FEBRUARY 2025 NEWS



Featured topic: political developments

 

On Science-Based Medicine,

David Gorski posted:


Christopher Hickie posted:


David Weinberg posted:

 

Edzard Ernst posted:


On Beyond the Noise, Paul Offit posted:

 

February 1: Nicholas Kristof (New York Times) wrote: “Our health in the hands of a man who'd make us sick,” concerning Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.


February 2: Michelle Smith (AP) reported “Pro-RFK Jr. letter to the Senate includes names of doctors whose licenses were revoked or suspended.” “The AP found that in addition to the physicians who had faced disciplinary action, many of the nearly 800 signers are not doctors.”


February 3 – Charlotte Graham-McLay (AP) wrote “RFK Jr. misled the US Senate on measles deaths, Samoa’s health chief says.” “Samoa’s top health official on Monday denounced as ’a complete lie’ remarks that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made during his bid to become U.S. health secretary, rejecting his claim that some who died in the country’s 2019 measles epidemic didn’t have the disease.”


February 7 – Andrea Love and Katie Suleta (American Council on Science and Health) wrote “Junk science bought and paid for: the latest anti-vaccine ‘study’ is a political stunt.” “Imagine resurrecting a long-debunked myth, slapping a fresh coat of pseudoscience on it, and dropping it just in time to sway public opinion before a major political hearing. That’s exactly what happened with a new ‘study’ claiming a link between vaccines and autism. However, this paper isn’t groundbreaking research; it’s a carefully orchestrated stunt, dressed up in scientific jargon, bankrolled by anti-vaccine activists, and riddled with methodological flaws big enough to drive a truckload of expired hydroxychloroquine through…

The paper can’t conclude anything about vaccinations or neurodevelopmental disorders. Yet it’s been amplified by RFK Jr. and his colleagues, who have profited off of anti-vaccine disinformation for decades in their latest attempt to undermine decades of data that show there is no causal relationship between vaccinations and autism. Coincidentally, this paper was published Friday, January 24, 2025, just in time for the Senate hearings for RFK Jr’s potential confirmation as HHS Secretary, which began January 29.”


February 11 – Lauren Weber and Caitlin Gilbert (Washington Post) wrote “RFK Jr. says vaccines aren’t tested enough. Experts say that’s baseless.” “…experts say placebo-controlled trials — where one group of people gets a medicine or treatment and the other does not — would be irresponsible to apply to most vaccines because it could deprive people of immunizations already proved to prevent infectious disease…Experts say his claim that vaccines do not undergo pre-licensing safety trials is not true — vaccines go through several stages of clinical trials before approval. Thousands of people are studied along the way to determine vaccines’ safety and effectiveness before they are rolled out to the public. And after vaccines are in use, companies, health-care providers and the federal government monitor for additional adverse events.”


February 15 – Pien Huang (NPR) reported “How changes to a CDC vaccine panel under Kennedy could reshape policy.”


February 16 – Caitlin Rivers (New York Times) wrote “Sorry Mr. Kennedy, most Americans want to get their shots.”


February 18 – Sheryl Stolberg (New York Times) wrote “Trump cuts target next generation of scientists and public health leaders.” “A core group of so-called disease detectives, who track outbreaks, was apparently spared. But other young researchers are out of jobs…It seems like a very destructive strategy to fire the new talent at an agency, and the talent that’s being promoted,’ said Dr. David Fleming, the chairman of an advisory committee to the C.D.C. director. He added, ‘A lot of energy and time has been spent in recruiting those folks, and that’s now tossed out the window’.”


February 20 – Will Stone (NPR) reported “Trump administration yanks CDC flu vaccine campaign.” “The ‘Wild to Mild’ flu vaccination campaign sought to encourage people to get the flu vaccine. In particular, the campaign aimed to communicate that flu vaccination can lessen symptoms and the chance of getting severely ill, even if it doesn't prevent someone from catching the flu. The Trump administration's decision to pull the campaign comes in the midst of a brutal flu season that's still raging.”


