Newspaper Clippings

Below are articles related to the Kirk family & the Mountsorrel boat building business.



Note : These were boats built by John Kirk (1770)
or possibly his son John Kirk (1801).

Staffordshire Advertiser - Saturday 16th August 1823 

 {Boats for Sale. Burton 20th August 1823}


          Pleasure Boats

  TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,

      By Mr. TITTERTON,


On the banks of the River Trent, Burton, on Wednesday

next, the 29th August, 1823, punctually at 11 o'clock,

A variety of beautiful new PLEASURE BOATS made

by  John Kirk, Boat Builder, Mountsorrel Dock,

Leicestershire.


Catalogues may be had of Mr Titterton



Note : These were boats built by John Kirk (1770)
or possibly his son John Kirk (1801).

Derby Mercury - Wednesday 18 May 1825

{pleasure boats for sale - John Kirk Boatwright}


PLEASURE BOATS. 

JOHN KIRK, BOATWRIGHT, 

MOUNTSORREL DOCK, LEICESTERSHIRE, 

BEGS leave to inform the Nobility and Gentry he 

continues building all kinds of Pleasure Boats on the London 

plan, for rowing, sailing, fishing, &c.-He has a great variety 

finished in handsome stile, and the newest fashion, ready for immediate 

use, viz, Wherries, Funneys, Skiffs, Shallops, Sailing

Boats. Punts, Canoes, Cutters, &c. built by the best Pleasure 

Boat Builders from London. 

J.K. trusts this will be found a favourable opportunity for 

those Gentlemen who are fond of Aquatic Excursions, as be can 

supply them with superior Boats at twenty per cent, cheaper than 

in London, and he will send them to any part of England.





Note : These were boats built by John Kirk (1770)
or possibly his son John Kirk (1801).

Nottingham Review and General Advertiser for the Midland Counties - Friday 03 August 1827 

 {Pleasure Boats for Sale. Nottingham Market Place  4th August 1827}


BY MR PARKER. 

Pleasure Boats. Gigs, Gig Harness, 

&c.  &c. 

To be SOLD by AUCTION.  by Mr. PARKER,

On Saturday, August 4th. 1827. in the Market-place, 

Nottingham, at Twelve Clock precisely, 

TWO handsome Pleasure BOATS. 

Carved and Gilt, built by Mr. 

Kirk, of Mountsorrel; also several 

useful GIGS, LIGHTCARTS, GIG and 

CART HARNESS, &c. which will be

described in Bills, to be had of the

Auctioneer. 

Also Convenient TRAVELLING VAN, capable 

of carrying Ten Outside and six Inside Passengers. 



Leicestershire Mercury - Saturday 28th July 1838

{John Kirk Junior drunk (b 1801) - Court Case brought by his father John Kirk Senior (b 1770) to stop the landlord of the Black Swan serving his son alcohol. July 26th 1838}


George Green, landlord of the Black Swan, Mountsorrel, 

was charged by Mr. Kirk, senr. with allowing 

his son to indulge in intoxication in his house, the latter 

being a perfect madman when excited by drink. Mr. 

K. said that he was from home at the time, and knowing 

that drink had a very bad effect upon the complainant's 

son. He had given directions that he should 

not be allowed to have liquor when a state of intoxication, 

but unfortunately the girl had allowed him to have three penny's worth of spirits and water during his 

absence — Mr Kirk admitted that the defendant was not at 

home, but said, that be (defendant) told him he would 

sell his wares to whom he pleased, which statement the 

latter denied. Mr. Dudley read the clause in the act 

stating that if any victualler "wilfully and knowingly" 

allowed drunkeness to take place in his house, he was 

liable to a penalty not exceeding £5, and then said, "We do not delight in punishment, but we shall do 

our duty through evil good report and, more by 

way of example to others, if you (addressing Mr. Cresswell) 

concur with me, sir, I shall inflict the full 

penalty."  Mr.Cresswell concurring a matter of course. Mr. Green was ordered to pay £5 and costs, 

though Mr. Kirk said he did not wish to punish him, 

being cautious? to prevent a repetition of the 

offence as he was about to leave Mountsorrel.


[What credence are our readers to give to expressions 

which fall from this worshipful bench of 

Justice ?  Mr Dudley first says "we do not delight in 

punishment" and then, to show his sincerity,immediately 

mulcts a respectable young man the heaviest 

penalty and "costs," though it is admitted that he had 

not offended against the act of parliament (inasmuch 

as he had not "wilfully and knowingly" encouraged 

intoxication,) and though the complainant urges that 

he does not wish to punish him! After the case was 

settled, the defendant was heard to say, " If they had 

stopped me on the highway, and taken the money out 

of my pocket, I should have thought less of it !"

Leicester Journal - Friday 3rd August 1838

{John Kirk Junior drunk (b 1801) - Court Case brought by his father John Kirk Senior (b 1770) to stop the landlord of the Black Swan serving his son alcohol. July 26th 1838}


George Green, landlord of the Black Swans public-house, 

Mountsorrel. was charged by John Kirk, of the same place, gent, 

with having, on Monday last, been guilty of encouraging drunkenness 

in his house by supplying his (Mr. Kirk's) son with liquor 

when in a state of intoxication, although repeatedly cautioned 

against so doing. The defendant was lined and costs, the 

Bench remarking, that they hoped it would prove a caution to the 

other beer and liquor-sellers in the town. 

 Leicester Journal - Friday 19 October 1838 

 {John Kirk Jno - served alcohol in the Black Swan, Mountsorrel.  Landlord George Green appealing against the conviction}



GREEN V.DUDLEY AND CRESWELL. 

An Appeal against a Conviction the Loughborough Magistrates. 


The following case was entered into, and occupied the 

attention of the court for several hours. Mr. George Green, 

of the Black Swan, Mountsorrel, was the appellant, and the 

Rev. J. Dudley and Robert Green Creswell, Esq. two 

Magistrates attending the Loughborough Bench, respondents. 

Mr. Hildyard appeared as counsel, and Mr. Cowdell, jun. 

solicitor, for the appellant; Mr. White, as counsel, and Mr. 

Jackson, as solicitor, for the respondents. 


The appeal was respecting a conviction, bearing date the 

26th of July last, whereby the defendant was alleged to have 

been duly convicted before the respondents, "for that he 

being a person licensed to sell exciseable liquor by retail to 

be drunk on the premises, &c. did the 23rd of July, wilfully

or knowingly permit drunkenness in the said house and 

premises, &c. by supplying John Kirk, the younger, with 

intoxicating liquors, he, the said John Kirk, being that 

time drunk and intoxicated, as he, the said George Green, 

then and there well knew, contrary to his license, &c. 

whereby had forfeited £5, this being adjudged to the 

first offence, &c. with costs." 


