Increasing a district’s capacity to produce greater results is firmly founded in high quality teaching and learning. Robert Marzano cites effective curriculum, instruction, and assessment as significant linchpins in driving comprehensive school improvement by clearly articulating what students need to “know and proficiently be able to do” throughout learning progressions. Embodied in these paradigms are essential learning skills and concepts which are considered fundamental for all learners and are fully supported by organizational attributes aligned to system structures. This approach creates an environment where learning is the constant and time and support become the variables.
NIET Teaching and Learning Standards
Research-based rubric clearly defines effective teaching and supports teachers in refining their craft.
Fosters collaboration around a common language and vision that correlates with student achievement.
Connect what to teach with how to facilitate learning
Ongoing training, mentoring, and classroom support during the school day to help teachers meet these standards
Instructionally Focused Accountability
Observations with actionable feedback
Identify the instructional needs of teachers and students
Meaningful goal-setting with a focus on student outcomes
School Plan
IGP
Support provided at all levels to meet those goals
Coaching support to meet the needs of teachers and students
Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum (GVC)
Implementing a "high-quality" curriculum aligned to rigorous state standards leads to notable student learning gains.
A guaranteed and viable curriculum:
Gives all students access to the same essential learning outcomes regardless of who is teaching the course
Can be taught in the time allotted.
Clarity around what all students must know and be able to do
High-quality curriculum matters and is most effective when paired with high-quality instruction.
Leaders will dig deeply into their implementation and how they support educators.
We will use Standards Based Learning to communicate student learning.
3.2 Collaborative learning: Peer-to-peer learning unlocks new insights, encourages teachers to share best practices, and fosters collegiality. We create collaborative structures and environments, including professional learning communities and cluster. We develop teacher leaders into instructional coaches to grow their colleagues' skills and create strategies for success.
Cluster Cycles
Ongoing, job-embedded, collaborative, student-centered, and led by expert instructors
Time to meet, learn, plan, mentor, and share with peers
Professional learning is based on a five-step cycle
identifying a problem or need that is clear and specific and can be measured in student work or outcomes
obtaining new learning aligned with this student's need that has proven successful in the school in leading to student growth
developing new teacher learning by teaching a strategy to address a student's need, with precise modeling, and subsequent analysis of student work
applying the new teacher learning in the classroom with support from teacher leaders
evaluating the impact of the strategy on student performance using formative assessment
Focused on the individual needs of teachers and students, determined by data and student work
Professional Learning Communities (PLCs)
Collaboration using the four questions
Collaborate on strategies for how to most effectively utilize the curriculum and teach in a way that helps students acquire the depth of knowledge asked for by state academic standards.
Focus on learning by each and every student
Collective Inquiry Into Best Practice and Current Reality
Members of PLCs are action-oriented: They move quickly to turn aspirations into action and visions into reality
Commitment to Continuous Improvement:
Gathering evidence of current levels of student learning
Developing strategies and ideas to build on strengths and address weaknesses in that learning
Implementing those strategies and ideas
Analyzing the impact of the changes to discover what was effective and what was not
Applying new knowledge in the next cycle of continuous improvement
Efforts are assessed based on results rather than intentions
3.3 Shared leadership: Building school leadership teams around a shared vision
Strong leadership and a shared vision are critical to success. Our Instructional Leadership Teams unite teachers, principals, and other administrators around a process to analyze school data, monitor goals, and drive improvements. Teachers gain expanded influence and are given decision-making authority.
Setting direction
Charting a clear course that all stakeholders understand
Establishing high expectations and using data to track progress and performance
Developing people through providing teachers and others in the system with the necessary support and training to succeed
Making the organization work, ensuring that the entire range of conditions and incentives in the school fully supports teaching and learning
Creating an environment that has positive and supportive professional relationships
Teacher leaders who work alongside their peers to improve instructional practice for all teachers
Focus on increasing capacity
Focus on students
Model curiosity, observation, and honesty
Have confidence in each other’s ability to improve student learning conditions and develop each other’s competency to do so.
Collect, analyze, and act upon evidence (data) to determine impact.
Multiple career paths-Master, Mentor, Career teachers
Effective teams for collective leadership that enlist teacher leaders, principals, and district leaders to drive improvement and sustain student gains
Clear roles and responsibilities and documented expectations
3.4 Reflective culture: Nurturing a growth mindset in all teachers and students.
Everyone, from community leaders to parents and teachers, coaches and school leaders, plays a role in building a culture of continuous academic improvement, unifying around a reflective culture that instills a growth mindset in all teachers and students. Work to articulate expectations for excellence, create benchmarks for getting there, and regularly assess and adjust course when necessary.
Individual Growth Plan (IGP)
Teachers regularly follow a process of self-observation and self-evaluation
look at what educators do in the classroom, think about why they carry out their routines and strategies, and consider whether what they do “works” – assessing whether their choices and actions result in evidence of student learning and achievement.
The goal is written in terms of teacher focus (instructional improvement) and student achievement and is supported by or aligned with a specific supporting area from the TAP Instructional Rubric
References specific strategies (activities) aligned to identified needs
that the teacher will implement in the classroom
indicates how implementation will be supported by the administrator, Master, or Mentor Teacher
References how the teacher will continually monitor changes in teacher/student practice
Data collection tool used during PLC
Measures student achievement (individually and collectively)
We are a Professional Learning Community
Reflects on instruction
Shares a common language around effective teaching
Operates with a growth mindset
Collaborates constructively
Focuses on continuous improvement
Culture of learning and growing together
School Plan
Drives school-wide improvement strategies
Principal as instructional leader
Analyzes data
Monitors School goals
Learning Walks and Instructional Rounds
3.5 Multi-Tiered Systems of Supports (MTSS): is an every-education decision-making framework of evidence-based practices in instruction and assessment that addresses the needs of all students. As an every-education process, MTSS allows educators to judge the overall health of their organization by examining data regarding the educational system and identifying students who need additional support. Those supports are provided in both small group and individual settings. Structures are monitored to ensure they support all learners to demonstrate proficiency in the Iowa Core standards and leave school ready for life.
Saydel CSD will increase the implementation of the following MTSS Key Components:
Evidence-based curriculum and instruction provided at the universal level (Tier I)
Universal screening shall be implemented at least three times per year
Evidence-based, instructional interventions will be provided at the targeted (Tier II) and Intense (Tier III) levels on a 4-6 week cycle
Progress monitoring data will be collected and utilized to guide instruction
Data-based decision making
Tools to accomplish the goal
PLC-Collaboration using the four questions (analysis of teaching and learning-academic and SEL)
IGP-Reflective journal to track student progress
SRG-Communication tool for student learning
Cluster-Professional Learning to grow teacher capacity
ILT monitors student learning and instructional practices
Supporting Documents:
Personalized Learning/Blended Learning
Multi-Tiered Systems of Supports (MTSS)