Newspaper Clippings
Below are articles related to the Kirk family & the Mountsorrel boat building business.
Note : These were boats built by John Kirk (1770)
or possibly his son John Kirk (1801).
Staffordshire Advertiser - Saturday 16th August 1823
{Boats for Sale. Burton 20th August 1823}
Pleasure Boats
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By Mr. TITTERTON,
On the banks of the River Trent, Burton, on Wednesday
next, the 29th August, 1823, punctually at 11 o'clock,
A variety of beautiful new PLEASURE BOATS made
by John Kirk, Boat Builder, Mountsorrel Dock,
Leicestershire.
Catalogues may be had of Mr Titterton
Note : These were boats built by John Kirk (1770)
or possibly his son John Kirk (1801).
Derby Mercury - Wednesday 18 May 1825
{pleasure boats for sale - John Kirk Boatwright}
PLEASURE BOATS.
JOHN KIRK, BOATWRIGHT,
MOUNTSORREL DOCK, LEICESTERSHIRE,
BEGS leave to inform the Nobility and Gentry he
continues building all kinds of Pleasure Boats on the London
plan, for rowing, sailing, fishing, &c.-He has a great variety
finished in handsome stile, and the newest fashion, ready for immediate
use, viz, Wherries, Funneys, Skiffs, Shallops, Sailing
Boats. Punts, Canoes, Cutters, &c. built by the best Pleasure
Boat Builders from London.
J.K. trusts this will be found a favourable opportunity for
those Gentlemen who are fond of Aquatic Excursions, as be can
supply them with superior Boats at twenty per cent, cheaper than
in London, and he will send them to any part of England.
Note : These were boats built by John Kirk (1770)
or possibly his son John Kirk (1801).
Nottingham Review and General Advertiser for the Midland Counties - Friday 03 August 1827
{Pleasure Boats for Sale. Nottingham Market Place 4th August 1827}
BY MR PARKER.
Pleasure Boats. Gigs, Gig Harness,
&c. &c.
To be SOLD by AUCTION. by Mr. PARKER,
On Saturday, August 4th. 1827. in the Market-place,
Nottingham, at Twelve Clock precisely,
TWO handsome Pleasure BOATS.
Carved and Gilt, built by Mr.
Kirk, of Mountsorrel; also several
useful GIGS, LIGHTCARTS, GIG and
CART HARNESS, &c. which will be
described in Bills, to be had of the
Auctioneer.
Also Convenient TRAVELLING VAN, capable
of carrying Ten Outside and six Inside Passengers.
Leicestershire Mercury - Saturday 28th July 1838
{John Kirk Junior drunk (b 1801) - Court Case brought by his father John Kirk Senior (b 1770) to stop the landlord of the Black Swan serving his son alcohol. July 26th 1838}
George Green, landlord of the Black Swan, Mountsorrel,
was charged by Mr. Kirk, senr. with allowing
his son to indulge in intoxication in his house, the latter
being a perfect madman when excited by drink. Mr.
K. said that he was from home at the time, and knowing
that drink had a very bad effect upon the complainant's
son. He had given directions that he should
not be allowed to have liquor when a state of intoxication,
but unfortunately the girl had allowed him to have three penny's worth of spirits and water during his
absence — Mr Kirk admitted that the defendant was not at
home, but said, that be (defendant) told him he would
sell his wares to whom he pleased, which statement the
latter denied. Mr. Dudley read the clause in the act
stating that if any victualler "wilfully and knowingly"
allowed drunkeness to take place in his house, he was
liable to a penalty not exceeding £5, and then said, "We do not delight in punishment, but we shall do
our duty through evil good report and, more by
way of example to others, if you (addressing Mr. Cresswell)
concur with me, sir, I shall inflict the full
penalty." Mr.Cresswell concurring a matter of course. Mr. Green was ordered to pay £5 and costs,
though Mr. Kirk said he did not wish to punish him,
being cautious? to prevent a repetition of the
offence as he was about to leave Mountsorrel.
[What credence are our readers to give to expressions
which fall from this worshipful bench of
Justice ? Mr Dudley first says "we do not delight in
punishment" and then, to show his sincerity,immediately
mulcts a respectable young man the heaviest
penalty and "costs," though it is admitted that he had
not offended against the act of parliament (inasmuch
as he had not "wilfully and knowingly" encouraged
intoxication,) and though the complainant urges that
he does not wish to punish him! After the case was
settled, the defendant was heard to say, " If they had
stopped me on the highway, and taken the money out
of my pocket, I should have thought less of it !"
Leicester Journal - Friday 3rd August 1838
{John Kirk Junior drunk (b 1801) - Court Case brought by his father John Kirk Senior (b 1770) to stop the landlord of the Black Swan serving his son alcohol. July 26th 1838}
George Green, landlord of the Black Swans public-house,
Mountsorrel. was charged by John Kirk, of the same place, gent,
with having, on Monday last, been guilty of encouraging drunkenness
in his house by supplying his (Mr. Kirk's) son with liquor
when in a state of intoxication, although repeatedly cautioned
against so doing. The defendant was lined and costs, the
Bench remarking, that they hoped it would prove a caution to the
other beer and liquor-sellers in the town.
Leicester Journal - Friday 19 October 1838
{John Kirk Jno - served alcohol in the Black Swan, Mountsorrel. Landlord George Green appealing against the conviction}
GREEN V.DUDLEY AND CRESWELL.
An Appeal against a Conviction the Loughborough Magistrates.
The following case was entered into, and occupied the
attention of the court for several hours. Mr. George Green,
of the Black Swan, Mountsorrel, was the appellant, and the
Rev. J. Dudley and Robert Green Creswell, Esq. two
Magistrates attending the Loughborough Bench, respondents.
Mr. Hildyard appeared as counsel, and Mr. Cowdell, jun.
solicitor, for the appellant; Mr. White, as counsel, and Mr.
Jackson, as solicitor, for the respondents.
The appeal was respecting a conviction, bearing date the
26th of July last, whereby the defendant was alleged to have
been duly convicted before the respondents, "for that he
being a person licensed to sell exciseable liquor by retail to
be drunk on the premises, &c. did the 23rd of July, wilfully
or knowingly permit drunkenness in the said house and
premises, &c. by supplying John Kirk, the younger, with
intoxicating liquors, he, the said John Kirk, being that
time drunk and intoxicated, as he, the said George Green,
then and there well knew, contrary to his license, &c.
whereby had forfeited £5, this being adjudged to the
first offence, &c. with costs."
