers); (2) infiltration of the org itself by former employees of such corporations. The first of these is clearly in play. What about the second?
To the extent that ADA receives funding from and is operated by people tied to entities with a financial interest in the persistence of diabetes, we would expect its behavior to move in the direction of serving those interests. If ADA has itself accumulated staff from such entities, it’s behavior can be influenced internally. To the extent that internal (staff) and external (sponsors) influences are aligned, they should nudge the organization’s behavior in the same general direction. Over time, this would shift its dietary recommendations towards those that preserve the problem of diabetes.
Everybody wants more pie.
closeup photo of sliced pie on white ceramic saucer
Carb-restriction as a treatment for diabetes has a fascinating history. As far back as the late 1700s, it was observed that carb-rich foods like bread and sugar aggravated diabetes symptoms and low-carb diets were recommended to diabetics. After the discovery of insulin in the early 1920s, dietary interventions began to fall out of favor. Pharmacotherapy (insulin injections) became more and more common.
To give a sense for how mainstream physicians approached diabetes prior to the discovery of insulin, check out the “starch-free diet.” It was devised by Dr. Herman Mosenthal, published in his 1921 book, Diabetes mellitus; a system of diets:
Image
The present system of diets has been designed with the object of allowing any patient or nurse, without special training in dietetics, to carry out the proper rationing for cases of diabetes mellitus. These diet lists have been in successful use in a number of hospitals and clinics for several years. -Dr. Herman Mosenthal (1921)
That was printed right around the discovery of insulin. Mosenthal would go on to be a founding member of ADA (established in 1939). He served as President in the 1940s and passed away in 1954. It wasn’t until 1971 that ADA released its first official dietary recommendations, which deviated significantly from Dr. Mosenthal’s starch-free diet.
ADA released dietary guidelines again in 1986. Assuming ADA would have endorsed something like its founding memberl’s starch-free diet when it was established, here’s how ADA’s dietary recommendations evolved from 1939-1986:
1939—Mosenthal’s “starch-free diet,” a very low-carb diet urging diabetics to avoid carb sources like sugars, grains, and fruit.
1971—Approximately 45% of calories from carbs was considered acceptable, apparently based on nothing more than population norms at the time.
1986—Approximately 55-60% of calories from carbs and total fat restricted to <30% of calories.
Key historical developments in the history of diabetes. Graphic from this paper.
There was a transition from lower to higher carbohydrate intake, and from higher to lower fat intake. By the mid-1980s, American dietary guidelines had moved squarely in the direction of carbs good, fats bad. This was driven largely be the belief that blood cholesterol levels are the primary driver of cardiovascular disease, resulting in the demonization of “bad” fats (saturated) and promotion of “good carbs” like whole grains. Mainstream medical institutions like the American Heart Association disseminated the official creed in creative ways, such as the infamous “food pyramid.” In large part, Americans listened.
As physician-scientist Dr. Orrin Devinsky explained to me, the evidence supporting this narrative was never strong. Here are a couple key changes in Americans’ diet patterns, based on analysis in this study, which I discussed in detail with Dr. Devinsky.
Since the mid-1900s, people transitioned away from “bad” animal fats (saturated), replacing them with “good” fats (polyunsaturated), such as “heart healthy” seed oils. To this day that’s the message we get from institutions like the American Heart Association, which certifies processed foods like Cheerios as “heart healthy.”
From the 1960s to the 1980s, per capita processed grain availability increased 113%. From the 1980s to the 1990s, it increased 47%.
These shifts in food production went more or less in the opposite direction from what Dr. Mosenthal was recommending at the time of ADA’s founding. After his death and the dissemination of official USDA dietary guidelines, amplified by mainstream health institutions, how did diabetes rates change?
Rates of type II diabetes have been climbing for decades. Source.
Diabetes rates have moved in one direction since the discovery of insulin, the founding and growth of ADA, and successive waves of dietary recommendations set forth by our mainstream institutions. There are multiple, competing narratives that can explain this general pattern.
One interpretation is that Americans aren’t following the guidelines. Institutions are providing good, evidence-based advice. American people just aren’t taking it. There may be some truth to this, but it doesn’t make total sense. As indicated above and explored in more detail here, Americans have shifted their diets in the direction of the guidelines. They started eating a lot of carbs in the form of grains—you know, the base of the food pyramid advice I was inculcated with as a child. A common response: well, we’re more sedentary. Not true either—obesity and diabetes rates have climbed despite evidence we are less sedentary than we once were.
