JULY 2025 NEWS
Featured topic: political developments
Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices
Paul Offit (Beyond the Noise) posted “This CDC resignation should scare you.” “Fiona Havers resigned because she feared that RFK Jr. would suppress or manipulate CDC data. ‘A lot of Americans are going to die from vaccine-preventable diseases,’ she warned.”
Beth Mole (Ars Technica) reported “RFK Jr. barred registered Democrats from being vaccine advisors, lawsuit says.”
Mike Stobbe (Associated Press) wrote “Ousted vaccine panel members say rigorous science is being abandoned under RFK Jr.” “The 17 experts who were ousted from a government vaccine committee last month say they have little faith in what the panel has become, and have outlined possible alternative ways to make U.S. vaccine policy.”
Vaccines – thimerosal/mercury and aluminum
Paul Offit (Beyond the Noise) posted “Mercury rising.” “A CDC Advisory Committee just made the same mistake it did 25 years ago. And it’s only the beginning.”
Andrea Love (ImmunoLogic) posted “Thimerosal isn’t mercury. But to RFK Jr. facts don’t matter.” “The U.S. Health and Human Services Department (HHS), now under RFK Jr., has officially declared thimerosal (a safe vaccine preservative) is dangerous. It’s not. But that lie, now policy, will ripple across the globe, destroying vaccine trust, access, and uptake in low-income countries.”
Alex Morozov, Helen Petousis-Harris, and Stephan Lewandowsky published “RFK Jr. is targeting aluminum in vaccines – and children could pay the price.” “If anti-vaccine activists successfully undermine aluminum-containing vaccines despite research findings like the Danish study, the consequences will be catastrophic.”
Kaitlin Sullivan (NBC News) wrote “Study finds no link between aluminum in vaccines and autism, asthma.” The paper is: Andersson et al., Ann Intern Med. 2025 Jul 15. “Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has spread vaccine misinformation for years, said on a podcast in 2024 that aluminum in vaccines is ‘extremely neurotoxic’.”
Vaccines – other
David Gorski (Science-Based Medicine) posted “After ACIP: where Robert Kennedy Jr. will likely go from here in his quest to eliminate vaccines”’; “Dr. Pierre Kory resurrects the false claim that vaccines cause SIDS”; and “An antivaxxer attacks the evidence-based medicine paradigm: Echoes of RFK Jr.’s ‘gold standard science’.” “Last week, antivaxxer Toby Rogers published two very long screeds attacking the EBM paradigm. Cleverly, echoed some of our criticisms of EBM but twisted them so that they are science denying, rather than affirming…he wants to base medicine on any form of science and evidence that confirms what he already believes, namely that vaccines cause autism, are ineffective, and are downright dangerous.”
“Orac” (Respectful Insolence) posted “Antivaxxers will testify before a Senate committee…again” and “’Voices of the Vaccine-injured’: old school antivax nonsense on steroids.” “Yesterday, Sen. Ron Johnson held a hearing, ‘Voices of the Vaccine-injured.’ As expected, the misinformation and conspiracy theories flowed.”
Edzard Ernst posted “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hired well-known anti-vaccine activist, Lyn Redwood, to the CDC’s vaccine safety office”; “The deadly consequences of RFK Jr.’s stance on vaccinations”; and “Robert F Kennedy Jr. and his dangerous BS about autism.”
Paul Offit (Beyond the Noise) posted “Senator Cassidy's line(s) in the sand.” “Senator William Cassidy (R, LA) promised that he would prevent RFK Jr. from disrupting vaccine programs. How’s he doing?” and “A 'modest' number of deaths.” “If we are to accept RFK Jr.’s anti-vaccine agenda, we are going to have to learn to accept more suffering, more hospitalizations, and more deaths from vaccine-preventable infections. Robert Malone, by appearing to minimize the 250 deaths in children from influenza this year, might have been trying to show us the way. In the end, we are going to have to ask ourselves, ‘How many vaccine-preventable deaths are too many?’”
Christina Jewett (New York Times) published “Top F.D.A. official overrode scientists on Covid shots.”
Apoora Mandavilli (New York Times) reported “Medical Societies sue Kennedy and H.H.S. over vaccine advice.” “Six leading medical organizations filed a lawsuit on Monday against Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health secretary, and the federal Department of Health and Human Services, charging that recent decisions limiting access to vaccines were unscientific and harmful to the public. The suit…seeks to restore Covid vaccines to the list of recommended immunizations for healthy children and pregnant women.”