Mr. White opened the case by stating the above facts.
Mr. Hildyard examined the conviction, and offered his
objection to it. The first was because it charged the defendant
with an offence, viz: did "knowingly or wilfully,"
and was therefore had the authority of several cases, to
which the learned counsel referred. This objection he stated
was fatal to the case. A witness was also tendered to be
heard, and refused a hearing by the court. Secondly, because
there was no informer's name on the information.
Thirdly, because of uncertainty, the words "intoxicating
liquors" not being sufficient to inform the defendant of what
liquor be was accused of selling, whether ale, wine, or spirit,
since certain liquors were called by law "intoxicating
liquors." Fourthly, because there was no adjudication of
the penalty being incurred, but only a statement "whereby
the said George Green, has forfeited the sum of £5. As
the justices had a discretion as to the amount of the penalty to
be paid—the words of the statute being "a sum not exceeding £5."
Mr. White begged the attention of the court, whilst he
replied to the objection of his learned friend. He first
referred to the last objection, his leaned friend stated that
there had been no adjudication of the penalty; be would
refer to the Act of Parliament, and he found that the magistrates
had convicted the appellant in the precise words which
the law prescribes. The conviction stated " whereby the
defendant has forfeited the sum of £5," which was all
intents and purposes, sum not exceeding £5—it was £5.
He would direct the attention of the court to the third
objection, which was, that the term "intoxicating liquors,"
was not sufficient to inform the defendant what liquor was
meant. The first answer he gave was, that the term
liquors," would answer for all liquors supplied;
for there might be intoxicating liquors to which no name
could be given. Now came the second objection, that
there was no informer's name on the back of the information
This was not necessary. Then about the quibble of "wilfully
or knowingly," how could a man do a thing wilfully
without doing it knowingly! The two terms were anonymous.
If there were any difference between the terms
wilfully and knowingly, should agree with his learned
friend.
Mr. Hildyard replied, that if his learned friend could not
distinguish between "wilfully" and "knowingly," he could
supply him with a definition. Suppose publican went
out in the morning, and said to his servant, " supply every
man with as much liquor he may call and pay for." If
he did so he would do so wilfully, though not knowingly.
Would any person pretend to say that though he might not
know every person whom liquor was supplied, he did not
do so wilfully ? There were cases also, where a publican
might supply liquor knowingly and not wilfully, but he did
not think he need adduce any instances of this.
A few more remarks followed, and the court retired to
deliberate on the objections to the conviction, but short
time they returned, and
The Chairman observed, that the magistrates were always
willing to decide upon case merely from a conviction, and
without going into the merits of it. If the counsel for the
appellant asked them to into its merits, they would do so,
but they could give opinion on the conviction alone. It
would be more satisfactory to the public if they were to go
into the merits of the case, than if they were to decide upon
the objections alone.
Mr. Hildyard consulted with the solicitor (Mr. Cowdell)
and they agreed that the case should be tried on its merits.
Mr. White having given an outline of the case, proceeded
to call the following witnesses, to corroborate it.
Ann Fern, deposed that she knew the Black Swan, at
Mountsorrel, which was kept by George Green ever since
the death of his father. Witness also endeavoured to prove
that the said George Green was the executor of the father.
Cross-examined Mr. Hildyard.—Could not say what
as then over the door; it used to be "Thomas
Green;" George Green had an elder brother named Thomas;
was at his father's funeral, and had been at the house
once since; did not know positively that George Green was
executor to his late father, or that he administered his effects.
Re-examined Mr. White. —Believed that Thomas
Green lived in London,
Sarah Barrs, examined by Mr, White, — Witness lived at
Mountsorrel, and remembered on the 23rd of July last,
seeing young John Kirk about six o clock coming down the
street, very drunk, without his hat. He went to the Black
Swan ; the servant of the house was standing in the gateway
and they had some conversation together he went in.
Witness also saw Kirk's wife and informed her where her
husband was, when she went into the house to him. Mr.
Kirk, sen. afterwards went into the house to him.
John Kirk stated that applied to the Rev. Mr. Dudley
Creswell for this conviction. Witness's son was a
boatwright, and had a wife and three children; was about
37 years of age, and his eldest child about eleven; was in
the habit of getting drunk; sometimes for two or three
weeks together; had sent the crier round on one occasion
to caution the publicans from letting him have drink; had
repeatedly been to Green's about his son's drunkenness. On
the 18th of the same month, his son was taken from that
very house to the round-house for being drunk,on that
occasion witness saw George Green, and told him that he
(witness) had been informed his son had expended 17s. in
two houses for drink, upon which Green threatened to knock
his head off. Witness went to Green's house on the 23rd,
and saw his son sitting there with a glass of gin and water
before him, he was so intoxicated that he could
get home; tasted th liquor and found that it was gin and
water. Soon after the servant came in, and Green's brother
charged him with giving his (witness's) son drink, after he
had been discharged from doing so doing; to which he replied
"you don't mean me, you mean my brother." Witness
then told him he would have him before the magistrates for
it, and went and obtained a summons accordingly. On the
hearing of the summons, he (witness) repeated the story he
had already told. Had repeatedly discharged Green from
letting his son have a drink. When he last told him so, he
replied, that he had a licence to sell liquors and would sell
when he pleased. For the last two years, had expected
every morning to hear of his son's wife or children being
dead, through some of his mad freaks.
Cross-examined - Believed that he was the only witness
examined, on the hearing of the case before the Magistrates.
Did not know whether any witness was examined on the
other side. When he had been examined, he went to the
back part of the Magistrates room, where very few persons
can hear; there was a great noise, so that he could not hear
whether Green asked to have his witnesses heard or not.
Saw Green in court and remained in the room until be was
convicted; he did not hear the Magistrates refuse to hear
Green's witnesses. Green spoke to them, but witness did not
hear what passed between them.
Mary Kirk, wife of John Kirk, deposed that her husband
was much addicted to drinking.He was intoxicated when
she saw him at the Black Swan on the 23rd of July. A
glass of gin and water stood before him. Witness had at
times had been under apprehension of violence from him, but not
so much latterly as formerly.