Mr. White opened the case by stating the above facts. 

Mr. Hildyard examined the conviction, and offered his 

objection to it. The first was because it charged the defendant 

with an offence, viz: did "knowingly or wilfully," 

and was therefore had the authority of several cases, to 

which the learned counsel referred. This objection he stated 

was fatal to the case. A witness was also tendered to be 

heard, and refused a hearing by the court. Secondly, because 

there was no informer's name on the information. 

Thirdly, because of uncertainty, the words "intoxicating 

liquors" not being sufficient to inform the defendant of what 

liquor be was accused of selling, whether ale, wine, or spirit, 

since certain liquors were called by law "intoxicating 

liquors." Fourthly, because there was no adjudication of 

the penalty being incurred, but only a statement "whereby 

the said George Green, has forfeited the sum of £5. As

the justices had a discretion as to the amount of the penalty to

be paid—the words of the statute being "a sum not exceeding £5." 


Mr. White begged the attention of the court, whilst he

replied to the objection of his learned friend. He first 

referred to the last objection, his leaned friend stated that 

there had been no  adjudication of the penalty; be would 

refer to the Act of Parliament, and he found that the magistrates 

had convicted the appellant in the precise words which 

the law prescribes. The conviction stated " whereby the 

defendant has forfeited the sum of £5," which was all 

intents and purposes, sum not exceeding £5—it was £5. 

He would direct the attention of the court to the third 

objection, which was, that the term "intoxicating liquors," 

was not sufficient to inform the defendant what liquor was 

meant. The first answer he gave was, that the term 

liquors," would answer for all liquors supplied; 

for there might be intoxicating liquors to which no name 

could be given. Now came the second objection, that 

there was no informer's name on the back of the information 

This was not necessary. Then about the quibble of "wilfully 

or knowingly," how could a man do a thing wilfully 

without doing it knowingly! The two terms were anonymous. 

If there were any difference between the terms 

wilfully and knowingly, should agree with his learned 

friend. 


Mr. Hildyard replied, that if his learned friend could not 

distinguish between "wilfully" and "knowingly," he could 

supply him with a definition. Suppose publican went 

out in the morning, and said to his servant, " supply every 

man with as much liquor he may call and pay for." If 

he did so he would do so wilfully, though not knowingly. 

Would any person pretend to say that though he might not 

know every person whom liquor was supplied, he did not 

do so wilfully ? There were cases also, where a publican 

might supply liquor knowingly and not wilfully, but he did 

not think he need adduce any instances of this. 


A few more remarks followed, and the court retired to 

deliberate on the objections to the conviction, but short 

time they returned, and 

The Chairman observed, that the magistrates were always 

willing to decide upon case merely from a conviction, and 

without going into the merits of it. If the counsel for the 

appellant asked them to into its merits, they would do so, 

but they could give opinion on the conviction alone. It 

would be more satisfactory to the public if they were to go 

into the merits of the case, than if they were to decide upon 

the objections alone. 


Mr. Hildyard consulted with the solicitor (Mr. Cowdell)

and they agreed that the case should be tried on its merits. 


Mr. White having given an outline of the case, proceeded 

to call the following witnesses, to corroborate it. 


Ann Fern, deposed that she knew the Black Swan, at

Mountsorrel, which was kept by George Green ever since 

the death of his father. Witness also endeavoured to prove 

that the said George Green was the executor of the father. 


Cross-examined Mr. Hildyard.—Could not say what 

as then over the door; it used to be "Thomas 

Green;" George Green had an elder brother named Thomas;

was at his father's funeral, and had been at the house 

once since; did not know positively that George Green was 

executor to his late father, or that he administered his effects.


Re-examined Mr. White. —Believed that Thomas 

Green lived in London, 

Sarah Barrs, examined by Mr, White, — Witness lived at 

Mountsorrel, and remembered on the 23rd of July last, 

seeing young John Kirk about six o clock coming down the 

street, very drunk, without his hat. He went to the Black 

Swan ; the servant of the house was standing in the gateway

and they had some conversation together he went in. 

Witness also saw Kirk's wife and informed her where her 

husband was, when she went into the house to him. Mr. 

Kirk, sen. afterwards went into the house to him. 


John Kirk stated that applied to the Rev. Mr. Dudley 

Creswell for this conviction. Witness's son was a

boatwright, and had a wife and three children; was about 

37 years of age, and his eldest child about eleven; was in 

the habit of getting drunk; sometimes for two or three 

weeks together; had sent the crier round on one occasion

to caution the publicans from letting him have drink; had

repeatedly been to Green's about his son's drunkenness. On 

the 18th of the same month, his son was taken from that 

very house to the round-house for being drunk,on that

occasion witness saw George Green, and told him that he 

(witness) had been informed his son had expended 17s. in 

two houses for drink, upon which Green threatened to knock 

his head off. Witness went to Green's house on the 23rd, 

and saw his son sitting there with a glass of gin and water

before him, he was so intoxicated that he could 

get home; tasted th liquor and found that it was gin and

water. Soon after the servant came in, and Green's brother

charged him with giving his (witness's) son drink, after he

had been discharged from doing so doing; to which he replied

"you don't mean me, you mean my brother." Witness

then told him he would have him before the magistrates for

it, and went and obtained a summons accordingly. On the

hearing of the summons, he (witness) repeated the story he

had already told. Had repeatedly discharged Green from 

letting his son have a drink. When he last told him so, he

replied, that he had a licence to sell liquors and would sell

when he pleased. For the last two years, had expected 

every morning to hear of his son's wife or children being 

dead, through some of his mad freaks.


 Cross-examined - Believed that he was the only witness

examined, on the hearing of the case before the Magistrates. 

Did not know whether any witness was examined on the 

other side. When he had been examined, he went to the

back part of the Magistrates room, where very few persons

can hear; there was a great noise, so that he could not hear

whether Green asked to have his witnesses heard or not. 

Saw Green in court and remained in the room until be was

convicted; he did not hear the Magistrates refuse to hear

Green's witnesses. Green spoke to them, but witness did not

hear what passed between them.

Mary Kirk, wife of John Kirk, deposed that her husband 

was much addicted to drinking.He was intoxicated when 

she saw him at the Black Swan on the 23rd of July. A 

glass of gin and water stood before him. Witness had at 

times had been under apprehension of violence from him, but not 

so much latterly as formerly. 