Andrea Love (ImmunoLogic) wrote “Newborn hepatitis B vaccines save lives, prevent cancer, and don't cause autism.”
Patricia Callahan (ProPublica) published “RFK Jr. wants to change a program that stopped vaccine makers from leaving the U.S. market. They could flee again.” “In his crosshairs is the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, a system designed to provide fair and quick payouts for people who suffer rare but serious side effects from shots…”
Sarah Owermohle (CNN) reported “Kennedy announces plan to reform Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.”
Chris Dall (Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy) posted “AAP [American Academy of Pediatrics] calls for end to nonmedical vaccine exemptions for school attendance.” “AAP argues that nonmedical vaccine exemptions ‘erode the safety of school environments" and limit the public health value of vaccine requirements for school attendance’.” Policy Statement
Jeremy Roebuck and Maegan Vazquez (Washington Post) reported “Amid Epstein backlash, Bondi ends case against MAGA-backed Utah doctor.” “The attorney general ordered prosecutors to dismiss charges against a Utah plastic surgeon accused of faking vaccine cards and injecting saline into patients who wanted to dodge vaccine mandates.”
Vjosa Isai (New York Times) reported “Canada's measles outbreak exceeds cases in U.S.” “Alberta, which has low measles vaccine rates, has recorded about 1,600 cases. The largely conservative province has a deep and vocal level of skepticism about the public health system and vaccines, with many people mirroring some of the arguments made in the United States by the health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.”
Vinay Prasad
David Gorski (Science-Based Medicine) posted “COVID-19 contrarian Dr. Vinay Prasad meets real world responsibility.” “Dr. Vinay Prasad parlayed his COVID-19 contrarianism into a high-ranking position in the FDA. Now he’s facing real world responsibility, and knives are out for him. Can he survive?”
Jonathan Howard (Science-Based Medicine) wrote “Dr. Vinay Prasad: bodily autonomy applies to raw milk, not vaccines.” “When it comes to the COVID vaccine, Dr. Prasad feels cardiac MRI abnormalities are ‘not a benign clinical finding.’ With COVID, he said these exact same MRI abnormalities are ‘massively overblown.’ With raw milk, Dr. Prasad feels people have the right to bodily autonomy, and that a risk of 70 per 1,000,000 is ‘very low.’ With the COVID vaccine, a risk of myocarditis of 27 per 1,000,000 only for young males, is enough for him to ban the vaccine for every healthy person under age 65.”
Dr. Howard also posted “With Laura Loomer on one side and Dr. Paul Offit on the other, our FDA leaders are caught in a trap of their own making.” “After years of bashing the medical establishment, Drs. Vinay Prasad and Marty Makary are stuck in a trap.”
Christina Jewett (New York Times) reported “Top F.D.A. official resigns under pressure.” “After turning down several new drugs and restricting use of another, Dr. Vinay Prasad drew the ire of the right-wing influencer Laura Loomer and others.”
FDA
Jonathan Howard (Science-Based Medicine) wrote “FDA has replaced its leadership with doctors who have done their ‘research’.”
Jeneen Interlandi (New York Times) wrote “Inside the collapse of the FDA.” “How the new health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is dismantling the agency.”
Paul Knoepfler (The Niche) wrote “Is Makary’s FDA already heading toward a breaking point?”
Political developments – other
Scott Gavura (Science-Based Medicine) posted “Wearables and wellness populism: how smart watches got MAHA’d.” “…MAHA is positioning wearables as tools and instruments of personal virtue, part of an ideology that sees disease as personally preventable.”
David Weinberg (Science-Based Medicine) wrote “A department adrift from its own 'Gold' standards.” “In this article I have presented recent communication practices of HHS and found them lacking. Unfortunately, the communication practices are reflective of a more serious problem: a lack of rigor and lack of seriousness in parsing the best evidence for the purpose of setting HHS priorities and policies. HHS has fallen short in transparency and Gold Standard Science.”
“Orac” (Respectful Insolence) posted “America’s quack (now CMS Administrator) Dr. Oz goes authoritarian quack…again.” “Dr. Oz recently advocated ‘cooperation’ with food companies to ‘make America healthy again.’ His call for ‘cooperation’ was really a threat, and his message to poor Americans has been that you don’t deserve healthcare unless you prove yourself ‘worthy’.”
