Prisoner's Dilemma
Two experiments on Prisoners Dilemma, framed as an Oligopoly Game were carried out. This page contains information about these games and materials related to the Prisoners Dilemma.
Crucial thing to note is that game 1 ended in complete lack of cooperation. All players were playing Nash Equilibrium HIGH and HIGH strategies. In contrast, Game 2 ended in complete cooperation. ALL players trusted others and all played LOW, LOW strategy. Paper must focus on how this change was achieved and how cooperation and trust can be created.
Protocols for how the experiment was run, and the results, are attached below. Related readings are given separate pages.
READINGS on PD:
Ahn et. al. Cooperation in PD games: Fear, greed, and history of play, Public Choice 106: 137–155, 2001
COMMUNICATION AND GUILT IN A PRISONER’S DILEMMA
By Topi Miettinen, Sigrid Suetens
Does Ethics Training Neutralize the Incentives of the Prisoner's Dilemma?
Evidence from a Classroom Experiment
Harvey S. James, Jr
Making Game Theory a Useful Part of Undergraduate
International Relations Classes1
George Ehrhardt
Computer-Mediated Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: An Experimental Analysis
Azi Lev-on, University of Pennsylvania
Cristina Bicchieri, University of Pennsylvania
Achieving greater cooperation in a noisy prisoner’s
dilemma: an experimental investigation q
Barbara Sainty
Preferences and Beliefs in a Sequential Social Dilemma:
A Within-Subjects Analysis.
Mariana Blancoa, Dirk Engelmannb, Alexander K. Kochc, Hans-Theo Normannd