Mr White said that was his case. 


Mr Hildyard addressed the Court, calling upon them to 

quash the conviction. The conviction stated that the appellant

did wilfully or knowingly supply Kirk with intoxicating 

liquors. Now George Green was never in the house 

at the time, did not serve the liquor, and it was not proved 

that he knew to it. From the evidence which had been provided

there was no evidence to prove the conviction.


Mr White prayed the Court confirm the conviction. 


The chairman gave it as the opinion of the Court that

the conviction was not quashed on the evidence.


Mr Hildyard said he had yet to learn that any man was 

responsible to the criminal law for acts committed by deputy.

In the criminal law a party was responsible for his 

own act, and his own act alone. They well knew the press

made an outcry for being held responsible for the sale 

of publications in shops, &c.—but it was for their civil acts 

alone. How was it to be proved that Green knew all

that liquors were supplied with his knowledge ? Green was

to be convicted because his servant was or was not able to 

tell whether the appellant could drink another glass of gin 

and water. It never could said Green wilfully or knowingly

supplied the liquor, when he did not much know 

of the existence of the man the time, not being himself

present Mr. Hildyard after making a few other observations called 


Mary Burdett, stated that she was before the Magistrates

at the time her master was convicted. When Mr. Kirk, jun. 

came in to her masters house, he appeared quite sober

as sober as she was; her master was in the garden the time, 

where he had been working during the day. Kirk had a 

glass of gin and water. It was much as a quarter of an 

hour after before her master came into the house. Witness 

went with her master to Loughborough, and he said they did 

not want her; heard one of the gentlemen say that her 

master was convicted — it was one of the gentlemen who said 

she need not give her evidence. Never heard them ask her 

master whether she could prove that any liquor had been given. 


John Witticombe, deposed that he went along with George

Green to Mr. Dudley's on the 30th of July. Heard George

Green apply for a copy of the conviction, Mr. Dudley said 

he had not got it—it would for him to have it a week 

before the trial. Mr. Mowbray had it; Mr. Dudley told 

Green that his attorney had been leading him wrong—he 

was too late for appeal. Mr. Dudley reached several 

books down, and he read from one that an appeal must be

made in twenty-four hours after—it was from "George 

the Good," and he, witness, paid attention to him for wondered 

which of the George's he meant (laughter). 


Mr. White addressed the Court on the evidence of 

the witnesses last called, after which the Court retired to 

deliberate. In about quarter of an hour the Chairman 

returned and said the Court were of opinion, the conviction 

was quashed on the informalities contained it. 


Some discussion then took place as to the costs, and it 

was ordered that they should be divided between the parties. 




Note : This article probably refers to John Kirk Jno .
Born 1801 & passed away in March 1842.

His sons John (1830) & William (1826) would have been too young to have taken over the business immediately.

 Leicestershire Mercury - Saturday 23 April 1842 

 {Mr John Kirk - died & dock to carry on article.}


Public Notice. 

MOUNTSORREL DOCK. 

THE Public, and especially those connected with 

the Boat Trade, are respectfully informed that 

the Business of Boat Building will be carried on by

the Executors of the late Mr. JOHN KIRK for the 

benefit of the Widow and Family ; and they have 

engaged Mr. Wm.Tingle (who has worked in the 

Dock for the last twenty years) as their foreman, and

they trust, by punctuality and attention the above 

business, to merit a large share of the public support. 


N.B. - All Debts owing to and from the late Mr. 

John Kirk, are requested to be forwarded, without 

delay, to John Wall and John Ellis, Executors. 

Mountsorrel, April 19, 1842.




Note :   This sale would have been after the death of
  John  Kirk (1801-1842)

Nottingham Review and General Advertiser for the Midland Counties - Friday 29 July 1842 

{Boats for Sale - 3rd August 1842 - Trent Bridge, Nottingham}


                         BY MR. W. EYRE. 

  Sale on Wednesday, August 3rd, 1842, the Trent 

             Bridge, London Road, Nottingham.

         FOR POSITIVE, UNRESERVED SALE. 

SEVEN beautifully-painted, well-built, fast-sailing 

PLEASURE BOATS, with Oars, &c. complete ;

also One TRENT BOAT, to be SOLD by AUCTION, 

Mr. EYRE, by order of the executors of the late Mr. 

John Kirk, Mountsorrel. Sale punctually at two o’clock in the afternoon. 

The Auctioneer particularly invites the attention of the 

public to this important sale, feeling assured the late Mr. 

Kirk’s well-earned fame a boat builder, will be a sufficient 

guarantee of their superiority ; and begs to observe to them 

the above excellent Sailing Boats will be at the place of 

sale for inspection the day preceding the sale.


Note :   This sale would have been after the death of
  John  Kirk (1801-1842)



 Leicester Journal - Friday 06 October 1848 

{Boat Business - still carried on}


BOAT BUILDING AND REPAIRING, MOUNTSORREL
                                            DOCK. 

THE Executors or the late JOHN KIRK, impressed with 

gratitude for favours received on behalf of the Widow and 

Family, inform their Friends the above Business is still 

carried by them, and request continuance of their favours. 

They also beg to state to those Persons who stand indebted to 

them, that their Accounts must be paid to them personally; or, 

it sent by Post, addressed John Wale and Ellis, J. Kirk's 

Executors, Mountsorrel. 

 October 4th, 1848

 Nottingham Review and General Advertiser for the Midland Counties
- Friday 20 February 1852

{Death of man in river near Kirk's residence, Mountsorrel}



Leicester Journal - Friday 27 October 1854 

{Boat Sale at Mountsorrel Wharf - Property of Mr. Thos. Chapman, a Bankrupt}


Bankrupts Property, at Mountsorrel. 

TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,

By J. WINDRAM, 

By Wednesdav, the 1st day of November, 1854, (by order 

of the Assignees of Mr. Thos. Chapman, a Bankrupt,) 

at the Kirk's Wharf, Mountsorrel, 

TWO capital NARROW BOATS, which may seen 

prior to the Sale, on application to Mr. Kirk, Mountsorrel

Sale to commence at Half-past Two for Three o'clock in

the Afternoon punctually. 



Below are the articles regarding the links to the family business 'Kirks & Co' from 1860 when the company assets were being sold off.