Paul Offit (Beyond the Noise) posted “RFK Jr.’s cruelest cut of all.” “On June 25, 2025, RFK Jr. cut off U.S. funding to the Global Alliance Vaccine Initiative (GAVI), which supports vaccines for more than half of the world’s children.”
Edzard Ernst posted “U.S. health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. emboldens the ’Bleach Boys’.” “’The bleachers are back, making connections with powerful people, reaching RFK and Trump,’ says Fiona O’Leary, an Ireland-based activist who has spent years trying to highlight the dangers of toxic bleach solutions being sold as an autism cure. ‘Bleachers want RFK to approve chlorine dioxide as a treatment for autism, cancer, and other conditions. It is like watching a horror show’.”
Ben Turner (Live Science) wrote “RFK’s proposal to let bird flu spread through poultry could set us up for a pandemic, experts warn.”
As noted in Consumer Health Digest, “Several non-governmental organizations have issued statements on how cuts to funding for health care and nutrition support in the newly enacted H.R.1 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) will harm consumers.”
Gideon M-K (Health Nerd) wrote “Do food dyes make children hyperactive?” “I don’t think banning food colours is a huge issue either way, but it is worth talking about because it’s yet another example of bad science being used by the Trump administration.”
Hannah Natanson, Carolyn Y. Johnson and Joel Achenbach published “Trump officials halt 'dangerous' research, overriding NIH career scientists.” “The Trump administration’s actions on NIH gain-of-function research have raised concerns among scientists, who argue the move could block experiments that are safe and potentially lead to new treatments and medicines.”
Evan Moffitt (The Observer) published “’Dark Age’ for HIV treatment as vaccine sceptic wields the axe.”
Ahmed Aboulenein (Reuters) wrote “Medical group urges Kennedy not to fire US care task force.” The United States Preventive Services Task Force “determines what cancer screenings and other preventive health measures insurers must cover.”
Danielle Ofri (New York Times) wrote “Doctors have lost their Mount Olympus of medicine.” “The institutions I trusted to be deliberative and evidence-based sources of knowledge that extended my medical abilities are no longer that.”
Stephanie Armour wrote “Chronically ill? In Kennedy’s view, it might be your own fault.” “Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and agency leaders have attributed a panoply of chronic diseases and other medical issues — such as autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, diabetes, and obesity — to consumers and their lifestyle choices.”
Featured topic: homeopathy
Edzard Ernst posted:
“Why homeopaths cannot possibly obtain informed consent from their patients.” “And guess what – without informed consent, homeopathy is unethical!”
“Some Indian homeopaths are about to get prescription rights.”
“The absurdity, of homeopathy, homeopaths and their arguments.”
“A turning point for homeopathy.” “The current editorial in the Journal ‘HOMEOPATHY’ is entitled ‘A Turning Point for Homeopathy?’ It hinges on the often discussed wishful thinking of homeopaths that the mechanism of action (MoA) of homeopathic remedies is explicable by the presence of nanoparticles in the remedy…The homeopathic community needs reminding that, to comprehensively explain the MoA of a medicine, a whole range of key elements are required…A detailed understanding of how a medicine works can only be developed, once these elements known. In the case of homeopathy, we are nowhere near this point. Therefore, the ‘nanoparticle theory of homeopathy’ (as well as all the other pseudoscientific theories for explaining how homeopathy works) is little more than BS! It would be more honest of homeopaths, I think, to stick to Hahnemann’s dogma and concede that their remedies work by acting on a mystical life force or energy. At least this would make it more transparent to the public that homeopathy is an obsolete, implausible and even quite ridiculous notion from the past.”
“The 'mimicry theory of homeopathy’.” “Here I propose that homeopathy too can be viewed and explained by that kind of mimicry. Homeopaths attempt to mimic the appearance or approach of real medicine in order to gain legitimacy, credibility and income.”
Posted “Homeopathy for chronic low-back pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.” “To be honest, I do not trust these findings one bit…Or do you know many small trials of an utterly implausible intervention that produced significant benefit on all outcome measures?”
Other topics
On Science-Based Medicine,
Mark Crislip:
Wrote “Garden of Healing.” Dr. Crislip evaluates claims made for medicinal plants in the Adelaide Botanic Garden.