Share
Another interpretation: diabetes rates have continued climbing decade after decade because of the dietary guidelines set forth by mainstream institutions. We have forgotten what physicians like Dr. Mosenthal and others knew over 100 years ago: carbohydrates, especially sugar and refined grains, exacerbate diabetes. We also know why: they drive insulin. The discovery and use of insulin as an injectable medicine gave us an easy way to acutely treat one of the major symptoms of diabetes (high blood sugar), enabling us to relax our focus on lifestyle interventions that can treat and even reverse the underlying biological problem (insulin resistance).
The simultaneous use of drugs (e.g. insulin) that treat the symptoms but not causes of metabolic dysfunction, together with diets that do not reverse the underlying metabolic problem (insulin resistance), creates a valuable commodity: people with high lifetime customer value. The longer someone lives with diabetes, the longer they’re around to continue spending money on medicines and foods, and the more justification there is for an expansion of ADA’s influence (and budgets).
Of course, there are other interpretations of what’s going on.
A natural counterargument here, as to why ADA’s dietary recommendations have changed over time, is that they’re simply following the science. We’ve learned a lot about diabetes, metabolism, and nutrition since Dr. Mosenthal’s 1921 starch diet. Many scientific papers were published in the past century. Many have been supported by ADA, which has devoted $950 million to “innovation studies” since the start of its Research Programs in 1952. How is that not a good thing? A large non-profit institution has injected hundreds of millions of dollars into research, expanding our knowledge base. Because that knowledge base grows and changes over time, we must continually update what we believe and recommend to patients. That’s scientific progress, isn’t it?
For better or worse, how scientific research is funded plays a big role in how it’s conducted, how the results are published and distributed, and whether labs get re-funded after publishing work fueled by their initial grants. As we’ll see, the shear size of the published literature—filled with a mixture of rigorous science, sloppy science, and conflicts of interest—provides an invaluable substrate from which human organizations can select results to fit desired narratives. Call this process “narrative selection,” by analogy with natural selection.
Contaminated science: how industry funding generates the substrate for narrative selection
For better or worse, the history of research on human diet, nutrition, and metabolism is filled with examples of suspicious funding, conflicts of interest (often unreported), and results based on sloppy and even fraudulent work. There are many, many examples that illustrate the corrupting influence that funding sources have had on research. Here’s just a few high-profile, well-documented cases:
Ancel Keys’ infamous “seven countries study” has influenced generations of scientists and the entire mainstream medical establishment for decades. (It even has it’s own website). That influence is still reflected in the practice of physicians and medical organizations today, despite the now well-known fact that Keys’ data was problematic in various ways. Studies contradicting his ‘diet-heart hypothesis’ were often ridiculed or suppressed (e.g., see Dr. Orrin Devinsky’s commentary on the ‘Framingham Heart Study,’ at ~1:16:51 in M&M #135)
For decades, the sugar industry dolled out large sums of money “that successfully cast doubt about the hazards of sucrose while promoting fat as the dietary culprit in coronary heart disease.” Corruption of the scientific process in the service of narrative formation.
It’s well-known that mainstream medical organizations like the American Heart Association practically owe their existence to large corporate donors. For example, Proctor & Gamble gave millions of dollars to AHA, influencing them to tell consumers to replace butter and “bad fats” with the “heart healthy” seed oils that P&G wanted to sell. This narrative yields dividends to this day.
No photo description available.
Crisco was introduced by Procter & Gamble in 1911, the first product of its kind made entirely from seed oils composed largely of omega-6 polyunsaturated fats.
Notice how mutually beneficial partnerships between for- and non-profits can arise, as in the case of Proctor & Gamble and AHA. P&G needed to create a narrative to motivate people to buy its new product (seed oils). To do this, they facilitated the expansion of another organization (AHA) by injecting money via donations. Like human growth hormone into a bod-builder’s buttocks, AHA’s budget and influence grew. Their growing prestige was used to propagate the narrative that P&G’s “vegetable” oils were good for the heart. A symbiotic relationship between expansion-hungry organizations, the growth of one facilitating growth of the other.