Mr White said that was his case.
Mr Hildyard addressed the Court, calling upon them to
quash the conviction. The conviction stated that the appellant
did wilfully or knowingly supply Kirk with intoxicating
liquors. Now George Green was never in the house
at the time, did not serve the liquor, and it was not proved
that he knew to it. From the evidence which had been provided
there was no evidence to prove the conviction.
Mr White prayed the Court confirm the conviction.
The chairman gave it as the opinion of the Court that
the conviction was not quashed on the evidence.
Mr Hildyard said he had yet to learn that any man was
responsible to the criminal law for acts committed by deputy.
In the criminal law a party was responsible for his
own act, and his own act alone. They well knew the press
made an outcry for being held responsible for the sale
of publications in shops, &c.—but it was for their civil acts
alone. How was it to be proved that Green knew all
that liquors were supplied with his knowledge ? Green was
to be convicted because his servant was or was not able to
tell whether the appellant could drink another glass of gin
and water. It never could said Green wilfully or knowingly
supplied the liquor, when he did not much know
of the existence of the man the time, not being himself
present Mr. Hildyard after making a few other observations called
Mary Burdett, stated that she was before the Magistrates
at the time her master was convicted. When Mr. Kirk, jun.
came in to her masters house, he appeared quite sober
as sober as she was; her master was in the garden the time,
where he had been working during the day. Kirk had a
glass of gin and water. It was much as a quarter of an
hour after before her master came into the house. Witness
went with her master to Loughborough, and he said they did
not want her; heard one of the gentlemen say that her
master was convicted — it was one of the gentlemen who said
she need not give her evidence. Never heard them ask her
master whether she could prove that any liquor had been given.
John Witticombe, deposed that he went along with George
Green to Mr. Dudley's on the 30th of July. Heard George
Green apply for a copy of the conviction, Mr. Dudley said
he had not got it—it would for him to have it a week
before the trial. Mr. Mowbray had it; Mr. Dudley told
Green that his attorney had been leading him wrong—he
was too late for appeal. Mr. Dudley reached several
books down, and he read from one that an appeal must be
made in twenty-four hours after—it was from "George
the Good," and he, witness, paid attention to him for wondered
which of the George's he meant (laughter).
Mr. White addressed the Court on the evidence of
the witnesses last called, after which the Court retired to
deliberate. In about quarter of an hour the Chairman
returned and said the Court were of opinion, the conviction
was quashed on the informalities contained it.
Some discussion then took place as to the costs, and it
was ordered that they should be divided between the parties.
Note : This article probably refers to John Kirk Jno .
Born 1801 & passed away in March 1842.
His sons John (1830) & William (1826) would have been too young to have taken over the business immediately.
Leicestershire Mercury - Saturday 23 April 1842
{Mr John Kirk - died & dock to carry on article.}
Public Notice.
MOUNTSORREL DOCK.
THE Public, and especially those connected with
the Boat Trade, are respectfully informed that
the Business of Boat Building will be carried on by
the Executors of the late Mr. JOHN KIRK for the
benefit of the Widow and Family ; and they have
engaged Mr. Wm.Tingle (who has worked in the
Dock for the last twenty years) as their foreman, and
they trust, by punctuality and attention the above
business, to merit a large share of the public support.
N.B. - All Debts owing to and from the late Mr.
John Kirk, are requested to be forwarded, without
delay, to John Wall and John Ellis, Executors.
Mountsorrel, April 19, 1842.
Note : This sale would have been after the death of
John Kirk (1801-1842)
Nottingham Review and General Advertiser for the Midland Counties - Friday 29 July 1842
{Boats for Sale - 3rd August 1842 - Trent Bridge, Nottingham}
BY MR. W. EYRE.
Sale on Wednesday, August 3rd, 1842, the Trent
Bridge, London Road, Nottingham.
FOR POSITIVE, UNRESERVED SALE.
SEVEN beautifully-painted, well-built, fast-sailing
PLEASURE BOATS, with Oars, &c. complete ;
also One TRENT BOAT, to be SOLD by AUCTION,
Mr. EYRE, by order of the executors of the late Mr.
John Kirk, Mountsorrel. Sale punctually at two o’clock in the afternoon.
The Auctioneer particularly invites the attention of the
public to this important sale, feeling assured the late Mr.
Kirk’s well-earned fame a boat builder, will be a sufficient
guarantee of their superiority ; and begs to observe to them
the above excellent Sailing Boats will be at the place of
sale for inspection the day preceding the sale.
Note : This sale would have been after the death of
John Kirk (1801-1842)
Leicester Journal - Friday 06 October 1848
{Boat Business - still carried on}
BOAT BUILDING AND REPAIRING, MOUNTSORREL
DOCK.
THE Executors or the late JOHN KIRK, impressed with
gratitude for favours received on behalf of the Widow and
Family, inform their Friends the above Business is still
carried by them, and request continuance of their favours.
They also beg to state to those Persons who stand indebted to
them, that their Accounts must be paid to them personally; or,
it sent by Post, addressed John Wale and Ellis, J. Kirk's
Executors, Mountsorrel.
October 4th, 1848
Nottingham Review and General Advertiser for the Midland Counties
- Friday 20 February 1852
{Death of man in river near Kirk's residence, Mountsorrel}
Leicester Journal - Friday 27 October 1854
{Boat Sale at Mountsorrel Wharf - Property of Mr. Thos. Chapman, a Bankrupt}
Bankrupts Property, at Mountsorrel.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By J. WINDRAM,
By Wednesdav, the 1st day of November, 1854, (by order
of the Assignees of Mr. Thos. Chapman, a Bankrupt,)
at the Kirk's Wharf, Mountsorrel,
TWO capital NARROW BOATS, which may seen
prior to the Sale, on application to Mr. Kirk, Mountsorrel
Sale to commence at Half-past Two for Three o'clock in
the Afternoon punctually.
Below are the articles regarding the links to the family business 'Kirks & Co' from 1860 when the company assets were being sold off.
Boat building had started with John Kirk (b. 1770) formally of Cossington Mill , but by 1860 Kirk & Co were principally coal dealers & boat builders in Mountsorrel, at this point ran by John Kirk, William Kirk, along with John Wale. This would have been John Kirk (1830) & William Kirk (1826) .
