This unit is designed to provide the “why” for doing the work of providing high-quality math instruction and supports for all students so that they can achieve at high levels, and to lay the groundwork for the modules and activities that follow.
At the conclusion of this unit, participants will be able to:
Analyze student math performance data across the state and within their county to identify possible inequities which need to be addressed.
Articulate the learner variability that exists across all students, examine areas of disproportionality for students with disabilities, and explore often generalized characteristics for each of the 13 disability categories.
Understand that each student has a unique individual learning profile that includes their background, experiences, interests, strengths, and stretches; more fully understand the variability that exists across all students and examine how much (or how little) a disability label implies regarding a student’s abilities or needs.
Identify the critical nature of Executive Functions (complex cognitive processes that support ongoing and goal directed behavior) as an area variability within all learners, not only students with disabilities. Understand how these cognitive skills impact how students plan, organize, strategize, pay attention, remember, and manage within time and space in a math learning environment.
When analyzing student math achievement data from the state to the site level, it becomes clear disparities exist among student groups involving expected outcomes and actual achievement.
Fortunately, California classrooms are composed of a broad and diverse student population. This diversity positively impacts the learning of the “whole child” as well as site, district, and state culture/climate as a “whole”.
By focusing our lens specifically on students with disabilities, we are able to identify areas of disproportionality (over-representation of one subgroup of students compared to the total population), and thus inequitable outcomes for certain student groups.
In order to calibrate access and equity across all diverse learners, we need to deeply understand and value individual student variability: their learning strengths and stretches, of which all students (and adults) possess.
Expect controversy, but with civility (we will share what we believe is best for our students and why, using data as evidence)
Respect - Paying Attention to Self and Others (No attacks & No Interruptions)
Presuming positive intentions, while also owning your intentions and your impact
Active listening (Pausing, Paraphrasing, Posing Questions)
Obligation as a group member to provide input while also having the right to pass, challenge by choice
Idea #1
Conduct “empathy interviews” with your students in order to understand their experiences and perspectives around success and/or struggles with math. Click here for guidelines on conducting empathy interviews.
Idea #2
Explore what you’ve learned about disability, learning characteristics and executive function, and profile a student in your classroom. Click here for blank “Student Profile”.
Idea #3
Analyze the executive function of all of your students and consider implementing supports items and procedures that would benefit all students.
Idea #4
Research a prevalent disability in your classroom or at your school site to understand how learning processes are affected and what research based supports are effective to improve access to the learning environment.
Updated Norms
addition of "Variability is Contextual" activity to Executive Function section
Framing Variability resource: Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities
Study of Rachel Lambert's article on mythologies versus promoted strategies for SWD
York Waterfall resource - strategies for LD based on generalized needs