Boat building had started with John Kirk (b. 1770) formally of Cossington Mill , but by 1860 Kirk & Co were principally  coal dealers & boat builders in Mountsorrel, at this point ran by John Kirk, William Kirk, along with John Wale.  This would have been  John  Kirk (1830) & William  Kirk (1826) .

Leicestershire Mercury - Saturday 7th April 1860

{NOTICE of Dissolved company 23rd March 1860}


 NOTICE. 

WHEREAS, the PARTNERSHIP existing between 

WILLIAM KIRK, JOHN WALE, and 

JOHN KIRK, Coal Dealers and Boat Builders, is by 

agreement DISSOLVED, it is requested that no moneys 

owing to the said Firm be paid until further notice be given 

in this Paper. 

JOHN WALE.  
JOHN KIRK. 

Mountsorrel, March 23, 1860.

Leicester Journal - Friday 18th May 1860 

{SALE of Boat Yard stock on the 29th & 30th  of May 1860}


To Coal Merchants, Farmers, Timber Dealers, and Others. 

TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION, 

By J. COOKE, 

(By order of the Assignee of William Kirk and Co., 

Bankrupts,) upon the Wharf at Mountsorrel, on 

Tuesday and Wednesday, the 29th and 30th days of 

May. 1860, 


THE whole of the valuable STOCK of FOREIGN and 

ENGLISH TIMBER, Wide and Narrow Boats and 

other effects. Comprising a many thousand feet of fine 

oak, elm, and ash trees, oak, ash, elm, and willow planking 

and boards of all thicknesses, oak squares, fence posts, 

gate posts, scantling-gate heads, bars, and backs, 4 1/2 and 

3 inch felloes, light spokes, nathes, oak gates, fieaks, fleak 

bars, barrow sides, bedsides, cow cribs, axle trees, Scotch,

ash and larch poles, red, white and spruce deals, battens 

and boards, 3 timber drugs, 5 carts, 2 wide boats, and 3 

narrow ditto, in good repair, chesnut pony cart and 

tackle, Avery's weighing machine and weights, bean mill, 

chaff cutter, saws, screw jack, ropes, spoking chains, and 

numerous other effects. 

Sale to commence each day at 10 o'clock in the morning. 

The greater portion of the above are to be seen at the 

Wharf, Mountsorrel, and the remainder at Barrow, Sileby, 

and Syston, upon premises lately occupied by Kirk and 

Company. 

Leicester Journal - Friday 18th May 1860

{Sale of Mountsorrel Dock & Wharf on the 28th of May 1860}


Mountsorrel Dock and Wharf. 

H. HARRIS,

Has been honoured with instructions from the Executors

John Kirk, sen., Gentleman, deceased,

TO OFFER BY PUBLIC AUCTION, 

At the Home of Mr. Bampton, the White Swan Inn,

Mountsorrel, in the county Leicester, on Monday, the 

28th day of May, 1860, at Six o'clock in the evening 

precisely, subject to such conditions shall be then and 

there produced. 


ALL that very desirable FAMILY RESIDENCE,

pleasantly situate in Mountsorrel aforesaid, on the 

main road leading from thence to Sileby, with garden in 

front, together with the spacious Coal Wharf, Dockyard, 

Warehouses, Workshops, extensive Shedding, commodious 

Stabling, Corn Hay and Straw Lofts adjoining the same, 

containing about 1 acre of ground or thereabouts, on which 

the Boat Building and Coal and Timber Trade has been 

carried on for upwards of 50 years. 


There is very extensive and highly respectable connection

in the Coal and Timber trade which might be much 

extended by any person commanding a capital. The 

situation for a Boat Builder is undeniable and a great 

business in that line has been carried on for several years. 


To view the same apply on the premises, and for further 

particulars to Messrs. Harris & Luck, Solicitors, or the 

Auctioneer, both of Leicester. 

 Leicester Mercury. - Saturday 4th August 1860 .

{Nottingham Bankruptcy Court Report 31st July 1860}


. Nottingham Bankruptcy Court, Tuesday, July 31. 

—(Before Mr. Commissioner Sanders.) In re Kirk

Wale, and Kirk,Mountsorrel, coal and timber merchants. 

This was a certificate meeting, and from the official

assignee's report we learn that the liabilities to creditors

unsecured amounted to £2,663.3s.4d. Assets: Book

debts, £922.9s.7d.; stock-in-trade, £363. Is.; horses, 

boats, &c, £405.18s.; total (deducting £13 for payments

in full), £1,678.8s.7d.; leaving a deficiency of £984.7s.1d. 

The balance-sheet commenced in April, 1857, with

a capital of £1,908.7s.1d.; loss trading, £1,834.14s.3d.: 

special loss by a disease in horses, of which fifteen 

died,£194.1s.; cash drawn by William Kirk, £457. 14s ;

ditto by John Wale, £219.8s.7d.; ditto by John Kirk

£166.14s.; £2,872.11s. The books had been very imperfectly

kept, and some furniture had been removed from

the house of William Kirk, but it had been since returned. 

The separate estate of William Kirk showed a deficiency 

of £445.5s.9d.; that of John Kirk, £720.5s.9d.; that

of John Wale, £1,280.19s.—Mr. Gregory, who represented

the assignees, said he did not wish to oppose the granting

of a certificate. —His Honour asked about the removal of 

the property which was referred the report ?—Mr.

Gregory said there had been a long examination on that

point. The property had belonged to the wife of William

Kirk before her marriage, and she removed it in the absence

of her husband, supposing that she had still control

over it. The greater part had been brought back.—The

Commissioner said the balance-sheet had some unfavourable

features. There was reason to believe the capital had

been very much over-estimated, which the court must look,

upon with great displeasure, because it gave false character

to the whole balance sheet. He would give third 

class certificate. 

Leicester Journal - Friday 17 August 1860 

{Sale of Wharf - 23rd August 1860. White Swan Inn, Mountsorrel}


Wharf at Mountsorrel. 

TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By R. WARNER,
On Thursday, the 23rd day of August, 1860, the White
Swan Inn, Mountsorrel, at Three for Four o'clock in
the Afternoon prompt,
ALL that Valuable WHARF, adjoining the road leading
from Mountsorrel to Sileby, having an excellent frontage
of forty yards or thereabouts to the river Soar,
and of about thirty to the aforesaid road. The Property
was recently in the occupation of W. Kirk and Co , and
is well adapted for carrying on the business of coal merchant,
boatwright, &c.  Immediate possession may had.
For further particulars apply to Mr. J. HARVEY,
Solicitor, Market-street, or to the Auctioneer, Horsefair
street, Leicester.