Leicestershire Mercury - Saturday 7th April 1860
{NOTICE of Dissolved company 23rd March 1860}
NOTICE.
WHEREAS, the PARTNERSHIP existing between
WILLIAM KIRK, JOHN WALE, and
JOHN KIRK, Coal Dealers and Boat Builders, is by
agreement DISSOLVED, it is requested that no moneys
owing to the said Firm be paid until further notice be given
in this Paper.
JOHN WALE.
JOHN KIRK.
Mountsorrel, March 23, 1860.
Leicester Journal - Friday 18th May 1860
{SALE of Boat Yard stock on the 29th & 30th of May 1860}
To Coal Merchants, Farmers, Timber Dealers, and Others.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By J. COOKE,
(By order of the Assignee of William Kirk and Co.,
Bankrupts,) upon the Wharf at Mountsorrel, on
Tuesday and Wednesday, the 29th and 30th days of
May. 1860,
THE whole of the valuable STOCK of FOREIGN and
ENGLISH TIMBER, Wide and Narrow Boats and
other effects. Comprising a many thousand feet of fine
oak, elm, and ash trees, oak, ash, elm, and willow planking
and boards of all thicknesses, oak squares, fence posts,
gate posts, scantling-gate heads, bars, and backs, 4 1/2 and
3 inch felloes, light spokes, nathes, oak gates, fieaks, fleak
bars, barrow sides, bedsides, cow cribs, axle trees, Scotch,
ash and larch poles, red, white and spruce deals, battens
and boards, 3 timber drugs, 5 carts, 2 wide boats, and 3
narrow ditto, in good repair, chesnut pony cart and
tackle, Avery's weighing machine and weights, bean mill,
chaff cutter, saws, screw jack, ropes, spoking chains, and
numerous other effects.
Sale to commence each day at 10 o'clock in the morning.
The greater portion of the above are to be seen at the
Wharf, Mountsorrel, and the remainder at Barrow, Sileby,
and Syston, upon premises lately occupied by Kirk and
Company.
Leicester Journal - Friday 18th May 1860
{Sale of Mountsorrel Dock & Wharf on the 28th of May 1860}
Mountsorrel Dock and Wharf.
H. HARRIS,
Has been honoured with instructions from the Executors
John Kirk, sen., Gentleman, deceased,
TO OFFER BY PUBLIC AUCTION,
At the Home of Mr. Bampton, the White Swan Inn,
Mountsorrel, in the county Leicester, on Monday, the
28th day of May, 1860, at Six o'clock in the evening
precisely, subject to such conditions shall be then and
there produced.
ALL that very desirable FAMILY RESIDENCE,
pleasantly situate in Mountsorrel aforesaid, on the
main road leading from thence to Sileby, with garden in
front, together with the spacious Coal Wharf, Dockyard,
Warehouses, Workshops, extensive Shedding, commodious
Stabling, Corn Hay and Straw Lofts adjoining the same,
containing about 1 acre of ground or thereabouts, on which
the Boat Building and Coal and Timber Trade has been
carried on for upwards of 50 years.
There is very extensive and highly respectable connection
in the Coal and Timber trade which might be much
extended by any person commanding a capital. The
situation for a Boat Builder is undeniable and a great
business in that line has been carried on for several years.
To view the same apply on the premises, and for further
particulars to Messrs. Harris & Luck, Solicitors, or the
Auctioneer, both of Leicester.
Leicester Mercury. - Saturday 4th August 1860 .
{Nottingham Bankruptcy Court Report 31st July 1860}
. Nottingham Bankruptcy Court, Tuesday, July 31.
—(Before Mr. Commissioner Sanders.) In re Kirk
Wale, and Kirk,Mountsorrel, coal and timber merchants.
This was a certificate meeting, and from the official
assignee's report we learn that the liabilities to creditors
unsecured amounted to £2,663.3s.4d. Assets: Book
debts, £922.9s.7d.; stock-in-trade, £363. Is.; horses,
boats, &c, £405.18s.; total (deducting £13 for payments
in full), £1,678.8s.7d.; leaving a deficiency of £984.7s.1d.
The balance-sheet commenced in April, 1857, with
a capital of £1,908.7s.1d.; loss trading, £1,834.14s.3d.:
special loss by a disease in horses, of which fifteen
died,£194.1s.; cash drawn by William Kirk, £457. 14s ;
ditto by John Wale, £219.8s.7d.; ditto by John Kirk
£166.14s.; £2,872.11s. The books had been very imperfectly
kept, and some furniture had been removed from
the house of William Kirk, but it had been since returned.
The separate estate of William Kirk showed a deficiency
of £445.5s.9d.; that of John Kirk, £720.5s.9d.; that
of John Wale, £1,280.19s.—Mr. Gregory, who represented
the assignees, said he did not wish to oppose the granting
of a certificate. —His Honour asked about the removal of
the property which was referred the report ?—Mr.
Gregory said there had been a long examination on that
point. The property had belonged to the wife of William
Kirk before her marriage, and she removed it in the absence
of her husband, supposing that she had still control
over it. The greater part had been brought back.—The
Commissioner said the balance-sheet had some unfavourable
features. There was reason to believe the capital had
been very much over-estimated, which the court must look,
upon with great displeasure, because it gave false character
to the whole balance sheet. He would give third
class certificate.
Leicester Journal - Friday 17 August 1860
{Sale of Wharf - 23rd August 1860. White Swan Inn, Mountsorrel}
Wharf at Mountsorrel.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By R. WARNER,
On Thursday, the 23rd day of August, 1860, the White
Swan Inn, Mountsorrel, at Three for Four o'clock in
the Afternoon prompt,
ALL that Valuable WHARF, adjoining the road leading
from Mountsorrel to Sileby, having an excellent frontage
of forty yards or thereabouts to the river Soar,
and of about thirty to the aforesaid road. The Property
was recently in the occupation of W. Kirk and Co , and
is well adapted for carrying on the business of coal merchant,
boatwright, &c. Immediate possession may had.
For further particulars apply to Mr. J. HARVEY,
Solicitor, Market-street, or to the Auctioneer, Horsefair
street, Leicester.
Leicester Journal - Friday 23 November 1860
{2nd Sale of Mountsorrel Dock & Wharf on the 27th of November 1860}
Leicester. Mountsorrel Dock and Wharf.
