Blind Peer Review

Peer Review Policy

All volumes and contributions submitted to the series undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure the highest academic standards.

1. Type of review
   The series adopts a double-blind peer review system: both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process.

2. Reviewer selection
   Each contribution is assessed by at least two external reviewers, selected based on their expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers must not have any conflict of interest with the author(s).

3. Evaluation criteria
   Reviewers are asked to assess:

• Originality and relevance of the contribution

• Theoretical and methodological rigor

• Clarity and coherence of the argumentation

• Contribution to the advancement of knowledge in the field

• Adequacy of sources and engagement with the relevant literature

4. Possible outcomes
   At the end of the review process, the editors may decide:

• Acceptance without revisions

• Acceptance subject to minor revisions

• Resubmission after substantial revisions

• Rejection

5. Transparency and confidentiality
   The review process is conducted with the utmost respect for confidentiality. All parties involved (editors, reviewers, authors) must adhere to the highest standards of academic integrity and ethical conduct.

6. Ethical guidelines
   The series follows the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers (Committee on Publication Ethics). Reviewers are expected to uphold these principles of integrity, fairness, and responsibility throughout the evaluation process.

7. Appeals
   Authors wishing to contest a decision may submit a reasoned appeal to the editors, who will review it in consultation with the scientific committee.