Scott Gavura:
Posted “Your terrain, your fault? Germ Theory Denial 2025.” “According to terrain theory, germs don’t cause disease – it’s your body’s failure to maintain internal purity. If you’re healthy enough, pathogens can’t hurt you…Terrain theory doesn’t just reject evidence: it rejects uncertainty. And in doing so, it offers an illusion of control: Live life purely and holistically, and you can avoid illness. But reality is messier. Disease can strike even the healthy. Through acknowledging the reality of germ theory, we’re also accepting a necessary truth: some aspects of our health are beyond individual control. Germ theory gave us something terrain theory couldn’t deliver: effective, lifesaving interventions like vaccination, antibiotics, sterilization and sanitation – together they have saved many millions of lives and are cornerstones of medicine. Healthy living matters too. Diet, sleep, physical activity, and avoiding tobacco reduce the risk of many illnesses. But when taken to extremes, which terrain theory encourages, it can lead to pseudoscience, stigmatize the sick, and undermine the public health systems and interventions that meaningfully contribute to a healthy society.”
Edzard Ernst:
Reported “Death associated with wet cupping therapy (hajima).” “This effect is likely to be an extremely rare event. Yet, it is worth remembering that wet cupping has other adverse effects that are much more frequent: It is painful. It can lead to nasty infections. It can leave unsightly scars. Even more important is, I think, the fact that wet cupping has no or very few benefits. This means its risk/benefit balance fails to be positive. And, in turn, this means, that we should discourage people from using it.”
Asked “Are chiropractors allowed to call themselves ‘Dr.’?”
Wrote “’Hands-off’ therapies are more effective than ‘hands-on’ therapies in the treatment of chronic cervical pain.”
Discussed “Eric S Kaplan, the strange chiropractor-friend of Donald Trump.” “Eric S. Kaplan is the President of DISC Centers of America, the largest group of Chiropractic clinics in the U.S.A., utilizing Non-Surgical Spinal Decompression….Even the most superficial look at the data, however, suggests that the evidence for nonsurgical spinal decompression is at best flimsy. While there are studies showing benefits, they often lack control groups or have small sample sizes, making it wrong to draw firm positive conclusions. Therefore, most medical professionals remain skeptical due to the lack of robust evidence.”
Discussed “The effect of hydrotherapy on people with non-specific chronic low back pain.” “So, if you have back pain, should you see a chiropractor (osteopath, acupuncturist, homeopath, other SCAM [so-called alternative medicine] practitioner who claims his/her therapy works for sore backs) or a practitioner of hydrotherapy? A difficult choice? Let me help you: the evidence is flimsy for all; the costs for chiro etc. tend to be high; the risks of chiro etc. can be considerable; Best to choose a treatment that is inexpensive and low-risk … which means? Yes, you got it: you might as well choose hydrotherapy!”
Wrote “Feverfew for migraine? A new and rather useless review of the evidence.” “…what exactly does the new review add to the existing knowledge? I fear, the answer is VERY LITTLE! Arguably, the new review is even less rigorous, transparent, thorough and informative than our paper. If that is so, why conduct and publish it?”
Wrote “The eternal allure of the panacea.” “The allure of such concepts is understandable: they are so much simpler than reality! When the naive enthusiasm wears off, it is time for some rational and critical thinking. The causes of disease are manifold, and (sadly) there is no (and never will be) a panacea.”
Declared “Animal chiropractic is nonsense.”
On McGill Office for Science and Society:
Jonathan Jarry:
Posted “Patchy science on LifeWave's mysterious patches.” “Take-home message: LifeWave patches are small, round patches that stick to the skin and that are being sold through multilevel marketing. Sources, including scientific papers, don’t agree on exactly what is inside these patches or how they are supposed to work to cause all sorts of vague health benefits. Published studies tend to be very bad in quality, and the lack of plausibility strongly suggests that when these patches are thought to work, it is because of placebo effects.”
Wrote “Con artists or true believers?” “Are all snake oil salesmen lying to you to get to your money? Or do some really believe what they’re selling?”
Discussed UV blood irradiation. “Take-home message: UV blood irradiation, which goes by a long list of other names, is the process of removing blood from the body, passing it in front of a UV lamp, and putting it back in the body, in order to treat illness. There are very few legitimate medical applications of this procedure, mainly the treatment of a form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (where cancer cells in the blood attack the skin). The technique is commonly offered by wellness clinics for every symptom or illness out there, with virtually no scientific evidence behind it.”
