Speaker: David Hogg (NYU/MPIA/Flatiron)
Contact Information:
Title: Is machine learning good or bad for astrophysics?
Abstract: Machine learning methods are having a huge impact in astrophysics. However, ML has a strong ontology — in which only the data exist — and a strong epistemology — in which a model is considered good if and only if it performs well on held-out training data. These philosophies are in strong conflict with our goals, practices, and philosophy in astrophysics. I identify locations in astrophysics practice at which the philosophy of ML is valuable (for example: in causal separations of foregrounds). I also show that there are contexts in which the use of ML methods introduce strong, unwanted, and un-correctable biases. The answer to the question posed in my title is “both.” Work in collaboration with Soledad Villar (JHU).
Visitor's room: 129
Tuesday
9:30 a.m.: Andrew Saydjari (Peyton 109A)
10:00 a.m:
10:30 a.m.: Coffee
11:00 a.m.: Colloquium
11:30 a.m.: Colloquium
12:00 p.m.: Bahcall lunch
12:30 p.m.: Bahcall lunch
1:00 p.m.: Bahcall lunch
1:30 p.m.: Jim Peebles
2:00 p.m.: Jim Peebles
2:30 p.m.: Matt Sampson (022)
3:00 p.m.: Jake Nibauer (129)
3:30 p.m.: Yan Liang (020)
4:00 p.m.: Peter Melchior (131)
4:30 p.m.: Tea Time with Grad Students in Grand Central
5:00 p.m.: Tea Time with Grad Students in Grand Central
Tuesday (March 4th, 2025)
Faculty Host: Peter Melchior
Postdoc Host: Andrew Saydjari
Christian Kragh Jespersen
Matt Sampson
Jasmine Parsons
Yan Liang
Jiaxuan Li
Speaker
WAITING LIST: Josh Winn
STUDENTS HAVE PRIORITY.
PLEASE NO MORE THAN 8 PEOPLE (it is more difficult to properly interact with the speaker in larger groups).