Phanocles

  • Alexander, Katherina. A Stylistic Commentary on Phanocles and Related Texts. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1988 (Classical and Byzantine Monographs 13). 162 pp.
  • Alfonsi, Luigi. ‘Phanoclea.’ Hermes 81, 1953, 379-83.
  • Alfonsi, Luigi & W. Schmid. ‘Elegie.’ In: Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 4, 1959, 1026-61.
  • Asquith, Helen. ‘From genealogy to catalogue: the Hellenistic adaptation of the Hesiodic catalogue form.' In: Richard Hunter (ed.). The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge: CUP, 2005, 266-86.
  • Asquith, Helen. Listed Narratives in Greek Poetry from Hesiod to Callimachus. The Development of a Genre. Diss. Cambridge University, 2006.
  • Bach, Nicolaus. Philetae Coi, Hermesianactis Colophonii atque Phanoclis reliquiae. Disposuit, emendavit, illustravit Nicolaus Bachius, accedunt Dan. Lennepii et Dav. Runkenii observationes integrae. Halis Saxorum: in libraria Gebaueria, 1829. xvi, 285 pp.
  • Bach, Nicolaus. Historia critica poesis Graecorum elegiacae. Programm Fulda 1840.
  • Barns, J.W.B. & Hugh Lloyd-Jones. ‘Un nuovo frammento papiraceo dell'elegia ellenistica.’ SIFC 35, 1963, 205-27.
  • Barra, G. ‘La figura di Orfeo nel IV libro delle Georgiche.’ Vichiana 4, 1975, 193-9.
  • Bergk, Theodor. Poetae Lyrici Graeci. Vol. 3, fasc. 4. Leipzig: Teubner, 1914 (Bibliotheca scriptorum et Graecorum Teubneriana), 116ff.
  • Blumenthal, Albrecht von. 'Phanokles.' RE 19.2, 1938, 1781-3.
  • Calderón Dorda, Esteban. ‘El mito en la poesía helenística menor.’ In: Juan Antonio López Férez (ed.). Mitos en la literatura griega helenística e imperial. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 2003 (Estudios de Filología Griega 8), 97-112. Federico Condello, Eikasmos 15, 2004, 542-50 || Luis Miguel Pino Campos, Fortunatae 15, 2004, 221-4 || J.M. Jacques, LEC 72, 2004, 360 || Stephen M. Trzaskoma, CR 57, 2007, 365-7 || Christophe Cusset, REA 108, 2006.
  • Cavallini, Eleonora. Il fiore del desiderio. Lecce: Argo, 2000. 170 pp.
  • D'Aiuto, Massimiliano. ‘Fanocle, Orfeo e “l'acqua di Forco”. In: Silvio Mario Medaglia (ed.). Miscellanea in ricordo di Angelo Raffaele Sodano. Napoli: Guida, 2004 (Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità, Università degli Studi di Salerno 29), 69-88.
  • Defradas, Jean. Les élegiaques grecs. Édition, introduction et commentaire. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1962 (Collection Érasme / Textesgrecs 5). 112 pp. Guillon, Hum(RES) Lettres class. 39.2, 1962/63 13 || F. Jouan, REG 75, 1962, 573-5.
  • Di Marco, Massimo. 'Phanokles.' In: Der Neue Pauly 9. Stuttgart & Weimar: Verlag J. B. Metzler, 2000, 733-4.
  • Galjanic, Anna. [Three and Then Some. Typology of Catalogue Poetry and Poetic Enumerations in Ancient Greek and Other Indo-European Literary Traditions. Ph.D. Harvard University, in progress.]
  • Gallé Cejudo, Rafael Jesús. 'Innovación mítica y etiológica en la elegía helenística: Agamenón y Argino en Phanocl. 5, Prop. 3.7 y Plu. Brut. anim. 7.' Habis 37, 2006, 183-90.
  • Gärtner, Thomas. 'Die hellenistische Katalogdichtung des Phanokles über homosexuelle Liebesbeziehungen. Untersuchungen zur tendenziellen Gestaltung und zum literarischen Nachleben.' Mnemosyne 61, 2008, 18-44.
  • Giangrande, Giuseppe. ‘A passage of Phanocles.’ MPhL 8, 1987, 85-6.
  • Hopkinson, Neil. A Hellenistic Anthology. Cambridge: CUP, 1988 (CGLC). xiv, 288 pp. D. Donnet, AC 58, 1989, 281-4 || G.O. Hutchinson, JHS 109, 1989, 236-7 || L. Lehnus, Maia 41, 1989, 79-80 || I.A. Rutherford, G&R 36, 1989, 99 || D. Vessey, CR 39, 1989, 184-5 || J. Clack, CW 83, 1989/90, 243 || D. Donnet, LEC 58, 1990, 287-8 || H. White, SicGymn 44, 1991, 323-30 || W.H. Mineur, Mnemosyne 45, 1992, 115-8.
  • Hunter, Richard L. 'The Hesiodic Catalogue and Hellenistic poetry.' In: id. (ed.). The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge: CUP, 2005, 239-65.
  • Jourdan, Fabienne. ‘Orphée est-il véritablement un homme? La réponse grecque: l'efféminé versus l'initiateur des hommes.’ LEC 76, 2008, 129-74.
  • Kost, Karlheinz. 'Phanokles.' In: Hatto H. Schmitt & Ernst Vogt (ed.). Lexikon des Hellenismus. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2005, 781-2.
  • Magnelli, Enrico. 'P.Oxy. 3723.1-2: il mito di Arginno?' ZPE 125, 1999, 87-90.
  • Magnelli, Enrico. 'Memoria letteraria in carmi epigrafici greci del Vicino Oriente.' ZPE 147, 2004, 51-5.
  • Marcovich, Miloslav. ‘Phanocles ap. Stob. 4.20.47.’ AJPh 100, 1979, 360-6.
  • Morelli, Giuseppe. ‘Fanocle.’ Maia 3, 1950, 1-8.
  • Rigler, F.A. & C.A.M. Axt. Leontii carminis Hermesianactei fragmentum, emendatum et Latinis versibus expressum. Accedit Phanoclis fragmentum. Coloniae ad Rhenum: typis J.P. Bachemii, 1828. 31 pp.
  • Romagnoli, E. ‘L’elegia alessandrina prima di Callimaco.’ A&R 2, 1899, 177-200. Reproduced with small alterations in: Musica e poesia nell’antica Grecia. Bari 1911, 159-95.
  • Ruhnkenius, David. ‘Annotationes ad Hermesianactem et Phanoclem.’ Appended to: Epistola critica II; in turn appended to: Homeri hymnus ad Cererem. 2nd edn. Leiden 1782, 283-303. Reprinted 1802, 1827; ‘Annotationes ad Hermesianactem’ also reprinted in: Opuscula II.615ff. and in Bach 1829, 214-32.
  • Santini, Carlo. ‘La morte di Orfeo da Fanocle a Ovidio.’ GIF 44, 1992, 173-81.
  • Schmitzer, Ulrich. Zeitgeschichte in Ovids Metamorphosen. Mythologische Dichtung unter politischem Anspruch. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1990 (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 4). viii, 377 pp.
  • Stern, Jacob. ‘Phanocles’ Fragment 1.’ QUCC 32, 1979, 135-43.
  • Villarrubia Medina, Antonio. 'Notas sobre algunos poemas de las epocas helenística e imperial.' Habis 33, 2002, 95-119.
  • Weber, G.E. (tr.). Die elegischen Dichter der Hellenen. Frankfurt 1826.