Sophie Pellar:
Wrote “Orange you overdoing it? A deep dive into the science of zone training.” “Think higher heart rate equals more fat burn? The science behind heart rate zones says otherwise. Discover why slow and steady might actually win the fat-loss race.”
Joe Schwarcz:
Wrote “Science shows carnivore diet is best left to lions.” “What is clear is that the fad is not supported by evidence. Quite the contrary. The lack of fibre increases the risk of colon cancer, imbalances the intestinal microbiome, and can lead to explosive diarrhea. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies red meat as ‘probably carcinogenic to humans’ and processed meat as ‘known to be carcinogenic to humans.’ A high-meat diet raises LDL cholesterol, the so-called ‘bad cholesterol,’ as well as blood levels of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a compound linked with cardiovascular risk. Meat also lacks vitamin C, magnesium and potassium, all found in plant foods. Then there is the issue of kidney stones.”
Posted “Want more energy and a feeling of wellbeing? That’s the promise of Eria Jarensis” (video with transcript). “Eria Jarensis is an orchid, an extract of which contains N,N-Dimethylphenethylamine (DMPEA)… Whether it has stimulant effects similar to other phenethylamine derivatives is not known because there have been no clinical trials. Neither is there evidence that it is a ‘fat burner,’ a substance that is supposed to boost the body’s metabolic rate leading to more calories burned at rest.”
July – Cara Santa Maria (Skeptical Inquirer) wrote “Twenty years of health scams and wellness trends.”
July 10 – Beth Mole (Ars Technica) wrote “Woman takes 10x dose of turmeric, gets hospitalized for liver damage.” “In fact, while rare overall, turmeric appears to have become the most common herbal cause of liver injuries in the US.”
July 13 – Teddy Rosenbluth (New York Times) wrote “So your doctor is a D.O. Does that matter?” “While vestiges from Dr. Still’s original philosophy are still incorporated into modern training — students spend roughly 200 hours learning a hands-on approach for diagnosing and treating various ailments called osteopathic manipulative treatment — most D.O.s say they don’t use these techniques.”
July 18 – Glenn Sacks (The Hill) wrote “Actually, research supports the COVID school closures.” Four studies are cited, concerned with issues like spread of COVID in households and communities and effects on minority families. “…in the context of the time, what we did was not unreasonable, and that we acted in good faith to protect our students, their families and their communities. “
July 21 – Henry Miller (Genetic Literacy Project) wrote “'Wellness' grifters' pseudoscience imperils public health.” “This movement no longer just peddles ineffective supplements and dubious diagnostics; it’s actively undermining science-based health policy — and putting human and even animal lives at risk. Nowhere is this more evident than in the crisis of H5N1 bird flu, a virus with real pandemic potential.”
July 21 – Emma Yaskinski (New York Times) asked “Do you need to drink electrolytes?” “But experts say you probably don’t need to reach for a sports drink during your regular workouts. Even if those workouts are strenuous or happen in hotter weather, drinking water when you’re thirsty is enough to keep you hydrated. The sugar and carbohydrates found in many sports drinks certainly may help competitive athletes maintain their energy, but the electrolytes have little impact.”
July 29 – Christina Jewett (New York Times) published “Kennedy announces plan to restrict some kratom products.” “In recent years, manufacturers have isolated and amplified a compound in kratom to make a more potent product. Concerns about addiction to 7-OH, or 7-hydroxymitragynine, have mounted because it binds to opioid receptors in the brain…People can buy 7-OH online and in smoke shops, where it’s often labeled kratom and 7 or 7-OH. It comes in the form of gummies, chewables, small drinks or tablets that melt in the mouth.” In a related story, the FDA issued a warning letter to companies marketing 7-OH.
Addition to previous months
January – Quigley and Shanahan published “Probiotics in health care: a critical appraisal” (Annu Rev Med. 2025 Jan;76(1):129-141). “…the field is filled with controversy, inconsistencies, misuse of terminology, and poor communication. While the probiotic concept is biologically plausible and in some cases mechanistically well established, extrapolation of preclinical results to humans has seldom been proven in well-conducted clinical trials. With noteworthy exceptions, clinical guidance has often been derived not from large, adequately powered clinical trials but rather from comparisons of disparate, small studies with insufficient power to identify the optimal strain.”