 Leicester Journal - Friday 23 November 1860 

{2nd Sale of Mountsorrel Dock & Wharf on the 27th of November 1860}


Leicester. Mountsorrel Dock and Wharf.
MARRIS and SON
Have been honoured with instructions from the Executors
of John Kirk, sen., gentleman, deceased,
TO OFFER BY PUBLIC AUCTION,
In One or more Lots, Tuesday, the 27th day of November
instant, at the house of Mr. Bamplon, the White
Swan Inn, Mountsorrel, in the County of Leicester, at
4 for 5 o'clock in the Afternoon.
ALL that very desirable FAMILY RESIDENCE,
pleasantly situated in Mountsorrel aforesaid, in the
main road leading from thence to Sileby, with Garden in
front, together with the spacious Coal Wharf, Dock Yard,
Warehouses, Workshops, extensive Shedding, commodious
Stabling, Corn, Hay, and Straw Lofts adjoining the same,
containing about one acre of ground, or thereabouts, on
which the boat building, and coal, and timber trade has
been carried on for upwards of fifty years.
  There has been carried on, on the said Premises, a very
extensive and highly respectable connection in the Coal
and Timber Trade, which might be much extended by any
person commanding a capital. The situation for a Boat
Builder is undeniable, and a great business in that line
has been carried on for several years.
  To view the same apply the Lock House adjoining,
and for further particulars to Messrs. HARRIS and LUCK,
Solicitors, or the Auctioneers, both ot Leicester. 








 Alfred Kirk (1839) - Son of John Kirk (1801)


Leicester Guardian - Saturday 16 February 1861 

{Scales set wrong - Court Case 14 February 1861}

 

POLICE COURT, Feb 14.

Before J.Martin, and J.Cartwright, Esqrs.

DEFICIENT SCALES - Alfred Kirk, of Mountsorrel

coal dealer, was convicted of having scales in his yard

deficient against the purchaser of 9lb. each weighing.

The defendant explained that when he left the wharf in

the morning, the scales were balanced with stones, which

was the usual practice amongst coal dealers, and that he

never weighed coals without them. He had subsquently,

however had them altered by a quantity of

Iron being permanently attached thereto. the bench

said, stones were not the proper things to balance with,

but as he possibly might not intend to defraud the

public, they would mitigate the penalty to 10s, and

costs.



Leicester Journal  -  Friday 6th September 1861 . 

{12th September 1861 - Auction of Property}


Valuable Freehold Houses, Framesmith's Shops, Warehouses,

&c., in Leicester, and Reversionary Interests

in real and Personal Estates. 


             TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION, 

                By JOHN HOLLAND, 


At Old Fish and Quart Inn, Church-gate, Leicester,

on Thursday, the Twelfth day of September next, at Six 

for Seven o'clock precisely, subject such conditions as

will be than produced, and in the following Lots:-


                     Lot 1.

Four well-built MESSUAGES, with back kitchens,

outbuildings, and yards thereto belonging, situate 

in Causeway-lane, and facing Vine-street, in the parish of All 

Saints, in Leicester, and large range of SHOPS and

WAREHOUSE ROOMS, 3 storys high, standing in the 

yards at the back of the said Messuages, and now used as 

Framesmith's Shops and Warehouse Rooms, by the respective

occupiers, Messrs. Ward, Sewell, Skinner, and 

Foxon. 


This Lot contains site 473 square yards and 6 feet, 

or thereabouts. 


                     Lot 2.

The REVERSIONARY INTERESTS of Wm. Kirk 

and John Kirk, late of Mountsorrel, bankrupts, being two 

fourteenth parts or shares the entirety of, and in the 

following real and personal estate:—The Duke of York

Inn, in Mountsorrel aforesaid, a Close of Land at Barrow-

upon-Soar, Close of Land at Sileby, Two Cottages at 

Mountsorrel, a Common Right of Pasturage upon the 

Mountsorrel Hills, and a sum of £1050—which Reversionary

Interests will come into possession-on the death of

a Lady now aged 55 years.


The real Estate which now produces a gross income of 

£65.8s. or thereabouts, is subject to a charge of £20

payable to Charles Kirk or his legal personal representatives.


The present interests of the said William Kirk and

John Kirk in the said  reversionary property, may be

increased or diminished in value by the occurrence of 

certain events, which will be fully explained at the time

of Sale.


For further particulars apply Messrs. MILES,

GREGORY, and BOUSKELL, Solicitors, or the Auctioneer,

Leicester. 


Leicester Chronicle - Saturday 6th January 1866 

{special meeting for the examination of Mr. John Woolley of Rothley, a debtor to the estate.}


Nottingham Bankruptcy Court, Tuesday. — In the

William Kirk, John Wale, and John Kirk, coal merchants, 

Mountsorrel. — This was a special meeting, for 

the examination of Mr. John Woolley, of Rothley,a

debtor to the estate. Mr.Harrison from the office of

Messrs. Miles Gregory, & Co., Leicester) conducted the

examination.-— Mr. Woolley stated tbat the original

amount Of his debt was £117 12s.9d., towards which

he had paid £102, leaving a balance of £15 12s.9d.— 

Mr. Harrison said the witness was in a good position.

The bankruptcy took place in April, 1860, and the 

assignees had been very indulgent with him. As far 

back as 1862, he made a proposal to them to pay £80

in the following January, and similar sums at intervals

of four months afterwards. The trustees had never 

been able to get anything from him since that time, 

without pressing him and threatening proceedings. 

The last payment be made was £5 in March last. 

Several letters had been sent to him since without 

avail, and the assignees had been compelled to bring 

him into the court. If his Honor made an order, 

they hoped be would direct the costs of tbe proceedings to 

be paid by the witness. — The Registrar (to the witness) 

Why did not you pay the money at once, without giving 

so much trouble? — The witness : I will pay it in three? 

months. — The Registrar : I have no doubt you are 

able to pay it — The witness : no, I am not — The 

Registrar (to Mr. Harrison): What is he ? — Mr. 

Harrision : He has got an extensive brickyard.— The 

Registrar : There must be an order for payment, and 

if you the (witness) do not pay, you must be sued.

Leicester Journal - Friday 14 May 1869 

{Freehold Property, Mountsorrel, Sileby, and Burrow-upon-Soar. Instructions from the Trustees for Sale under the Wills of Mr. John Kirk and Mr. Z. D. Kirk, to offer for SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION, On Tuesday, the 25th day of May. 1869. 6 Lots of Land including Duke of York Pub.}


Freehold Property, Mountsorrel, Sileby, and Burrow-upon-Soar,
in the County of Leicester.  