February 20 – An Editorial in JAMA by Bibbins-Domingo and others was entitled “Reaffirming the JAMA Network commitment to health of patients and the public.” “Multiple infectious threats remain active across the globe, but the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been prohibited from communicating with other public health agencies, such as the World Health Organization, to coordinate a response and from advising the public about the nature of these threats and how to best take protective action….Some authors of scientific works in process have had to remove their names from publications for these publications [related to gender] to proceed…The free exchange of ideas is essential to scientific progress, just as it is integral to the founding ideals of the US. The integrity of the scientific process does not depend on blind trust in science or on an assumption that a scientific finding is always right. Rather, this integrity hinges on the confidence that the free exchange of scientific ideas grounded in rigorously conducted scientific inquiry, including the discussion, debate, and disagreement that results in further inquiry, ultimately leads to insights that are likely to be true. For those of us who are part of the biomedical enterprise, the silencing of this scientific discourse and the prohibition of communication of information for patients and clinicians directly threaten the professional oaths that many have taken to protect the health of patients and the public.”


February 21 – Benjamin Mueller (New York Times) published “Trump administration stalls scientific research despite court ruling.” “Using an arcane law, officials have effectively delayed funding from the National Institutes of Health, leaving medical studies in jeopardy.”


February 24 – Tina Reed (Axios) wrote “The businesses hoping to boom under an RFK Jr.-led HHS.” “Kennedy's interest in treating the root causes of chronic illnesses through lifestyle changes could elevate unregulated alternatives and risky pseudoscience while relegating diagnosis and treatment of disease to the back burner, critics warn…The Natural Products Association has already been pressing Congress to allow people to use flexible savings accounts and health savings accounts on supplements, CEO Daniel Fabricant said. It's also trying to get supplements to be eligible for WIC and SNAP dollars…The FDA regularly warns stem cell clinics and chelation therapy centers they face possible legal action if they continue to make unsubstantiated claims, but they could expect to see more relaxed oversight of that sort, said William Matthew London, editor of the Center for Inquiry's Quackwatch.” A related story by Arthur Allen (KFF Health News) was “With RFK Jr. in charge, supplement makers see a chance to cash in.”


February 24 – Reed Abelson and Susanne Craig (New York Times) reported “Dr. Oz: how his millions collide with Medicare.” “The TV celebrity and Trump nominee has pledged to divest from most of his financial interests. But they touch nearly every corner of health care, from insurance to blood pressure cuffs and vitamins, leading experts and lawmakers to doubt he could make impartial decisions.”


February 28 -  Angrej Singh (Axios) wrote “FDA cancels meeting to pick flu vaccine strains for next winter.” “The abrupt cancellation of the FDA's next vaccine advisory committee meeting is a deeply concerning development that could delay and disrupt a critical step in production of the annual flu vaccine.”


 

Featured topic: antivaccination (see also political developments above)

 

On Science-Based Medicine, Jonathan Howard:

 

Edzard Ernst:

 

On McGill Office for Science and Society, Jonathan Jarry:

 

On ImmunoLogic, Andrea Love:


February 8 – Lauren Weber (Washington Post) published “In Idaho, a preview of RFK Jr.’s vaccine-skeptical America.” “This Idaho health district banned public clinics from distributing the coronavirus vaccine as widespread fear during the pandemic fades from public memory.”


February 13 – Tim Balk (New York Times) reported “Louisiana Health Department says it will stop promoting ‘mass vaccination’.” “Louisiana’s top health official said in an internal memo to the state’s Health Department on Thursday that it would no longer use media campaigns or health fairs to promote vaccination against preventable illnesses…Louisiana is experiencing a surge in flu this winter.” In a related story from The Guardian, “Bill Cassidy, the Republican US senator, has said his home state of Louisiana’s recent decision to cancel the promotion of mass vaccination against preventable diseases is a disservice to parents who want to keep their children healthy.”