You don’t have to look far to see how widespread the food industry’s influence on research is. Everyone from Kellogg’s to Nestle provides funding—lots and lots of it. The same is true of pharmaceutical companies that profit from the growing pool of chronic disease sufferers. These companies not only fund scientists directly, they sponsor medical organizations—ADA, AHA, etc. In turn, these institutions use that money to fund research, advertise meal plans to consumers, and pay staff. To the extent that the recommendations of these non-profits drive consumer behaviors that are good for their sponsors, a mutually advantageous ecosystem is created—an environment in which the goal of every organization (expansion) in the network is reinforced through reciprocal financial benefit, ultimately powered by consumer behavior motivated by the narratives they subscribe to.
All of these organizations vary in size and structure, but none of them wants their domain of influence (or revenue streams) to shrink. All of them rely on the construction of narratives, stories people must believe to motivate their behavior in ways that fuel the organization. These narratives take diverse forms, ranging from the product marketing stories compelling consumers to buy products to virtue signaling messages of social good non-profits use to drive donations.
Share
Labyrinthine financial ties connect for-profit companies, non-profit institutions, and research labs. These can be invisible, as when scientists and physicians fail to disclose conflicts of interest. To give just one example, the lead author of this paper from the American Academy of Pediatrics failed to disclose nearly $225,000 in funding from Big Pharma. That paper was meant to cast doubt on the effectiveness of low-carb diets in youth with obesity and diabetes. Because it’s published, peer-reviewed research by credentialed experts, it can be cited as evidence against low-carb diets for people with metabolic conditions. One then has justification to promote stories involving “carb moderation” and “good carbs,” providing the impetus for things like ADA’s cheerios and chocolate chip-filled “power snack”, which can be called an “evidence-based” recommendation.
An uncomfortable truth about the scientific literature: you can dig up a set of papers to justify just about any conclusion you want.
Science is difficult and expensive. Labs often produces conflicting results. If you fund lots of different research labs, you’re bound to see a diverse results, some of which have conflicting interpretations. This creates a two-pronged opportunity for anyone looking for a science-backed narrative to justify behavior that serves their organization’s interests: (1) Selectively re-fund the labs who produced the results you like best, biasing the field over time; (2) Selectively point to a subset of results to promote your preferred narrative, or else throw up your hands and say things like, “The science isn’t settled,” “More research is needed,” or “Look at all the research we’re funding!” Merchants of doubt have much use for unsettled science.
A good example of how the official research process can be artificially skewed by special interests is illustrated by this re-evaluation of data from the Minnesota Coronary Experiment (MCE) of 1968-73. This study conflicted the dominant narrative that blood cholesterol levels are a major driven of heart disease, but the data went unpublished until 2016. It showed that even though replacement of “bad” saturated fat with “good” linoleic acid (seed oils) did effectively lower serum cholesterol, this did not translate to lower risk of heart disease or mortality. In other words, a large study contradicting the dominant narrative espoused by mainstream health institutions sat idle, collecting dust, for decades.
“Findings from the Minnesota Coronary Experiment add to growing evidence that incomplete publication has contributed to overestimation of the benefits of replacing saturated fat with vegetable oils rich in linoleic acid.” —Ramsden et al. (2016)
I’m not saying this means that each and every study with industry funding is wrong and needs to be thrown out, but we also can’t be so naive that we “follow the science” by blindly pointing to published research. Even worse: blindly following the story someone else is telling just because they have PubMed citations. When “the science” says there’s only weak evidence supporting the recommendation of low-carb diets to people with impaired glucose metabolism, we should probably take note of when that work is funded by General Mills.
Tufts University’s “Food Compass” consistently ranks processed foods like Cheerios as, “To be encouraged.” Recall that Cheerios are also recommended by ADA as a, “Power snack” together with chocolate chips. Food and beverage companies like Kellogg’s, General Mills, and PepsiCo all paid to support this work, which coincidentally resulted in 100+ of their processed food products as being ranked highly.
The process of narrative selection
Biological diversity is the substrate of natural selection, the process by which organismal forms are “fitted” to the physical environment through the selective survival and reproduction of those best adapted to the environment. Evidential diversity is the substrate for narrative selection, the process by which specific conclusions are fitted to narratives which motivate human behavior.