MARRIS and SON 

Have received instructions from the Trustees for Sale
under the Wills of Mr. John Kirk and Mr. Z. D. Kirk, to offer for 

  SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION, 

On Tuesday, the 25th day of May. 1869, at Five for Six o'clock the Evening precisely, at the house Mr. Bampkin, the White Swan Inn, in Mountsorrel, in the County of Leicester, in the following or such other Lots as may be agreed upon, and subject to such conditions as shall be then produced, THE following VALUABLE PROPERTY, situate in the several parishes above named:

   Lot 1. 

A Close of very good MEADOW LAND, adjoining the Green-lane, in the parish of Sileby, and short distance from the main road leading from Mountsorrel to Sileby, and containing by  measurement  5a. 2r. 20p. or thereabouts, now in the occupation of Mr. William Jacques. 

  Lot 2. 

A Close of very excellent MEADOW LAND, in the parish of Barrow-upon-Soar, containing 3a. 2r. 0p. or thereabouts, now in the occupation of Mr. Jelly, and adjoining to close the property of Charles Ansted, Esq., now in the occupation of Mr. William Simpson.

 Lot 3. 

All that commodious old licensed PUBLIC HOUSE, called tbe Duke of York, adjoining the canal lock, with stabling for horses, coach house, piggeries, and numerous offices, with garden and orchard, the occupation of Mr. Thomas Jelly.

   Lot 4.

 All that piece or parcel of LAND, formerly cultivated for growing osiers, adjoining the River Soar between and Barrow," on which are large quantity of fine willow poles

  Lot 5.

 All those two MESSUAGES or TENEMENTS, situate at the south end of Mountsorrel, adjoining the main street, in the occupation of Stableford and Hames. 

  Lot 6.

 A Right of Common the Mountsorrel Hills. To view the Lots apply to the respective Tenants, and for further particulars to the Auctioneers, Friar-lane, or to Messrs. STONE, PAGET, and BILLSON, Solicitors, Leicester. 



Morning Post - Wednesday 16 March 1870 (London)

{PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS}

William Kirk, John Wale, and John Kirk. Mountsorrell, Leicestershire, coal merchants— final dividend of 1s. 1d., any Monday, at Harris's, Nottingham.

Leicester Chronicle - Saturday 21 August 1875

{Boats for Sale}


By Mr. S. JACKSON. 

Mountsorrel, near Loughborough, Leicestershire. 

New Narrow Boat and Pleasure Yacht for Sale by Auction. 

S. JACKSON, 

Has instructions from Mr. Kirk, Boat 

Builder, &c,

TO SELL BY AUCTION, 

At his Dock, on Tuesday, the 24th day of August, 1875,
at Half -past Four in the Afternoon,
A NEW NARBOW BOAT, built of the best English
Oak, with Iron Knees, to carry 80 Tons or there-abouts.
Width 7 feet 1 inch, length nearly 71 feet Built
on the best and most approved principles and by superior
workmen. There is a first-class cabin, gang planks, top
mast, box mast, and deck board, all complete. 

Also, a First-class PLEASURE YACHT nearly new ;
to carry 20 or more persons, with masts, main and jib
sails, and rigging complete. 

Mountsorrel is one mile from Sileby, 1 1/2 from Barrow,
and 4 1/2 miles from Loughborough Stations, on the
Midland Railway. 
A train arrives at Sileby at 3.42 up, and 2.54
down; and leaves Sileby at 4.48 and 7.6 down, and 6.35 up.

Further articles below related to the Kirk family.


Note : Wife of John Kirk (1770)

Elizabeth Kirk (nee Hall)
Johns 2nd wife dies 29th  Aug 1811. Buried 1st Sep 1811.
she was born c1784 Market Harborough


Northampton Mercury - Saturday 07 September 1811

{died 29th Aug 1811}

Thursday ...

Same day, the 27th year her age, Mrs. Kirk, wife 

of Mr. John Kirk, Cossington Mills, Leicestershire.


Note : Catherine Kirk (1787), sister of John Kirk (1770),
daughter of William Kirk (1841).


Stamford Mercury - Friday 29 April 1814

{CATHERINE KIRK (1787-1865) married April 1814 William Gilson (of Twyford)} 
Wednesday 27th April i presume.

Wednesday night, .... 

Same day, Mr. W. Gillson, of Twyford, to Miss Catherine
Kirk, youngest sister of Mr. Kirk, of Cossington
Mill, Leicestershire.


Note : John Kirk (1770) joins father William Kirk (1742)
in the family business. Miller's at Cossington Mill.

Fleur-de-Lis Inn was situated at 37, Belgrave Gate in Leicester. In the first half of the 19th century inquests, auctions, corporation business, Framework Knitters grievance meetings and other political gatherings would be hosted here. It was demolished in 1969 to make way  for the new Haymarket shopping centre scheme.  

The Cross-Keys Inn, Loughborough is  currently known as the Phantom, situated on the corner of Leicester Road and Pinfold Gate.

Leicester Journal - Friday 20 October 1815

{William & John Kirk - Millers at Cossington Mill}


    Cossington Mills 

        JOHN KIRK,  

BEGS leave to return his sincere thanks to his

fiends for all favours conferred upon him to

the Flour Trade, and begs leave to inform them he 

has taken his Son into partnership.

All Debts due to the said John Kirk, on account 

of the Flour Trade, are requested to be settled 

immediately and all persons having any demands, 

to send them in, in order that they may be discharged.

           _________________


KIRK and SON respectlully inform their friends

and the public that they will constantly

have on hand a large stock of Flour, the very 

first quality, and on the most reasonable terms.— 

All orders will be thankfully received and punctually 

executed, by 

 Their Most Obedient Servants, 

   JOHN KIRK

   WILLIAM KIRK


N.Bs Attendance at the Fleur-de-Lis Inn, Leicester, 

on Saturdays, and the Cross Keys Inn, 

Loughborough on Thursdays.


Note : 1800's Joy riding -
servants riding in their carts without reins.

Leicester Journal - Friday 29 August 1834


Mr Parr, of Wanlip, Joseph Chester, of Blackbrook,

Wm. Kirk, of Cossington Mill, Joseph Bostock, of Breedon,

and George Powdill, of Breedon, were each fined

20S and costs, for their servants riding in their carts

without reins.


Note : William Kirk of  Cossington Mills, Leicestershire
d 12 Apr 1835. William Kirk (1797-1835).  Son of John Kirk (1770).
The last Kirk to live at Cossington Mills.