February 17 – Katie Suleta (American Council on Science and Health) wrote “Making rabies great again.”


February 20 – Timothy Caulfield (The Walrus) wrote “Vaccines don’t cause autism but the lie that they do is still going strong.”


February 24 – Beth Mole (Ars Technica) wrote “COVID shots protect kids from long COVID – and don’t cause sudden death.” “COVID-19 vaccines cut the risk of long COVID by between 57–73 percent in kids and teens, according to a study published today in JAMA Network Open. And there's more good news: A second study published today in the journal offered more data that the now-annual shots are not linked to sudden cardiac arrest or sudden cardiac death in young athletes—a claim that gained traction on social media and among anti-vaccine groups during the acute phase of the pandemic.” The papers are: Yousaf et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2459672 Paper and Astley et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461327 Paper.

 


Other topics

 

On Science-Based Medicine,

Scott Gavura:

 

Steven Novella:

 

On Respectful Insolence, “Orac”:

 

Edzard Ernst:

 

On McGill Office for Science and Society:

Jonathan Jarry:


Christopher Labos:


Joe Schwarcz:

 

February – Skeptical Inquirer posted a video of a panel discussion, “Longevity lies and the fountain of youth.” “In a society obsessed with commercial quick fixes and biohacking, the quest for healthy aging and longevity has taken center stage. From dietary supplements and anti-aging creams to wellness retreats and lifestyle programs, the market is saturated with promises of eternal youth. The panel consisted of Timothy Caulfield, Rina Raphael, and Nick Tiller.


February 7 – Vivian Ho (Washington Post) reported “The real-life cancer hoax behind Netflix’s ‘Apple Cider Vinegar.” “Wellness influencer Belle Gibson claimed for years that she had cured her brain cancer through nutrition and holistic medicine, only to have her hoax exposed.” Steven Novella also discussed the series on Science-Based Medicine.


February 25 – An article by Teddy Amenabar (Washington Post) discussed creatine supplements. “When paired with resistance training, creatine supplements may improve strength and physical function in older adults, experts say.”


February 26 - Nickel and others published “Social media posts about medical tests with potential for overdiagnosis” (JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461940 Paper). The authors examined posts on Instagram and TikTok “ that discussed full-body magnetic resonance imaging, the multicancer early detection test, and tests for antimullerian hormone, gut microbiome, and testosterone…most posts were misleading or failed to mention important harms, including overdiagnosis or overuse.” Most posts “were from account holders with some form of financial interest in promoting the test.” A story by Dani Blum (New York Times) discussed the findings.

 

 

Additions to previous month

 

January 15 – Sakizadeh and others published “Characteristics of clinics offering non-traditional Lyme disease therapies in Lyme endemic states of the US” (Open Forum Infectious Diseases, in press Paper). “We found that unproven therapies are routinely offered, and some therapies raise safety concerns. The cost of care can be high, which may lead to significant out-of-pocket expenditures for patients.”


January 29 – Engeli and others published “Cannabidiol in foods and food supplements: Evaluation of health risks and health claims” (Nutrients. 2025 Jan 29;17(3):489 Paper). “A critical evaluation of the available data on potential beneficial health effects of CBD in the dose range at or below the LOAEL [lowest observable adverse effect level] of 4.3 mg/kg bw/day revealed no scientific evidence that would substantiate health claims, e.g., in relation to physical performance, the cardiovascular, immune, and nervous system, anxiety, relaxation, stress, sleep, pain, or menstrual health. Conclusions: The SKLM [Permanent Senate Commission on Food Safety of the German Research Foundation] concluded that consumption of CBD-containing foods/food supplements may not provide substantiated health benefits and may even pose a health risk to consumers.”



PREVIOUS NEWS PAGES