Everyone has ideas. For any idea we encounter, there’s a chance we believe in and act on that idea. Experts are a special subset of people possessing specialized knowledge and whose ideas carry extra weight. All other things being equal, the more you’re seen as an expert the more likely your ideas are to replicate in others’ minds upon exposure. Scientific results published through the official peer-review apparatus are shareable units of specialized, expert knowledge. These bits of knowledge can be amplified by institutions and individuals, often in mutated form. The shear quantity of publications generated year after year provides a rich substrate for narrative selection.
There are many funders of research—governments, for-profit corporations, non-profit institutions—fueling mass production of scientific papers. From the diversity of papers generated, human minds curate (select) and interpret (mutate) the findings. The resulting ideas can then be crafted into a narrative—a press release, recorded speech, or Substack article—vehicles by which the ideas are transmitted to others minds (reproduction). The most successful narratives are those most effective at motivating people to further propagate the narrative—either by motivating them to transmit the narrative themselves or to support the expansion of other voices amplifying the narrative (e.g. tax-deductible donations to ADA, subscribing to this Substack, etc.).
Share
In biological evolution, natural selection is imposed by the physical environment, which dictates whether or not a given organismal form reproduces. In ideational evolution, narrative selection is imposed by the human mind, which dictates whether or not a given idea is communicated. Human minds encode and share information in the form of stories (narratives), which are composed of simpler ideas (memes, analogous to genes). Naturally, we tend to believe and communicate those narratives that suit our interests as status-seeking social primates. This tendency acts as a kind of meta-filter through which we digest the narratives we consume. Recall the words of Upton Sinclair:
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
Human organizations naturally craft narratives that suit their goals, such as expansion of influence. Contraction is never the goal, for the simple reason that organizations are composed of status-seeking social primates. Do you want to lose your job, get demoted, or have your budget slashed? I didn’t think so. You want to “achieve your goals,” “make an impact,” “serve your community,” and “fight for [Good Thing].” There are many euphemisms for status-seeking. It’s much less common to hear people communicate with nakedly self-interested language (“I just want more money,” “I’m just saying this to get laid”). We re-code our status-seeking into language that makes for a better narrative, one that’s more likely to be respected and therefore communicated by our peers.
The more an organization is respected, the more prestige it has. Expert credentials are a mark of prestige. Prestigious institutions acquire their status as such, in large part, through their association with experts. Harvard is a prestigious university. Lots of people want to get in, only a minority do. Lots of people care about what it’s faculty have to say and pay their attention when they speak, which is why Harvard is so influential. ADA is also influential. Many people take it seriously. We would therefore expect it to be composed of experts, the top experts when it comes to diabetes. Right?
Whether or not you believe ADA has been corrupted by its ties to corporate interests (more on that later), they presumably understand the basics of human metabolism. If their mission is to eradicate diabetes and they direct so many resources toward research and education, ADA presumably harbors bona fide diabetes experts. After all, they started out that way—founded by Dr. Mosenthal and other top physicians, back in 1939. ADA’s current employees may not all be doctors, but I would expect the staff responsible for educating people on diabetes to at least understand foundational concepts of metabolism.
After posting their “Plate Method” video online, ADA was flooded with comments. Many were critical. Before shutting off comments on their posts, they left this remark on the Facebook post featuring their Director of Nutrition & Wellness:
The comment seemed to be in response to the many people who stated that carbohydrates are not an essential part of the human diet. Essential dietary components are those we must eat in order to survive and function properly. For example, there are both essential and non-essential amino acids. The essential ones are those we must obtain through diet because our bodies cannot produce them. Vitamin C is another example. Unlike other animals, humans cannot produce vitamin C endogenously. We must therefore consume foods containing it.
Are carbohydrates essential components of the human diet? Here’s the key part of ADA’s response to the comments they received:
“The brain needs glucose to function appropriately, so a certain amount of carbohydrates is needed for people as part of healthy eating.”
As metabolic psychiatrist Dr. Georgia Ede explained, that statement is a half-truth. “A half-truth is a very powerful problem in the world,” she told me. The true part is that our brains do always need some glucose. At any given moment, brain cells use a combination of glucose (carb) and ketones (fat) for fuel. The exact mix depends on your diet and metabolic state, but some glucose is always there. The false part of ADA’s statement is that dietary carbohydrates are necessary for us to obtain glucose. That’s totally false and well-known. Through a process called gluconeogenesis, our cells can create glucose from non-carbohydrate substates. (I first learned this in Biochemistry 101, in college).