Leicester Journal - Friday 17 April 1835 

{William Kirk (death) - 1835}


Cossington Mills, in this county, Sunday morning last, sincerely and deservedly lamented by a large circle of friends, Mr. William Kirk, in his 37th year. 


Note : William Kirk of  Cossington Mills, Leicestershire
d 12 Apr 1835 , buried 17 Apr 1835 Cossington.
Abode-Cossington Mill

Stamford Mercury - Friday 01 May 1835


At Cossington Mills, Leicestershire, on the 19th ult., {May}

in his 37th year, Mr Wm. Kirk.


Note : Concerning the affairs of the late William Kirk (1797-1835).  Son of John Kirk (1770). William (Junior) was the last Kirk to be the Miller at Cossington Mill.



Leicester Journal - Friday 08 May 1835

   

                The Affairs of Mr. William Kirk, 

  Late of Cossington Mills, in the County of Leicester, 

                              Miller, deceased. 


ALL Persons having any claim or demand against the 

estate of the deceased, are requested, forthwith, to 

send particulars thereof to Mrs. Kirk, Mr. William 

Heap, at Cossington Mills aforesaid, or to Mr. John 

Barfoot Eames of the Newarke Street, Leicester, 

hosier, executors; and all persons who stood indebted 

to the said William Kirk, at the time of his death, are 

de-ired to pay the amount of their respective debts immediately 

to either of the said parties. 

  By order of the Executors, 

     Andrew Peak. 

Granby Place. Leicester. May 7th, 1835.


Note : Concerning the affairs of the late William Kirk (1797-1835).  Son of John Kirk (1770). William (Junior) was the last Kirk to be the Miller at Cossington Mill.



 Leicester Journal - Friday 11 November 1836 

 {Sale at Cossington Mill - Late Mr Kirk}


 Valuable Fat and Store Stock, Implements, Hay Store,

                                   Keeping, &c. 

          COSSINGTON MILL, LEICESTERSHIRE. 

                     TO SOLD BY AUCTION, 

                             BY B PAYYNE,

 

On Wednesday, the 16th day November, 1836. 

THE whole of the valuable Fat and Store STOCK and

other Effects, of the late Mr. KIRK 


On the Premises, Cossington Mill, in the county of Leicester,

Consisting of 12 prime fat Cows and Heifers,2 barren 

Cows, five 4-year old Steers, five 3-year old Ditto Gilt, 3

Store Pigs, capital Draught Horse. 7 years old, 6-inch wheel 

Waggon, ditto Cart, broad wheel Drug, with iron arms,

Turnip Cutter, Chaff Cutter, &c. 

ALSO, 

About 7 Tons of Prime Old Hay. (to taken off the premises) 

16 Acres capital GRASS KEEPING, till the 25th 

of March, 5 Acres of Swede and Common Turnips, and 

several lots of Straw, with the Yard, till the 25th day of

March next. Sale to commence at 12 o'clock. 

 
Note : Death of two Charles  Kirks.
including Charles Kirk (1833-1859) off the Cape of Good Hope.



 Leicestershire Mercury - Saturday 22 October 1859 

 {Death of Kirks}


On the 19th inst, at Mountsorrel, Charles Kirk, second son

Mr Wm. Kirk, boat builder, aged 15 months.


On the 23rd July, at King William's Town, Cape of Good

Hope, aged 27 years, of consumption, Charles Kirk, third son

of the late Mr. John Kirk, boat builder, of Mountsorrel. He

volunteered from Her Majesty's 2nd Regt of Foot, into the

Cape Mounted Rifles.

Leicester Mercury - Saturday 05 November 1886

{Z. D. Kirk Marriage . 23 Oct 1886}


Married, at Loughborough, on Sunday the 23rd ult {Oct}, Mr

Z.D.Kirk, of Mountsorrel, to Miss Luck, of Loughborough.

You talk of Gretna, silly blade !

From henceforth cease your plea,

If i'm as luck-y as this maid,

The kirk shall come to me.

Leicester Journal - Friday 28 October 1870


On the 14th inst {Oct}, at Chepstow, Helen, only surviving

daughter of the late Mr W.Kirk of Cossington Mills,

in this County.

Death of Alfred Kirk (1861) & Catherine Ann (nee Mason) (1867) Daughter - Emma Mary Kirk b.1893. 4 Months Old



Leicester Chronicle - Saturday 26 August 1893

{Death of Alfred Kirk's Daughter - Emma Mary Kirk b.1893}



Sudden Death of a Child. — The deputy coroner 

(Mr. J. Harvey) beld an inquest on Monday evening 

at the Albert Coffee Bouse on the body of Emma 

Mary Kirk, aged four months, daughter of Alfred 

Kirk, shoe riveter, who resides at 4, Foundry-square. 

— The mother stated that the child had been weakly

since birth. On Friday night deceased appeared to 

have a cough and a rattling in the throat. Witness 

poulticed her on the chest and back with linseed, 

and again in the middle of the night. About half- 

past four on Saturday morning witness noticed a 

change for the worse in the child's condition and she 

at once took her to Dr. Dickson's surgery and saw 

his assistant, who said be could do nothing for the 

child. He advised her to take the child home and 

give it some brandy and milk. Besides suckling 

deceased had been fed on boiled milk and water and 

sago.- Mr.C.H.Roberts, surgeon, said he had 

examined the deceased's body and found it extremely 

emaciated. Death was due to a wasting disease.— 

The jury returned a verdict in accordance with the 

medical testimony.Journal - Friday 28 October 1870




To read more on Uncle Alf's time as a POW
go to Alf Kirk - 1916


 Leicester Chronicle - Saturday 28 November 1942 

{Great Uncle Alf Kirk  - POW}


Cpl. Alfred Kirk, 

Loyal Regt., is a 

prisoner of war 

in Japanese 

hands. His home 

is at 12, Bendbow 

Rise, Braunstone Estate, Leicester. 

He joined 

the Army seven 

years ago.

Below are articles related to the Almond family 




Joseph Almond (1858).
Cab Driver of Leicester

 Leicester Journal - Friday 27 April 1888


BOROUGH POLICE.

FRIDAY.—Before J. Stafford (in the chair), W. Winterton, 

J. Bennett, J. H. Williams, and J. E. Hodges, 

Esqrs.

Joseph Almond, Mansfield Street, for causing an obstruction 

in the Haymarket with three horses and a

bus, on the 3rd April, was fined 10s, or seven days.