MARRIS and SON
Have been honoured with instructions from the Executors
of John Kirk, sen., gentleman, deceased,
TO OFFER BY PUBLIC AUCTION,
In One or more Lots, Tuesday, the 27th day of November
instant, at the house of Mr. Bamplon, the White
Swan Inn, Mountsorrel, in the County of Leicester, at
4 for 5 o'clock in the Afternoon.
ALL that very desirable FAMILY RESIDENCE,
pleasantly situated in Mountsorrel aforesaid, in the
main road leading from thence to Sileby, with Garden in
front, together with the spacious Coal Wharf, Dock Yard,
Warehouses, Workshops, extensive Shedding, commodious
Stabling, Corn, Hay, and Straw Lofts adjoining the same,
containing about one acre of ground, or thereabouts, on
which the boat building, and coal, and timber trade has
been carried on for upwards of fifty years.
There has been carried on, on the said Premises, a very
extensive and highly respectable connection in the Coal
and Timber Trade, which might be much extended by any
person commanding a capital. The situation for a Boat
Builder is undeniable, and a great business in that line
has been carried on for several years.
To view the same apply the Lock House adjoining,
and for further particulars to Messrs. HARRIS and LUCK,
Solicitors, or the Auctioneers, both ot Leicester.
Alfred Kirk (1839) - Son of John Kirk (1801)
Leicester Guardian - Saturday 16 February 1861
{Scales set wrong - Court Case 14 February 1861}
POLICE COURT, Feb 14.
Before J.Martin, and J.Cartwright, Esqrs.
DEFICIENT SCALES - Alfred Kirk, of Mountsorrel
coal dealer, was convicted of having scales in his yard
deficient against the purchaser of 9lb. each weighing.
The defendant explained that when he left the wharf in
the morning, the scales were balanced with stones, which
was the usual practice amongst coal dealers, and that he
never weighed coals without them. He had subsquently,
however had them altered by a quantity of
Iron being permanently attached thereto. the bench
said, stones were not the proper things to balance with,
but as he possibly might not intend to defraud the
public, they would mitigate the penalty to 10s, and
costs.
Leicester Journal - Friday 6th September 1861 .
{12th September 1861 - Auction of Property}
Valuable Freehold Houses, Framesmith's Shops, Warehouses,
&c., in Leicester, and Reversionary Interests
in real and Personal Estates.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By JOHN HOLLAND,
At Old Fish and Quart Inn, Church-gate, Leicester,
on Thursday, the Twelfth day of September next, at Six
for Seven o'clock precisely, subject such conditions as
will be than produced, and in the following Lots:-
Lot 1.
Four well-built MESSUAGES, with back kitchens,
outbuildings, and yards thereto belonging, situate
in Causeway-lane, and facing Vine-street, in the parish of All
Saints, in Leicester, and large range of SHOPS and
WAREHOUSE ROOMS, 3 storys high, standing in the
yards at the back of the said Messuages, and now used as
Framesmith's Shops and Warehouse Rooms, by the respective
occupiers, Messrs. Ward, Sewell, Skinner, and
Foxon.
This Lot contains site 473 square yards and 6 feet,
or thereabouts.
Lot 2.
The REVERSIONARY INTERESTS of Wm. Kirk
and John Kirk, late of Mountsorrel, bankrupts, being two
fourteenth parts or shares the entirety of, and in the
following real and personal estate:—The Duke of York
Inn, in Mountsorrel aforesaid, a Close of Land at Barrow-
upon-Soar, Close of Land at Sileby, Two Cottages at
Mountsorrel, a Common Right of Pasturage upon the
Mountsorrel Hills, and a sum of £1050—which Reversionary
Interests will come into possession-on the death of
a Lady now aged 55 years.
The real Estate which now produces a gross income of
£65.8s. or thereabouts, is subject to a charge of £20
payable to Charles Kirk or his legal personal representatives.
The present interests of the said William Kirk and
John Kirk in the said reversionary property, may be
increased or diminished in value by the occurrence of
certain events, which will be fully explained at the time
of Sale.
For further particulars apply Messrs. MILES,
GREGORY, and BOUSKELL, Solicitors, or the Auctioneer,
Leicester.
Leicester Chronicle - Saturday 6th January 1866
{special meeting for the examination of Mr. John Woolley of Rothley, a debtor to the estate.}
Nottingham Bankruptcy Court, Tuesday. — In the
William Kirk, John Wale, and John Kirk, coal merchants,
Mountsorrel. — This was a special meeting, for
the examination of Mr. John Woolley, of Rothley,a
debtor to the estate. Mr.Harrison from the office of
Messrs. Miles Gregory, & Co., Leicester) conducted the
examination.-— Mr. Woolley stated tbat the original
amount Of his debt was £117 12s.9d., towards which
he had paid £102, leaving a balance of £15 12s.9d.—
Mr. Harrison said the witness was in a good position.
The bankruptcy took place in April, 1860, and the
assignees had been very indulgent with him. As far
back as 1862, he made a proposal to them to pay £80
in the following January, and similar sums at intervals
of four months afterwards. The trustees had never
been able to get anything from him since that time,
without pressing him and threatening proceedings.
The last payment be made was £5 in March last.
Several letters had been sent to him since without
avail, and the assignees had been compelled to bring
him into the court. If his Honor made an order,
they hoped be would direct the costs of tbe proceedings to
be paid by the witness. — The Registrar (to the witness)
Why did not you pay the money at once, without giving
so much trouble? — The witness : I will pay it in three?
months. — The Registrar : I have no doubt you are
able to pay it — The witness : no, I am not — The
Registrar (to Mr. Harrison): What is he ? — Mr.
Harrision : He has got an extensive brickyard.— The
Registrar : There must be an order for payment, and
if you the (witness) do not pay, you must be sued.
Leicester Journal - Friday 14 May 1869
{Freehold Property, Mountsorrel, Sileby, and Burrow-upon-Soar. Instructions from the Trustees for Sale under the Wills of Mr. John Kirk and Mr. Z. D. Kirk, to offer for SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION, On Tuesday, the 25th day of May. 1869. 6 Lots of Land including Duke of York Pub.}
Freehold Property, Mountsorrel, Sileby, and Burrow-upon-Soar,
in the County of Leicester.