Gluconeogenesis Definition
To recap: ADA posted their Plate Method video on social media. They got lots of critical comments, then posted a half-truth in response before shutting off new comments. Many were quick to point out these things. Some took time to politely critique their statement about the necessity of dietary carbs.
Who posted that factually inaccurate statement on ADA’s Facebook page, anyway? Was it Stacey Krawczyk herself, the Director of Nutrition featured in the video? Or was it just some social media manager? Whoever posted on behalf of ADA was either ignorant of gluconeogenesis or else knowingly posted a half-truth for other reasons. Either way, it’s misinformation.
That got me thinking: if ADA was founded by physicians well-versed in the biology of their day… who works there now?
Share
Because this article was first prompted by the uproar around ADA’s Plate Method video, I started by looking at their Director of Nutrition & Wellness. A registered dietitian with a Masters of Science degree in nutrition, she describes herself as a “wellness executive and food systems change agent”. Past employers include the National Soybean Research Lab and Kellogg Company.
One wonders: does Stacey believe soybean oil is a “good fat,” or that Kellogg’s breakfast cereals can be part of a healthy, balanced diet? Do her beliefs have anything to do with her work history? We can only speculate. What we know for sure is that Kellogg’s is publicly traded, so if she’s holding onto stock from her 7+ years of service she will benefit from an increase in the share price. She will also benefit if ADA grows and she’s able to move up through the ranks. If both things happen, win-win for Stacey.
What we’re getting at here is the concept of the “revolving door.” We see it all over. The most famous examples of revolving doors connect government to private industry—banking, pharma, and weapons manufacturers are infamous. Big Food is another. A revolving door is a mechanism by which interests are aligned across organizations that would otherwise be independent or even antagonistic to one another. Alignment happens organically as people move between organizations they have a financial interest in. No explicit, top-down coordination is required. If a bunch of people spend their careers going back-and-forth between banking and politics, this facilitates the creation of regulations that benefit the banks those individuals are moving to and from.
Revolving doors are not limited to government-private sector interactions. They can be found between private companies, research institutions, and non-profits. If you casually browse the “People” section of ADA’s LinkedIn page, you will see many such examples. People join and/or leave ADA to work in biotech or pharma companies making diabetes drugs, large food and beverage manufacturers, and other non-profit health institutions like the American Heart Association. Do these connections have anything to do with ADA’s designation of Cheerios as a “power snack?”
Back of Cheerios Box with photo of Coach Ice-T
Marketing content from General Mills’ 2022 “Pour Your Heart Into It” campaign. Cheerios products come in many flavors, from Frosted to Chocolate Peanut Butter. Advertised as “part of a heart healthy diet,” these processed foods are often “American Heart Association Certified” despite main ingredients including corn starch and sugar.
In addition to a Director of Nutrition who spent years at Kellogg’s, five minutes of searching revealed ADA executives who have worked as spokespeople for insulin makers like Eli Lilly and in sales at Coca-Cola. Analysis of publicly available tax documents has shown that the food industry donates a lot of money to US-based patient advocacy organizations. According to this study, nine food and beverage companies collectively donated over $10 billion inflation-adjusted dollars to such orgs between 2001 and 2018.
What are food companies really buying?
Why do large corporations, such as junk food makers, make such donations? What are they actually buying? According to Dr. Robert Lustig, they seek to exculpate themselves as causal forces driving obesity, metabolic syndrome, and other “disease of civilization.” For example, Coca-cola donated $1.5 million in 2015 to help start the Global Energy Balance Network, a non-profit that minimized the role of diet in driving obesity by overemphasizing physical activity. This narrative emphasis shifts blame away from food and beverage makers who load their products with high-fructose corn syrup and other obesity-promoting added ingredients. They want us to believe it’s all about energy balance (how much we eat) and energy expenditure (how much we move). Consumers should exercise more and watch their total calorie count, not focus on the specific ingredients engineered into processed foods.
An alternative narrative arises from the observation that obesity and metabolic dysfunction have continued to climb even though total calorie intake has been flat and people have been exercising more than they used to. If people’s metabolic health continues to decline despite these trends in energy intake and expenditure, it suggests a different story. Perhaps people aren’t just lazy. Perhaps our food supply is loaded with obesogens, substances that promote obesity and metabolic dysfunction independent of caloric content.