Below are articles related to the Troth family 


The below article relates to a court case involving two Troth's - David Troth (nail fogger) & William Troth, who informed on him for trying to get away with paying John Liddell (nailor) in goods instead of paying him money (truck system).  A nail fogger would supply iron to the nailor and he would then make the nails needed and return them to the fogger for payment.  This would be a pitiful amount but made worse by the fogger paying the nailor in goods instead, often at inflated prices, effectively  enslaving and trapping the nailor into an increasingly poor situation.

If this was my William Troth then it may explain him leaving Bromsgrove shortly afterwards for Ibstock in Leicestershire. It may have been a difficult situation informing on a fellow Troth or perhaps he was  disillusioned  with the poor conditions of a nailor's life.

 Worcester Herald - Saturday 11 June 1842 

 Troths in Court (William / David). Truck ACT


THE TRUCK SYSTEM.-A CONVICTION.-William Troth

informed upon David Troth, of Bromsgrove, nail fogger,

that on the 11th, 13th and 14th days of May last, he paid to

John Liddell, nailor, certain goods, such as bread, bacon,

soap, sugar, &c., as for wages, and instead of payment in

the current coin of the realm. Mr Taylor prosecuted, and

for the defendant Mr. Charles Pumfrey stated that Mr. George

Edmonds had requested him to ask the Bench to postpone

the hearing till next Court day, as it was impossible for him

(Mr Edmonds) to attend at Bromsgrove that day. The informer

having already been three days in attendance would

not consent, and so it went to a hearing, the defendant not

having the benefit of legal aid.

 Liddell, the prosecutor, a more that half-starved looking

stripling, deposed. I have worked for David Troth three

months. On the 9th of May i received two quarters of iron

from him to work up into "ground hobs" [shoe nails so

called]. On the 10th May i took the nails in and had 6d on

them in money. On the 11th i received from Troth three

loaves of bread, value 1s. 6d., and 1 1/4lb bacon, charged to

me 11d. I then brought away two quarters of iron, which

Troth weighed to me, which i was to make into "ground

hobs." I took in all my nails on the 14th. Troth weighed

them. they came to 9s. 2d. I said i wanted my 

money; he said i could not have the money, i must have goods.

His wife then gave me 


                                                s.   d.

   1 lb. sugar .................  0    8

   1 lb. soap ...................  0    6

   1 1.2 lb pork .............  0    9

   2 loaves .....................  1    0

   Money ........................  1   11

                                                 ______

                                                 4   10


Which, with 3s. 10d.,the price of the goods, and 6d. I

had received before, made up the 9s. 2d. After receiving

the goods i waited more then ten minutes for money; and i

told Mrs. Troth that i wanted it to pay for my stallage.

[The workman having no shops of their own pay rent for the

use of somebody's shop, and this they call stallage.]. She

asked me if i did not want more things ? Did i not

want some plums or some currants? I said no, "i had

been plum'd and curranted quite enough." After waiting

thus long she put the money on the counter. It was

all in copper.

 Defandant cross-examined the witness, but not in any

way likely to aid his own cause or to shake witness's testimony.

 Joseph Penrice was next called; he deposed that on the

14th May last he was in Troth's house, and saw Liddell

there with nails. Defendant weighed them and went to the

pantry to reckon them up; they came to 9s. 2d. as Troth said,

and then Mrs Troth asked him what she was to put for him.

David Troth was present and quite close to the parties, and

witness. She wanted to know after that if he did not want

something else. Liddell said no, he required money to pay

his stallage, and she gave him 1s. 11d. in money. Troth's

daughter, Mary Troth, brought it to her mother in her apron.

 This was the case for the prosecution. In defence Troth

averred that Liddell had not been in his employment more

than three weeks instead of the three months, as he himself said;

that at first he had brought a parcel of nails to his shop to

sell, and that he (Troth) had refused to buy them, but his

(Troth's) wife had asked him to take pity on him and see if

he could not buy them; that Liddell never had any iron

from him, not an oz., and as to the goods which the latter

said he had had in place of his wages, he (Troth) knew nothing

about that. [The latter impudent assertion was received

with a shout of derision by the spectators.] Troth

then called his son, Henry Troth, a lad of 17 or 18, who

swore that he never saw Liddell at his father's till the 14th

May, when he saw him bring him some details which his father

purchased for 2s. 2d., and which 2s. 2d, he (witness) saw

paid then and there in copper. Witness having been cautioned

by the Bench adherred to his statement that the sum

paid was 2s. 2d.

  Mary Troth, daughter of the defendant, a girl of 19 or

thereabout, repeated an echo in every respect of her brother's

evidence, and especially swore, adhering to her oath on

having been cautioned, that the sum paid to Liddell on the 

14th was 2s. 2d.

  Mr. TAYLOR then briefly addressed the Bench for the

prosecution, contending that the offences charged on the 11th

and 13th had been most clearly proved, and indeed had not

been sought to be disproved, the evidence for the defence

going only to the transactions of the 14th, and even as to

the latter the testimony of the witnesses Liddell and Penrice 

had not been at all spoken, as it was impossible to believe

that there had been no transactions between Liddell

and defendant up to the 14th, which was the bearing of the

evidence for the defence.

  The bench seemed to take this view of the case, but as it

was the first offence of which Troth had been accused, convicted

him on only one of the charges; and then Mr. Taylor

having applied to the Bench for a portion of the penalty to

the informer -

  Mr. COLLETT said that he was disapproved of giving anything

to informers in such cases, and would divide the Bench

upon it. The present case was not devoid of suspicion; he

did not know that it might not have been trumped up, and

if informers were to be remunerated in this way, the Bench

would have plenty of such informations. - [Suppressed cries

of "So much the better."]

  Mr RICKETTS differed altogether from this view. The

law intended to put down the system, and by giving a portion

of the fines to the informers, to reward those who took the

labour upon themselves of prosecuting offenders, there

was no imputation against the charachter of the witnesses or

informer in this case, and he should propose that the usual

portion of the fine be paid to the informer.

   Mr. TAYLOR suggested that if Mr. Collett knew the fearful

injury that the truck system did to the poor workmen,

he would not differ in this view of the case; and the Bench

generally having concurred with Mr. Ricketts, Troth was

fined £5, including costs, and one-half of the fine, after

deduction of the costs, was ordered to be paid to the informer.

The alternative punishment is three months imprisonment 

with hard labour.

  Besides the above there were two or three assault cases

before the Bench, but all notice of these must be deferred

until out next.