MARRIS and SON
Have received instructions from the Trustees for Sale
under the Wills of Mr. John Kirk and Mr. Z. D. Kirk, to offer for
SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION,
On Tuesday, the 25th day of May. 1869, at Five for Six o'clock the Evening precisely, at the house Mr. Bampkin, the White Swan Inn, in Mountsorrel, in the County of Leicester, in the following or such other Lots as may be agreed upon, and subject to such conditions as shall be then produced, THE following VALUABLE PROPERTY, situate in the several parishes above named:
Lot 1.
A Close of very good MEADOW LAND, adjoining the Green-lane, in the parish of Sileby, and short distance from the main road leading from Mountsorrel to Sileby, and containing by measurement 5a. 2r. 20p. or thereabouts, now in the occupation of Mr. William Jacques.
Lot 2.
A Close of very excellent MEADOW LAND, in the parish of Barrow-upon-Soar, containing 3a. 2r. 0p. or thereabouts, now in the occupation of Mr. Jelly, and adjoining to close the property of Charles Ansted, Esq., now in the occupation of Mr. William Simpson.
Lot 3.
All that commodious old licensed PUBLIC HOUSE, called tbe Duke of York, adjoining the canal lock, with stabling for horses, coach house, piggeries, and numerous offices, with garden and orchard, the occupation of Mr. Thomas Jelly.
Lot 4.
All that piece or parcel of LAND, formerly cultivated for growing osiers, adjoining the River Soar between and Barrow," on which are large quantity of fine willow poles
Lot 5.
All those two MESSUAGES or TENEMENTS, situate at the south end of Mountsorrel, adjoining the main street, in the occupation of Stableford and Hames.
Lot 6.
A Right of Common the Mountsorrel Hills. To view the Lots apply to the respective Tenants, and for further particulars to the Auctioneers, Friar-lane, or to Messrs. STONE, PAGET, and BILLSON, Solicitors, Leicester.
Morning Post - Wednesday 16 March 1870 (London)
{PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS}
William Kirk, John Wale, and John Kirk. Mountsorrell, Leicestershire, coal merchants— final dividend of 1s. 1d., any Monday, at Harris's, Nottingham.
Leicester Chronicle - Saturday 21 August 1875
{Boats for Sale}
By Mr. S. JACKSON.
Mountsorrel, near Loughborough, Leicestershire.
New Narrow Boat and Pleasure Yacht for Sale by Auction.
S. JACKSON,
Has instructions from Mr. Kirk, Boat
Builder, &c,
TO SELL BY AUCTION,
At his Dock, on Tuesday, the 24th day of August, 1875,
at Half -past Four in the Afternoon,
A NEW NARBOW BOAT, built of the best English
Oak, with Iron Knees, to carry 80 Tons or there-abouts.
Width 7 feet 1 inch, length nearly 71 feet Built
on the best and most approved principles and by superior
workmen. There is a first-class cabin, gang planks, top
mast, box mast, and deck board, all complete.
Also, a First-class PLEASURE YACHT nearly new ;
to carry 20 or more persons, with masts, main and jib
sails, and rigging complete.
Mountsorrel is one mile from Sileby, 1 1/2 from Barrow,
and 4 1/2 miles from Loughborough Stations, on the
Midland Railway.
A train arrives at Sileby at 3.42 up, and 2.54
down; and leaves Sileby at 4.48 and 7.6 down, and 6.35 up.
Further articles below related to the Kirk family.
Note : Wife of John Kirk (1770)
Elizabeth Kirk (nee Hall)
Johns 2nd wife dies 29th Aug 1811. Buried 1st Sep 1811.
she was born c1784 Market Harborough
Northampton Mercury - Saturday 07 September 1811
{died 29th Aug 1811}
Thursday ...
Same day, the 27th year her age, Mrs. Kirk, wife
of Mr. John Kirk, Cossington Mills, Leicestershire.
Note : Catherine Kirk (1787), sister of John Kirk (1770),
daughter of William Kirk (1841).
Stamford Mercury - Friday 29 April 1814
{CATHERINE KIRK (1787-1865) married April 1814 William Gilson (of Twyford)}
Wednesday 27th April i presume.
Wednesday night, ....
Same day, Mr. W. Gillson, of Twyford, to Miss Catherine
Kirk, youngest sister of Mr. Kirk, of Cossington
Mill, Leicestershire.
Note : John Kirk (1770) joins father William Kirk (1742)
in the family business. Miller's at Cossington Mill.
Fleur-de-Lis Inn was situated at 37, Belgrave Gate in Leicester. In the first half of the 19th century inquests, auctions, corporation business, Framework Knitters grievance meetings and other political gatherings would be hosted here. It was demolished in 1969 to make way for the new Haymarket shopping centre scheme.
The Cross-Keys Inn, Loughborough is currently known as the Phantom, situated on the corner of Leicester Road and Pinfold Gate.
Leicester Journal - Friday 20 October 1815
{William & John Kirk - Millers at Cossington Mill}
Cossington Mills
JOHN KIRK,
BEGS leave to return his sincere thanks to his
fiends for all favours conferred upon him to
the Flour Trade, and begs leave to inform them he
has taken his Son into partnership.
All Debts due to the said John Kirk, on account
of the Flour Trade, are requested to be settled
immediately and all persons having any demands,
to send them in, in order that they may be discharged.
_________________
KIRK and SON respectlully inform their friends
and the public that they will constantly
have on hand a large stock of Flour, the very
first quality, and on the most reasonable terms.—
All orders will be thankfully received and punctually
executed, by
Their Most Obedient Servants,
JOHN KIRK
WILLIAM KIRK
N.Bs Attendance at the Fleur-de-Lis Inn, Leicester,
on Saturdays, and the Cross Keys Inn,
Loughborough on Thursdays.
Note : 1800's Joy riding -
servants riding in their carts without reins.
Leicester Journal - Friday 29 August 1834
Mr Parr, of Wanlip, Joseph Chester, of Blackbrook,
Wm. Kirk, of Cossington Mill, Joseph Bostock, of Breedon,
and George Powdill, of Breedon, were each fined
20S and costs, for their servants riding in their carts
without reins.
Note : William Kirk of Cossington Mills, Leicestershire
d 12 Apr 1835. William Kirk (1797-1835). Son of John Kirk (1770).
The last Kirk to live at Cossington Mills.