Many common food additives function as obesogens, promoting fat accumulation and metabolic dysfunction independent of caloric content. Figure from this paper. See also M&M #140.
Narratives are powerful because they motivate human action. The stories we’re exposed to influence our choices. To the extent that you believe the narrative that metabolic health is primarily about how much you eat overall, your attention will focus more on the total number of calories you consume and burn, and away from the specific ingredients put into the foods you eat. To the extent you believe that specific foods should be avoided even in moderation, because they contain obesogens, you will be motivated to stop purchasing products produced by companies like Coca-Cola or General Mills. Which of these competing narratives you subscribe to determines your view of what constitutes a healthy “power snack.”
This is what I believe these companies are really buying with their donations to ADA, AHA, and other organizations: narrative selection. With respect to any set of human behaviors, there are always multiple competing narratives, each motivating us to act in certain ways. Organizations naturally seek to construct and promote those narratives that motivate people to act in ways that serve the interests of the organization. When General Mills donates money, they’re participating in narrative selection. And it works. The Tufts University “Food Compass” algorithm gives Cheerios a high score. That “evidence” supports ADA’s label of Cheerios as a, “Power Snack.”
Share
The size of a company’s donations determines their ability to nudge these organizations in the direction of espousing Narrative A rather than Narrative B. If Splenda donates a million bucks and ADA’s Director of Nutrition has a problem with promoting Splenda-filled recipes to people, what should you do? If you want that sweet Splenda money to keep funding your stated mission, you fire the Director. (This is what a recent lawsuit settled by ADA alleged).
For an interesting exercise in how these relationships influence narrative formation, study the literature on the biological effects of Splenda, how that company responds in press releases, and their work with ADA promoting a certain narrative about “zero-calorie” sweeteners (which are not, in fact, devoid of calories).
Companies like Splenda have an interest in promoting narratives that motivate consumers to behave in ways that support the org’s growth.
Whatever you believe about how and why ADA functions, it’s efforts to stop the spread of diabetes have not been successful. The organization is embedded in a complex network of organizations that play a role, directly or indirectly, in shaping the metabolic health of our society. This network is a complex system of interacting nodes, each comprised of human beings who (a) espouse the belief in mission statements, and (b) respond to quarterly incentives. Some of these mission statements, such as ADA’s, are explicitly aimed at eliminating diabetes. None would claim to be promoting the opposite. And yet, things aren’t moving in the direction of the stated mission. People act according to incentives, which tell us which way things will move.
A famous phrase from systems thinking is, “The purpose of a system is what it does.” It’s a simple heuristic used to explain why complex systems like human organizations often produce results at odds with the stated intentions of those who operate them. In analyzing complex systems, it tells us to focus on outcomes, not intentions.
Outcomes emerge from incentives, not intentions. Remember the cobras. When you feel motivated to grab your next power snack, ask yourself: what’s the story here, and who is telling it?
Special note: I contacted two ADA representatives ahead of producing this content, in order to hear their perspective. Stacey Krawczyk, Director of Nutrition & Wellness, did not respond through her personal website or LinkedIn. Chuck Henderson, CEO, told me, “My comms team will be in touch. They have your info.” I never heard from them.
To learn more about the topics covered in this essay, try these episodes of the Mind & Matter podcast:
M&M #132: Obesity Epidemic, Diet, Metabolism, Saturated Fat vs. PUFAs, Energy Expenditure, Weight Gain & Feeding Behavior | John Speakman
M&M #134: Omega-6-9 Fats, Vegetable & Seed Oils, Sucrose, Processed Food, Metabolic Health & Dietary Origins of Chronic Inflammatory Disease | Artemis Simopoulos
M&M #135: History of Diet Trends & Medical Advice in the US, Fat & Cholesterol, Seed Oils, Processed Food, Ketogenic Diet, Can We Trust Public Health Institutions? | Orrin Devinsky
M&M #140: Obesogens, Oxidative Stress, Dietary Sugars & Fats, Statins, Diabetes & the True Causes of Metabolic Dysfunction & Chronic Disease | Robert Lustig
M&M #100: Infectious Disease, Epidemiology, Pandemics, Health Policy, COVID, Politicization of Science | Jay Bhattacharya
For further reading:
Postlight Reader