Leicester Journal - Friday 17 April 1835
{William Kirk (death) - 1835}
Cossington Mills, in this county, Sunday morning last, sincerely and deservedly lamented by a large circle of friends, Mr. William Kirk, in his 37th year.
Note : William Kirk of Cossington Mills, Leicestershire
d 12 Apr 1835 , buried 17 Apr 1835 Cossington.
Abode-Cossington Mill
Stamford Mercury - Friday 01 May 1835
At Cossington Mills, Leicestershire, on the 19th ult., {May}
in his 37th year, Mr Wm. Kirk.
Note : Concerning the affairs of the late William Kirk (1797-1835). Son of John Kirk (1770). William (Junior) was the last Kirk to be the Miller at Cossington Mill.
Leicester Journal - Friday 08 May 1835
The Affairs of Mr. William Kirk,
Late of Cossington Mills, in the County of Leicester,
Miller, deceased.
ALL Persons having any claim or demand against the
estate of the deceased, are requested, forthwith, to
send particulars thereof to Mrs. Kirk, Mr. William
Heap, at Cossington Mills aforesaid, or to Mr. John
Barfoot Eames of the Newarke Street, Leicester,
hosier, executors; and all persons who stood indebted
to the said William Kirk, at the time of his death, are
de-ired to pay the amount of their respective debts immediately
to either of the said parties.
By order of the Executors,
Andrew Peak.
Granby Place. Leicester. May 7th, 1835.
Note : Concerning the affairs of the late William Kirk (1797-1835). Son of John Kirk (1770). William (Junior) was the last Kirk to be the Miller at Cossington Mill.
Leicester Journal - Friday 11 November 1836
{Sale at Cossington Mill - Late Mr Kirk}
Valuable Fat and Store Stock, Implements, Hay Store,
Keeping, &c.
COSSINGTON MILL, LEICESTERSHIRE.
TO SOLD BY AUCTION,
BY B PAYYNE,
On Wednesday, the 16th day November, 1836.
THE whole of the valuable Fat and Store STOCK and
other Effects, of the late Mr. KIRK
On the Premises, Cossington Mill, in the county of Leicester,
Consisting of 12 prime fat Cows and Heifers,2 barren
Cows, five 4-year old Steers, five 3-year old Ditto Gilt, 3
Store Pigs, capital Draught Horse. 7 years old, 6-inch wheel
Waggon, ditto Cart, broad wheel Drug, with iron arms,
Turnip Cutter, Chaff Cutter, &c.
ALSO,
About 7 Tons of Prime Old Hay. (to taken off the premises)
16 Acres capital GRASS KEEPING, till the 25th
of March, 5 Acres of Swede and Common Turnips, and
several lots of Straw, with the Yard, till the 25th day of
March next. Sale to commence at 12 o'clock.
Note : Death of two Charles Kirks.
including Charles Kirk (1833-1859) off the Cape of Good Hope.
Leicestershire Mercury - Saturday 22 October 1859
{Death of Kirks}
On the 19th inst, at Mountsorrel, Charles Kirk, second son
Mr Wm. Kirk, boat builder, aged 15 months.
On the 23rd July, at King William's Town, Cape of Good
Hope, aged 27 years, of consumption, Charles Kirk, third son
of the late Mr. John Kirk, boat builder, of Mountsorrel. He
volunteered from Her Majesty's 2nd Regt of Foot, into the
Cape Mounted Rifles.
Leicester Mercury - Saturday 05 November 1886
{Z. D. Kirk Marriage . 23 Oct 1886}
Married, at Loughborough, on Sunday the 23rd ult {Oct}, Mr
Z.D.Kirk, of Mountsorrel, to Miss Luck, of Loughborough.
You talk of Gretna, silly blade !
From henceforth cease your plea,
If i'm as luck-y as this maid,
The kirk shall come to me.
Leicester Journal - Friday 28 October 1870
On the 14th inst {Oct}, at Chepstow, Helen, only surviving
daughter of the late Mr W.Kirk of Cossington Mills,
in this County.
Death of Alfred Kirk (1861) & Catherine Ann (nee Mason) (1867) Daughter - Emma Mary Kirk b.1893. 4 Months Old
Leicester Chronicle - Saturday 26 August 1893
{Death of Alfred Kirk's Daughter - Emma Mary Kirk b.1893}
Sudden Death of a Child. — The deputy coroner
(Mr. J. Harvey) beld an inquest on Monday evening
at the Albert Coffee Bouse on the body of Emma
Mary Kirk, aged four months, daughter of Alfred
Kirk, shoe riveter, who resides at 4, Foundry-square.
— The mother stated that the child had been weakly
since birth. On Friday night deceased appeared to
have a cough and a rattling in the throat. Witness
poulticed her on the chest and back with linseed,
and again in the middle of the night. About half-
past four on Saturday morning witness noticed a
change for the worse in the child's condition and she
at once took her to Dr. Dickson's surgery and saw
his assistant, who said be could do nothing for the
child. He advised her to take the child home and
give it some brandy and milk. Besides suckling
deceased had been fed on boiled milk and water and
sago.- Mr.C.H.Roberts, surgeon, said he had
examined the deceased's body and found it extremely
emaciated. Death was due to a wasting disease.—
The jury returned a verdict in accordance with the
medical testimony.Journal - Friday 28 October 1870
To read more on Uncle Alf's time as a POW
go to Alf Kirk - 1916
Leicester Chronicle - Saturday 28 November 1942
{Great Uncle Alf Kirk - POW}
Cpl. Alfred Kirk,
Loyal Regt., is a
prisoner of war
in Japanese
hands. His home
is at 12, Bendbow
Rise, Braunstone Estate, Leicester.
He joined
the Army seven
years ago.
Below are articles related to the Almond family
Joseph Almond (1858).
Cab Driver of Leicester
Leicester Journal - Friday 27 April 1888
BOROUGH POLICE.
FRIDAY.—Before J. Stafford (in the chair), W. Winterton,
J. Bennett, J. H. Williams, and J. E. Hodges,
Esqrs.
Joseph Almond, Mansfield Street, for causing an obstruction
in the Haymarket with three horses and a
bus, on the 3rd April, was fined 10s, or seven days.
Below are articles related to the Troth family
The below article relates to a court case involving two Troth's - David Troth (nail fogger) & William Troth, who informed on him for trying to get away with paying John Liddell (nailor) in goods instead of paying him money (truck system). A nail fogger would supply iron to the nailor and he would then make the nails needed and return them to the fogger for payment. This would be a pitiful amount but made worse by the fogger paying the nailor in goods instead, often at inflated prices, effectively enslaving and trapping the nailor into an increasingly poor situation.
If this was my William Troth then it may explain him leaving Bromsgrove shortly afterwards for Ibstock in Leicestershire. It may have been a difficult situation informing on a fellow Troth or perhaps he was disillusioned with the poor conditions of a nailor's life.
Worcester Herald - Saturday 11 June 1842
Troths in Court (William / David). Truck ACT
THE TRUCK SYSTEM.-A CONVICTION.-William Troth
informed upon David Troth, of Bromsgrove, nail fogger,
that on the 11th, 13th and 14th days of May last, he paid to
John Liddell, nailor, certain goods, such as bread, bacon,
soap, sugar, &c., as for wages, and instead of payment in
the current coin of the realm. Mr Taylor prosecuted, and
for the defendant Mr. Charles Pumfrey stated that Mr. George
Edmonds had requested him to ask the Bench to postpone
the hearing till next Court day, as it was impossible for him
(Mr Edmonds) to attend at Bromsgrove that day. The informer
having already been three days in attendance would
not consent, and so it went to a hearing, the defendant not
having the benefit of legal aid.
Liddell, the prosecutor, a more that half-starved looking
stripling, deposed. I have worked for David Troth three
months. On the 9th of May i received two quarters of iron
from him to work up into "ground hobs" [shoe nails so
called]. On the 10th May i took the nails in and had 6d on
them in money. On the 11th i received from Troth three
loaves of bread, value 1s. 6d., and 1 1/4lb bacon, charged to
me 11d. I then brought away two quarters of iron, which
Troth weighed to me, which i was to make into "ground
hobs." I took in all my nails on the 14th. Troth weighed
them. they came to 9s. 2d. I said i wanted my
money; he said i could not have the money, i must have goods.
His wife then gave me
s. d.
1 lb. sugar ................. 0 8
1 lb. soap ................... 0 6
1 1.2 lb pork ............. 0 9
2 loaves ..................... 1 0
Money ........................ 1 11
______
4 10
Which, with 3s. 10d.,the price of the goods, and 6d. I
had received before, made up the 9s. 2d. After receiving
the goods i waited more then ten minutes for money; and i
told Mrs. Troth that i wanted it to pay for my stallage.
[The workman having no shops of their own pay rent for the
use of somebody's shop, and this they call stallage.]. She
asked me if i did not want more things ? Did i not
want some plums or some currants? I said no, "i had
been plum'd and curranted quite enough." After waiting
thus long she put the money on the counter. It was
all in copper.
Defandant cross-examined the witness, but not in any
way likely to aid his own cause or to shake witness's testimony.
Joseph Penrice was next called; he deposed that on the
14th May last he was in Troth's house, and saw Liddell
there with nails. Defendant weighed them and went to the
pantry to reckon them up; they came to 9s. 2d. as Troth said,
and then Mrs Troth asked him what she was to put for him.
David Troth was present and quite close to the parties, and
witness. She wanted to know after that if he did not want
something else. Liddell said no, he required money to pay
his stallage, and she gave him 1s. 11d. in money. Troth's
daughter, Mary Troth, brought it to her mother in her apron.
This was the case for the prosecution. In defence Troth
averred that Liddell had not been in his employment more
than three weeks instead of the three months, as he himself said;
that at first he had brought a parcel of nails to his shop to
sell, and that he (Troth) had refused to buy them, but his
(Troth's) wife had asked him to take pity on him and see if
he could not buy them; that Liddell never had any iron
from him, not an oz., and as to the goods which the latter
said he had had in place of his wages, he (Troth) knew nothing
about that. [The latter impudent assertion was received
with a shout of derision by the spectators.] Troth
then called his son, Henry Troth, a lad of 17 or 18, who
swore that he never saw Liddell at his father's till the 14th
May, when he saw him bring him some details which his father
purchased for 2s. 2d., and which 2s. 2d, he (witness) saw
paid then and there in copper. Witness having been cautioned
by the Bench adherred to his statement that the sum
paid was 2s. 2d.
Mary Troth, daughter of the defendant, a girl of 19 or
thereabout, repeated an echo in every respect of her brother's
evidence, and especially swore, adhering to her oath on
having been cautioned, that the sum paid to Liddell on the
14th was 2s. 2d.
Mr. TAYLOR then briefly addressed the Bench for the
prosecution, contending that the offences charged on the 11th
and 13th had been most clearly proved, and indeed had not
been sought to be disproved, the evidence for the defence
going only to the transactions of the 14th, and even as to
the latter the testimony of the witnesses Liddell and Penrice
had not been at all spoken, as it was impossible to believe
that there had been no transactions between Liddell
and defendant up to the 14th, which was the bearing of the
evidence for the defence.
The bench seemed to take this view of the case, but as it
was the first offence of which Troth had been accused, convicted
him on only one of the charges; and then Mr. Taylor
having applied to the Bench for a portion of the penalty to
the informer -
Mr. COLLETT said that he was disapproved of giving anything
to informers in such cases, and would divide the Bench
upon it. The present case was not devoid of suspicion; he
did not know that it might not have been trumped up, and
if informers were to be remunerated in this way, the Bench
would have plenty of such informations. - [Suppressed cries
of "So much the better."]
Mr RICKETTS differed altogether from this view. The
law intended to put down the system, and by giving a portion
of the fines to the informers, to reward those who took the
labour upon themselves of prosecuting offenders, there
was no imputation against the charachter of the witnesses or
informer in this case, and he should propose that the usual
portion of the fine be paid to the informer.
Mr. TAYLOR suggested that if Mr. Collett knew the fearful
injury that the truck system did to the poor workmen,
he would not differ in this view of the case; and the Bench
generally having concurred with Mr. Ricketts, Troth was
fined £5, including costs, and one-half of the fine, after
deduction of the costs, was ordered to be paid to the informer.
The alternative punishment is three months imprisonment
with hard labour.
Besides the above there were two or three assault cases
before the Bench, but all notice of these must be deferred
until out next.